Hi all. I cannot see what I am doing wrong here. Try this yourselves. In the
message box put:
put test tab tab return \
sw_ tab tab return \
sw_test3 tabtab return into theDropData
put tab tab into theFilter
filter theDropData without theFilter
put theDropData
I get:
test
Bob-
Try
filter theDropData without * theFilter *
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences
Hi Bob,
filter theDropData without * theFilter *
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
Economy-x-Talk is always looking for new projects. Contact me
Dangit! I think I already asked this one a couple weeks ago! sigh I remember
now.
Bob
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Bob-
Try
filter theDropData without * theFilter *
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use
The filter command works on wildcards, not regex
Your filter definition = keep lines that are not exactly tabtab
You might be thinking
put * tab tab * into theFiliter
= which means keep lines that do not have at least two tabs in sequence
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Hi
à 20:07, David Glasgow a écrit :
How about the filter with only kicks in after the second or third
character is typed? The first two characters take a disproportionate
amount of time, and probably don't reduce the list size substantially.
David Glasgow
Yesterday I went back to an old HC stack that filtered just such a list. I
tried a Rev version of it on a list of 400,000 lines and it seems to run
reasonably responsively. If this has already been dealt with better, then just
ignore...
There is a search field and another field named results.
Jim,
Le 22 oct. 2009 à 05:41, Jim Ault a écrit :
your asking a lot of a chunking function to scan a large body of
text between key strokes.
Start with the following steps to see if these help.
-1- Showing a list of more than 50 hits may not be useful
Good idea.
-2- Doing an filter
Alex,
Thank you for your message. I'm not very at ease with messages and the
command send but I will test your code. I think it is the good way
to not slow down the typing of the user.
Jerome Rosat
Le 23 oct. 2009 à 00:33, Alex Tweedly a écrit :
Would it be practical to break your list
Jérôme Rosat wrote:
Alex,
Thank you for your message. I'm not very at ease with messages and the
command send but I will test your code. I think it is the good way
to not slow down the typing of the user.
IMO well worth the time to try it.
Alex Tweedly regularly comes up with non-obvious
Jérôme-
Friday, October 23, 2009, 8:51:18 AM, you wrote:
If some body in the list is looking for a file with names and address
(400K lines), I create a file with french name, French, Spanish,
Italians, Portuguese first name and address of Geneva in Switzerland.
It is possible to download
Mark,
My text file is a raw file. When I open a stack, I create a simpler
tab list.
Your code is much better for the 1 to 3 chars. But, if the name you
search is at the end of the list (for example rosat) it takes more
time than my code.
Jerome Rosat
Le 23 oct. 2009 à 19:13, Mark
Jérôme-
Friday, October 23, 2009, 10:55:26 AM, you wrote:
Your code is much better for the 1 to 3 chars. But, if the name you
search is at the end of the list (for example rosat) it takes more
time than my code.
Well, of course. There's no rosat in the data set, so you have to go
through the
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Jérôme Rosat wrote:
I explained in my message that I wish to filter a list of names and
addresses dynamically when I type a name in a field. This list
contains 400'000 lines like this: Mme [TAB] DOS SANTOS albertina
[TAB] rue GOURGAS 23BIS [TAB] 1205 Genève
I made
Alex Tweedly wrote:
Note the use of .. to give an indication that work is still in
progress and there may be more matches to come.
Hmmm that's a bit of a cheap way to do it.
Much better to put the number of lines in sData into tDataSize, and then do
put 20 - (20 * tCount /
Thank you Jim, Richard, Brian and Mark,
Please excuse me to answer so tardily, I posted a message yesterday,
but it was not published in the list. I make a new attempt.
I explained in my message that I wish to filter a list of names and
addresses dynamically when I type a name in a field
Jérôme Rosat wrote:
I explained in my message that I wish to filter a list of names and
addresses dynamically when I type a name in a field. This list
contains 400'000 lines like this: Mme [TAB] DOS SANTOS albertina
[TAB] rue GOURGAS 23BIS [TAB] 1205 Genève
I made various tests using
is a little beat slower
(about 50 milliseconds) than the filter ... with. There is no
significant difference when the third char or more is typed. Of
course I filter a variable before to put it in the list field
How about the filter with only kicks in after the second or third
character
your asking a lot of a chunking function to scan a large body of text
between key strokes.
Start with the following steps to see if these help.
-1- Showing a list of more than 50 hits may not be useful
-2- Doing an filter operation with less than 3 chars may not be useful
-3- Showing
I wish to filter a list which contains approximately 300'000 lines. I
try the filter ... with command. It's slow.
I try the Repeat for each loop but it's slower.
Is it possible to use the filter ... with command and to force
RunRev to check only one item of the line and not the whole line
, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jérôme Rosat jro...@mac.com wrote:
I wish to filter a list which contains approximately 300'000 lines. I try
the filter ... with command. It's slow.
I try the Repeat for each loop but it's slower.
Is it possible to use the filter ... with command and to force RunRev
Jérôme,
Are you applying the filter to a text field? If so, try temporarily
saving the field to a variable, applying the filter to the variable,
then saving the variable back to the field. The speed should increase
dramatically. If you're already doing this, I'm afraid I don't have
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jérôme Rosat jro...@mac.com wrote:
I wish to filter a list which contains approximately 300'000 lines. I try
the filter ... with command. It's slow.
I try the Repeat for each loop but it's slower.
Is it possible to use the filter ... with command and to force
Thank you Sarah, Chris and Andre,
I use already a variable and my filter pattern is *[' -] myString
*.
I'm going to try with a SQLite database.
Le 19 oct. 2009 à 23:49, Sarah Reichelt a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jérôme Rosat jro...@mac.com wrote:
I wish to filter a list
Jérôme-
Monday, October 19, 2009, 3:51:30 PM, you wrote:
I use already a variable and my filter pattern is *[' -] myString
*.
Can you post the code you're using? Do you have enough physical memory
to hold the entire list without page swapping?
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
I would suspect that the leading * is causing the most slowdown.
That is going to force the filter command to search the entire line
every time, since the ['-] portion could be anywhere.
Switching to SQLLite could work, but you are going to have to
completely reformat your data. If you
Jérôme Rosat wrote:
I wish to filter a list which contains approximately 300'000 lines. I
try the filter ... with command. It's slow.
I try the Repeat for each loop but it's slower.
Is it possible to use the filter ... with command and to force
RunRev to check only one item of the line
On Oct 19, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Jérôme Rosat wrote:
I wish to filter a list which contains approximately 300'000 lines.
I try the filter ... with command. It's slow.
I try the Repeat for each loop but it's slower.
Is it possible to use the filter ... with command and to force
RunRev to check
On 26.07.09 at 16:23 -0700 Tom Cole apparently wrote:
Dear Group,
I have two items that I hope someone can help on. One is very
straightforward: I need to filter a field by the items.
That is, I have a field with zillions of records with four items
(comma delimited)
itemone,itemtwo
Dear Group,
I have two items that I hope someone can help on. One is very
straightforward: I need to filter a field by the items.
That is, I have a field with zillions of records with four items
(comma delimited)
itemone,itemtwo,itemthree,itemfour
I want itemfour to disappear after I put
I have two items that I hope someone can help on. One is very
straightforward: I need to filter a field by the items.
That is, I have a field with zillions of records with four items (comma
delimited)
itemone,itemtwo,itemthree,itemfour
I want itemfour to disappear after I put the field
Tom-
Sunday, July 26, 2009, 4:23:36 PM, you wrote:
I want itemfour to disappear after I put the field into a variable.
The problem is that item four is never the same, so I can't filter by
a specific string. I'm sure there must be a way to just have all of
item four go poof.
I'm a bit
Sarah-
Sunday, July 26, 2009, 5:22:50 PM, you wrote:
delete variable tData[4]
! That was the part I couldn't come up with...
The only danger with this is that the first three items in each line
have to define a unique key - any duplicates will be dropped, but
that's the array-based
I am having a problem with 'filter'.
I'm passing this tab return delimited data (as an array)...
*SAMPLE*7/2/09 2 We don't ship kitties to Hong Kong
No dogs 7/2/09 1 we don't do dogs
This one7/2/09 3 This one is that oneAnd this one has
paragraphs
Paul, the filter command may need some wildcards, otherwise it will
filter out any lines which contain more than just the filter
expression, so:
filter pSnips with * tThing *
Best,
Mark
On 3 Jul 2009, at 20:39, pwf wrote:
I am having a problem with 'filter'.
I'm passing this tab
Hello List:
Is it possible to use any kind of wildcard with file filtering on OSX?
I have several JPEG images that show no file type (just the empty boxes)
which often happens when Preview gets ahold of them. Then when trying to
filter a list of images in an answer file dialog using JPEG
Answering my own question:
Is it possible to use any kind of wildcard with file filtering on OSX?
I have several JPEG images that show no file type (just the empty boxes)
which often happens when Preview gets ahold of them. Then when trying to
filter a list of images in an answer file
:
Is it possible to use any kind of wildcard with file filtering on
OSX?
I have several JPEG images that show no file type (just the empty
boxes)
which often happens when Preview gets ahold of them. Then when
trying to
filter a list of images in an answer file dialog using JPEG
Does anyone know why I get no data in a variable when I filter more
than once?
In the following, either of the filters works alone with the other
commented out, but together I get no data.
on mouseup
put fld sortfield into cat
--FILTER #1
put 12/15/1971 into rat
filter cat with *rat
put one cr two cr owl into tList
filter tList with o*
gives you
owl
one
Filtering that 2 line list with
filter tList with t*
will give you an empty list. The first filter removed anything that
would match the 2nd filter, therefore the list is empty.
Bernard
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6
Thanks Jim - good to confirm that there is no way to escape chars for filter
expressions. I guess this is the sort of thing that should be posted as a
note to the dictionary.
2009/5/2 Jim Ault jimaultw...@yahoo.com
The technique I have used in the past is to do a
replace
I think this does what you require:
put tr[1] cr after tList
put tr(2) cr after tList
put tr[3] cr after tList
put tr[a] cr after tList
put td[1] cr after tList
put tra[1] cr after tList
filter tList without [t][r]?[0-9]]
put tList
Try playing around with the 2nd letter of the filter
This would usually work :
put theader[1] cr after tList
put th(1) cr after tList
put th(2) cr after tList
put th[3] cr after tList
put tbody[1] cr after tList
put tr[1] cr after tList
put td[2] cr after tList
put tra[3] cr after tList
put tr[11] cr after tList
filter tList without th?[0
does this work?
filter tXmlText with *tr[[2]]
When you wrote to the list about this problem before, I did a quick
test and that seemed to work, so I thought maybe I don't get the
problem.
I'm not sure if it will work using [[*]]
Bernard
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:11 PM, David Bovill da
Afraid not :(
2009/5/2 Bernard Devlin bdrun...@gmail.com
does this work?
filter tXmlText with *tr[[2]]
When you wrote to the list about this problem before, I did a quick
test and that seemed to work, so I thought maybe I don't get the
problem.
I'm not sure if it will work using
The technique I have used in the past is to do a
replace [ with † in blockOfLines
replace ] with ^ in blockOfLines
filter blockOfLines without tr††*^^
--and in case there are kept lines that had the '[]' chars
replace † with [ in blockOfLines
replace ^ with ] in blockOfLines
Hope this helps
Still trying to figure this out - my hack ends up failing - I've returned a
list of child names from XML, and wish to filter out all the tr elements
which appear like tr[1], tr[2]. So I want to filter using tr[*], but as
[ is a special char... andthe usual \[ does not work for escaping? Any
ideas
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:11 AM, David Bovill da...@architex.tv wrote:
Still trying to figure this out - my hack ends up failing - I've returned a
list of child names from XML, and wish to filter out all the tr elements
which appear like tr[1], tr[2]. So I want to filter using tr
OK - thanks!
2009/5/1 Sarah Reichelt sarah.reich...@gmail.com
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:11 AM, David Bovill da...@architex.tv wrote:
Still trying to figure this out - my hack ends up failing - I've returned
a
list of child names from XML, and wish to filter out all the tr
elements
which
Any one know the way to escape characters such as [ in patterns for the
filter expression?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http
.
-Original Message-
From: Luis l...@anachreon.co.uk
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: 2/1/2009 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ot] fractal graphic filter
No wonder I wake up with a headache.
Cheers,
Luis.
Randall Reetz wrote:
The problem with fractal compression
Randall-
Monday, February 2, 2009, 10:00:44 AM, you wrote:
This is the AI stuff from the Palm guy... correct? I have looked at
this. And yes, Jff Hawkins (co-author of On Intelligence) gets it!
A lot of cognitive science at work here. And Bill Atkinson is on board
as well. He bent my ear
of that data. Do that
and you can selectively and accurately reduce an image (or any other
data set) to more general terms. For instance, if a filter were
able to extract obects (humans, plants, buildings, furnature,
infrastructure, land use, animals, equipment) into semantic
primitives, it sould
received this link from yet another list (chaos theory, fractals,
etc...). Fractalius plugin for photoshop extracts hidden fractal texture
of an image. The effect is really cl!
http://www.redfieldplugins.com/filterFractalius.htm
Now I wonder what is the algorithm behind this... Any ideas
I wonder if they're cross platform. If they didn't say, probably not. PC
only?
2009/2/1 viktoras d. vikto...@ekoinf.net
received this link from yet another list (chaos theory, fractals, etc...).
Fractalius plugin for photoshop extracts hidden fractal texture of an image.
The effect is really
On Feb 1, 2009, at 2:42 PM, stephen barncard wrote:
I wonder if they're cross platform. If they didn't say, probably
not. PC
only?
Yes, it's in their FAQ page, there are no plans to make Mac versions.
___
use-revolution mailing list
a scheme to regions
and others other other regions... Setting up a topograhic mapping of
compressions as directed by the morphology of that data. Do that and you can
selectively and accurately reduce an image (or any other data set) to more
general terms. For instance, if a filter were able
) to more general terms. For instance, if a filter were
able to extract obects (humans, plants, buildings, furnature,
infrastructure, land use, animals, equipment) into semantic
primitives, it sould describe and store reality the way our brains
do while we sleep. Achieving million-to-one
other data set) to more
general terms. For instance, if a filter were able to extract obects (humans,
plants, buildings, furnature, infrastructure, land use, animals, equipment)
into semantic primitives, it sould describe and store reality the way our
brains do while we sleep. Achieving million
-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: 2/1/2009 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [ot] fractal graphic filter
No wonder I wake up with a headache.
Cheers,
Luis.
Randall Reetz wrote:
The problem with fractal compression is that it like all compression schemes
is usually applied indiscriminately to a whole file
Filter jpeg files in MACOSX
How can I filter the files created by the application Preview and
saved as JPEG?
According to the Rev documentation I should use either there two
commands:
answer file SELEZIONA of type JPEG
answer file SELEZIONA with filter JPEGs,*.jpg
Unfortunately
' in
Finder prefs still allows to have this kind of file showing up in the
answer file dialog.
I think it's due to the formulation abobe that adds 'JPEG Images'.
Le 27 déc. 08 à 16:24, paolo a écrit :
Filter jpeg files in MACOSX
How can I filter the files created by the application Preview and
saved
Hi all,
After having checked the doc, and drink 2 coffees,
I'm stuck this morning with this simple one line of code:
answer file Choose a ICS file... with filter ICS,*.ics
the filtering doesn't work at all ?
Well, did try with different suffix and same behavior...
Rev 3.0 on Tiger
Any
Hi Thierry,
On Mac, a file type is expected, while on Windows a file extension is
expected. You need to check the platform and then use the right command.
For example, for Mac:
answer file Choose a ICS file... with filter ICS,ICS
I have put a space after the ICS file type, because file
: -
example topic:
...
answer file (field Prompt) of type RSTK
answer file empty with filter JPEGs,*.jpg
a bit further, we can read:
The way file types are specified depends on the platform:
Filtering for Mac OS: You can use either with filter or of type
answer file empty with filter JPEGs,*.jpg
a bit further, we can read:
The way file types are specified depends on the platform:
Filtering for Mac OS: You can use either with filter or of type..
-
But, your examples do not help me
Doc: -
example topic:
...
answer file (field Prompt) of type RSTK
answer file empty with filter JPEGs,*.jpg
a bit further, we can read:
The way file types are specified depends on the platform:
Filtering for Mac OS: You can use either with filter or of type
Bonjour, Thierry:
answer file with type ICS|*ics|
Will work for you :-)
Hmmm, try differents solutions from Mark and You,
and always get it wrong
So, it's not my day :-(
I think i'm going to check the answer dialog stack...
May be corrupted ?
No no, just a typo we did not notice
Please omit the asteriks * in the suffix:
answer file with type ICS|ics|
and even few chars less:
answer file Select a ICS file... with type |ics
Et voila ... It works :-)
Hmm, do I need to say that having the solution
I don't see how one could come to it by reading the Docs ?
Anyway,
Bonjour Thierry,
Please omit the asteriks * in the suffix:
answer file with type ICS|ics|
and even few chars less:
answer file Select a ICS file... with type |ics
Et voila ... It works :-)
Please also check bug #6433
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=6433
Hmm, do I
answer file with type ICS|*ics|
Will work for you :-)
Hmmm, try differents solutions from Mark and You,
and always get it wrong
So, it's not my day :-(
I think i'm going to check the answer dialog stack...
May be corrupted ?
Merci beaucoup
Thierry
Field extension contains .jpg
script has
put (* fld extension) into tFilter
filter tFiles with (quote tFilter quote)
put tFiles into fld Listing
result nada!
Why?
filter tFiles with *.jpg works
and
put tFilter
returns
*.jpg
I tried this too:
put (quote * fld extension
You are adding quote chars to the filter string so that
quote .jpgquote would have to actually be in the the line to be a 'hit'
Most file names do not contain quotes.
-- try
filter tFiles with tFilter
or
filter tFiles with (* fld extension)
or if you want to get more confused
Aum Swami,
I use this all the time in our stacks, I use double asterisks like:
put *.jpg* into tFilter
filter tFiles with tFilter
and it works.
Andre
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Sivakatirswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Field extension contains .jpg
script has
put (* fld extension
yep that was it... I was using the detailed files and forgot to add
the * on the end
Andre Garzia wrote:
Aum Swami,
I use this all the time in our stacks, I use double asterisks like:
put *.jpg* into tFilter
filter tFiles with tFilter
and it works.
Andre
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:25 AM
is there any way to know what file type user selects in ask file with
filter dialog ? I need to specify different handlers for file Save as,
and now am first asking user to select the type of a desired output
(i.e. raw binary, ascii text, png image or ppm image) and next opening
ask file
viktoras didziulis wrote:
is there any way to know what file type user selects in ask file with
filter dialog ? I need to specify different handlers for file Save as,
and now am first asking user to select the type of a desired output
(i.e. raw binary, ascii text, png image or ppm image
I guess
if I wish to avoid displaying a chain of dialogs, I have to design own
custom askFile() function or handler. The only role of ask file with
type or ask file with filter that is described in the dictionary seems
to be limited to displaying existing filenames whose types match the one
filter. But I just
did a test using with type and it works.
on mouseUp
ask file Export picture as: with type JPEG File|jpg|JPEG or type
GIF File|gif|GIFf
put the result into tResult
put it tResult
end mouseUp
I typed in a file name without an extension. The message box contained
the path
output to a necessary processing handler.
I misread your post, I didn't notice you were using filter. But I
just did a test using with type and it works.
on mouseUp
ask file Export picture as: with type JPEG File|jpg|JPEG or type
GIF File|gif|GIFf
put the result into tResult
put
with filter will be marked as obsolete or
discontinued in a not too distant future...
Have Fun
Björnke
On 10 Jun 2008, at 17:57, viktoras didziulis wrote:
Jacqueline, Thanks for the suggestion,
still 'the result' after execution is empty. It would probably
contain something if path selection
How do you escape chars with the filter command? Specifically what do you do
if you want to filter lines that contain the * character?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:59 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you escape chars with the filter command? Specifically what do you do
if you want to filter lines that contain the * character?
I replace them with something else, then filter, than change them back again.
e.g
I think this works as well?
filter shellResult with *[*]*
2008/5/26 Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:59 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do you escape chars with the filter command? Specifically what do you
do
if you want to filter lines
Just in case you want to hear more of George, you can visit his site at
georgebancroft.net. I've posted some of the new stuff we are working on
for the 2nd CD (full band this time).
Don't mean to advertise here but while we were on the subject of music
len
Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Klaus: no MP3s at your site?
...and no mp3s on my site either... apparently JaguarPC has been fiddling
with server things again and lost all my website files so I'll have to
upload them again, but I've got some at http://cdbaby.com/cd/alephnull if
anyone
Richard-
Klaus: no MP3s at your site?
...and no mp3s on my site either... apparently JaguarPC has been fiddling
with server things again and lost all my website files so I'll have to
upload them again, but I've got some at http://cdbaby.com/cd/alephnull if
anyone cares...
--
Mark Wieder
Richard-
Is there an option to purchase a download rather than wait for a physical
CD?
Not that I'm aware of. I don't think cdbaby has that capability, but then
I've never really followed up on it to find out.
PS: Really nice cover art. Gorgeous.
Yes, thanks. I'm quite pleased with the
On Feb 19, 2008 10:22 AM, Judy Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just bought myself a new (used) open hole, sterling head
flute ('cuz I always wanted one)
Sorry, but the mention of jazz and flute in the same thread immediately
brings to mind the scene from Anchorman with Will Ferrell.
You (all) should!
I played flute piccolo (and recorder... and piano for about a year
and a half) from 5th grade through high school and am just now picking
it up again. Just bought myself a new (used) open hole, sterling head
flute ('cuz I always wanted one) and had my picc serviced and am
Cool bass site! I believe Mark Wieder is also an earth shaker - any
others here?
Did both my undergrad and master's in music, so I was playing quite a
variety of instruments. Played upright bass for a bit: poorly. :P
Spent more time with the electric bass—some jazz, mostly rock—but
J. Downs wrote:
Cool bass site! I believe Mark Wieder is also an earth shaker - any
others here?
Well I built a recording studio. Let's see...we've got a bass or two, a
drummer... any guitarist and/or keyboard players? Maybe we can create
a virutal gig using Rev?
len morgan
Hi there,
just spend some hours debugging some otherwise clean code
for a couple of hours just to discover that:
...
put one numtochar(0) two into newstring
filter newstring without empty
put newstring
...
gives: one!
I just wanted to remove empty lines, so is this correct behaviour
:
Hi there,
just spend some hours debugging some otherwise clean code
for a couple of hours just to discover that:
...
put one numtochar(0) two into newstring
filter newstring without empty
put newstring
...
gives: one!
I just wanted to remove empty lines, so is this correct behaviour?
Or should
Hi Mark,
I think using engine opertaions on data that contains nulls is a
bit of a no-no. I believe (though happy to be corrected) that Rev
uses C-style null terminated strings internally, so nulls will
often produce 'unexpected results'.
Hm, I have been using numtochar(0) quite often in
Oh well, my theory is clearly flawed - though I remember having some
trouble with nulls a few years ago and so have avoided using them since.
Cool bass site! I believe Mark Wieder is also an earth shaker - any
others here?
Best,
Mark
On 14 Feb 2008, at 13:06, Klaus Major wrote:
Hi
I know for sure that null does not work with the filter command.
I have posted code in the past for extracting data from sources that you do
not create and one of the steps I put in before any filter commands is
replace null with empty in dataBlock
Sorry it works that way.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
Hi Jim,
I know for sure that null does not work with the filter command.
well, that's what I know now, too :-)
I have posted code in the past for extracting data from sources that
you do
not create and one of the steps I put in before any filter commands is
replace null with empty
Yep, except I am a bass violin player (unless you count the Ashbory
which, in my book really isn't a bass guitar, although it does have
some things in common). I have played classical, now I play jazz,
avante-garde, meditational (all the previous improv), and some fiddle
music, but that I
Mark Smith wrote:
Klaus Major
http://www.major-k.de/bass
Cool bass site! I believe Mark Wieder is also an earth shaker - any
others here?
I haven't been in a band since college. These days, with music I'm more
of an end-user (though I have a couple friends trying to coax me back
into
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
