Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-27 Thread Thierry D.
Hi all, Thanks to all for your suggestions. I've found a solution to this question. not sure if it is completely resolved, but seems to work quite well. So, better share in the hope it will help few of you... I've changed the filename of my stack, that's it ! then the name and the filename

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-20 Thread Thierry D.
Le 19 mai 2010 à 23:05, Malte Pfaff-Brill a écrit : Thierry, Hello Malte, does your stack have any substacks that are still open? Rev can not destroy it in that case. Yes, one substack and sometimes it's visible, sometimes not visible. Then, the mainstack is closed, but still in memory.

RE: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-20 Thread Jim Bufalini
Thierry wrote: Another point: this reminds me one thread on this list about someone who couldn't start an external. I guess/feel that his problem could be that his stack was still in memory, and when he restarted it, the normal process of loading the external didn't work because the stack

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi Thierry, Yes, I am having the same problem. Once in a while, even after explicitly deleting a stack with the delete command, the stack still pops up somehow. I think this is due to the compexity of the IDE. Probably, the IDE team has used the long ID of a stack in several places,

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Thierry D.
Hi Thierry, Yes, I am having the same problem. Once in a while, even after explicitly deleting a stack with the delete command, the stack still pops up somehow. Thanks Mark I'm not alone ! Half the suffering is gone :) I think this is due to the compexity of the IDE. Probably, the

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay
Thierry D. wrote: Hi all, from time to time, in Rev IDE ( 4.0 MacOS ) when closing a stack, the stack is still in memory, seen in the Application browser too. DestroyStack and DestroyWindow are set properly ! and Yes, I refresh the application browser. It had happened few times during my

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Thierry D.
Le 19 mai 2010 à 19:59, J. Landman Gay a écrit : What happens if you type into the message box: delete stack main stack Does it go away then? (Make sure you specify the mainstack, not the substack.) Hmmm, as soon as I sent my email to this list, it starts to work again :) and

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Richmond Mathewson
What happens if you type into the message box: delete stack main stack Does it go away then? (Make sure you specify the mainstack, not the substack.) Yes, it does! However, if you have saved the stack it will still exist where it has been saved. All that DELETE STACK does is remove it

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay
Richmond Mathewson wrote: What happens if you type into the message box: delete stack main stack Does it go away then? (Make sure you specify the mainstack, not the substack.) Yes, it does! However, if you have saved the stack it will still exist where it has been saved. All that

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Andre Garzia
Been there as well, came to a little fix if you can call that a fix, instead of closing the stack try something along the lines of: delete stack myStack This will really take it out of the memory, so these days, I close and then I delete or vice versa... On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Thierry

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Richmond Mathewson
On 19/05/2010 22:19, J. Landman Gay wrote: Richmond Mathewson wrote: What happens if you type into the message box: delete stack main stack Does it go away then? (Make sure you specify the mainstack, not the substack.) Yes, it does! However, if you have saved the stack it will still

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Thierry D.
Le 19 mai 2010 à 21:38, Richmond Mathewson a écrit : On 19/05/2010 22:19, J. Landman Gay wrote: Richmond Mathewson wrote: What happens if you type into the message box: delete stack main stack Does it go away then? (Make sure you specify the mainstack, not the substack.) Yes, it

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Thierry D.
Le 19 mai 2010 à 21:34, Andre Garzia a écrit : Been there as well, came to a little fix if you can call that a fix, instead of closing the stack try something along the lines of: delete stack myStack This will really take it out of the memory, so these days, I close and then I delete or

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Malte Pfaff-Brill
Thierry, does your stack have any substacks that are still open? Rev can not destroy it in that case. Do you reference to it with a filePath? - Will be reopened each time you reference to it then. Does it carry an external that is still used? - Rev won´t destroy it then AFAIK Other than those

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread J. Landman Gay
Malte Pfaff-Brill wrote: Thierry, does your stack have any substacks that are still open? Rev can not destroy it in that case. Do you reference to it with a filePath? - Will be reopened each time you reference to it then. Does it carry an external that is still used? - Rev won´t destroy it

Re: destroystack wrong behavior...

2010-05-19 Thread Nicolas Cueto
4. Any open drivers must be closed How to tell what are the open drivers? Is there a commad like openStacks for drivers? BTW, I too've suffered this destroystack wrong behavior, always shrugging it off as something of my own doing rather than Rev's. Something I'm even more convinced of after