Thank you Andre!
That's what I call a community - one day one wrote wouldn't it be nice
to have own Revolinux distro and the next day he is about to download
it :-)
It would be good to make it small enough to fit into a single CD/LiveCD.
Thanks again and
Best wishes!
Viktoras
Andre Garzia
.nabble.com/Rev-for-Linux-was-Re-iPadding-around-tp1460131p1468807.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage
Hi, Peter,
indeed, some time ago I used to deploy simple Revolution apps on Puppy.
They worked. Apps were compiled using the old engine (2.6). However I
have never tried that again with the new Rev 4.x, some day I will :-).
Viktoras
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Indeed, this would be a great
on all. Its the generic level of
feature support that is the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Rev-for-Linux-was-Re-iPadding-around-tp1460131p1460886.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 03/02/2010 10:33, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
In Ubuntu, you don't do anything - the OS checks for updates and prompts the
user as needed, an experience very much like OS X.
Yes, of course standard Debian has an update manager which pops up, if you
want it to work that way. That's how you will
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Peter Alcibiades
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
My point about the Rev support is this. I don't know exactly what you could
do to STOP Rev running on Mandriva or the Slackware derivatives. Its a
crazy idea. It runs on them by default. Its not that Rev
what about creating our own Debian based Linux distribution?.. We would
give it a name of Revolinux with most of the system management utilities
(or GUIs for these) written in RevTalk, its own software repositories.
This would provide a lot of opportunities and motivation to test and
polish
On 03/02/2010 12:17, viktoras d. wrote:
what about creating our own Debian based Linux distribution?.. We
would give it a name of Revolinux with most of the system management
utilities (or GUIs for these) written in RevTalk, its own software
repositories. This would provide a lot of
I agree :-), still
a) is also valid for developers of any other existing Linux distribution
- given enough motivation, people manage to cope with their plates;
b) if onRev server is included, then it is not limited to development,
but can also be deployed as a server (you know LAMP, so this
Actually Viktoras, it might not be as much work as at first seems.
OpenSuse have now produced a system whereby one can choose to build
one's own version of Linux in the cloud. When all the configuration
is done, the distro can then just be downloaded and installed.
It is certainly within the
Are you nuts? No value???
this is the elusive x-talk OS! The holy grail and final goal of all x-talk
evolution! you blasphemer, heretic, burn him! *foam*
;)
On 3 Feb 2010, at 11:42, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
On 03/02/2010 12:17, viktoras d. wrote:
what about creating our own Debian based
Bernard Devlin wrote:
Sorry to disagree Peter, It is not just at the generic level where
there are problems. I am assuming by the generic level you mean the
way that Rev on Linux is treated like the unloved stepchild of Windows
and OS X (developer previews meant to flush out bugs only being
Hello Folks,
arriving late on the thread.
I used many linux distros till I finally settled on OpenSUSE 11.2. I find
Ubuntu very charming and used it from Gusty Gibbon till Karmic Koala (can't
remember version numbers but I love those silly names, was waiting for
hungry hippo), it was fun to use
I guess the upshot of this whole discussion is that everything is a tradeoff.
To gain stability we have to lose some freedom. The most stable government is a
dictatorship, where only one man's wishes are done and everyone complies with
the standard he issues. But of course, nobody wants that.
YES !!
Le 3 févr. 2010 à 18:27, Bob Sneidar a écrit :
I guess the upshot of this whole discussion is that everything is a tradeoff.
To gain stability we have to lose some freedom. The most stable government is
a dictatorship, where only one man's wishes are done and everyone complies
with
Andre you are a certified genius.
Bob
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:43 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
If people here are so inclined, I can try to build a simple suse that would
bundle Rev without a license (so you would need to put a license on first
run) and some useful tools. You could run it as a
Andre Garzia wrote:
If people here are so inclined, I can try to build a simple suse that would
bundle Rev without a license (so you would need to put a license on first
run) and some useful tools. You could run it as a virtual machine under
vmware or virtualbox and thus test your software
I am no genius, the guys at SUSE (Novell??) are. They made the software, I
am just using it.
Speaking of software, suse studio is giving me error 500 as of half an hour
ago. Must be overwhelmed, as soon as I it is up and running I will try to
cook something.
Now, a simple pool, for those wanting
Hi Andre,
Very interessant synthese. Thanks. It seems it would be a good idea to
be back to Suse (i used it from the 5.3 to 9.2 distros, in the past,
at the time it was the most usable on the different platforms i had to
do with, Yast behind... :-). Never had only one problem to run MC nor
Andre,
If my memory don't freeze ;-)
libXext.so.6, libX11.so.6, libm.so.6, libc.so.6, ld-linux.so.
2libraries are needed and installed out of most of the recent
distributions, as long as the XWindows support is configured.
Best,
Pierre
Le 3 févr. 10 à 19:34, Andre Garzia a écrit :
I am
One possibility for RevBrowser would be to build an alternative using WebKit
(aka Chrome, Safari engine). That would allow for the same browser engine on
all 3 platforms, instead of locking down projects to the lowest common
denominator (i.e., IE). It would certainly support Linux as that is
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Brian Yennie bri...@qldlearning.com wrote:
One possibility for RevBrowser would be to build an alternative using WebKit
(aka Chrome, Safari
engine). That would allow for the same browser engine on all 3 platforms,
instead of locking down
projects to the
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Richard Gaskin
ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
At the risk of soundy all FOSSy, is the problem with the scripted elements
like revPrintField something that one of us scripters could address?
I'm just re-iterating Peter's long-standing problems with Rev on
Larry Snider wrote:
An opinion from a list lurker...
I would very much appreciate further development of a Linux version of
Rev. (And any other UNIX-type OS for that matter...)
...
One aspect that apparently is not given much consideration is the
enterprise/infrastructure. Not everyone
practical useful and stable,
and never having to think about upgrades again, go to Debian Stable.
I wouldn't put Ubuntu on any machine I was going to have to support.
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Rev-for-Linux-was-Re-iPadding-around-tp1460131p1460272.html
Sent from
On 02/02/2010 21:21, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
There's a nice Slackware based educational distribution from Zenwalk. Very
worth a look. The Slack base makes it stable and fast. It is Xfce based
rather than Gnome.
The other one to consider is Skolelinux, aka Debian-EDU. This is Debian
Stable
A conniption is a display of bad temper. If you have a conniption fit
you are throwing a tantrum.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Richmond Mathewson
richmondmathew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/02/2010 21:21, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
There's a nice Slackware based educational distribution from
On 02/02/2010 22:38, Larry Snider wrote:
A conniption is a display of bad temper. If you have a conniption fit
you are throwing a tantrum.
Thank you very much. I don't know why, but conniption fit
has always made me laugh - now I know what it means it
still seems rather funny . . . :)
in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Rev-for-Linux-was-Re-iPadding-around-tp1460131p1460570.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
The way you do Debian is, you stick with Stable, just getting the security
and occasional really major application updates, for around 2 years. This
is done with
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
And that's why I use Ubuntu. :)
In Ubuntu, you don't do
On 03/02/2010 01:34, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
The way you do Debian is, you stick with Stable, just getting the security
and occasional really major application updates, for around 2 years. This
is done with
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
I do this every few months, and you get the
On 03/02/2010 02:26, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
The way you do Debian is, you stick with Stable, just getting the
security
and occasional really major application updates, for around 2 years.
This
is done with
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
And that's why I
32 matches
Mail list logo
