On 22 Feb 2008, at 16:06, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Lars Brehmer wrote:
...do the rev developers themselves plan to make that platform
a standalone option? I guess that can't really be answered until
everyone has seen the SDK,but isn't it theoretically possible?
I am keeping my fingers
In this case, I've been putting the ID column off to the right and
tabbing it off the display. I have a lot of tables with far more
columns than they show, for example, a 16 column table with 4 columns
showing.
This makes it easy, when the user clicks on one row, to show item
detail,
Josh Mellicker wrote:
In this case, I've been putting the ID column off to the right and
tabbing it off the display. I have a lot of tables with far more
columns than they show, for example, a 16 column table with 4 columns
showing.
A good solution for fixed-width lists, but many of my
On 23 Feb 2008, at 02:27, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Suppose you want to display records from a database in a multi-
column list field. You'll want to keep track of the ID field, but
that's just noise to the end-user so you don't want to display it.
Currently, you'd have to parse out that
Björnke von Gierke wrote:
On 23 Feb 2008, at 02:27, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Suppose you want to display records from a database in a multi-
column list field. You'll want to keep track of the ID field, but
that's just noise to the end-user so you don't want to display it.
Currently, you'd
Getting to this thread a bit late...
A Windows mobile version of Rev would be great (hey I think I even voted
for
one in BugZilla about three years ago) but if I could only have one mobile
Rev platform then it would be for the iPhone/iPod Touch. These are the
first
handheld
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Richard, a lot of the people who say they don't like the iPhone
keyboard are won over as soon as they actually use one.
In my case it was the other way around. After all, it's rare that Apple
does something as completely baseless as the hockey-puck mouse, so I was
You complain that my handler deletes the data, so it seems I wasn't
clear enough. Obviously there's a custom property, called data. This
is what you use to show later parts of, or sorted stuff of, in the
field. That is why I said less memory efficient, because there's an
additional
Just stick some bubble-wrap over the screen!
Cheers,
Luis.
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Richard, a lot of the people who say they don't like the iPhone
keyboard are won over as soon as they actually use one.
In my case it was the other way around. After all, it's rare that
Björnke von Gierke wrote:
You complain that my handler deletes the data, so it seems I wasn't
clear enough. Obviously there's a custom property, called data. This
is what you use to show later parts of, or sorted stuff of, in the
field. That is why I said less memory efficient, because
I couldn't agree more! Personally I doubt I will ever learn to use/
code Apple's Xcode or the coming iPhone SDK, but I am sure some of you
real cracks out there could develop a rev stack that can convert what
is necessary to run a standalone on those devices. Or do the rev
developers
Lars,
standalones would need an ARM targeted engine and that does not exist
(I think). Best options for us is Web apps on iPhone.
iPhone javascript support has some nice features so you can build nice
webapps for it.
andre
PS: who has not an iPhone and thus can't test anything.
On 2/22/08,
Lars Brehmer wrote:
...do the rev developers themselves plan to make that platform
a standalone option? I guess that can't really be answered until
everyone has seen the SDK,but isn't it theoretically possible?
I am keeping my fingers crossed!
Software is just lights dancing on a screen.
On Feb 22, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
PS: who has not an iPhone and thus can't test anything.
Perhaps you could try iPhoney http://www.marketcircle.com/iphoney/.
My brother Greg says it works OK and he used it a little while
developing the iPhone interface to ScreenSteps Live.
On Feb 22, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
iPhone javascript support has some nice features so you can build nice
webapps for it.
andre
PS: who has not an iPhone and thus can't test anything.
http://www.marketcircle.com/iphoney/
Not really an iPhone but seems to provide a 'frame'
If I were RunRev, long before I jumped on the iPhone bandwaqon I'd make
an engine that runs on the Windows-based handhelds. Simpler API, and a
much larger installed base.
A Windows mobile version of Rev would be great (hey I think I even voted for
one in BugZilla about three years ago) but if
Hello
Sorry Richard, but I disagree.
I recently read (maybe from this same mailing list) that the iPhone
has more penetration than Linux within internet-connected devices. If
I remember correctly, measurement was taken from Google visitors.
If this is correct, the iPhone would be an
On Feb 22, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
So it may be best for Rev to keep focusing on honing the engine for
the business tasks currently asked of it, while the Handheld
Platform Wars play themselves out for at least another year.
Not to get in the way of other important
Terry Judd wrote:
If I were RunRev, long before I jumped on the iPhone bandwaqon I'd make
an engine that runs on the Windows-based handhelds. Simpler API, and a
much larger installed base.
A Windows mobile version of Rev would be great (hey I think I even voted for
one in BugZilla about
Andres Martinez wrote:
Sorry Richard, but I disagree.
I recently read (maybe from this same mailing list) that the iPhone
has more penetration than Linux within internet-connected devices. If
I remember correctly, measurement was taken from Google visitors.
If this is correct, the iPhone
On 23/2/08 9:26 AM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it may be best for Rev to keep focusing on honing the engine for the
business tasks currently asked of it, while the Handheld Platform Wars
play themselves out for at least another year.
I agree that we need to play the waiting
On 23/2/08 10:20 AM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I do know this: Rev is already on the desktop, and to fully exploit
the opportunities already before us we really need independent column
alignment and zero-width columns in fields. A lot of money is left on
the table until
silly question, but what does one do with a zero-width column ?
On 23/2/08 10:20 AM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I do know this: Rev is already on the desktop, and to fully exploit
the opportunities already before us we really need independent column
alignment and
Hide data in-line in a column in a field row. Associating hidden data
with a line can be very useful. Currently we have to hide any such
data at the end of a row, out of view.
sqb
silly question, but what does one do with a zero-width column ?
On 23/2/08 10:20 AM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL
I don't know about other programmers, but I would be able to display just
the columns I wanted for the user without having to parse a table of data.
For example:
All data is in one table of 15 columns.
Field price would use column 1,2,4,10
which could be
[database id][inventory item
Martin Blackman wrote:
silly question, but what does one do with a zero-width column ?
Not silly at all. I got the idea from Ken Ray, and have been a strong
advocate of it since. But when I first heard about it, I had the same
question. :)
Suppose you want to display records from a
26 matches
Mail list logo
