Re: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five!

Kenneth: What you said is not wrong. Vertica and Riak are examples of distributed databases that don't require hand-holding. Cassandra is for Java-programmer DIYers, or more often Datastax clients, at this point. Thanks, James. From: Kenneth Brotman To:

Re: newbie , to use cassandra when query is arbitrary?

Hi Rahul, I cannot confirm the size wrt Cassandra, but usually in berkley db for *10 M records* , it takes around 120 GB. Any operation takes hardly 2 to 3 ms when query is performed on index attribute. Usually 10 to 12 columns are the OOTB behaviour but one can configure any attribute to be

RE: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five!

Jeff, you helped me figure out what I was missing. It just took me a day to digest what you wrote. I’m coming over from another type of engineering. I didn’t know and it’s not really documented. Cassandra runs in a data center. Now days that means the nodes are going to be in managed

Re: Right sizing Cassandra data nodes

Thanks for the response Rahul. I did not understand the “node density” point. Charu From: Rahul Singh Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" Date: Monday, February 19, 2018 at 12:32 PM To: "user@cassandra.apache.org"

Re: newbie , to use cassandra when query is arbitrary?

What is the data size in TB / Gb and what what is the Operations Per second for read and write. Cassandra is both for high volume and high velocity for read and write. How many of the columns need to be indexed? You may find that doing a secondary index is helpful or looking to Elassandra / DSE

Re: Right sizing Cassandra data nodes

1. I would keep opscenter on different cluster. Why unnecessarily put traffic and computing for opscenter data on a real business data cluster? 2. Don’t put more than 1-2 TB per node. Maybe 3TB. Node density as it increases creates more replication, read repairs , etc and memory usage for doing

Re: SSTableLoader Question

Sounds good. Thanks for the explanation! On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Rahul Singh wrote: > If you don’t have access to the file you don’t have access to the file. > I’ve seen this issue several times. It’s he easiest low hanging fruit to > resolve. So figure

Right sizing Cassandra data nodes

Hi All, Looking for some insight into how application data archive and purge is carried out for C* database. Are there standard guidelines on calculating the amount of space that can be used for storing data in a specific node. Some pointers that I got while researching are; -

[RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 3.11.2 released - PLEASE READ NOTICE

PLEASE READ: MAXIMUM TTL EXPIRATION DATE NOTICE (CASSANDRA-14092) -- The maximum expiration timestamp that can be represented by the storage engine is 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00, which means that inserts with TTL thatl expire after

[RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 3.0.16 released - PLEASE READ NOTICE

PLEASE READ: MAXIMUM TTL EXPIRATION DATE NOTICE (CASSANDRA-14092) -- The maximum expiration timestamp that can be represented by the storage engine is 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00, which means that inserts with TTL thatl expire after

RE: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five!

Well said. Very fair. I wouldn’t mind hearing from others still. You’re a good guy! Kenneth Brotman From: Jeff Jirsa [mailto:jji...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:10 AM To: cassandra Cc: Cassandra DEV Subject: Re: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five! There's a

Re: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five!

There's a lot of things below I disagree with, but it's ok. I convinced myself not to nit-pick every point. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13971 has some of Stefan's work with cert management Beyond that, I encourage you to do what Michael suggested: open JIRAs for things you

Re: Cassandra counter readtimeout error

Hi Javier, Glad to hear it is solved now. Cassandra 3.11.1 should be a more stable version and 3.11 a better series. Excuse my misunderstanding, your table seems to be better designed than thought. Welcome to the Apache Cassandra community! C*heers ;-) --- Alain Rodriguez -

Re: newbie , to use cassandra when query is arbitrary?

It can be minimum of 20 m to 10 billions With each entry can contain upto 100 columns Rajesh On 19 Feb 2018 9:02 p.m., "Rahul Singh" wrote: How much data do you need to store and what is the frequency of reads and writes. -- Rahul Singh rahul.si...@anant.us

Re: newbie , to use cassandra when query is arbitrary?

How much data do you need to store and what is the frequency of reads and writes. -- Rahul Singh rahul.si...@anant.us Anant Corporation On Feb 19, 2018, 3:44 AM -0500, Rajesh Kishore , wrote: > Hi All, > > I am a newbie to Cassandra world, got some understanding of the

Re: Cassandra cluster: could not reach linear scalability

Thanks for your help, I'been biased with Cassandra server and forget about the client completely! Sent using Zoho Mail On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:21:03 +0330 Lucas Benevides lu...@maurobenevides.com.br wrote Why did you set the number of 1000 threads? Does it show to be the

Re: Cassandra cluster: could not reach linear scalability

Why did you set the number of 1000 threads? Does it show to be the more performatic when threads = auto? I have used stress tool in a larger test bed (10 nodes) and my optimal setup was 24 threads. To check this you must monitor the stress node, both the CPU and I/O. And give it a try with fewer

Re: Cassandra counter readtimeout error

Hi, Thank you for your reply. As I was bothered by this problem, last night I upgraded the cluster to version 3.11.1 and everything is working now. As far as I can tell the counter table can be read now. I will be doing more testing today with this version but it is looking good. To answer your

RE: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five!

Comments inline >-Original Message- >From: Jeff Jirsa [mailto:jji...@gmail.com] >Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 10:58 PM >To: user@cassandra.apache.org >Cc: d...@cassandra.apache.org >Subject: Re: Cassandra Needs to Grow Up by Version Five! > >Comments inline > > >> On Feb 18, 2018, at

newbie , to use cassandra when query is arbitrary?

Hi All, I am a newbie to Cassandra world, got some understanding of the product. I have a application (which is kind of datastore) for other applications, the user queries are not fixed i.e the queries can come with any attributes. In this case, is it recommended to use cassandra ? What benefits

Re: Help needed to enbale Client-to-node encryption(SSL)

> > (2.0 is getting pretty old and isn't supported, you may want to consider > upgrading; 2.1 would be the smallest change and least risk, but it, too, is > near end of life) I would upgrade as well. Yet I think moving from Cassandra 2.0 to Cassandra 2.2 directly is doable smoothly and

Re: Cassandra counter readtimeout error

Hello, This table has 6 partition keys, 4 primary keys and 5 counters. I think the root issue is this ^. There might be some inefficiency or issues with counter, but this design, makes Cassandra relatively inefficient in most cases and using standard columns or counters indifferently.