OK so my search will continue :-)
Meanwhile I'll consider to change my implementation, which i'd like to
prevent.
Maybe somebody of you knows a time and size based cache system where i can
map a key to an object?
René
2009/6/16 Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com
That's the one,
Hi Renè,
Renè Glanzer wrote at Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 09:47:
OK so my search will continue :-)
Meanwhile I'll consider to change my implementation, which i'd like to
prevent.
I've reopened COLLECTIONS-3, since I was able to write a unit test that
reproduces the problem.
Maybe somebody of
Hi Jörg,
that are great news, I'll give it a try.
And of course I'll report my experience.
René
2009/6/17 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
Hi Renè,
Renè Glanzer wrote at Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 09:47:
OK so my search will continue :-)
Meanwhile I'll consider to change my
Renè Glanzer wrote at Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 11:48:
Hi Jörg,
that are great news, I'll give it a try.
And of course I'll report my experience.
That would be fine. Actually I opened an own JIRA issue for this now
(COLLECTION-330), COLLECTION-3 was simply too vague and had a too long
history
Hi Jörg,
it's me again. With a smile on my face :-)
I changed my code according to your hint.
Now i don't use the keySet but the entrySet. With only to adopt the rest of
the method to the entrySet and still
calling the remove() method of the iterator in my tests no
Hi,
it's me again with an update.
the LRUMap.mapIterator() still produces the
ConcurrentModificationException when a call to MapIterator.remove()
occurs.
Maybe this info helps
René
2009/6/17 Renè Glanzer rene.glan...@gmail.com:
Hi Jörg,
it's me again. With a smile on my face :-)
I changed
why don't you just use softreference + expiration timestamp and save
all the trouble?
Leon
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Renè Glanzerrene.glan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it's me again with an update.
the LRUMap.mapIterator() still produces the
ConcurrentModificationException when a call to
Hi Nestor,
Has there been any update you have on state persistence for scxml ?
Regards,
R2D2.
Nestor Urquiza-3 wrote:
Yes I will keep you posted and in fact I am evaluating
to use iBATIC (I posted the question to javaranch,
iBATIC and Hibernate forums) because seems like iBATIC
creates
Hi all,
is it possible to persist the state of an scxml instance into a database ?
What would be the api call structure to achieve this? I understand that the
junits have roundtrip testcase to check for serialization and
deserialization. However, file system based operations are not currently
Well, I hope your hash function is well thought through :-)
otherwise using hashmap for caching might be a mess
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Renè Glanzerrene.glan...@gmail.com wrote:
I was searching for a very lighweight cache systems with not much overhead
for my purposes. The LRUMap
Renè Glanzer wrote at Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 16:07:
Hi,
it's me again with an update.
the LRUMap.mapIterator() still produces the
ConcurrentModificationException when a call to MapIterator.remove()
occurs.
So did you also try with the entrySet? I've not written a unit test for the
I only gave it a short test. Then i found the MapIterator in the docs an
switched to it.
The docs stated that MapIterator is the better way than entrySet.
Sorry for this, I'm at home right now so i can test it with an entrySet at
the earliest tomorrow.
Looking forward to report the result.
12 matches
Mail list logo
