Is you response directed to me, Scot? Or is it to all of the 'other kind of
contributors than you are'?
If directed at me, then have the common decency to state my name, so that
all of us do know that too.
RE: mailing list moderators.
Up to yesterday, I was not aware of the fact that there was
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a workflow with OFBiz.
I'm using Ofbiz 12.04. I tried using the ofbiz-workflow and shark but
getting a lot of errors. I'm new to OfBiz.
Is there any workflow which can be intergrated with OfBiz 12.04? OSWorkflow
and jBPM are the other ones that I've tried, but could
Quite a novel you've written there Piere. There's so many things I'd like to
clarify in your rant but you're so far detached from the reality of how this
community works that it's gotten to the point of being pointless.
Regards
Scott
On 19 September 2014 20:59:48 GMT+12:00, Pierre Smits
Like debating with you, Sott
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Quite a novel you've
Thanks you for the prompt reply Pierre.
So, if I have to implement workflow in ofbiz now, which is the best path?
Should I check into Activiti?
If you have some resources on the same, kindly share.
Thanks again!
--
View this message in context:
Varun044,
The path is to work together with the contributors who pledged their
willingness to work on this. These are:
- Hans Bakker
- Mohd Viqar
- Rong Nguyen
The best place to do this is discuss it in this mailing list.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
I would suggest an virtual meeting as an alternative so that the team
can decide on scope, initial tasks, priorities and project management
structure.
This should be followed by a note to the ML summarizing the discussion
and decisions taken and could include an invitation to others to
That is a excelent suggestion, Ron.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
wrote:
I
Hi all,
I like to share with you the message below from the Executive V.P. of the
ASF regarding the Apachecon event. Please take notice and act on it. It
will surely help spread the word about our project and its works.
Again I present you the url for the schedule of the OFBiz talks at the
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Typically, this sort of thing is done in Jira - which provides a set of
collaboration tools and a means for voting on the change.
Jira is proprietary; so who pays for it? Or, is it free for open
source
I am sorry, I do not understand the question.
In this project, we collaborate using Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ
so that everyone can participate, share files, vote, etc.
If the Work Flow idea requires extensive labor, then Jira can be used to
break down tasks, assign
They are suggesting that you will use the one that OFBiz already has for
that purpose.
Nothing new to do. Just create the module identification and then the
issues that you need in order to define the work on the Workflow project.
Rn
On 19/09/2014 11:34 AM, Ted Byers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
They are suggesting that you will use the one that OFBiz already has for
that purpose.
Nothing new to do. Just create the module identification and then the issues
that you need in order to define the work on
Atlassian provides graciously tools like Jira and Confluence to the ASF.
Did you know that Jira underneath uses the OFBiz Entity Engine?
Jacques
Le 19/09/2014 18:20, Ted Byers a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
They are suggesting
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Atlassian provides graciously tools like Jira and Confluence to the ASF.
That suggests a healthy relationship between the open source sector
and the commercial sector. That is nice to see.
Did you know that
Forgive the amateur-speak, but would it be ok to invent an abstracted
layer of vendor-neutral APIs service bindings such forth that
engenders implementation interest among entities like SugarCRM and its
competitors? It'd be kind of like what SQL did for the database
industry, or what CMIS is
No one is suggesting using JIRA as part of OFBiz. (As Jacques points out
parts of OFBiz are used in JIRA as a development framework.)
The suggestion was to use JIRA as an issue tracking system to help
manage the Workflow project.
The suggested technical base for Workflow is Activiti (read
Of course Todd. All that you're suggesting is fine, as long as there
is a rational argument for doing it (and in many cases there is - I
just ask that if I involve myself in a project, I know what that
argument is).
I am not about to develop a new CRM de novo, when there exists
products like
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
No one is suggesting using JIRA as part of OFBiz. (As Jacques points out
parts of OFBiz are used in JIRA as a development framework.)
Nor was I. I was just curious about how the workflow features already
in
Thank you, sir, for taking time out of your day to explain a few things.
Most of it is penetrating a certain thick skull.
On 14-09-19 11:05 AM, Ted Byers wrote:
Of course Todd. All that you're suggesting is fine, as long as there
is a rational argument for doing it (and in many cases there
Not sure if it is supposed to use the setting, but when you assign a supplier
to a product you can do multiple suppliers.
I find it a bit odd that it lets you do multiple main suppliers (I would
think it should only let you select one).
But even with just one set as main, when you do a generate
Le 19/09/2014 20:16, Ted Byers a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ron Wheeler
rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
No one is suggesting using JIRA as part of OFBiz. (As Jacques points out
parts of OFBiz are used in JIRA as a development framework.)
Nor was I. I was just curious
Does anyone know why CustomTimePeriod fromDate and thruDate are of type
date instead of timestamp? Because the fields are of type date, it
causes issues when joining the it for date comparison for view-entities.
For example:
view-entity entity-name=OrderHeaderAndCustomTimePeriod
Joel,
See my comments inline
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:03 PM, jfrad...@styleline.com
jfrad...@styleline.com wrote:
Not sure if it
Thanks Jacques, That is useful and appreciated.
Ted
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
Original Message
From: Jacques Le Roux
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 3:27 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Reply To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: OfBiz workflow
Le
Hi Christian,
this is a known issue and there is already a ticket with some comments in it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5740
Jacopo
On Sep 19, 2014, at 11:16 PM, Christian Carlow christian.car...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does anyone know why CustomTimePeriod fromDate and thruDate
Demo trunk is down, I am getting blank page while accessing :
http://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr
Thanks Regards
—
Deepak Dixit
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
27 matches
Mail list logo
