RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Leandro Melo
t; > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:48 AM > > > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > > > Subject: RE: ActionForm with all application > > > attributes > > > > > > > > > > > >

RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Jim Barrows
> -Original Message- > From: Leandro Melo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 10:25 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: ActionForm with all application attributes > > > --- Jim Barrows <

RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Leandro Melo
--- Jim Barrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Leandro Melo > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:48 AM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: RE: ActionForm with a

RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Jim Barrows
> -Original Message- > From: Leandro Melo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:48 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: ActionForm with all application attributes > > > Jim, all the code i`m talking about is inside a Base

RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Leandro Melo
Jim, all the code i`m talking about is inside a Base Action Form. It seems the you`re thinking that my code is inside a action, aren`t you?? Maybe a misundertanding, maybe mine, maybe yours. So, i agree with some of your comments, but not on all of thems. In fact, i`m gonna to take a look about th

RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Jim Barrows
> -Original Message- > From: Leandro Melo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 5:40 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: ActionForm with all application attributes > > > Bill, wait a minute, i just thought on something.

RE: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Jim Barrows
> -Original Message- > From: Leandro Melo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 5:48 PM > To: struts jakarta > Subject: ActionForm with all application attributes > > > Hi, > i sent this question yesterday, but as nowbody > answered me, i trying it again with a

Re: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Bill Siggelkow
True -- some people use bulk property setters like those provided by BeanUtils to move data from the ActionForm to the DTO -- I think that is primarily where you would need to be careful. Personally, I am not fond of the use of an uber form; it doesn't seem very object-oriented; however, I can

Re: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Leandro Melo
Bill, wait a minute, i just thought on something. I wouldn't matter if a hacker set a attributes in my BaseActionFomr, if i don't use it to build my DTOs. I mount my DTOs case specific, so i'd just ignore the hacker set attribute. But if this hacker set attribute is in my DTO, i agree that i could

Re: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-08 Thread Leandro Melo
Bill, this is for sure a disadavantage. Do you see others Actually, we're suceptible to this avantage in all forms, but i agree with you that if i have a base form with all atributes the chances of things getting messed up is a log bigger. --- Bill Siggelkow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: >

Re: ActionForm with all application attributes

2004-09-07 Thread Bill Siggelkow
Are all of your getters and setters public? If so, (which I assume is true), one disadavantage is that request parameters can be passed in that set stuff on the form that you may not be expecting. For example, suppose your uber form supports properties for 'foo' 'bar' and 'baz'. Let's say one f