Comments inline
On Apr 7, 2005 7:36 AM, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > sed: -e expression #4, char 2: Extra characters after command
> > > make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/config.c] Error 1
> > > make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2
> > >
> > > and here is the file arch/um/kernel/.config.
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 22:02, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:33:56PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> > Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> | Mail-Followup-To: [email protected]
>
> Please fix your MUA.
>
> > TX for the info, but sorry, I guess you missundersto
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 15:16, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Uml compile is btoken in current linus bk 2.6:
>
> CC arch/um/kernel/ptrace.o
> arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c: In function `send_sigtrap':
> arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c:324: warning: implicit declaration of function
> `SC_IP'
> arch/um/kern
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 09:33:56PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
| Mail-Followup-To: [email protected]
Please fix your MUA.
> TX for the info, but sorry, I guess you missunderstood. We were not talking
> about kernel's include/linux/errno.h, but ab
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:26, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> >>Jeff Dike wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
> >
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have
ERESTARTNOINTR in my /usr/include, inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not.
2.6.11 shows:
| $ grep ERESTARTNOINTR -r .
| ./linux/errno.h:#define ERESTARTNOINT
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 07:45, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:51 pm, Ian McDonald wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> I'm trying to track this down and fix it, but mine didn't even get that
> far, it died with:
>
> CC arch/um/kernel/ptrace.o
> arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c: In functio
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
These patches are tested a
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:16, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have
> > ERESTARTNOINTR in my
Please note:
> > /usr/include
> > , inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not.
>
> 2.6.11 sh
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> I merged these, except for the restartnointr one because I don't have
> ERESTARTNOINTR in my /usr/include, inside a #ifdef KERNEL or not.
2.6.11 shows:
| $ grep ERESTARTNOINTR -r .
| ./linux/errno.h:#define ERESTARTNOINTR 513
And it i
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 20:57, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> >>Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
> >>UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
> >>These patches are tested a bi
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64.
I merged these, except for the restartnointr
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64.
I merged these, except for the restartnointr
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 03:27:50PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote:
> Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
> UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
> These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64.
I merged these, except for the restartnointr one becaus
> > And UML does compile under 2.6.11 with a patch for gcc (which is
> > include in 2.6.12-rc4). Haven't yet tried 2.6.12-rc1 but can do later
> > if this will help.
>
> I'm confused: what?
>
That should read 2.6.12-rc2 not 2.6.12-rc4.
I will supply the .config when I get into university. I will
Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to
UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files.
These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64.
s390 implementation is *not* included in tarball, this will
be posted later, when thing are more stable.
Please see patches an
Uml compile is btoken in current linus bk 2.6:
CC arch/um/kernel/ptrace.o
arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c: In function `send_sigtrap':
arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c:324: warning: implicit declaration of function
`SC_IP'
arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c:324: error: union has no member named `tt'
arch/um/kernel/ptr
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:51 pm, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have applied 2.6.12-rc2 patches against 2.6.11 and gone to compile
> and it fails...
>
> Here is what I have done:
> make menuconfig ARCH=um
> Added in hostfs, UML networking - daemon (but also tried with these
> off, no diffe
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 04:55 pm, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Speaking of which, I ask this from time to time:
> >
> > What's the minimal patch set that _just_ adds -SKAS0 mode to something
> > like a 2.6.11 kernel? I'd like to try it out, but every time I sit down
> > to whack at it my interest bud
19 matches
Mail list logo
