Re: [uml-devel] Please add: um: add missing declaration of 'getrlimit()' and friends

2013-12-09 Thread Antoine Martin
t;> The change was introduced in 3.9 and needs backporting to all stable trees. > Which "all"? Newer than 3.9 you mean? No, this affects 3.4.73 too: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=52A6.7090009%40nagafix.co.uk&forum_name=user-mo

[uml-devel] 3.4.73 affected by "uml: signal.c build errors"

2013-12-08 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi Richard, Not sure how this got fixed in HEAD, but the same fix needs to be applied on top of 3.4.73 I've just added the includes to arch/um/os-Linux/start_up.c, as per: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/24/791 And the kernel builds again. Compile-tested-by: Antoine Martin Cheers An

[uml-devel] UML build broken since 3.0.75 (also affects 3.2.x)

2013-05-25 Thread Antoine Martin
ake[1]: *** [mm/memory.o] Error 1 make: *** [mm] Error 2 This fix is just a copy of what is found in later kernels. Compiled and boot tested both 3.0.80 and 3.2.45, x86_64 and i386. Signed-off-by: Antoine Martin --- a/arch/um/include/asm/pgtable.h 2013-05-25 09:20:51.42000 + +++ b/ar

Re: [uml-devel] "Couldn't grant pty"

2013-01-12 Thread Antoine Martin
fs, I guess I need to update the webpage as the this one is supposed to boot ok with UML, without any tty issues. Note however that I rarely use those filesystems with UML anymore, and many distros have repeatedly moved/changed/broken tty initialization in so many undocumented ways that I

[uml-devel] X11 vfb forward ported to 3.2

2012-02-15 Thread Antoine Martin
t the time of the original patch, all I get is a black window... I'll try to see if I can figure out why it's not updating. Here it is if you want to try it / comment / help: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/vfb-3.2.patch

[uml-devel] 2.6.32.47 breaks UML build (both i386 and amd64)

2011-11-07 Thread Antoine Martin
o valid symbol. make: *** [.tmp_kallsyms1.S] Error 1 Using this config for a 64-bit build: http://uml.devloop.org.uk/kernels/kernel64-2.6.32.46.config Note: I only applied the patch to the existing build tree and did not make clean or make mrproper. 2.6.33.20 is not affec

[uml-devel] something broke hppfs

2010-05-19 Thread Antoine Martin
LD fs/hostfs/hostfs.o LD fs/hostfs/built-in.o CC fs/hppfs/hppfs.o fs/hppfs/hppfs.c: In function 'hppfs_fill_super': fs/hppfs/hppfs.c:721: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type make[2]: *** [fs/hppfs/hppfs.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs/hppfs] Error 2 make: *** [fs] Er

[uml-devel] Fedora 12 can't link with libc.a

2009-12-27 Thread Antoine Martin
KSYM.tmp_kallsyms1.S nm: '.tmp_vmlinux1': No such file Anyone from redhat who understands the changes to the linker/static libs should be able to fix this quickly I would have thought. Cheers Antoine --

Re: [uml-devel] I really need help, nothing works

2009-07-30 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I think you may need to read this and then re-formulate your question: http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html I'm not even sure this is the right mailing list, as 90% of your mail seems like a rant about e17/Ubuntu. John Vincent wrote: > Hi

Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/Makefile:100: *** missing separator. Stop.

2008-04-30 Thread Antoine Martin
Peter Teoh wrote: > Erh...I think I found the error. I did "make oldconfig arch=um", it > works. And now I did "make arch=um" it started compiling. Is this > correct? Documentation every says "make xxxconfig ARCH=um" where the > ARCH is capitals, which gave me error. Thanks. > ARCH ha

[uml-devel] syscall failed

2008-03-28 Thread Antoine Martin
FYI: (skas4 host) [43492659.84] syscall_stub_done : ret = -12, offset = 548682067984, data = 7f115010 [43492659.84] syscall_stub_done : syscall 9 failed, return value = 0xfff4, expected return value = 0x47a [43492659.84] syscall parameters: 0x47a 0x1000 0x7 0x11

[uml-devel] fakehd

2008-02-25 Thread Antoine Martin
le to register the correct major number to emulate ide (or even scsi) Had a play with arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c but couldn't get it to work. Cheers Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.

[uml-devel] skas3 for 2.6.24

2008-01-25 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Has anyone managed to apply skas3 to 2.6.24? Things have moved around so much that I can't figure out where is what... Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Re: [uml-devel] console and do_syscall_stub

2008-01-24 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > Any idea about this console thing? Ignore this - I'm getting tired... Here's what caused it in syslog-ng.conf: destination console_all { file("/dev/tty12"); }; Which does not exist as the guest is booted up with con=null con0=fd0,fd:1 > (

Re: [uml-devel] console and do_syscall_stub

2008-01-24 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:58:45PM +0000, Antoine Martin wrote: >> [42949466.74] do_syscall_stub : ret = -12, offset = 548682067984, >> data = 606b1010 > > This usually means that a UML p

[uml-devel] console and do_syscall_stub

2008-01-23 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 [42949466.74] Failed to open console 12, err = -2 [42949466.74] Failed to open console 12, err = -2 [42949466.74] Failed to open console 12, err = -2 [42949466.74] Failed to open console 12, err = -2 [42949466.74] Failed to open c

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] 64 bit host ?

2007-12-13 Thread Antoine Martin
B all in all. Hard to imagine > that a compiled kernel would be of the same size, no ? Hah, yes. thinking about it, 45MB is a tad excessive! Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHYX45GK2z

[uml-devel] uml FB

2007-12-02 Thread Antoine Martin
ng us to attach/detach as needed: start session, detach, log out of X, log in, attach to guest framebuffer (although this doesn't address the mouse/keyboard issue). Is this (easily) feasable at all? Thanks Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Usin

[uml-devel] 2.6.23 linkage error with ipv6 enabled

2007-10-09 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I remember something similar ages ago with another IPv6 symbol no being pulled in - can't remember how to fix it. (.text+0x116b9): warning: Using 'getservbyname' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the gli

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.21.5 crashes [was link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any']

2007-08-16 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Antoine Martin wrote: > Antoine Martin wrote: >> Jeff Dike wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >>>> If it doesn't crash on emerge --sync (when I reboot it doesn't >&g

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.21.5 crashes [was link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any']

2007-08-15 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Antoine Martin wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >>> If it doesn't crash on emerge --sync (when I reboot it doesn't >>> always crash), try buil

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.21.5 crashes [was link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any']

2007-08-09 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> If it doesn't crash on emerge --sync (when I reboot it doesn't always >> crash), try building something big (like glibc or gcc: emerge g

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.21.5 crashes [was link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any']

2007-08-07 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> If it doesn't crash on emerge --sync (when I reboot it doesn't always >> crash), try building something big (like glibc or gcc: emerge gl

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.21.5 crashes [was link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any']

2007-07-31 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:09:15PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Works for me (tm) > > OK. > >> btw, if you're in bug squashing mode, > > I always am (or if not, someone needs to give me a

[uml-devel] aio vs gentoo headers

2007-07-27 Thread Antoine Martin
I needed the tiny change below to be able to build on amd64 with gentoo kernel headers. posted here just in case it's useful, I can compile both x86 and amd64 kernels using these headers but not cross compile (make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386) That still fails with: arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.c: In

Re: [uml-devel] ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 breakage?

2007-07-19 Thread Antoine Martin
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 18:08 +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> Jeff Dike wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:23:25AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I don't mind bugging people

Re: [uml-devel] ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 breakage?

2007-07-15 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:23:25AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> I don't mind bugging people to get to the bottom of this, do you know >> where to knock? >> I can't find anything in MAINTAINERS. >> > > Did you install

Re: [uml-devel] ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 breakage?

2007-07-14 Thread Antoine Martin
asm/page.h >> > > Hummm, I guess the header tidying people need to fix a bunch of > things. I'll make whatever changes needed in UML to not use illicit > headers, but I do need complete interface definitio

Re: [uml-devel] link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any'

2007-07-13 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:05:28PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libc.a(in6_addr.o):(.rodata+0x0): >> >> multiple definition of `in6addr_any' >> net/built-in.o:(.rodata+0x5380):

Re: [uml-devel] ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 breakage?

2007-07-13 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:03:21PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> I had updated the kernel headers and these include files have been removed. >> Until UML uses some other trick, this works for me for the 64-bit build: >> >> cp /usr/src/lin

Re: [uml-devel] block layer request length increases break 2.6.22.* COW ubd

2007-07-13 Thread Antoine Martin
n a laptop), I've copied it here: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/skas-2.6.22-v9-pre9.patch.bz2 (also compile tested) Anyone fancy doing the same work to v8? I remember having severe problems with v9... Antoine - This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: [uml-devel] ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 breakage?

2007-07-13 Thread Antoine Martin
: In function 'foo': arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.c:52: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct user_fxsr_struct' make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.s] Error 1 make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.s] Error 2 Antoine Martin w

[uml-devel] ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 breakage?

2007-07-13 Thread Antoine Martin
fxsr_struct' arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.c:70: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct user_regs_struct' make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.s] Error 1 make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.s] Error 2 This use

[uml-devel] link failure, multiple definition of 'in6addr_any'

2007-07-13 Thread Antoine Martin
status This is from a known "good" config upgraded to 2.6.22 with oldconfig. I removed IPv6 support and all is well. Antoine - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of

Re: [uml-devel] Building a UML uClinux(Busybox/uClibc) filesystem

2007-06-07 Thread Antoine Martin
t filesystem has no lib folder. I > guess this means that the pre-built filesystem was built with glibc? > (Unlike the mine or the buildroot variant which use uClibc) IIRC, that's because it was built with the static option. Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIG

Re: [uml-devel] doubt regarding UML instlation please help me.

2007-06-06 Thread Antoine Martin
el mirror to use which has already uml > patch built in Try this: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/work/current/2.6/2.6.17/patches/jmpbuf Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.or

Re: [uml-devel] Query ....

2007-06-04 Thread Antoine Martin
1 > > make[1]: *** [arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386] Error 2 > > Please help me. Search the archives, this problem was discussed bef

Re: [uml-devel] doubt in debugging.

2007-05-24 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 battipatisainagendra Bhavaniprasad wrote: > Hi, > Does Suse linux consist of skas patch bult in??? No, I am not aware of any vendor kernels that contain the skas patch. Antoine > > rg

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.18 UML machine on FC6 host

2007-05-22 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ryan Angilly wrote: > Do you know why exactly the kernel needs to be upgraded? Just curious. Some bugs that were fixed in the host code. circa 2.6.20.2 > > Antoine Martin nagafix.co.uk> writes: >>> I've been trying

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.18 UML machine on FC6 host

2007-05-18 Thread Antoine Martin
ernel. Try 2.6.21 or >= 2.6.20.8 Antoine > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > msg04571.html > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/m > sg04479.html > > Has there been any further resolution of trying to get UML to ru

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-30 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:18:56PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Full marks for number of lines of code changed! (1!) > > Yeah, I thought that was a plus. > >> On the plus side, it only adds the para

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-30 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 05:46:29PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Attached. >> >> Not sure which approach is best: >> >> 1) this one requires a command line like: >> "vmlinux eth0=p

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-27 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Antoine Martin wrote: > Antoine Martin wrote: >> Jeff Dike wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >>>> Question remains as to why the mac address was the same until 2.6.20 and >>

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-27 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Antoine Martin wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >>> Question remains as to why the mac address was the same until 2.6.20 and >>> is now different. >> We sta

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-27 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Question remains as to why the mac address was the same until 2.6.20 and >> is now different. > > We started providing randomized MACs

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-27 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> The easiest way to work around this is to provide a MAC on the UML >> command line. > Except, pcap doesn't have the option. > I am looking at pcap_user.c and pcap_kern.c trying to figure out where I > can add parsing for that. in: check_transport(

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-27 Thread Antoine Martin
C on the UML > command line. Except, pcap doesn't have the option. I am looking at pcap_user.c and pcap_kern.c trying to figure out where I can add parsing for that. Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Lin

Re: [uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-25 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 07:43:21PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Using the exact same kernel config with 2.6.19.x works but not with 2.6.20.x >> >> # ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 promisc up >> SIOCSIFA

[uml-devel] regression: pcap broken in 2.6.20.x

2007-04-22 Thread Antoine Martin
such device Antoine -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGK6zIGK2zHPGK1rsRCvlWAJ4mPnP1dQQgol4Bpx4+CFt/bnEHOgCfQfDC 7KG75RhnxZiS98gsVA+nURE= =wsN+ -END PGP SIGNATURE

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-04 Thread Antoine Martin
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Antoine Martin wrote: >> and this one: >> http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/2.6.18-rc4/uml-x11-fb >> which applied cleanly, but is not letting me set the option - Kconfig is >> beyond me: >> >> arch/u

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-03 Thread Antoine Martin
Antoine Martin wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> There are patches floating around for a UML frame buffer device. >>> Gerd Kraxel^H^H^H^H^H^HHoffmann did one using plain X11, which worked >>> g

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-03 Thread Antoine Martin
Blaisorblade wrote: > On lunedì 2 aprile 2007, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Jeff Dike wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >>>> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the >>>> user base woul

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Antoine Martin
I suggest taking a look at Gerd's patches. IIRC, he posted them to lkml >> last year. > > I have Gerd's patch sitting in my tree, but it's never really worked > for me, so I haven't pushed it. Yep, I tried th

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Just like the network auto-configuration via dhcp, it would allow users >> to download images+kernel and run them like appliances without >> understanding anything about X or UML, just cli

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-02 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: >> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the >> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation. > > Why? I've never understood wh

Re: [uml-devel] [RFC] UML kernel & rootfs bundle with every kernel release ?

2007-04-01 Thread Antoine Martin
x27;m even wanting to have a "Vmware-like" interface. Or at > least standard scripts for guest management. I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation. my 2p Cheers Antoine > >

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] [PATCH] uml hostfs: fix interaction between hostfs=path1 and -o path2 at mount time

2007-03-04 Thread Antoine Martin
host admin should use non-modular kernels to prevent such tampering. > So the host admin really needs to run > UML in a chroot if he needs real security. chroot isn't totally foolproof (see chroot-again issue), but

Re: [uml-devel] do_syscall_stub: syscall 9 failed

2007-01-31 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:15PM +0000, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Just caught this in `dmesg` >> >> [42977596.52] Adding 131064k swap on /dev/ubdb. Priority:-1 >> extents:1 across:131064k >> [42980169.29] do_syscall_stub : ret = -12

Re: [uml-devel] do_syscall_stub: syscall 9 failed

2007-01-30 Thread Antoine Martin
000 0x5 0x11 0x3 0x16cee000 [42984014.51] fix_range_common: failed, killing current process Antoine Martin wrote: > Just caught this in `dmesg` > > [42977596.52] Adding 131064k swap on /dev/ubdb. Priority:-1 > extents:1 across:131064k > [42980169.29] do_s

[uml-devel] do_syscall_stub: syscall 9 failed

2007-01-30 Thread Antoine Martin
, which is why I added the swap, now it may still not have enough (compilation crashed in a similar manner) but this time there is no OOM message. Any ideas what this is? Cheers Antoine - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence

Re: [uml-devel] Thread (NPTL?) support, 2.6.20-rc5-git3, x86_64, reproducible segmentation fault and possible culprit

2007-01-29 Thread Antoine Martin
en > shared object file: No such file or directory I think that's because glibc 2.5 does not support kernel 2.4, it only supports nptl (unfortunately). Antoine - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-22 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:46:12PM +0000, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Finally someone confirms what I have been seeing for ages! >> Maybe the devs can find out what is going on now... > > OK, can someone give me access to a box where this is happening? Sure th

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-21 Thread Antoine Martin
rors with the same kernels, I wouldn't completely discard the possibility that glibc has something to do with this. Also, there was a report today that *_FS_SECURITY is causing problems. Do you happen to have *_FS_SECURITY options switched on (on the host)? Antoine > Strace says: > >

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-21 Thread Antoine Martin
as compiled with -O um) > gdb>run ubd0=/var/opt/FedoraCore5-AMD64-root_fs eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.0.117 > after first trap in gdb > gdb>handle SIGUSR1 pass nostop noprint > from than on its strait gdb, tell me if you need a script for loading symbols > of kernel modules. That wou

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-19 Thread Antoine Martin
Antoine Martin wrote: >>>> I have downgraded the x86 boxes to 2.6.15.7 and these are up and >>>> running again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just >>>> not an option for some of the amd64 boxes. >>> >>> My setup is: &

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-19 Thread Antoine Martin
#x27;t static - glibc should be similar since we're using Gentoo amd64) If that still does not work then I can be certain that it is something to do with the host. Thanks Antoine BTW, anyone know if UML guests are compatible with exec-shield? -

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-19 Thread Antoine Martin
and running >> again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just not an >> option for some of the amd64 boxes. > > My setup is: Thanks for that. That is very similar to mine. I don't think this has anything to do with the guest...

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-19 Thread Antoine Martin
has not changed. I've tried all the versions you can find on: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/kernels/ And some of Blaisorblade's kernels too (>2.6.15 as I need TLS) Any ideas? Anyone? Antoine - Take Surveys. Earn Ca

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-19 Thread Antoine Martin
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:00 +0000, Antoine Martin wrote: >> Is anyone else having stability problems on AMD64? Or am I the only one >> using it? >> Not only is x86 UML broken on AMD64, I am also getting (seemingly) >> random crashes runnin

[uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-19 Thread Antoine Martin
use latest glibc) * amd64 unable to run x86 guests * amd64 unable to run amd64 guests reliably ... Antoine - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get

Re: [uml-devel] UML/64bit is miscompiled by gcc 4.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS

2007-01-17 Thread Antoine Martin
Don't know if that helps, but here it is: (sysrq t on 2.6.20-rc5): [42949400.26] SysRq : Show State [42949400.26] [42949400.26] free sibling [42949400.26] task PCstack pid father child younger older [42949400.26] ksoftirqd/0 S B7

Re: [uml-devel] UML/64bit is miscompiled by gcc 4.0.3 on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS

2007-01-17 Thread Antoine Martin
ts on 64-bit hosts (the same binaries that used to work before - statically compiled). The boot stops very early during the "checking ptrace" step. Antoine - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Joi

Re: [uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host

2006-09-06 Thread Antoine Martin
C mmap in /tmp/...OK Checking for the skas3 patch in the host: - /proc/mm...not found - PTRACE_FAULTINFO...not found - PTRACE_LDT...not found UML running in SKAS0 mode remove_umid_dir - actually_do_remove failed with err = -2 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Antoine Martin w

[uml-devel] virtual framebuffer device visible on host

2006-09-06 Thread Antoine Martin
primitives that a framebuffer device provides? Antoine - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM

Re: [uml-devel] User-mode-linux-devel Digest, Vol 3, Issue 35

2006-08-28 Thread Antoine Martin
ple have coughed up resources, time > and support for the project over the past several years. While a more > organized approach is in order, it doesn't mean that you can't trust > anyone besides Jeff. Again, I agree... Antoine

[uml-devel] 2.6.17-rc1 with hardened gcc

2006-04-03 Thread Antoine Martin
e. I guess this isn't really that important since TT is going to go away. Finally, congratulations! all the images I have built now work - even fedora (4 and 5) and opensuse. Antoine signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [uml-devel] Re: TLS support - status - need for re-testing

2006-03-24 Thread Antoine Martin
kern.c. I couldn't figure out in which order I need to apply these (no series file) and I've ran out of time. Antoine signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[uml-devel] Re: TLS support - status - need for re-testing

2006-03-23 Thread Antoine Martin
ib/tls moved out of the way, so I assume that glibc uses tls and all these images seem to work fine. > More important: has anyone tested that? I thought i had... but maybe not. Antoine --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groun

[uml-devel] new filesystem images

2006-03-08 Thread Antoine Martin
new Honeypot images - avoid those. Also, do not use FC4-x86, this one still has a problem with TLS. Do let me know of any problems. Antoine PS: here is the problem with FC4-x86: Setting hostname localhost: [ OK ] set_thread_area failed when setting up thread-local storage /etc/rc.d/rc.sys

[uml-devel] 2.6.15-rc1 Badness in handle_page_fault

2006-01-16 Thread Antoine Martin
fork_handler returned -2 [45512109.94] load_TLS(O_FORCE) in fork_handler returned -2 [45512113.30] uml_net_start_xmit: failed(-1) [45512116.58] load_TLS(O_FORCE) in fork_handler returned -2 Antoine --- This SF.net email is

[uml-devel] 2.6.15 is out (and here is a skas3 patch for it)

2006-01-03 Thread Antoine Martin
There were some trivial merge problems when using the 2.6.14 patch. Here is the same patch but without any offsets: http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/skas-2.6.15-v9-pre7.patch.bz2 Antoine --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep

[uml-devel] Re: Ho ho ho.. Linux 2.6.15-rc7

2005-12-27 Thread Antoine Martin
\; As some of the patches may leave empty files behind. Antoine --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as

Re: [uml-devel] Re: pcap cross-linking [PATCH]

2005-12-20 Thread Antoine Martin
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:01 -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 19 December 2005 12:33, Antoine Martin wrote: > > Yep, it's a shame compartment does not ship with all distros. > > chroot without su is pointless (since you can use 'chroot-again' to > > escape

Re: [uml-devel] Re: pcap cross-linking [PATCH]

2005-12-20 Thread Antoine Martin
3.4.4/../../../libpcap.a I thought the '-m32' would force it to try to find the 32 bit version? So in the end the only way to get it to build is to copy the library to /usr/lib32... no patch needed. Antoine --- This SF.net email is sp

Re: [uml-devel] Re: pcap cross-linking [PATCH]

2005-12-19 Thread Antoine Martin
> > So I added this statement to the Makefile (patch attached) and now all > > is well: > > +ifeq ($(SUBARCH),i386) > > +LDFLAGS_pcap.o := -r /usr/lib32/libpcap.a > > +else ahh, so this is the right way to find the lib... (cool) > $ gcc -print-file-name=libpcap.a > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [uml-devel] skas3 (almost) works on amd64?

2005-12-19 Thread Antoine Martin
skas3 is still much faster than skas0... no hard figures though. Antoine --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log fil

[uml-devel] Re: pcap cross-linking [PATCH]

2005-12-19 Thread Antoine Martin
t. > Also, I see you're using SeLinux. I don't know anything about its library > handling, and possibly it's going to make the story more difficult. It can do that... but the good thing is that it can be disabled. > However, > strace/ltrace as suggested above should diag

[uml-devel] skas3 (almost) works on amd64?

2005-12-18 Thread Antoine Martin
e(PTRACE_SYSCALL, 23866, 0, SIG_0) = 0 --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) --- full log here (700MB/840KB) The kernels were built using vanilla gcc-3.4.4, and the tests were repeated on 2 separate platforms (gentoo 2005.1 and FC4) - selinux was disabled for the tests. Antoine -

[uml-devel] hpps

2005-12-18 Thread Antoine Martin
Paolo, What is the state of hppfs? You sent 12 patches in September, and there was some discussion with Al Viro about some of the patches (but no new patches) Can I try to apply them to 2.6.14? Thanks Antoine --- This SF.net email is

[uml-devel] pcap cross-linking

2005-12-18 Thread Antoine Martin
7;t show me anything missing. Any ideas? Thanks Antoine --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing

[uml-devel] [PATCH] Re: 2.4.32-bs2

2005-12-11 Thread Antoine Martin
/usr/lib32 to guarantee that the libs are exactly the same? (and add a 32bit bash, gcc, make...) > > I'll send a patch when the whole thing works. > > The patch is for review, and please don't send any whole patch on the ML - Sure, I meant just the diffs with 2.4.28-bs2! Ant

[uml-devel] Re: 2.4.32-bs2

2005-12-11 Thread Antoine Martin
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 17:47 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Thursday 08 December 2005 03:10, Antoine Martin wrote: > > All, > > > > Talking about tty logging and fake ide reminded of the current state of > > UML on 2.4 kernels: > > http://uml.nagafix.co.u

Re: [uml-devel] tls: set_thread_area failed

2005-12-10 Thread Antoine Martin
um/drivers/pcap_user.o -m elf_i386 -r /usr/lib32/libpcap.a /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/../../../../lib/libpcap.a Otherwise it moans about linking 64-bit libs with 32-bit... which is fair enough I guess. Antoine --- This SF.n

Re: [uml-devel] tls: set_thread_area failed

2005-12-09 Thread Antoine Martin
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 18:52 +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Thursday 08 December 2005 03:13, Antoine Martin wrote: > > I'm still trying to get a regular FC4 image to boot with the latest x86 > > tls support code. > Mainline kernel or with jdike patchset? Latest jdike fr

Re: [uml-devel] testing of 2.6.15-rc1+patches and 2.6.15-rc3 x86 guests on amd64 host

2005-12-07 Thread Antoine Martin
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 23:01 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:35:14PM +0000, Antoine Martin wrote: > > [42951313.91] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode signal 7 > > Did your /tmp fill up? > > > * Now, with 2.6.15-rc3 it does not boot

[uml-devel] tls: set_thread_area failed

2005-12-07 Thread Antoine Martin
I'm still trying to get a regular FC4 image to boot with the latest x86 tls support code. (since Gentoo works fine) but this is what I get: # fsck.ext3 -a /dev/ubda set_thread_area failed when setting up thread-local storage Segmentation fault Is this glibc? Any ideas? Thanks An

[uml-devel] 2.4.32-bs2

2005-12-07 Thread Antoine Martin
: *** [mk_sc.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/uml/kernels/src/linux-2.4.32-bs2/arch/um/sys-i386/util' make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/util/mk_sc] Error 2 Any ideas? Antoine Here is the modified Makefile $ cat linux-2.4.32-bs2/arch/um/kernel/tt/Makefile # # Copyright (C) 2002 - 2003 Jeff

[uml-devel] fakehd and tty logging

2005-12-06 Thread Antoine Martin
ts re-added to 2.6 then I would probably want to use both features for honeypots. "The fakehd switch lost its implementation at some point. Since no one is screaming for it, we might as well remove it." Please please please (not screaming

[uml-devel] Re: Stop the insanity

2005-12-01 Thread Antoine Martin
27; make[2]: *** [arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/skas] Error 2 make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2 (I used the files that worked on gcc4 to make sure I did not make a mistake merging it) I haven't booted into the GCC4 one, but there is no reason why it wouldn

[uml-devel] Re: Stop the insanity

2005-12-01 Thread Antoine Martin
: *** [arch/um/kernel/skas/clone.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/skas] Error 2 > make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2 After switching to gcc-vanilla it compiles fine... (both with 3.3.6 and 3.4.4) Later I will try all the gcc profiles to try to identify which hardened patches cause the proble

  1   2   >