Note - this is *not* an official vote thread, hence it not also going to
incubator@. This is an informal preliminary to the official release vote.
I've cut the first attempt at a viable RC for 1.6.1-incubating. The bits
we'll end up voting on are in
http://people.apache.org/~abayer/jclouds-1.6.1-i
Oh crap, I forgot one key part - the release notes. silkysun, how do we
generate those?
A.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Note - this is *not* an official vote thread, hence it not also going to
> incubator@. This is an informal preliminary to the official releas
fwiw, here are the list of JIRAs changed in this release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12324412&styleName=Html&projectId=12314430
A.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Oh crap, I forgot one key part - the release notes. silkysun
l be happy to
> read through the commit history and draft a copy. Sound good?
>
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Bayer >wrote:
>
> > fwiw, here are the list of JIRAs changed in this release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/s
I have absolutely no sense of aesthetics, so I'm not the right person to
ask in re: navigability and aesthetics in general, but I do have two
requests:
- Increase the font size of the text on pages - it's just too small to read
on a big monitor without blowing up the page considerably.
- There sho
tion of
> the release notes [1]?
>
> Everett
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12324412&styleName=Html&projectId=12314430
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> Sounds good - I'll open a JIRA for f
fyi, the release doesn't go to sonatype any more - we have the vote here,
and then we release it on Apache's Maven repo manager, and then it syncs
from there to central.
A.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Becca Wood wrote:
> jclouds Version 1.6.1 Release Notes WIP.
> https://wiki.apache.org/jc
+1 to the thread, if you're a committer,
you should say something like "+1 (non-binding, PPMC)" to make it easier to
distinguish between non-binding votes and the binding votes from IPMC
members.
A.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Note - this is *not* an o
The Apache jclouds (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
jclouds 1.6.1-incubating.
This is the first Apache release of jclouds. Apache jclouds is a cloud
agnostic library that enables developers to access a variety of supported
cloud providers using one API.
The source archives
So, this came up on IRC and it seems like it should be proposed here on the
list. =)
We should have a regular release cadence, at least for maintenance releases
of the current stable release (i.e., currently, the 1.6.x train). That will
let us be sure of roughly how long it'll be before a fix is a
So this is still a little tentative, because I've still got some formal
process to go through, but...
I'm pleased to announce the first Apache jclouds meetup (not the first
jclouds meetup, not by a long shot, but...well, yeah!) to be held in San
Francisco, at Cloudera's offices in the Financial Di
And we're not tentative any more - 5:30-8pm, Cloudera's offices on the 11th
floor of 433 California St., Monday, July 8. =)
A.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> So this is still a little tentative, because I've still got some formal
> process to go th
FYI, roadmap wiki is now a table - when adding a feature, please put any
JIRAs related to it in there and the status of work on the feature.
A.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> So, this came up on IRC and it seems like it should be proposed here on
> the list. =)
>
> I've also put up a wiki page for
> collecting roadmap ideas/concrete plans/etc -
> https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/1.7.0%20Roadmap
>
>
> Why use the wiki for this? Why not use the Roadmap feature in JIRA [1]?
> Isn't that what it's for?
>
> If we put it in the wiki, then we've got to manage t
ache-incubator-47600.html
>
> On Jun 24, 2013, at 6:30 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> And we're not tentative any more - 5:30-8pm, Cloudera's offices on the 11th
> floor of 433 California St., Monday, July 8. =)
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer
FYI. I'm moving github.com/jclouds/jclouds.github.com to
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-jclouds-site at ASF now.
The old repo will still be there, but there'll be a new repo,
github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site, which will be the mirror of the ASF repo,
and the one we'll use for pull
Ok, this is taking some history rewriting to get rid of an anomalous 200+mb
test output file from 1.3.0-rc2 that was overwritten shortly anyway. =)
A.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> FYI. I'm moving github.com/jclouds/jclouds.github.com to
> https://git-wip-us
I tried to get elegant. It failed. So say goodbye
to documentation/releasenotes/1.3.0-output/eucalyptus-partnercloud-s3.txt
on all versions. =)
A.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Ok, this is taking some history rewriting to get rid of an anomalous
> 200+mb test
Alright, that took a bunch of stupid work, but now it's mirroring properly,
and I'm moving jclouds/jclouds.github.com to jclouds/
legacy-jclouds.github.com.
A.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> I tried to get elegant. It failed. So say goodbye
>
Don't think so, no. I believe that's the case for all the ASF git repos.
A.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Everett Toews
wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>
> > FYI. I'm moving github.com/jclouds/jclouds.github.com to
> > https:
Yeah, keypairs in CloudStack are basically borked in 1.6.0 in a bunch of
ways. It should be a lot better in 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT - see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-106. Give that a try -
remember that you'll need to use the ASF snapshot repo at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repos
Will take a look this weekend.
A.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Jim Glennon
wrote:
> Hi Adrian, i'd forgotten about this. it's now become a priority for us.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-195
>
> ~jim
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
>
>> Hi, Jim.
I don't know of anyone currently working on the Terremark support - but we
happily take patches! =)
A.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Kedar Dave wrote:
> It seems Terremark implementation is still on v2.8 api from Terremark
> which seems to be long deprecated and now discontinued. Is there a
Rate limit on EC2 should improve in 1.6.2-incubating - I made a few changes
that should cut down on the number of calls it makes, etc, that help from
hitting the rate limit in the first place, and it's correctly using
BackoffLimitedRetryHandler to delay/retry when it does hit rate limits.
Give the
Yeah, that looks like a very definite bug.
A.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> I'm confused as to the differences between the 2 ways to create a security
>> rule below:
>>
>
> Please let us know where in the docs you are finding this, and which
> version of jclouds you
Hmm. Could you open a JIRA for this at https://issues.apache.org? I'll dig
into it.
A.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Mohan Baruwal Chhetri <
mohanbaru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create an instance on Ninefold using the JClouds API.
>
> ComputeServiceContext computeS
Actually, the filter should be returning every template that's executable,
across all projects, etc...I don't think the project id is the issue, I
think the issue is that your templates aren't marked as executable.
A.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Mohan Baruwal Chhetri <
mohanbaru...@gmail.com
Huh. Ok, I'll dig into it and see I can come up with a way to get
Ninefold's template listings to include both public and private templates.
A.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mohan Baruwal Chhetri <
mohanbaru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I've had a chat with the Ninefold Tech support.
Actually, in 1.6, don't you still need to go the CONTEXT_TOKEN route? i.e.,
EC2Client ec2Client =
computeServiceContext.unwrap(EC2ApiMetadata.CONTEXT_TOKEN).getApi()
I thought unwrapApi wasn't available on async-enabled services...
A.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> H
Hrm - this is something that's annoyed me in the past too. I think you
probably can just do 10 calls to the same template with two instances
each, but it may well not end up in the same group - that's an
implementation detail per-API. But we really should have a way to
throttle maximum number of in
I actually met with Victor from Terremark recently - he was expressing an
interest in working on getting ecloud back working again, but I haven't
heard anything from him since I met him on Thursday...
A.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> Andrew - not sure if this would h
Any interest? It's JavaOne week, so a hackathon/meetup sounds like a good
plan to me. jdaggett mentioned an interest in Rackspace hosting - still up
for that?
A.
w. It'll still be another three weeks or so until the next board
meeting, so we won't be officially graduated until then, but that's all
that's left! Thanks, everyone!
A.
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Andrew Bayer
Date: Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:19
Hi Jim -
We added support for egress rules in master, for 1.7.0 -
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/2c6d8b24797ad87a8653e90db84aa6ebac8e9d67-
I'll see if I can backport it cleanly to 1.6.3, which is coming out
next
month.
A.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Jim Glennon
wrote:
> Adrian,
34 matches
Mail list logo
