Re: jconsole using activemq

2016-09-23 Thread Tim Bain
Does that apply for a hostname of localhost like the OP was using? And can you give more details about exactly what switched, and in what version of the JVM? I'd have expected hostname resolution to be handled by the OS and/or a service like DNS, and that therefore the behavior would be the same

Re: Active MQ Shared File System Master Slave with Elastic File System

2016-09-23 Thread Tim Bain
Thanks for following up on this to make sure that one got created. On Sep 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "wcrowell" wrote: > Thank you!!! I was going to create one if it had not been done already. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4. >

Re: jconsole using activemq

2016-09-23 Thread Matt Pavlovich
The sounds like a hostname to IP resolution. Newer JDK's require a lookup for the hostname to an IP for JMX. Many cloud and VM instances do not set this by default. For example, if you have your hostname vm-123456 1. Add entry to /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 vm-123456 2. Restart the JVM On

Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption

2016-09-23 Thread mlange
Concluded the test now; No good news though. After sending the 100.000 messages (which got consumed by services that in turn also produced new messages and so had a flow from one queue to another and another etc... resulting in about 1.500.000 messages in the few hours that this test ran) I

Re: Active MQ Shared File System Master Slave with Elastic File System

2016-09-23 Thread wcrowell
Did a JIRA issue get created on this? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716847.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ Shared File System Master Slave with Elastic File System

2016-09-23 Thread wcrowell
Thank you!!! I was going to create one if it had not been done already. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716853.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

Re: activemqmessageconsumer duplicate dispatch on connection

2016-09-23 Thread MariscaJane

Re: Active MQ Shared File System Master Slave with Elastic File System

2016-09-23 Thread ishmeister
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6441 If anyone wants to update the ticket, feel free. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716851.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User

Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption

2016-09-23 Thread mlange
possibly of note is that I had the sync option on the default (quorum_mem). I have moved the data directories for each broker as an ".org" (for safekeeping) and will try and see if quorum_disk is the way to prevent this situation from happening. It will take a little while though to get definite

Re: Active MQ Shared File System Master Slave with Elastic File System

2016-09-23 Thread ishmeister
No not yet, but I will do so now. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-with-Elastic-File-System-tp4715818p4716848.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption

2016-09-23 Thread mlange
Yes, the three brokers are on separate (virtual) machines that write to their own disk. It's hard to determine (at this point) whether the original master got corrupted, as it (at least) got corrupted after starting said broker again (or was already corrupted to begin with) -- View this

Re: ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption

2016-09-23 Thread Tim Bain
Just to confirm: your three brokers are writing their LevelDB files to independent, separate disk locations, giving you three separate sets of LevelDB files. Right? Is the original master's set of data files corrupted? Or is it just the two slaves for whom this happened? On Sep 23, 2016 5:44

Re: jconsole using activemq

2016-09-23 Thread Tim Bain
If I remember correctly, you also can skip all the authentication checks by starting JConsole (or JVisualVM) on the same machine as your broker, running as the same user as the broker, and then selecting it from the Local Processes list. Sometimes that's an option, sometime it's not, but it was

Re: jconsole using activemq

2016-09-23 Thread Steve Hill
We ran into many problems getting JMX to work properly in our test environment. We are running two instances on each server in our test environment. We found the following changes got it to work and kept them using independent mbean servers. In the bin/env file add the following (We have it

ActiveMQ ReplicatedLevelDB corruption

2016-09-23 Thread mlange
Recently I installed Apache ActiveMQ in a few different ways. One of those is using ReplicatedLevelDB for a master/slave/slave setup. Yesterday I did a bit of loadtesting: sending 100.000 messages with 100 threads producing the messages (used jmeter for that) (so each thread produced 1000

[CVE-2016-4978] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis: Deserialization of untrusted input vunerability

2016-09-23 Thread Martyn Taylor
Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Apache Artemis 1.0.0, 1.1.0, 1.2.0, 1.3.0 A class implementing the Serializable interface is free to implement the “readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in)” method however it chooses. This readObject method is used

Re: KAHADB clean up old log files

2016-09-23 Thread lichtin
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6440 Tim Bain wrote > I was going to write a JIRA enhancement request for that when I had some > free time, but if you have time to write it before I get to it, that would > be fine. Please put the link here if you do. > > On Sep 22, 2016 9:00 AM,