Re: No IP assigned to VM instance even though UI/router says otherwise

Hi Rishi, The systemvm template is not used for user vms. As you have noticed, the network interfaces are configured by cloudstack , dhcp does not work. You can test with the built-in Centos 5 templates. You can also try the templates on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/ (provided by NuxRo) -Wei

No IP assigned to VM instance even though UI/router says otherwise

Hi there, I am trying to understand why a VM instance created by Cloudstack does not get an IP address in "Basic network" configuration. Interestingly, unter the "instances" page UI shows an IP assigned to my VM instance. Furthermore, the router VM adds an entry for my VM/IP in its "/etc/hosts"

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? I think a shared network with vlan=untagged is what you need. You can use an advanced zone or advanced zone with security groups, or even a basic zone. GitHub link:

Guest VM connecting DC NAS

Hi All, The optimum way to get NFS storage on the ACS guest VM is what we're attempting to determine.This test environment is set up for advanced networking on ACS (4.19.1). ACS Portal: 10.10.40.252 NFS server: 10.10.40.250 KVM host: 172.16.0.100 (Have two network interface cards, one for

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Pearl and Ruben, I think the main issue is that both networks (same gateway/cidr but under different accounts) should work. Pearl's idea is good, we can add some steps as below - backup the database - remove a Free IP from `user_ip_address` table - create a shared network with startip/endip =

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

I did not hit the issue with overlapping IP ranges as the network in the destination domain / account was initially created with a different vlan and then they were updated (or swapped) with the VLAN in the source domain. However, I did not test with IPv6.

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Pearl, Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, assignVirtualMachine is an option, but in this case the used network is not accessible by the destination domain/account. Creating the same network twice also doesn't seem like an option due to NetUtils.ipRangesOverlap. It also seems to not be a

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Ruben, Have you tried the 'Assign Instance to Another Account' (assignVirtualMachine API) operation on the stopped VMs. This would help in moving the VM(s) from one domain/account to another. I did a small test to see if we could preserve the IP and it seemed to work but I may be wrong in

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Wei, the use cases may vary. In some cases it will be moved completely to a different domain+account, in other cases not. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:48 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Ruben, > > Will you move all VMs on the network to another account, or just some > of the VMs ? > > -Wei > > On Fri, Apr

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Ruben, Will you move all VMs on the network to another account, or just some of the VMs ? -Wei On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:44 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Thanks Daan :-) Hope there are others with some ideas as well! > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:42 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > ok, from

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Thanks Daan :-) Hope there are others with some ideas as well! On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:42 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, from what I know now I have exhausted my clues. Hope you get your > migration done expediently. > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > > > Hmm, that

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

ok, from what I know now I have exhausted my clues. Hope you get your migration done expediently. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Hmm, that might be possible. However we would like to automate as much as > possible. Changing existing IPs to unused ones is not an option,

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hmm, that might be possible. However we would like to automate as much as possible. Changing existing IPs to unused ones is not an option, no. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:25 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, and you probably can't redistribute the IPs in the domain or > define the order of migration

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

ok, and you probably can't redistribute the IPs in the domain or define the order of migration to be in line with the range? On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:01 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > The target domain already exists with VMs running in it > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:46 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote:

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

The target domain already exists with VMs running in it On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:46 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > so probably a stupoid suggestion, but why ot rename the domain then? > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:04 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > > > Hi Daan, cases may vary. For our first migration in

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

so probably a stupoid suggestion, but why ot rename the domain then? On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:04 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Hi Daan, cases may vary. For our first migration in the end all VMs will > move to the other domain. > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > >

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Daan, cases may vary. For our first migration in the end all VMs will move to the other domain. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Ruben, do you need to move domainA completely to domainB or do you > need to move *some* VMs from it? > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:00 AM

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Ruben, do you need to move domainA completely to domainB or do you need to move *some* VMs from it? On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:00 AM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Hi all, > > We're looking into the following. We are using advanced networking on ACS > 4.16.1 (upgrading soon to 4.18.1). We have a guest

Re: CloudStack management server as a VM on KVM hypervisor

Hi Kapil, It can be done but it's not wise. You'd need to manually start the VM. We run a small Proxmox cluster to host our ACS supporting VMs: management, rabbitmq, influxdb, secondary storage nfs. Kind regards, Ruben Bosch On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:46 AM Kapil Bhuskute wrote: > Hello, >

Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi all, We're looking into the following. We are using advanced networking on ACS 4.16.1 (upgrading soon to 4.18.1). We have a guest network that is assigned to a specific domain A (ROOT/foo/domainA). Now we will need to move VMs from domain A to domain B (ROOT/bar/domainB) while preserving IP

CloudStack management server as a VM on KVM hypervisor

Hello, We need to know about below two possibilities for setting up the cloud stack environment. 1. Can we setup the 'Cloudstack Management Server' as a VM hosted on the same set of KVM hypervisor cluster that we need to manage in CloudStack? 2. How do we recover the cloud stack

Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi Pearl, I think due to download errors from some of the public templates (official linux cloud templates are affected), the migration process stucks is not proceeding. I have deleted these templates and redownloaded them manually. Still, the job is still in status "scheduled". @Jithin:

Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

I've some notes on Debian here - https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c Last time I tested it worked for me. Regards. From: lists Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 13:25 To: users Subject: Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian

Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi Mevludin, Just curious about how you are migrating the secondary storage. Are you using the CloudStack feature to migrate data across secondary storage? So you added a new secondary storage and cloudstack already started syncing the public templates from URLs? -Jithin From: Pearl d'Silva

Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi Mevludin, When migrating data to another secondary store, it only considers private templates and public templates with no url - those which are created from snapshots or volumes. Public templates with URLs are automatically synced(downloaded) on to the newly added secondary store. So, they

Adding S3 secondary storage fails with NullPointerException

Hi all, I got a null pointer exception while adding s3 secondary storage to my Cloudstack cluster. This is related to this exact issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8956 I got a few questions:  - Is there a known workaround for this yet?  - My workaround would be to setup NFS

Cloudstack Zabbix Monitoring

Hi there, Is anyone using Zabbix to monitor the management JAVA processes? I tried to add a JMX interface to the host with the following parameters on management server: -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3344 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false

Re: [D] Define a release schedule for the project [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Define a release schedule for the project @GutoVeronezi points to the more abstract reasons we want to allow breaking changes. We have long had a list of more mondain reasons to introduce breaking changes: - API truly restful -

Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi all, it looks like with every secondary storage migration Cloudstack tries to re-download all templates with URLs instead of simply grabbing the already downloaded template from the old image store. If that's true, how to avoid that behaviour? Mevludin

Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

Hi Ive deployed recent on both 11 and 12. What issue on 12 did you encounter? > > On Apr 25, 2024 at 1:59 PM, Khang Nguyen Phuc > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > I'm a newbie, and I mainly use Debian servers. So I want to deploy > CloudStack on Debian. I've

Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

Hello everyone, I'm a newbie, and I mainly use Debian servers. So I want to deploy CloudStack on Debian. I've experimented with CloudStack 4.19 on Debian 11 , it works fine, but I noticed that CloudStack doesn't officially support Debian (CloudStack's documentation recommends using Ubuntu or

Re: Recommended method of generating SystemVM images for new arch?

Hi Rishi You can follow this mailing list discussion to generate systemvm template for different arch https://lists.apache.org/list?users@cloudstack.apache.org:2023-1:Cloudstack%20on%20arm64%20and%20packer%20build%20systemvmtemplate%20success Regards Kiran From: Rishi Misra Date: Wednesday,

Recommended method of generating SystemVM images for new arch?

Hi there, Is there a recommended way of generating SystemVM images for new architecture? I tried using build.sh but I'm not sure if there is an easy way of doing it since packer may require tweaking on archs for it to

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user outbackdingo added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release good to know, be interesting to see 8.3 and CS working GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9214727 This is an automatically sent email for

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user ydirson added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release xo-lite should not have any impact, it's just another client of the same API GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9214408 This is an automatically sent

Re: [D] Define a release schedule for the project [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: Define a release schedule for the project Hello guys, Thanks @JoaoJandre for raising the discussion. Many might understand the benefits and the necessity of having a well-defined versioning schema; however, I feel that it is

Re: [D] Enhancing CloudStack Management UI Accessibility with Keyboard Shortcuts [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Enhancing CloudStack Management UI Accessibility with Keyboard Shortcuts Good to hear @apurv-1 - after struggling to get your PR in, we abandoned our own effort mainly due to support with vue3 and latest ant-d. If you're up for

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release Good to hear! It's been a while since xcp-ng had a release. If it is backward compatible wrt API, usage and guest OS then adding support would be a straightforward entry in the hypervisor support

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user outbackdingo added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release not sure how their xoa lite will affect it, as its on and installed by default on 8.3, anyway willing to test GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9213608

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user shwstppr edited a comment on the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release We may need to add some changes for hypervisor support, similar to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4672 (maybe part of it). But this will be done after release in my opinion. GitHub link:

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release We may need to add some changes for hypervisor support, similar to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4672 (maybe part of it) GitHub link:

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user ydirson added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release No API breakage, only introduction of new APIs for new functionalities (e.g. vTPM) GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9209551 This is an automatically

Re: Microvms Firecracker integration with ACS

anyone? maybe facing the need to implement microvms? Atte, Ricardo Pertuz On 21 Apr 2024 at 7:10 AM -0500, Ricardo Pertuz , wrote: > Hey Community, > > Has anyone been able to integrate ACS with Firecracker or is it something on > the roadmap?. Thanks > > BR, > > Ricardo

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release Are there any api changes? As far as I understand version 8.3 should work as long as the used api calls are still working. GitHub link:

Re: Move VM to other account

Hi Wei, I’m using 4.19.0.1 > Please check the network, server/disk offerings, templates, etc Well, since I just enrolled them from a template, I removed them from the domain account, logged in as the customer (was a new account so I knew the password), and enrolled it exactly the same way as I

Cloudstack Zabbix Monitoring

Hi there, Is anyone using Zabbix to monitor the management JAVA processes? I tried to add a JMX interface to the host with the following parameters on management server: -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3344 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false

Re: Move VM to other account

Indeed, this needs to be improved. Which cloudstack version do you use ? Please check the network, server/disk offerings, templates, etc Kind regards, Wei On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:48 PM Jimmy Huybrechts wrote: > > Hi, > > I mentioned it before but again running in the same issue with a

Move VM to other account

Hi, I mentioned it before but again running in the same issue with a different account.. how to see WHY an account cannot be moved to a different account. 2024-04-23 12:34:22,614 ERROR [o.a.c.a.c.a.v.AssignVMCmd] (qtp1789718525-7698:ctx-b0881a99 ctx-be595b24) (logid:2fe13e1b) Failed to move

Re: How to force NFSv4 in ACS

Hi Henrique! And what do I do in the case of Second Storage VM? How do I get the secondary storage to be mounted on the SSVM? On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 3:21 AM wrote: > Hello, Murilo. > > When NFS primary storage is created on ACS, it is mounted on hosts with > the environment settings, which

Re: Router has failing health checks -System Alerts

You can go to the "Health checks" tab in the VR page, it will tell you the free space in the VR. -Wei On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:28 AM Raghava Yerubandi wrote: > > Hello Community, > > We are getting a system alert stating that *Router > 360417e0-48a7-4467-9098-0cac656da27a has failing

Router has failing health checks -System Alerts

Hello Community, We are getting a system alert stating that *Router 360417e0-48a7-4467-9098-0cac656da27a has failing checks: disk_space_check.py *in our environment. Can anyone suggest to me what the problem is & where we can troubleshoot it. we are using ACS - 4.16

Re: AMD Processor support in compute offering

Hi. Normally, you either sponsor it or develop it. This is how CloudStack works. Every function in CS was developed and sponsored by some individual or company. Also, I think that required functionality is already there. At least Qemu hooks probably enable it. Пн, 22 апр. 2024 г. в 08:11,

RE: How to force NFSv4 in ACS

Hello, Murilo. When NFS primary storage is created on ACS, it is mounted on hosts with the environment settings, which can be customized via /etc/nfsmount.conf. Could you add the following lines to this file and check if it works? [ NFSMount_Global_Options ] vers=4.0 timeo=1800 Best regards,

AW: Monitoring Cloudstack

Take a look at this: https://www.shapeblue.com/monitoring-apache-cloudstack-hypervisors/ ShapeBlue published a nice White Paper about it. Regards, Swen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Marty Godsey Gesendet: Samstag, 20. April 2024 08:22 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org Betreff:

RE: RVR's in master/master state

Thanks Wei That was the article I was following for troubleshooting - proved to be very useful. In our case even though the multicast config was present and correct on the switches it has just stopped working after the power outage. Re-applying the multicast switch config immediately restored

Re: Storage pool stucks in initialized

Hi Wei, yes it is, an all hosts. What makes me wonder is if Cloudstack would automatically enable the storage pool if it is configured on all hosts or do I have to manually remove the DB entry and remove the pool of the hosts and retry. Mevludin Am 22.04.2024 um 09:18 schrieb Wei ZHOU:

Re: Storage pool stucks in initialized

Hi, Please check if package "libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-rbd" has been installed on all hosts -Wei On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:16 AM Mevludin Blazevic wrote: > > Hi all, > > I tried to add a second Zone-wide storage pool (Ceph-RBD), which fails > with notification "Request failed". The

Storage pool stucks in initialized

Hi all, I tried to add a second Zone-wide storage pool (Ceph-RBD), which fails with notification "Request failed". The strange thing is that only some KVM host have added the storage pool and some did not. In addition, no erros or exception were logged in the management-server logs. Are there

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland edited a comment on the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I didn't know about the stacktrace limit option, that is good. > Another point is that we would have to change the whole code base to comply > with this standard. This is true what ever we decide,

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I didn't know about the stacktrace limit option, that is good. > Another point is that we would have to change the whole code base to comply > with this standard. This is true what ever we decide, but

AMD Processor support in compute offering

Hi Team, Since the AMD new release of GPU cards AMD Instinct™ MI300X GPU Data, we would like to add the GPU support for these AMD M1300X cards to offer GPU related services to our end customers. Any possibilities of this card support in the upcoming releases? If possible any ETA is fine for our

Re: Monitoring Cloudstack

Hello, It depends, For OS parameters you can use any agent based i.e zabbix, for cloudstack specific parameters you can use API calls and integrated with any existing monitoring tools. i.e host disconnection status, agent state status, cluster and host utilisation, if any disk is migration

Microvms Firecracker integration with ACS

Hey Community, Has anyone been able to integrate ACS with Firecracker or is it something on the roadmap?. Thanks BR, Ricardo

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

Thank you all for your thoughtful response. Rohit, I did try Option 2 with limited success. The architecture I was targeting was `s390x` and it did give me some ideas on how it can work. Creating a systemvm template for this arch was tricky as Debian 12 s390x image and cloud init scripts had

Re: RVR's in master/master state

Hi Gary, Thanks for the sharing I recall a similar issue caused by a multicast configuration (not the same): https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7838#issuecomment-1722697352 anyone facing the similar issue could check the multicast configurations. Kind regards, Wei On Fri, Apr 19,

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user slavkap added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled Hi all, KVMHAMonitor is initialized when the agent host is started (without knowing if HA is enabled/disabled). It is used either when Host HA is enabled to check the host. If

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when the > host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA setting > is disabled in

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user adidiborg added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @sbrueseke, We are also facing similar issue, but as per our logs ( on all KVM ) we are only seeing below log lines - ``` Feb 19 12:01:08 kvm-2 java[9465]: WARN

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke edited a discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) # ISSUE TYPE * Bug Report # COMPONENT NAME ~~~ HA ~~~ # CLOUDSTACK VERSION ~~~ 4.19.0 ~~~ # CONFIGURATION # OS / ENVIRONMENT #

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > @weizhouapache I would suggest to take another look into that and change it > default. In my opinion a host should not automatically reboot at all if no > settings are

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > afaik, this has 0 things to do with host HA, VM HA or anything else. This > scrip (kvmspheartbeat.sh) has been there for last 12 years (that I'm aware > of) - and it only

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @sbrueseke , I beg to differ, when storage can not be reached all VMs will be running on read-only disks from there on in. This means the hosts is useless and VMs need to

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > > > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts > > > > > when the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when > > > > > any

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts > > > > when the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when > > > > any HA setting

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @weizhouapache I would suggest to take another look into that and change it default. In my opinion a host should not automatically reboot at all if no settings are configured.

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled afaik, this has 0 things to do with host HA, VM HA or anything else. This scrip (kvmspheartbeat.sh) has been there for last 12 years (that I'm aware of) - and it only checks

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when > > > the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA > > > setting is

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user dseralathan added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled heartbeat[13962]: kvmheartbeat.sh will reboot system because it was unable to write the heartbeat to the storage. I received the same error when my Primary NFS Storage was in

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > > @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when > > the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA > > setting is disabled

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @DaanHoogland now I am confused! Why is KVMHAMonitor rebooting hosts when the host is unable to write a heartbeat file to any storage when any HA setting is disabled in the UI?

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled > @sbrueseke are you addressing (designing/implementing a solution to) this bug? I'm not deep enough into the topic to suggest a solution. We noticed the bug because we were

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled Hey @sbrueseke , I finally got a chance to look at this again.If you are using NFS this is how it is supposed to work , I think. If you are using LinStor, see the merged PR

Re: [D] KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled @sbrueseke are you addressing (designing/implementing a solution to) this bug? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8953#discussioncomment-9174417

Re: RVR's in master/master state

thanks Gary, good te hear On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 6:20 PM Gary Dixon wrote: > Hi Daan > > Sorry - I forgot to post back what the issue turned out to be. > > We had a power outage in our building where our Dev environment is racked. > After doing some tcp dumps on some vxlan interfaces I was

Monitoring Cloudstack

Hello all. What ways do you guys monitor your Cloudstack servers? SNMP, API, etc?..

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

Hi Rishi, There may be approaches you can consider; 1. Arch-specific cluster: CloudStack assumes clusters are homogenous; so you can start with arch-specific cluster - one cluster of x86 hosts and another one of arm64, within the same zone. You'll then need to decide which arch you want to

Re: Community Over Code North America 2024 - Talk submitting

Hello guys, I discussed with the responsibles and it was decided that the CloudStack talks will not be targeted to an individual track; however, the track "Cloud and runtime" was renamed to "CloudStack, Cloud, and Runtime", due to our expressiveness in it, and we will be co-chairing this

Re: Deployment of VNF appliance without VR

Hmm Interesting. Thanks Alex. Will try it out. Regards, Shiv (Sent from mobile device. Please excuse brevity and typos.) On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, 21:10 Alex Mattioli, wrote: > You can set your upstream router with a static ARP entry for the public > IP, this way if your user changes the IP they'll

RE: RVR's in master/master state

Hi Daan Sorry - I forgot to post back what the issue turned out to be. We had a power outage in our building where our Dev environment is racked. After doing some tcp dumps on some vxlan interfaces I was seeing lots of bad checksums. Our Network engineer swore that the switches we're all OK

Re: [D] logging standards in CloudStack [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: logging standards in CloudStack I believe that adding an error message in `ERROR` followed by the stack trace in `DEBUG` is not so interesting. For instance, if we have the `INFO` level enabled and an exception occurs, we would not

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

different clusters should be fine. maybe @Rohit Yadav can give some advice. -Wei On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > > good point Rishi, > I think you would have to separate the hardware into different > clusters at least, but maybe even separate zones. I never heard of >

RE: Deployment of VNF appliance without VR

You can set your upstream router with a static ARP entry for the public IP, this way if your user changes the IP they'll simply lose their own connectivity. Should be quite easy to automate. -Original Message- From: K B Shiv Kumar Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 4:30 PM To:

Re: Backup options

looks like you've been quite complete in your sumup Jimmy On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 3:41 AM Jimmy Huybrechts wrote: > > Hi, > > What are the current backup options that work with Cloudstack? > > - Veeam enterprise > - Networker > - Backroll > > The above I found, backroll seems to not be very

Re: ManageIQ + CloudStack

Piotr, sounds good. Are you willing to propose and mentor this effort? On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:26 AM Piotr Pisz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an idea that could be implemented as part of GSOC 2024. > > > > We currently use vSphere+Automation Center for internal purposes, but we > plan to

Re: CloudStack managing KVM Hypervisors on multiple architectures?

good point Rishi, I think you would have to separate the hardware into different clusters at least, but maybe even separate zones. I never heard of anybody doing a setup like yours. On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 6:56 PM Rishi Misra wrote: > > Can a CloudStack instance running on x86 manage deployments

Re: Deployment of VNF appliance without VR

Hi Wei, The main concern with that solution is how do we prevent the user from going into the VNF and changing the public IP. That can cause an ARP clash and bring down someone else's system too. That's the only and very major drawback in that solution. Was wondering if there's any workaround for

Re: RVR's in master/master state

sorry no one could help you Gary, Have you gotten any further on this issue? On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:59 PM Gary Dixon wrote: > HI all > > > > ACS 4.15.2 > > Ubuntu 20.04 > > KVM > > Adv Zone no sec groups > > > > We recently had to move all of our dev ACS environment virtual management > and

Re: Deployment of VNF appliance without VR

Hi, You can deploy the VNF appliance on a shared network as the first network -Wei On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 3:38 PM Kaushik Bora wrote: > > Dear Community, > > > >We have been going through the VNF appliance deployment which is > available in release 4.19.0. We have successfully tested the

Deployment of VNF appliance without VR

Dear Community, We have been going through the VNF appliance deployment which is available in release 4.19.0. We have successfully tested the VNF deployment scenario with the Virtual Router. However, want to evaluate if the VNF appliance can be deployed without the Virtual Router as well,

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.2.0

The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of CloudStack 4.18.2.0. The CloudStack 4.18.2.0 release is a maintenance release as part of its 4.18.x LTS branch and contains around 100 fixes and improvements since the CloudStack 4.18.1.0 release. Some of the highlights include:

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >