t must include
the release process discussion.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 9/8/25 10:56, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All - this thread is NOT about versioning scheme or releases process.
For those who want tl;dr - this thread is only about LTS release support
timeline, extending the supp
Hello, Rajiv
CloudStack does not have a set release schedule policy, despite many
efforts to create one. We are about to release version 4.21, and the
planning for 4.22 has already started, but the precise release date for
the next "major" is not set.
In any case, the general idea is: if you
+1
On 7/16/25 09:41, Daan Hoogland wrote:
This is a vote to implement changes as proposed in [1] and defined in
[2]. This is part of the retirement process as defined in [3]. The
plan is to do the final removal in the next major release if no
maintainer volunteers. Note however that Oracle Linux
Congratulations Bernardo !
On 7/16/25 04:28, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
invited Bernardo to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
that they have accepted.
Please join us in welcoming Bernardo to their new role and
responsibi
are shown in the logs during the service
initialization? If possible, could you annex the initialization logs for
the Usage server?
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 5/27/25 10:58, Joann Mõndresku wrote:
Hello.
We tried to enable cloudstack-usage recently, but the management server is
failing
y, if I have missed a storage/volume type that supports
snapshots, please amend my explanation :)
Best regards,
João Jandre.
On 5/15/25 11:59, P, Rajasekar wrote:
Hello Apache CloudStack Community,
I am currently using Apache CloudStack version 4.20 and have a question
regarding sna
atform deal with the hypervisors and keep track of the relevant metadata.
Best regards,
João Jandre.
On 3/10/25 10:57, P, Rajasekar wrote:
Hello Apache CloudStack Community,
Thank you, João Jandre , for your quick response.
I wanted to let you know that I have submitted a feature request here
There was a "time" missing here :-)
On 3/7/25 09:41, João Jandre wrote:
Also, I believe that there is still to apply your idea to GSoC.
/html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainFSFreeze),
this should not be too hard to implement for KVM. I'm not sure about Xen
or VMware though.
You could raise an issue on the Github to request this feature. Also, I
believe that there is still to apply your idea to GSoC.
Best regards,
J
Thank you, everyone!
I hope I'm able to live up to your expectations as a new PMC member :)
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 2/27/25 13:47, Pearl Dsilva wrote:
Congratulations João!
Regards,
Pearl
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:12 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee
Congratulations Fabricio!!!
On 2/13/25 06:28, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited
Fabricio to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they
have accepted.
Please join us in welcoming Fabricio to their new role and
responsib
Congratulations Jithin!!
Best regards,
João
On 2/5/25 10:18, Daan Hoogland wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Jithin Raju (rajujith) to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that they have accepted.
Jithin has been a long time CloudStac
Hello Suresh, all
I'm +1 with you as RM for 4.21.
Regarding the schedule, for the project's standards, it is an early
release with only 6 months apart from the last minor (our average is
around 9 months if I'm not mistaken). However, I'm for it, I believe
that a shorter release cycle would be
rings that are specific to those domains.
You can check my last email to see how to create a offering dedicated to
a domain.
Best regards,
João Jandre.
On 12/12/24 09:19, Ahmed Awlaqi wrote:
Hi João,
If I go with option 2 where I set tags on the compute offerings and hosts,
is there any w
However, I would go with the cluster
dedication route.
Best regards,
João Jandre
[1]:https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.20.0.0/adminguide/host_and_storage_tags.html
On 12/12/24 08:53, Ahmed Awlaqi wrote:
I don't see any option to dedicate a compute offering. Can you share p
# Apache CloudStack LTS Release 4.20.0.0
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of
CloudStack 4.20.0.0.
Apache CloudStack 4.20 is the most recent release of the cloud
management platform. It comes as a product of extensive contributions
from the development communit
Hello, Ivet
I believe I have sent you the quote and the picture some time ago, maybe
the email got lost?
I'll re-send it to you.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 11/27/24 11:22, Ivet Petrova wrote:
Hi Joao,
I would be happy to help on the blog post for the ACS blog. Do you have some
Hi all,
After 192 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.20.0.0 *passes* with
6 PMC + 5 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
* Boris Stoyanov
* Rohit Yadav
* Daan Hoogland
* Nicolas Vazquez
* Abhishek Kumar
* Suresh Kumar Anaparti
+1 (non binding)
* Bernardo De Marco Gonçalves
* Gabriel Santos
* Rene Pe
Hi, all
Sorry for not realizing CCC was happening now. I'll be extending the
voting for another 120 hours, so the voting will end at Wednesday next
week.
Enjoy the event!
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 11/20/24 09:16, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Indeed, thanks for the effort! I'm on
Hi All,
I've created a 4.20.0.0 release (RC3), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.20.0.0-RC20241119T0854
Commit: 2fe3fcef7c77cf9a1b629c9df3afc0cdb88ad4f6
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at th
Hi all,
I'm ending the voting. We have critical issues which are being worked
on. When those are addressed, we may have another voting.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 10/23/24 05:31, Jithin Raju wrote:
+1
Tested the following:
Instance deploy, expunge
Volume attach
Created VPC
Site to
Hi All,
I've created a 4.20.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.20.0.0-RC20241021T1317
Commit: f66abec51f6c906f9d8089e05c7cb1c5aa2572c8
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at th
Hi Wei,
Apparently there was... We'll fix it and I'll create an RC2 soon.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 10/11/24 10:16, Wei ZHOU wrote:
Hi João, and Daan,
I think there was something wrong in the forward-merge or branches.
For example, I can find the file Qcow2HeaderField.java i
Hi All,
I've created a 4.20.0.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.20.0.0-RC20241011T0947
Commit: cd4acc1fa6219ce0ec5f44978c76bf5b859b98e0
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at th
ure that if you create a
PR someone from the community will help :)
Best Regards,
João Jandre
On 9/10/24 03:35, Piotr Pisz wrote:
Hi,
Is this page:
https://app.transifex.com/ke4qqq/CloudStack_UI
Is the right place to do the translation?
What is the next procedure after completing the exist
days, label as stale.
- After 60 days, close it.
Best regards,
João Jandre.
On 5/2/24 05:35, Rohit Yadav wrote:
I like the general idea but at the same time want to weight in that we also do
the right thing in handle issues and PRs. Sometimes there are genuine issues
and PRs, however, we make
should not happen in the next releases, as
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9385 reworked how procedures
are defined for ACS DBs.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 8/15/24 16:40, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
Hello all,
I've tried to upgrade my cloudstack from 4.19.0.1 to the latest
ng to different MariaDB nodes that are on
the same Galera cluster.
Could you share the value that you configured for db.usage.uri? please
make sure that you are connecting to the cloud_usage DB and not the
cloud DB.
Best regards
João Jandre
On 8/13/24 08:24, Joan g wrote:
Hello Community,
of the other listed OSs.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 6/21/24 08:49, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Related PRs, requesting for review:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8609
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/409
Regards.
From: Nux
ually delete the old
ones on the DB.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 6/18/24 06:31, Nixon Varghese K S wrote:
Hello,
I am using ACS 4.18.0.0v in my production environment, and more than 100
instances, including Kubernetes instances, are running on my setup. The
user interface appears to be stu
otice that the metrics are not being
deleted, you might have to manually delete the old ones on the DB.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 6/18/24 03:40, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
Hello everyone,
Could someone recommend me a way to disable the collection of vm metrics? It is
currently taking a long
Also, does anyone have any "must have" Issues/PRs for 4.20.0.0? If so,
could you share them via this thread or ping me (@JoaoJandre) on Github?
Best Regards,
João Jandre.
On 5/23/24 13:39, Suresh Anaparti wrote:
Hi João Jandre,
I think, it's better to do 4.19.1.0 before 4.20.0
ncept of incremental
snapshots when using KVM as the hypervisor; which tends to be a lot
faster and save storage space.
Best Regards,
João Jandre.
On 5/24/24 04:32, Khang Nguyen Phuc wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for some advice on solutions for backing up VMs running on KVM
in Clouds
,
João Jandre
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of
CloudStack 4.18.2.0.
The CloudStack 4.18.2.0 release is a maintenance release as part of
its 4.18.x LTS branch and contains around 100 fixes and
improvements since the CloudStack 4.18.1.0 release. Some of the
highlights include:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.18.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.18.2.0-RC20240412T0825
Commit: 154566f914c778d448d4ab07b47b2db874bbf982
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at th
Hi all,
To give you an update on the 4.18.2.0 situation: we're finishing the
work on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8897 to fix the
regression found by Rene. We should have a new RC tomorrow.
Best regards,
Joao Jandre
On 4/8/24 17:19, João Jandre Paraquetti wrote:
As Rene
gland wrote:
ok, if it is a regression (introduction of a bug on formerly working
functionality) It would mean a blocker and we can easily respin a new
RC. What do you think @João Jandre Paraquetti ?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:43 AM Rene Peinthor wrote:
Probably neither a blocker or critical, ass
Hi All,
I've created a 4.18.2.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.18.2.0-RC20240405T1541
Commit: 0d19ffa61c76f592c77ea04a982e15e8575ceb45
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at th
, but if you
have any trouble with it, feel free to create an issue on
https://github.com/scclouds/cloudstack-deb-builder so that we can take a
look at it.
Best Regards,
João Jandre
On 3/28/24 08:44, Jimmy Huybrechts wrote:
Hi Ruben,
Even though it being ubuntu 18 on docker, would that work
n
evolve and not be chained to the same features/API/limitation/technical
debts forever.
Furthermore, having a schedule allows us to have a project roadmap, that
outlines the future deprecations, changes and big features.
Best Regards,
João Jandre.
atest/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.html
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 2/16/24 04:12, Bharat Bhushan Saini wrote:
Hi Jithin,
Let me clear my context, for example I am taking 6 cpu cores to run a
instance and I run 2 instance with 6 cpu cores which causes 12 cpu
cores are using at a
e regarding the log4j2 configuration.
Best regards,
João Jandre.
new system VMs start on a given storage, the easiest
solution is to add a tag to your desired storage, and add the same tag
to the system VMs' compute offerings.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 1/29/24 15:41, Piotr Pisz wrote:
Hi,
We migrate resources from the first primary pool to t
Congrats, Alexandre!
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 1/10/24 19:27, Nux wrote:
All,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Alexandre Mattioli to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Alex has been instrumental in many
Hello, Mikko
The snapshot.backup.to.secondary global configuration dictates whether
snapshots will stay on primary storage or will be backed up to secondary
storage.
Best regards,
João Jandre
On 12/29/23 10:50, Mikko Kaipila wrote:
Hi,
It seems that volume snapshot changed into primary
t ACS
considers to be the host's max CPU capability, if you try to create a VM
with a CPU speed higher than that, you'll get an "No destination found
for a deployment for VM instance" error.
About the "Network Rate" parameter, all network traffic will be restricted.
nnection URL, so the first available host is used for all queries,
and if one of the hosts is shut down, it will try to reconnect with the
other on the list. As this mode only connects to a single DB, the
problems referenced by Rohit are avoided. But the failover mechanism is
still in place.
Bes
Hello, Willard
Could you share your whole log4j config file?
I'm asking because the default one will have the following configuration:
This is the only "logger" configuration that is using the SNMP appender
by default. And the package that it is
,
João Jandre (JoaoJandre)
On 06/06/2023 09:06, Rohit Yadav wrote:
João,
Technically, for lazy consensus a vote thread needs three +1 (binding) votes
which are only counted towards a decision or approval [1].
Since there are no objections but concerns shared so far, the PR can be
reviewed, tested
proceed in the PR. Any
remaining issues people might have with the PR can be addressed in the
PR's discussions in github, so that we can finally merge the PR.
Best regards,
João Jandre (JoaoJandre)
On 18/05/2023 17:29, Sidimar Carniel wrote:
Important effort in this work!
[ ] +1 ap
nfiguration upgrade, the new configs will have the same names and same
paths as the old ones, this upgrade has already been tested. All that
users must do when installing the new packages is answer 'yes' when
questioned about upgrading the log4j config.
Best regards,
João Jandre (
llying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Best regards,
João Jandre (JoaoJandre)
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2
[2] https://github.c
d with the proposals.
Best regards,
João Jandre (JoaoJandre)
On 13/05/2023 13:22, Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
The latest news I heard from the reload4j project is that they are now
sponsored by the Sovereign Tech Fund (STF) among other backers [1] so I don't
see any support, maintenance, longevi
In PR #7131 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131) I have
proposed to normalize ACS's loggers, and more importantly, upgrade the
library log4j to log4j2 version 2.19.
Log4j2 has a lot of features that could offer benefits to ACS:
* Async Loggers - performance similar to logging swit
1.24.0, also tested basic operations using k8s.
Best regards,
João Jandre (JoaoJandre)
On 15/02/2023 04:49, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Rohit, I started building them and they should be ready but I haven´t made
them publicly available yet. I'll look at that today
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:46 AM Rohit
56 matches
Mail list logo
