hat the POD has. Have you
> tried this possibility?
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:38 AM, cs user wrote:
>
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > I hadn't tried allocating more VM's until the host gets full. If this
> > feature was available and it was possible to both
on
> an empty host. Addition instances created with this service offering then
> get put onto the same host, rather than looking for other free hosts within
> the same pod."
>
> Have you tried allocating VMs until the host gets full?
>
> What do you want to happe
; You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain.
> Have you tried that?
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, cs user wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest
> version
> > of Cloudstack, i
Hi All,
I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest version
of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch in a particular
pod?
Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, cs user wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Question regarding dedicating a Pod to a
hows you secondary storage mounted there. Don't think hypervisor sees
> NFS
> (even if primary storage and NFS coming from same storage box). Plus,
> while
> doing activities like VM deploy and snapshot things always move from
> secondary to primary via SSVM.
>
>
ng to me, or perhaps a mysql setting? How can I
increase this setting?
Cheers!
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:41 AM, cs user wrote:
> Thanks Makrand, I will take a look at these values, much appreciated!
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Makrand wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
&g
0
>
> --
> Makrand
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, cs user wrote:
>
> > Hi Makrand,
> >
> > Thanks for responding!
> >
> > Yes this does work for us, for small disks. Even with small disks however
> > it seems to take a while, 5 mins or
ors. I'd ask
> someone else to confirm though...
>
> On 8/24/16 7:20 AM, cs user wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Xenserver 6.5, cloudstack 4.5.2. NFS primary storage volumes
> >
> > Lets say I have 1 pod, with 2 clusters, each cluster has its own primary
&g
one cloud zone.
>
> In normal case of moving volume within cluster, Storge XEN motion is what
> it uses.
>
>
>
> --
> Makrand
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM, cs user wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Xenserver 6.5, cloudstack 4.5.2. NFS prima
Hi All,
Xenserver 6.5, cloudstack 4.5.2. NFS primary storage volumes
Lets say I have 1 pod, with 2 clusters, each cluster has its own primary
storage.
If I migrate a volume from one primary storage to the other one, using
cloudstack, what aspect of the environment is responsible for this copy?
r vice versa is not
> supported in Cloudstack. If you are able to do this it’s a bug.
>
>
> Thanks
> Shweta
>
> On 7/4/16, 5:33 PM, "cs user" wrote:
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >This question relates to cloudstack 4.5.2. I know this is a bit behind now
>
Hi Folks,
This question relates to cloudstack 4.5.2. I know this is a bit behind now
but its still quite stable for us :-)
The problem I have is that lets say I do the following:
1. Launch a vm using a service offering which does not have shared storage,
and does not offer ha (local only).
2. I
Hi Gian,
We have been running 4.5.2 for quite some time now and haven't had any
major issues. We've been using Cloudstack since 4.1 and 4.5.2 is most
stable version we have encountered.
We are using Xen with basic networking.
Hope that helps!
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Gian Paolo Buono
w
Hi All,
Question regarding dedicating a Pod to an account..
If I dedicate a Pod to an account, login as that account and then create an
instance, when it comes to the affinity screen, I get the following:
"Please select any affinity groups you want this VM to belong to"
However, what I real
Hi All,
It appears that this command allows you to migrate a virtual machine to a
new account. At the same time it allows you to assign a new list of
security groups to the VM.
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/assignVirtualMachine.html
Is there a way to update the list of
Hi Folks,
Can anyone tell me if this is possible? Cloudstack 4.5, new project.
Add a sec group to the project, add a new rule, allow access via account.
If you try this, it says it cannot find the group. Also when listing the
security groups, it appears the new group has been created without an
Hi Rohit,
This looks fantastic to me. It's a very much needed addition to the UI.
Look forward to trying it out at some point in the future :-)
Thanks!
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The present CloudStack UI hides most of the metrics data such as cpu,
> memor
stack$ git tag --contains
27b7e49b395d089ff45037faa51e73d979ceb62b
4.5.1
4.5.2
However we have two different environments installed, one on version 4.5.1
and one with 4.5.2, and are seeing the same issue on both
Cheers
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:58 PM, cs user wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:521)
at
com.cloud.agent.transport.ArrayTypeAdaptor.deserialize(ArrayTypeAdaptor.java:80)
at
com.cloud.agent.transport.ArrayTypeAdaptor.deserialize(ArrayTypeAdaptor.java:40)
at
com.google.gson.JsonDeserializerExceptionWrapper.deseria
ere it is getting executed.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cs user [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2015 16:01
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk
>
&
the problem.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cs user [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2015 20:53
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> We are seeing some prob
t sure.
>
> Vadim
>
> On 2015-09-29 21:54, Rene Moser wrote:
>
> Hi
>>
>> On 09/29/2015 01:03 PM, cs user wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Are there any steps other than upgrading with yum, that need to be
>>> followed
>>> when upgrading from 4.5.1 to 4.5.2?
>>>
>>
>> Yum update and you are done.
>>
>> Yours
>> René
>>
>
Hi Folks,
We are seeing some problems when attempting live migrations in a clustered
cloudstack environment. We have 4 management servers, and when we attempt a
migration of an instance (local storage) from one host to another, the
migration times out.
However, if we only have one management serv
Hello,
Are there any steps other than upgrading with yum, that need to be followed
when upgrading from 4.5.1 to 4.5.2?
The upgrade guide explains the steps to go from 4.4.x, 4.3.x etc, but not
if you are already on 4.5.x.
Cheers!
Hi There,
I'm not sure if this is currently possible for existing root disks. Perhaps
someone else can advise if it is?
I believe there has been some recent work to allow the size of the root
volume to be increased when an instance is deployed however.
Take a look at:
http://cloudstack.apache.o
Hi Folks,
Looks like this is fixed in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/479 ?
Which cloudstack release contains this fix?
Many thanks!
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:16 AM, cs user wrote:
> Forwarding to users channel in case anyone else has seen this...
>
>
>
> Hi All,
&
Forwarding to users channel in case anyone else has seen this...
Hi All,
We have seen this in 2 separate environments, both running the same
versions of Cloudstack and Xenserver. When we reboot an instance, we lose
access to it.
Looking at the iptables config on the xen host, we can see that t
Hi There :)
I've gone through the process of uploading the SSL certificate again, and
now all is working fine, which is fantastic! :)
Not sure if this has broken as part of upgrading or if it was never
installed fully before, but its working now.
Cheers!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Thomas
Hi There,
The url's that are being generated are of the form:
https://192-168-2-15.random.net
Which all looks fine.
The secstorage.ssl.cert.domain parmater is set to *.random.net
>From the ssvm I ran the following:
openssl s_client -connect 192-168-2-15.random.net:443
Which then seemed to co
Hi Folks,
After updating to 4.5.1 and installing using the shapeblue SSVM templates:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/new/
We are hitting an issue very similar to the below when trying to copy
templates between zones:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1475
We ar
2015 at 9:17 AM, cs user wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Bit more info here, It seems that after a network restart with the clean
> option, one of the router ip's is not being reserved correctly:
>
> mysql> select id,account_id,domain_id,public_ip_address,state,allocat
one else has
> upgraded to ACS 4.5.1 ?
>
>
> And now how to upgrade existing VRs which are using old systemvm template ?
> just install ia32-libs ? Because on them as well vhd-util is not
> executable.
>
> /Ajay
>
> On 22 July 2015 at 13:21, cs user wrote:
>
>
> How I can use this new template?
>
> I can't delete current systemvm template, and even if I want to use new
> one with new name I can't download it coz of this error.
> On 21-Jul-2015 7:49 pm, "cs user" wrote:
>
> > Hi Ajay,
> >
>
Hi Ajay,
We had the exact same issue, had to use the template from here:
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/new/
Worked fine after that.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Ajay Kamble
wrote:
> this is the url
>
> http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-
addresses above are the two IP's of the router's in each pod. This
is with basic networking. The second one has not been reserved correctly,
and so instances are are being assigned the same IP.
Cheers
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:51 AM, cs user wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Been test
Hi Folks,
Been testing with 4.5.1, all looks fine. However we have just hit an issue
where a guest has been allocated the same IP as the eth0 address of the
router for the pod.
Has anyone come across this issue before?
Here is how the db looks (Apologies for the formatting)!
mysql> select * fro
e URL, but make sure
to use the 64 bit one"
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Yes, use the one from Shapeblue.
>
> Erik
>
> Den mandag 13. juli 2015 skrev cs user følgende:
>
> > Hi There,
> >
> > We have this exact same issue, we have
Hi There,
We have this exact same issue, we have upgraded to 4.5.1 and are using Xen.
We have downloaded the following systemvm template:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2
The systemvm starts ok, but if we try to create a template from a snapshot
it com
Hi All,
Is there a guide I can follow to upgrade Xenserver from 6.1 to 6.2 on
Cloudstack 4.5.1?
I'd rather wait for any issues with 6.5 to be completely ironed out before
moving to it, 6.2 has been out for a while now.
Cheers!
Hi Folks,
I'm seeing issues when creating a large number of machines, destroying
them, and quickly recreating them again sometimes an ip address which
was previously in use (minutes ago) is reused for the new machines.
We're seeing issues where a switch still believes an enclosure holds the I
Hi Erik,
Thanks for this, I did check by using developer tools, I just assumed
listHosts would only be returning host data.
I can see it also includes the systemvm info :-)
Thanks again.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:17 PM, cs user wr
Hi All,
Looking at this page:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.4/root_admin/listSystemVms.html
There doesn't seem to be a way to return the "Agent State", which you can
see when logging into the cloudstack webui, and browsing to the systemvm
view.
Is there a way to query the systemvm
Hi All,
Does anyone have a work around for this? There doesn't appear to be an
option for it.
Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Jochim, Ingo
wrote:
> How can I attach a volume to a server using knife-cloudstack?
>
> "knife cs server add nic" exists but for disks?
>
> Thanks.
> Ingo
>
>
; >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> > | M: +447968161581
> >
> > [email protected] | www.shapeblue.com
> > | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> > <https://twitter
Hi All,
Quick question with regards to xenserver and deploying a cloudstack
instance from a template stored within secondary storage.
In this case it is secondary storage using NFS and deploying to local disk
on the xenserver. (cloudstack 4.3, Xen 6.0.1)
I believe this script is used to pull dow
all of the VMs. It
> does not seem to be easy to clear a 'failed' record from the discovery
> database.
I found this as well, great to hear it wasn't just me.
Cheers!
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Phillip Kent
wrote:
> Hi cs user,
>
> I have not so far had
Ah, I managed to get the sshkeypair working with this template! :)
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/coreos/x86_64/
Just need to get discovery working now.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:58 AM, cs user wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for the blog post Phillip, very impressive! :)
>
>
Hi All,
Thanks for the blog post Phillip, very impressive! :)
I've had a play with coreos/cloudstack myself, but it's been pretty manual
and the SSH public key has been baked into the template.
I guess I'm missing something very simple here, but how is everyone
managing to set the following via
ported into a 4.3.4 release?
git tag --contains 0b99822
4.4.0
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:44 PM, cs user wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Looking at the code The following functions appear to have changed
> between 4.3 and 4.4, which seem to relate to vif's, could
k/4.4/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
Thanks!
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, cs user wrote:
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> Many thanks for getting back to me. Will there be a way for us to fix this
> ourselves then, or will we have to w
| NULL |
>
> | 218 | NULL| Storage | NULL | NULL
>> | 1 | NULL| Native|
>> StorageNetworkGuru| NULL |
>
> | 219 | P01 | Guest| p01.domain.internal | Shared
>> | 1 | vlan://untagged | Vlan |
>> DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru | Domain |
>
&
27;Dhcp' and id='70001';
>
> +---+-+-+-+-+---+
> | id| created | default_nic | display_nic | broadcast_uri
> | isolation_uri |
>
> +---+-+-+-
w does this
isolation_uri column get set, is it from the database or hard coded in the
code?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:02 AM, cs user wrote:
> Hi Again... :-)
>
> So it looks like the vif on the xenserver is not being setup correctly (or
> has been removed). The following rule is d
CLOUDSTACK-7399?
> >
> > this kind off feedback is not spam but much appriciated and hereby
> > solicited.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:33 PM, cs user wrote:
> > > Just to clarify, the fix was:
> > >
> > > update networks set broadcast_uri=&q
P BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP PROMISC MTU:1500 Metric:1
>
> RX packets:7982 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>
> TX packets:8513 errors:0 dropped:1 overruns:0 carrier:0
>
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:32
>
> RX bytes:1349032 (1.2 MiB) T
re
It seems the config is duplicated but without the pluses. I think these are
similar to wildcard entries?
Cheers!
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Silly question but Is your xenserver configured bridge mode rel
t; monitoring
>
>
>>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Somesh Naidu
wrote:
> You might want to do a arpping on the router's IP from one of the guests
> and see how many records are returned.
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Systems, Inc.
>
&
Hi All,
We have upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2.
After some issues with starting the systemvm's, the virtual routers no
longer responding to dns requests from the vm's which we start (or existing
ones).
We have disabled the firewall on the virtual routers and ran tcpdump on
them but we can't see any
Hello All,
As I've just posted, but to put the answer in this thread, the fix for us
was:
update networks set broadcast_uri="vlan://untagged" where mode='Dhcp';
These were set to null for each of our zones after the upgrade.
Cheers!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:50 AM,
Just to clarify, the fix was:
update networks set broadcast_uri="vlan://untagged" where mode='Dhcp';
As these were set to null.
Sorry for the spam!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:31 PM, cs user wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Many many thanks for this. We had the
Hi Laurent,
Many many thanks for this. We had the exact same problem but using
xenserver as hosts. The fix for us was:
select name,broadcast_uri from networks where mode='Dhcp';
We were using basic networking as well.
We had upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2, using Xenserver 6.1.
Thank you!!!
On
t;:"v-10830-VM","wait":0}}]
>> }
>
> 2015-03-25 22:29:46,530 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
>> (Work-Job-Executor-105:ctx-d52c9025 job-184934/job-186529 ctx-9bb73739) Seq
>> 137-6516145710851687335: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 345049290103, via:
>> 137
ny
>> clusters, returning.
>
>
>
Any reason why these would be in the avoid set?
Thanks!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:11 PM, ilya wrote:
> I see insufficient capacity..
>
> post content of
>
> grep -E 'job-184934|job-185963' management-server.log
>
Hello,
We have upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2 and can no longer start new systemvm's
(or normal instances in zones which have both a secondary storage vm and
router running). Existing system vm's appear to have been upgraded.
We are using Xenserver version 6.1.
They appear for a split second in XenC
Hello,
>From the docs here:
http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/systemvm.html
It says:
"Do not use the destroyRouter API when only one router is available in the
network, because restartNetwork API with the cleanup=false parameter can’t
recreate it later. If you want to d
Covent Garden, London, WC2N
> 4HS
>
>
> On 10 Mar 2015, at 23:11, Nux! mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think it should be possible what you suggest. Have not tried it though.
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Bor
Hi All,
Apologies, second question in one evening :-)
If you have 1 zone in cloudstack configured for basic networking, and 2
pods. Are you able to configure these pods to have completely different
subnets on different vlans?
This is certainly possible to do in the webinterface, but will it
Hi Osay,
I'd be really interested to hear about how you get on with the Cloudstack
Driver for Docker Machine, using the CoreOS template.
Cheers! :-)
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Osay Osman Yuuni wrote:
> Thanks Lucian. Actually I'm running this off of Xenserver. I'll try with
> "Other PV
Hi Justyn,
This appears similar to the following bug I raised a few weeks ago:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7775
Will it be possible for a dev to take a look at this?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Justyn Shull wrote:
> Small update: I was able to get past this error by
I also have an issue with snapshots, cloudstack 4.3, Xen 6.2 and S3
storage. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7775
Perhaps you can check the log files listed in the description of the
problem, to see if you are running into a similar issue.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:02 A
mething you trying now and it fails?
>
> Please open a jira issue here https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
>
> Mark this issue as major in Jira, post this issue on dev list with
> reference to jira issue id.
>
>
>
> On 10/22/14, 5:17 AM, cs user wrote:
>
Apologies, new member of the list having problems replying to an existing
message! :-)
We're having the same issues as France. Xenserver, 6.01 latest hotfixes,
cloudstack 4.3 and 4.4. Snapshot of volume on local disk, to be transferred
to S3. When the xenhost attemps the PUT request, the snapshot
72 matches
Mail list logo
