Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

d this possibility? > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:38 AM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > I hadn't tried allocating more VM's until the host gets full. If this > > feature was available and it was possible to both dedicate a po

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

stances created with this service offering then > get put onto the same host, rather than looking for other free hosts within > the same pod." > > Have you tried allocating VMs until the host gets full? > > What do you want to happen when this dedicated POD gets full? > >

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

; You can dedicate a pod to a user account or domain. > Have you tried that? > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:09 AM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest > version >

Re: Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

Hi All, I asked this a while back and never got a response. With the latest version of Cloudstack, is it possible to force an account to launch in a particular pod? Cheers! On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Question regarding d

Re: Cloudstack - volume migration between clusters (primary storage)

ve from > secondary to primary via SSVM. > > Have you actually seen any setup where you have verified this? > > @ cs user, > When you're moving the volumes, are those attached to running VM? or > those > are just standalone orphan volumes? > > > >

Re: Cloudstack - volume migration between clusters (primary storage)

a mysql setting? How can I increase this setting? Cheers! On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:41 AM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Makrand, I will take a look at these values, much appreciated! > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Makrand <makrandsa...@gmail.c

Re: Cloudstack - volume migration between clusters (primary storage)

anisition.wait.interval:3600 > > -- > Makrand > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Makrand, > > > > Thanks for responding! > > > > Yes this does work for us, for small disks. Even with small di

Re: Cloudstack - volume migration between clusters (primary storage)

ted directly on hypervisors. I'd ask > someone else to confirm though... > > On 8/24/16 7:20 AM, cs user wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Xenserver 6.5, cloudstack 4.5.2. NFS primary storage volumes > > > > Lets say I have 1 pod, with 2 clusters, each cluster has its own

Re: Cloudstack - volume migration between clusters (primary storage)

gt; see it as part as one cloud zone. > > In normal case of moving volume within cluster, Storge XEN motion is what > it uses. > > > > -- > Makrand > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > >

Cloudstack - volume migration between clusters (primary storage)

Hi All, Xenserver 6.5, cloudstack 4.5.2. NFS primary storage volumes Lets say I have 1 pod, with 2 clusters, each cluster has its own primary storage. If I migrate a volume from one primary storage to the other one, using cloudstack, what aspect of the environment is responsible for this copy?

Re: Migrate vm from local storage to shared - change service offering

ice versa is not > supported in Cloudstack. If you are able to do this it’s a bug. > > > Thanks > Shweta > > On 7/4/16, 5:33 PM, "cs user" <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Hi Folks, > > > >This question relates to cloudstack 4.5.2. I

Migrate vm from local storage to shared - change service offering

Hi Folks, This question relates to cloudstack 4.5.2. I know this is a bit behind now but its still quite stable for us :-) The problem I have is that lets say I do the following: 1. Launch a vm using a service offering which does not have shared storage, and does not offer ha (local only). 2.

Re: Cloudstack Best Production Ver.

Hi Gian, We have been running 4.5.2 for quite some time now and haven't had any major issues. We've been using Cloudstack since 4.1 and 4.5.2 is most stable version we have encountered. We are using Xen with basic networking. Hope that helps! On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Gian Paolo Buono

Implicit dedication vs Explicit dedication

Hi All, Question regarding dedicating a Pod to an account.. If I dedicate a Pod to an account, login as that account and then create an instance, when it comes to the affinity screen, I get the following: "Please select any affinity groups you want this VM to belong to" However, what I

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Hi Rohit, This looks fantastic to me. It's a very much needed addition to the UI. Look forward to trying it out at some point in the future :-) Thanks! On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > The present CloudStack UI hides most of the

Re: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk

at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:521) at com.cloud.agent.transport.ArrayTypeAdaptor.deserialize(ArrayTypeAdaptor.java:80) at com.cloud.agent.transport.ArrayTypeAdaptor.deserialize(ArrayTypeAdaptor.java:40) at com.google.gson.JsonDeserializerExceptionWrapper.des

Re: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk

$ git tag --contains 27b7e49b395d089ff45037faa51e73d979ceb62b 4.5.1 4.5.2 However we have two different environments installed, one on version 4.5.1 and one with 4.5.2, and are seeing the same issue on both Cheers On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:58 PM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com>

Re: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk

the job originated and where it is getting executed. > > -Original Message- > From: cs user [mailto:acldstk...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2015 16:01 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local di

Re: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk

ons that can point to the problem. > > -Original Message----- > From: cs user [mailto:acldstk...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2015 20:53 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk > > Hi Folks,

Re: Cloudstack upgrade - 4.5.1 to 4.5.2

atically, but I am not sure. > > Vadim > > On 2015-09-29 21:54, Rene Moser wrote: > > Hi >> >> On 09/⁠29/⁠2015 01:03 PM, cs user wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Are there any steps other than upgrading with yum, that need to be >>>

Cloudstack upgrade - 4.5.1 to 4.5.2

Hello, Are there any steps other than upgrading with yum, that need to be followed when upgrading from 4.5.1 to 4.5.2? The upgrade guide explains the steps to go from 4.4.x, 4.3.x etc, but not if you are already on 4.5.x. Cheers!

4.5.1 - Xen 6.5 SP1 - Live migrations failing - Local disk

Hi Folks, We are seeing some problems when attempting live migrations in a clustered cloudstack environment. We have 4 management servers, and when we attempt a migration of an instance (local storage) from one host to another, the migration times out. However, if we only have one management

Re: expand root disk type volume

Hi There, I'm not sure if this is currently possible for existing root disks. Perhaps someone else can advise if it is? I believe there has been some recent work to allow the size of the root volume to be increased when an instance is deployed however. Take a look at:

Re: Instance reboot issue - CS 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5

Hi Folks, Looks like this is fixed in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/479 ? Which cloudstack release contains this fix? Many thanks! On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:16 AM, cs user <acldstk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Forwarding to users channel in case anyone else has seen this... &

Fwd: Instance reboot issue - CS 4.5.1 - Xen 6.5

Forwarding to users channel in case anyone else has seen this... Hi All, We have seen this in 2 separate environments, both running the same versions of Cloudstack and Xenserver. When we reboot an instance, we lose access to it. Looking at the iptables config on the xen host, we can see that

Re: 4.5.1 - SSVM Cert issues

Hi There :) I've gone through the process of uploading the SSL certificate again, and now all is working fine, which is fantastic! :) Not sure if this has broken as part of upgrading or if it was never installed fully before, but its working now. Cheers! On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:00 PM,

4.5.1 - SSVM Cert issues

Hi Folks, After updating to 4.5.1 and installing using the shapeblue SSVM templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/new/ We are hitting an issue very similar to the below when trying to copy templates between zones: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1475 We

Re: 4.5.1 - SSVM Cert issues

Hi There, The url's that are being generated are of the form: https://192-168-2-15.random.net Which all looks fine. The secstorage.ssl.cert.domain parmater is set to *.random.net From the ssvm I ran the following: openssl s_client -connect 192-168-2-15.random.net:443 Which then seemed to

Re: 4.5.1 Guest allocated same IP address as router

at 9:17 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, Bit more info here, It seems that after a network restart with the clean option, one of the router ip's is not being reserved correctly: mysql select id,account_id,domain_id,public_ip_address,state,allocated from user_ip_address where

Re: ACS 4.5.1 unable to download template

how to upgrade existing VRs which are using old systemvm template ? just install ia32-libs ? Because on them as well vhd-util is not executable. /Ajay On 22 July 2015 at 13:21, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ajay, hmmm, I'm not sure how you will be able to do it easily, if you

Re: ACS 4.5.1 unable to download template

use this new template? I can't delete current systemvm template, and even if I want to use new one with new name I can't download it coz of this error. On 21-Jul-2015 7:49 pm, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ajay, We had the exact same issue, had to use the template from here

Re: ACS 4.5.1 unable to download template

Hi Ajay, We had the exact same issue, had to use the template from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/new/ Worked fine after that. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Ajay Kamble ajay.kamble...@gmail.com wrote: this is the url

Re: 4.5.1 Guest allocated same IP address as router

of the router's in each pod. This is with basic networking. The second one has not been reserved correctly, and so instances are are being assigned the same IP. Cheers On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:51 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, Been testing with 4.5.1, all looks fine

4.5.1 Guest allocated same IP address as router

Hi Folks, Been testing with 4.5.1, all looks fine. However we have just hit an issue where a guest has been allocated the same IP as the eth0 address of the router for the pod. Has anyone come across this issue before? Here is how the db looks (Apologies for the formatting)! mysql select *

Re: Template Issue in 4.5.1

, but make sure to use the 64 bit one On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, use the one from Shapeblue. Erik Den mandag 13. juli 2015 skrev cs user acldstk...@gmail.com følgende: Hi There, We have this exact same issue, we have upgraded to 4.5.1

Re: Template Issue in 4.5.1

Hi There, We have this exact same issue, we have upgraded to 4.5.1 and are using Xen. We have downloaded the following systemvm template: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.5/systemvm64template-4.5-xen.vhd.bz2 The systemvm starts ok, but if we try to create a template from a snapshot it

Cloudstack 4.5.1 - Upgrade Xenserver 6.1 to 6.2

Hi All, Is there a guide I can follow to upgrade Xenserver from 6.1 to 6.2 on Cloudstack 4.5.1? I'd rather wait for any issues with 6.5 to be completely ironed out before moving to it, 6.2 has been out for a while now. Cheers!

cloudstack 4.3 - xen hosts - gratuitous ARP

Hi Folks, I'm seeing issues when creating a large number of machines, destroying them, and quickly recreating them again sometimes an ip address which was previously in use (minutes ago) is reused for the new machines. We're seeing issues where a switch still believes an enclosure holds the

Systemvm agent state - via api

Hi All, Looking at this page: https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.4/root_admin/listSystemVms.html There doesn't seem to be a way to return the Agent State, which you can see when logging into the cloudstack webui, and browsing to the systemvm view. Is there a way to query the systemvm

Re: Systemvm agent state - via api

, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Looking at this page: https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.4/root_admin/listSystemVms.html There doesn't seem to be a way to return the Agent State, which you can see when logging into the cloudstack webui, and browsing

Re: knife-cloudstack attach disk

Hi All, Does anyone have a work around for this? There doesn't appear to be an option for it. Cheers! On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Jochim, Ingo ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de wrote: How can I attach a volume to a server using knife-cloudstack? knife cs server add nic exists but for disks?

Re: Xen - Deploying servers from a template

| www.shapeblue.com htp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS x-apple-data-detectors://5 On 28/04/2015 15:13, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Quick

Xen - Deploying servers from a template

Hi All, Quick question with regards to xenserver and deploying a cloudstack instance from a template stored within secondary storage. In this case it is secondary storage using NFS and deploying to local disk on the xenserver. (cloudstack 4.3, Xen 6.0.1) I believe this script is used to pull

Re: CoreOS/Docker - a new blog series

of the VMs. It does not seem to be easy to clear a 'failed' record from the discovery database. I found this as well, great to hear it wasn't just me. Cheers! On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Phillip Kent phillip.k...@xmlsoup.com wrote: Hi cs user, I have not so far had any issues with using

Re: CoreOS/Docker - a new blog series

Ah, I managed to get the sshkeypair working with this template! :) http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/coreos/x86_64/ Just need to get discovery working now. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:58 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the blog post Phillip, very impressive! :) I've

Re: CoreOS/Docker - a new blog series

Hi All, Thanks for the blog post Phillip, very impressive! :) I've had a play with coreos/cloudstack myself, but it's been pretty manual and the SSH public key has been baked into the template. I guess I'm missing something very simple here, but how is everyone managing to set the following via

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

ported into a 4.3.4 release? git tag --contains 0b99822 4.4.0 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 Cheers! On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:44 PM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Looking at the code The following functions appear to have changed between 4.3 and 4.4, which seem to relate to vif's, could

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

/plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java Thanks! On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jayapal, Many thanks for getting back to me. Will there be a way for us to fix this ourselves then, or will we have to wait

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jayapal, Many thanks for getting back to me. Will there be a way for us to fix this ourselves then, or will we have to wait for an update? We are able to work around the problem in the following way, but this is no real solution. On the xenhost

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

will be untagged. Thanks, Jayapal On 27-Mar-2015, at 9:01 PM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Just to add, in the database, the nics table: isolation_uri used to be set to ec2://untagged for vm_type=DomainRouter of mode Dhcp. This is no longer happening however, they are just set as NULL

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:77 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:32 RX bytes:3404 (3.3 KiB) TX bytes:5502 (5.3 KiB) On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:57 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jayapal, Those two parameters

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

outgoing dns requests? 3) anything in syslog/dnsmasq logs? 4) any egress rules in place? Erik Den torsdag 26. mars 2015 skrev cs user acldstk...@gmail.com følgende: Hi All, We have upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2. After some issues with starting the systemvm's, the virtual routers

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

-switch-network-backend bridge #echo 1 /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables #echo 1 /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-arptables Thanks, Jayapal On 27-Mar-2015, at 1:50 PM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.commailto: acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Somesh, arping looks good, the correct mac

Re: WARNING for users migrating from Cloudstack 4.2 to 4.4.2

off feedback is not spam but much appriciated and hereby solicited. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:33 PM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Just to clarify, the fix was: update networks set broadcast_uri=vlan://untagged where mode='Dhcp'; As these were set to null. Sorry

Re: Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

get set, is it from the database or hard coded in the code? On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:02 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Again... :-) So it looks like the vif on the xenserver is not being setup correctly (or has been removed). The following rule is defined on xen host which

Re: Cloudstack 4.4.2 - unable to start new systemvm's

-185963' management-server.log On 3/25/15 2:52 PM, cs user wrote: Hello, We have upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2 and can no longer start new systemvm's (or normal instances in zones which have both a secondary storage vm and router running). Existing system vm's appear to have been upgraded. We

Re: Cloudstack 4.4.2 - unable to start new systemvm's

-Routing] due to Unable to start v-10830-VM due to It seems that the vm does attempt to start on the host, but it doesn't come up. This is what I can see from within xencenter, the vm appears in a powered down state for a brief moment and then dies. Thanks! On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:36 AM, cs user

Re: WARNING for users migrating from Cloudstack 4.2 to 4.4.2

Just to clarify, the fix was: update networks set broadcast_uri=vlan://untagged where mode='Dhcp'; As these were set to null. Sorry for the spam! On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:31 PM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Laurent, Many many thanks for this. We had the exact same problem

Re: WARNING for users migrating from Cloudstack 4.2 to 4.4.2

Hi Laurent, Many many thanks for this. We had the exact same problem but using xenserver as hosts. The fix for us was: select name,broadcast_uri from networks where mode='Dhcp'; We were using basic networking as well. We had upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2, using Xenserver 6.1. Thank you!!!

Re: Cloudstack 4.4.2 - unable to start new systemvm's

Hello All, As I've just posted, but to put the answer in this thread, the fix for us was: update networks set broadcast_uri=vlan://untagged where mode='Dhcp'; These were set to null for each of our zones after the upgrade. Cheers! On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:50 AM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com

Virtual Routers not responding to dns requests

Hi All, We have upgraded from 4.3 to 4.4.2. After some issues with starting the systemvm's, the virtual routers no longer responding to dns requests from the vm's which we start (or existing ones). We have disabled the firewall on the virtual routers and ran tcpdump on them but we can't see any

Question regarding virtual routers in a basic network

Hello, From the docs here: http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/systemvm.html It says: Do not use the destroyRouter API when only one router is available in the network, because restartNetwork API with the cleanup=false parameter can’t recreate it later. If you want to

Basic networking - Multiple pods for 1 zone

Hi All, Apologies, second question in one evening :-) If you have 1 zone in cloudstack configured for basic networking, and 2 pods. Are you able to configure these pods to have completely different subnets on different vlans? This is certainly possible to do in the webinterface, but will it

Re: Docker Support?

Hi Osay, I'd be really interested to hear about how you get on with the Cloudstack Driver for Docker Machine, using the CoreOS template. Cheers! :-) On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Osay Osman Yuuni oyu...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Lucian. Actually I'm running this off of Xenserver. I'll try

Re: Snapshots not working when using S3 (ceph) ACS 4.4.0

Hi Justyn, This appears similar to the following bug I raised a few weeks ago: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7775 Will it be possible for a dev to take a look at this? On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Justyn Shull just...@codero.com wrote: Small update: I was able to get

Re: Snapshots not being moved to secondary storage

I also have an issue with snapshots, cloudstack 4.3, Xen 6.2 and S3 storage. Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7775 Perhaps you can check the log files listed in the description of the problem, to see if you are running into a similar issue. On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:02

Re: Fwd: users Digest of: get.18005

? Or is this something you trying now and it fails? Please open a jira issue here https://issues.apache.org/ jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK Mark this issue as major in Jira, post this issue on dev list with reference to jira issue id. On 10/22/14, 5:17 AM, cs user wrote: Apologies, new member

Fwd: users Digest of: get.18005

Apologies, new member of the list having problems replying to an existing message! :-) We're having the same issues as France. Xenserver, 6.01 latest hotfixes, cloudstack 4.3 and 4.4. Snapshot of volume on local disk, to be transferred to S3. When the xenhost attemps the PUT request, the snapshot