Hi all,
in ACS 4.17.2, I encountered a strange secondary storage (NFS) behaviour
when try to migrate from one primary storage to another (both RBD):
When migrating volumes back to the origin primary storage, I get this
error message:
Resource is unreachable: Migrate volume failed
GitHub user bordeldecul added a comment to the discussion: Secondary storage
migration error (Stats Collector)
Thank you for the help.
The error message was misleading.
I was able to narrow it down to a network issue.
The SSVM is in a new IP range and cannot mount the old secondary storage
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary storage
migration error (Stats Collector)
In the Management server logs, do you see any of the following logs:
```
1. StorageCollector is running...
or
2. There is no secondary storage VM for secondary storage host
```
If the
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: Secondary storage
migration error (Stats Collector)
You will need to wait for some time until the stats collector runs to get
details of the capacity of the destination store (newly added one). As per the
code, the Storage stats
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
> @dylan62370 Since the VM is running but the agent is down this indicates an
> issue for the java agent in the system VMs to connect to the management
&g
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
If it helps, here's my ifconfig
```
[root@cloudstack-test ~]# ifconfig
cloud0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 169.254.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broa
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
No :/
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
and can 10.0.0.15 ping 10.0.0.66?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9535#discussioncomment-10404348
This is an automatically
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
Yes, it's a /24.
I created a cloudbr0 bridge on the physical port ens33
Here's the ip a of the server containing ssvm and cloudmanagement
```
[root@
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
ok, removing the route does nothing probably. your internal DNS server
10.0.0.15, can't even be reached from your ssvm. It should be reachable through
et
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
I removed the route and here's the result of the commands:
The commands were made on the SSVM VM
**ip a**
```
root@s-2-VM:~# ip a
1: lo:
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@dylan62370 , I am not sure but if you have only one IF on the VM it shouldn't
see two (and create a second route for that)
Though it looks like the routes
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
I currently have 1 active network card on the VM.
This VM contains KVM, NFS and cloudstack-management.
(this is a test before moving on to a real
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
could you check the new VM also and look at the routing table and also look at
the traceroute output?
In you routing table I see the route for 10.0.0.0 twice
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
No it doesn't work, I rebuilt the VM to see if it was coming from the server
but no.
The ping still doesn't go through from the SSVM VM.
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
so can you ping 8.8.8.8 (and 1.1.1.1) from the ssvm?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9535#discussioncomment-10394637
This
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
All my servers use my internal DNS.
I can use them to reach Google and other sites without worry.
However, from the SSVM VM I can't even
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
All my servers use my internal DNS.
I can use them to reach Google and other sites without worry.
However, from the SSVM VM I can't even
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
Tout mes serveurs utilise mes DNS interne.
Je peux atteindre grâce à eux google ou autre sans soucis.
Cependant, depuis la VM SSVM je ne peux même
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@dylan62370 , all looks good except for your dns. Does it delegate any unknown
domains from 10.0.0.15 and 10.1.0.9? or is it caching ok?
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
The ping to google is KO the ping to my gateway 10.0.0.1 is KO too on the ssvm.
```
root@s-2-VM:~# ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
The ping to google is KO the ping to my gateway 10.0.0.1 is KO too on the ssvm.
```
root@s-2-VM:~# ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
The ping to google is KO the ping to my gateway 10.0.0.1 is KO too on the ssvm.
```
root@s-2-VM:~# ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
The ping to google is KO the ping to my gateway 10.0.0.1 is KO too on the ssvm.
```
root@s-2-VM:~# ping 1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
@DaanHoogland
The ping to google is KO'd the ping to my gateway 10.0.0.1 is KO'd too on the
ssvm.
When I go to the /etc/network/interfaces interf
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@dylan62370 , try logging into the ssvm and ping from there. Also check the dns
settings (resolv.conf) on the ssvm.
( run /usr/local/cloudstack/systemvm/ssvm
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
Hello, @rajujith
I found the problem, my network was not good.
I redid everything and the agent is now UP.
However, when I want to download a template or an
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
@dylan62370 Since the VM is running but the agent is down this indicates an
issue for the java agent in the system VMs to connect to the management server
port
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a comment on the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
Hello @DaanHoogland !
The VM is UP but I've just seen that the agent is DOWN...
I don't understand why...
https://github.com/user-attachments/asset
GitHub user dylan62370 added a comment to the discussion: There is no secondary
storage VM for downloading template to image store
Hello @DaanHoogland !
Everything is UP and in the right KVM server.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/44c9c564-0868-400f-a557-ebfb764c06cd";>
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: There is no
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store
@dylan62370 , can you check "infrastructure/system vms"? you should see
something like
Unfortunately, I can't transfer ISO/Templates to my cloudstack.
When I transfer locally or from register, I get this error message:
“Request failed (530)
The
GitHub user dylan62370 edited a discussion: There is no secondary storage VM
for downloading template to image store
Hello ! :)
Unfortunately, I can't transfer ISO/Templates to my cloudstack.
When I transfer locally or from register, I get this error message:
“Request failed (530)
The
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: QUestion on Secondary
Storage For New Zone
@midhunpjos Secondary storage in all zones needs to be mountable from the
management servers. If you can allow temporary access till the systemVM
template is copied to the new secondary
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Delete Template
from specific secondary storage
@nxsbi , you are right. This would be a good addition. As a workaround you can
look at template_store_ref. It does not have a removed field but for your use
case it should, and next
Thank you for the reply, Jithin.
From: Jithin Raju
Date: Friday, May 24, 2024 at 8:21 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secondary Storage Maintenance and moving networks
WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless
Hi Marty,
Your assumptions on the impact of a secondary storage offline situation are
correct.
For the VRs you can stop and start them. You may want to make sure that the
corresponding virtual network in the xenserver for public network VLAN is
deleted before starting the VR.
-Jithin
From
Hello all,
Quick question. It's time to update the storage for our secondary storage
array. However, I don’t see a way to put the secondary storage into maintenance
mode. Based on how secondary storage is used, I assume that if the backend goes
offline, I will lose access to templates,
it. Also, suppose you download a template to an
image store from a URL. Some time passes, and the template in that URL
gets updated. Then, you add a new secondary storage that tries to
download the updated template from the same URL. After the download
finishes, ACS will compare the downloaded
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: Initial zone
set-up does not verify usable secondary storage - leads to issues
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9036
GitHub user Jayd603 added a comment to the discussion: Initial zone set-up does
not verify usable secondary storage - leads to issues
> @Jayd603 , can you remove the zone/storage and re-add instead?
It takes a lot of steps to delete a zone and I don't remember if it removed the
s
GitHub user Jayd603 added a comment to the discussion: Initial zone set-up does
not verify usable secondary storage - leads to issues
> @Jayd603 , is your system vm template seeded on your secondary storage? The
> path `/template/tmpl/1/3` on your secondary storage should contain a
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Initial zone set-up
does not verify usable secondary storage - leads to issues
@Jayd603 , is your system vm template seeded on your secondary storage? The
path `/template/tmpl/1/3` on your secondary storage should contain a valid
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Initial zone set-up
does not verify usable secondary storage - leads to issues
@Jayd603 , can you remove the zone/storage and re-add instead?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9036#discussioncomment
Hi Hanis,
You can find the removed template URL using the SQL query below, you can
register a new one.
select url from vm_template where type='BUILTIN';
-Jithin
From: Hanis Irfan
Date: Wednesday, 1 May 2024 at 10:39 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Secondary stor
rfan
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer | Nebula Systems Sdn Bhd
Email: hanis.ir...@nebula-sys.com
Website: https://www.nebula-sys.com
-Original Message-
From: Jithin Raju
Sent: Tuesday, 30 April, 2024 12:27
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secondary storage system VM agent state
For the SSVM issue this article might help you, specifically check for the
management server IP connectivity on port 8250.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
Regarding the login issue you mentioned I am not sure about
I'm currently learning CS and setting up a POC environment.
Two system VMs is running on the same KVM host in my 3 KVM host cluster.
However, the secondary storage VM Agent state is shown as Connecting.
I've SSH into the secondary storage VM and can assure that it can reach the
In
@Jithin: Yes, I am using the Cloudstack feature for migrating the storage.
Mevludin
Am 26.04.2024 um 07:20 schrieb Jithin Raju:
Hi Mevludin,
Just curious about how you are migrating the secondary storage. Are you using
the CloudStack feature to migrate data across secondary storage?
So you a
Hi Mevludin,
Just curious about how you are migrating the secondary storage. Are you using
the CloudStack feature to migrate data across secondary storage?
So you added a new secondary storage and cloudstack already started syncing the
public templates from URLs?
-Jithin
From: Pearl d'
aren't
ideally getting duplicated on the new secondary store.
Regards,
Pearl
From: Mevludin Blazevic
Sent: April 25, 2024 4:51 AM
To: users
Subject: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage
Hi all,
it looks like with every seco
Hi all,
I got a null pointer exception while adding s3 secondary storage to my
Cloudstack cluster.
This is related to this exact issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8956
I got a few questions:
- Is there a known workaround for this yet?
- My workaround would be to setup NFS
Hi all,
it looks like with every secondary storage migration Cloudstack tries to
re-download all templates with URLs instead of simply grabbing the
already downloaded template from the old image store. If that's true,
how to avoid that behaviour?
Mevludin
trying to download the file to NFS server 192.168.50.2. Is it
the secondary storage you removed? If yes restart the SSVM. If management
server is still attempting to connect to this NFS server/share you could
unmount that share on the management server.
-Jithin
From: Granwille Strauss
Date
Okay, thanks for your explanation.
So basically there is no much benefit having the 4x100Gbits and hpc environment
for secondary storage traffic when using a separate nic.
How would you size the nic for secondary when using 10ssds per host? Can you
give me any number
-Original Message
Alright. CephFS and RBD stay in different Ceph pools. To clarify, this is how
CloudStack does it
1. Upload of Guest Images and ISOs: The secondary storage VM mounts the NFS
share (from CephFS) and writes the images to CephFS pool.
2. Instance Launch for the first time: The RBD image gets
Yes, CephFS over NFS (ganesha)
Hello,
Are you planning to use CephFS over NFS for your secondary storage?
Regards,
Jayanth Reddy
From: R A
Date: Friday, 29 March 2024 at 2:10 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Understanding Secondary Storage Traffic
Hello Community,
i am planning a cloudstack hyperconverged
Hello Community,
i am planning a cloudstack hyperconverged cluster with Ceph as primary and
secondary storage.
I already know that snapshots, volume backups and images are transferred via
secondary storage interface, but I have problems in understanding the correct
flow.
Maybe someone can
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:14 PM Kapil Bhuskute
wrote:
>
> Hello Daan,
> What exactly did you mean by initiating the secondary storage?
> We have a secondary storage path and server name mentioned in the Cloudstack
> management server wizard to add it, and that got added in the UI
Hello Daan,
What exactly did you mean by initiating the secondary storage?
We have a secondary storage path and server name mentioned in the Cloudstack
management server wizard to add it, and that got added in the UI.
It is a nfs export hosted on the same cloudstack server and is already
Kapil,
did you initiate your secondary storage (at
kvm01.p01.ops.sjc01.qualys.com:/mnt/data)?
and did you export the storage for it from the nfs server?
The error says there is a problem there.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:35 AM Kapil Bhuskute
wrote:
>
> The secondary storage VM is not able
The secondary storage VM is not able to get deployed in CloudStack 4.19 with
below errors.
Feb 16 13:25:08 qcs01 java[417597]: INFO [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator]
(secstorage-1:ctx-adb3bb9a ctx-2cb81e1f) (logid:67e774fb) Adding disk object
[ROOT-6258] to VM [VM instance {"id&
r/ganesha brick to the mounted
> store3 - then remove the secondary storage?
>
You will have to reconcile the data in the ..-store-ref tables, but it
seems you hit s limitation of the system and this is a way around it.
Please Please test this in a test environment. I dont understand your is
Thanks for the response. Does that mean that manually (rsync/scp/mount +
mv) is a viable option?
In other words - I could mount the store3 volume on one of my gluster
instances and mv the data from the gluster/ganesha brick to the mounted
store3 - then remove the secondary storage?
Thanks
hope this helps,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 4:33 PM Mark Winnemueller
wrote:
>
> Hello CloudStack users,
>
> Using CloudStack V 4.18.1.0 I cannot delete my secondary storage store1
> due to "Cannot delete image store with active templates backup!". I
> have tried migr
Hello CloudStack users,
Using CloudStack V 4.18.1.0 I cannot delete my secondary storage store1
due to "Cannot delete image store with active templates backup!". I
have tried migrating the data to store3, and CloudStack says that it
succeeded, but the data is still on the existing
Hi Harikrishna,
Thanks again, seems to work fine :-) (so far)
Best regards,
Wilken
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Harikrishna Patnala
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Februar 2024 10:32
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: UI - change name of secondary storage and management server
I´ve
2:18 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: UI - change name of secondary storage and management server
Hi Harikrishna,
Thank you, I will take a look!
Does this also work with the "mshost" table (for the management server).
Do you know of any limitations or dependencies re
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Februar 2024 04:55
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: UI - change name of secondary storage and management server
Hi Wilken,
This API does not have that parameter to edit the name, it´s a good thing to
add. You will have to go and edit the name in the data
: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: UI - change name of secondary storage and management server
Hi guys,
Is there an easy way to change the name of the secondary storage and management
server in CS 4.18.1.0 via UI / API call seen under:
Infrastructure --> Secondary storage -->
Hi guys,
Is there an easy way to change the name of the secondary storage and management
server in CS 4.18.1.0 via UI / API call seen under:
Infrastructure --> Secondary storage --> "Name"
Infrastructure --> Management servers --> "Name"
Is there an API cal
;, 'Destroyed', 'Failed');
________
From: Jeremy Hansen
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2024 5:06 AM
To: Vivek Kumar via users
Subject: Migrating secondary storage
I’m trying to migrate to new secondary storage. I’m receiving this error:
Jan 26 23:33:25
I’m trying to migrate to new secondary storage. I’m receiving this error:
Jan 26 23:33:25 dell1.fr1.clx.corp java[1787564]:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Complete migration failed as
there are data objects which are not Ready - i.e, they may be in Migrating,
creating
:47 AM Bryan Tiang
wrote:
> Morning All,
>
> Just to update, we managed to resolve the issue, but it had to be done
> manually from the db.
>
> Manually alter DB to remove templates from old zone
>
> Successfully removed old templates > Old Secondary Storage > Old Zone
&g
Morning All,
Just to update, we managed to resolve the issue, but it had to be done manually
from the db.
Manually alter DB to remove templates from old zone
Successfully removed old templates > Old Secondary Storage > Old Zone
Changed "state" to "inactive" and add
Hi Community,
We're trying to remove secondary storage but we need to delete the existing
templates first
However, we're receiving this error Failed to delete template
Error message from management server
Jan 16 11:23:49 N2NCLOUDMY1MG01 java[87629]: ERROR
[o.a.c.s.i.BaseImageStore
ur ACS using
>> DNS names?
>
> Yes, I always use DNS everywhere. Never use static IPs in any of the
> configuration.
>
> If it's Ceph Monitors for primary storage, NFS hostnames for Primary Storage
> or Secondary Storage.
>
> Make sure you have a proper domain
orage, NFS hostnames for Primary
Storage or Secondary Storage.
Make sure you have a proper domain name to use for your infrastructure
and then just use DNS.
Wido
I’m a fan - Regards,
Antoine
*Antoine Boucher*
antoi...@haltondc.com
[o] +1-226-505-9734
www.haltondc.com
“Data security m
Op 15/12/2023 om 18:10 schreef Antoine Boucher:
Hello, When I initially adopted ACS a few years ago, I inadvertently placed my
secondary storage on the storage network. Surprisingly, everything functioned
well in the first year.
However, issues arose when I updated the system to the next
Op 15/12/2023 om 18:10 schreef Antoine Boucher:
Hello, When I initially adopted ACS a few years ago, I inadvertently placed my
secondary storage on the storage network. Surprisingly, everything functioned
well in the first year.
However, issues arose when I updated the system to the next
ted ACS a few years ago, I inadvertently placed
> my secondary storage on the storage network. Surprisingly, everything
> functioned well in the first year.
>
> However, issues arose when I updated the system to the next version. The SSVM
> failed to manage and operate the
Hello, When I initially adopted ACS a few years ago, I inadvertently placed my
secondary storage on the storage network. Surprisingly, everything functioned
well in the first year.
However, issues arose when I updated the system to the next version. The SSVM
failed to manage and operate the
Hi Marty,
This PR seems to be related to your requirement:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7659
-Jithin
From: Marty Godsey
Date: Tuesday, 5 December 2023 at 10:40 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: S3 Secondary Storage
I know you can add more than one secondary storage
I know you can add more than one secondary storage, but is there a way to
restrict people from getting to one or the other?
Basically, I want to provide an option to my users where their snapshots can be
sent to an S3 storage location offsite if they choose it. How do I provide
access to that
Granwille,
The ISO that is mentioned in the below log snippets shows SSVM (not management
server itself) is trying to download the file to NFS server 192.168.50.2. Is it
the secondary storage you removed? If yes restart the SSVM. If management
server is still attempting to connect to this NFS
Hi Guys
My cloud stack management server still wants to connect to a secondary
NFS server. We have shutdown the NFS storage and we removed it from
Cloudstack management via UI in the secondary storage area, we made sure
to migrate all its existing data to another secondary NFS prior.
But
Thank you!
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 6:49 AM Jithin Raju
wrote:
> Hi Mindaugas,
>
> CPVM doesn’t require access to secondary storage. You can avoid running
> the script ‘ssvm-check.sh’ on CPVM.
>
> -Jithin
>
> From: Mindaugas Milinavičius
> Date: Friday, 28 July 2
Hi Mindaugas,
CPVM doesn’t require access to secondary storage. You can avoid running the
script ‘ssvm-check.sh’ on CPVM.
-Jithin
From: Mindaugas Milinavičius
Date: Friday, 28 July 2023 at 12:27 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack 14.18.0 Can't mount cpvm secondary st
Hello everyone,
with ssvm - without any problem, all working good, with cpvm - can't mount
nfs secondary storage.
I tried mount manually - without problem. ping going.
Anyone have this problem?
root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-che
Hi Bryan,
thank you very much. I will take a look!
Regards,
Swen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bryan Lima
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2023 17:17
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: dedicated secondary storage
Hello Swen,
PR #7659[1] was recently created to extend
Hello Swen,
PR #7659[1] was recently created to extend ACS by giving users the
possibility to create scripts (in JavaScript) to direct resources
(Volumes, Templates, Snapshots, and ISOs) to a specific secondary
storage. The initial functionality is only bare-bones and could be
further
: Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 15:58
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
Can you elaborate on this statement?
"but only if there aren’t VMs using the template as the backing file on
that primary storage pool."
The document
Betreff: RE: dedicated secondary storage
Not at the moment.
What's your use case there?
-Original Message-
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 5:31 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: dedicated secondary storage
Hi all,
is it possible to create a seco
with your approach is that only updating secondary
> storage will not ensure that new dpeloyments will get the latest version,
> since CloudStack keeps copies of the template on primary storage also. New
> deployments use the cached templates on primary storage when it is
> available to av
Not at the moment.
What's your use case there?
-Original Message-
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 5:31 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: dedicated secondary storage
Hi all,
is it possible to create a secondary storage dedicated to a domain? Thx
It’s not available now I think , could be a new feature.
-Jithin
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 9:01:09 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: dedicated secondary storage
Hi all,
is it possible to create a secondary storage dedicated to
Hi all,
is it possible to create a secondary storage dedicated to a domain? Thx for
a quick reply. :-)
regards,
Swen
that only updating secondary
storage will not ensure that new dpeloyments will get the latest version, since
CloudStack keeps copies of the template on primary storage also. New
deployments use the cached templates on primary storage when it is available to
avoid copying from secondary storage
gt; that file over time. We would not be looking to trigger an update on all of
> the primary storage pools where instances have been deployed, just the
> secondary storage such that new deploys use the updated image.
>
> Over time, distro cloud images get updated with the latest upda
1 - 100 of 813 matches
Mail list logo
