I think it will be easier for me to stick with basic network.
Can I use vSwitch with basic network if I do not use security groups?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Carlos Reategui wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> The sys
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> The system vms need a public network, so at least 2 "public" Ips.
>
Can I just allocate a range of IPs within my existing 192.168.1.0/24 for
this and tag it with the public VLAN id? or do I need to create a
The system vms need a public network, so at least 2 "public" Ips.
On 8/15/13 11:14 AM, "Carlos Reategui" wrote:
>Thanks for the response.
>
>I am a complete novice when it comes to VLANs so hopefully I can pull this
>off. My hosts/guest physical network is using a Dell PowerConnect 2848
>which
Thanks for the response.
I am a complete novice when it comes to VLANs so hopefully I can pull this
off. My hosts/guest physical network is using a Dell PowerConnect 2848
which says it supports VLAN tags so I'll look at its docs to see what I
need to do to configure it.
You mention that the gues
Currently CS supports security groups functionality only with bridge
networking mode.
If you are ok with out security groups then with advanced shared you will
be able to achieve what you are looking for. Advanced shared expects
tagged VLANs for guest and public traffic types.
On 15/08/13 5:35 A
Hi All,
The Cloudstack docs for XenServer say to use bridge networking when using
basic networking. Is this still the case with CS 4.1 and XS 6.1?
XS 6.1 introduced LACP which I would prefer to use but it is not supported
with bridge networking. I think my storage network would benefit from it.
