Sanjeev,
That will only work if the Guest traffic and Management traffic share the same
NICs, if they are on different NICs (controlled by the traffic labels) simply
setting the same VLAN ID will not be enough.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3603
Yes if Guest and Management traffic are on the different NIC we have to give
traffic labels while creating physical networks.
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:40 PM
To:
Umesh,
Lets put steps so that we are in same page:
1. When we deploy a VM, we use get_template function which basically retrieves
the template information matching the description you provided under services
class for ostype under test module EX: test_loadbalance.py. I am surprised
that you
On 14.01.2014 14:13, sebgoa wrote:
Hi,
While 4.2.1 was just announced, 4.3 is coming in fast.
To try to cut down on the number of votes necessary to get the
release out we need any help we can get testing 4.3
you can grab the latest rpms at:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:55 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tuna, send an email to dev with a pointer to the exact commits your are
talking about
will do. Thanks Sebastien!
--Tuna
On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 14.01.2014 14:13, sebgoa wrote:
Hi,
While 4.2.1 was just announced, 4.3 is coming in fast.
To try to cut down on the number of votes necessary to get the
release out we need any help we can get testing 4.3
you can grab the latest
Hi Radhika, Sanjeev:
Thanks for the answer, makes a bit more sense now.
--David
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi David,
For this release, there is no admin-specific actions, but in the coming
releases there are enhancements
Hi everyone,
I am currently building a test environment comprised of:
- Cloudstack version 4.2.0
- Citrix XenServer 6.2.0 (free trial version from store.citrix.com)
The final purpose is to create an advanced zone with GRE isolation.
I have been running into a number of problems and finally
Quick question,
We deployed two management servers for CloudStack, and they are behind a
load balancer to be able to use them in active-active. What about the
usage service? Does it need to run only on one node or both?
Thanks!
--
Francois Gaudreault
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud
It needs to run only on one node - but I don't think there are any
deleterious effects (aside from wasted CPU cycles) from having more
than one.
--David
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Francois Gaudreault
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote:
Quick question,
We deployed two management servers for
OK. Any chance of duplicate entries if we have two usage server running?
Francois
On 1/14/2014, 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
It needs to run only on one node - but I don't think there are any
deleterious effects (aside from wasted CPU cycles) from having more
than one.
--David
On Tue, Jan
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Shanker Balan
shanker.ba...@shapeblue.comwrote:
1. it's possible expand the hard drive for an instance? how ?
You can’t resize the “root” disk as of now. A data disk can be resized.
Shouldn't be any issue with that.
--David
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Francois Gaudreault
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com wrote:
OK. Any chance of duplicate entries if we have two usage server running?
Francois
On 1/14/2014, 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
It needs to run only on one node -
If you need to, I believe you can resize the Root Volume on the Hypervisor, but
obviously this will have be completed by Admins with Hypervisor access, and not
normal users.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
Hi,
I’ve spent a fair bit of lab time trying to get GRE tunnelling working in
CloudStack 4.2.1 / Xenserver 6.1 but have had no luck so far.
As per various posts, documents and wiki articles I’ve got:
- Xenserver 6.1 cluster with all patches, CloudStack 4.2.1 installed from RPMs
(CentOS 6.5).
Hi all,
my Secondary Storage VM Agent State keeps on changing
Agent State connecting, change to Agent State Alert
am unable to download ISOs, can someone help me?
Thanks in advance!
Motty,
What does your system look like?
Is it single management server, or Multi management server?
Basic or Advanced Networking?
Hypervisor type?
Was the SSVM previously working or is this a new build?
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 |
I apologize for not being specific,
is advance networking setup, hypervisor KVM. Management server is installed
on a separate physical machine than the database and two KVM hypervisors in
all four machines
is a new setup, I have not being able to download ISOs successfully because
of this
How have you configured the networking on your hypervisors?
What are your Bridges called?
How many NICs?
What KVM Traffic Labels have you used?
Just heading off to the land of Nod, but will review in the morning (unless
someone else does first)
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
I have four network adapter two are going to storage, one is for
public/guest and one for management so i have two briges cloudbr0 and
cloudbr1 interface eth0 pong to cloudbr0 and eth1 poing to
cloudbr1(management)
I am able to ping to the bridges.
when I go to Dashboard on the GUI, my secondary
I'm pretty sure this how we've run it in our shop since day one, and have
had no issues. (we are in the 3.0.x stream however, so your mileage may
vary)
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Pretty sure running on two nodes is not an issue,
Hi Dag,
I updated GRE modules to make it work fine with XenServer and XCP during
the summer. It now appears on master branch. Maybe it will added to future
releases.
Will looking into your issue to find out the problem.
Thanks,
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Jan 15, 2014 5:53 AM, Dag
22 matches
Mail list logo
