Re: VPC with Private Gateway leads to MASTER/MASTER

Hello Richard We were also facing master/master issue a lot off late. For that we we increased advert_int from 1 to 3, auth_type from AH to pass in keepalived config. We are monitoring it to see if it happens again in our platform. Sent from my iPhone > On 11-Jun-2019, at 8:50 PM, Richard

Cloudstack orchestration feature

Hi all, I have been exploring cloudstack cloud platform while comparing it with openstack cloud platform. I am a little skeptical about which solution to use as our cloud platform between cloudstack and openstack. Following are the difficulties I am facing which comparing these two solutions.

Re: Problem due to create network

Based on the " https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/1d05fead49f5c856257a741b07122f5633d2e359/framework/db/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/db/Merovingian2.java#L121:L154; I'm not quite sure it's a configurable thing. I don't see any parameter with that value or i.e. half of that... Perhaps

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

migrate away all VMs to another host in that Basic zone - there is no way to move VMs to a new Zone... On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 23:26, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > You mean I should delete and re-add VMs? > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:43 AM Andrija Panic > wrote: > > > You want to evacuate all VMs

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

You mean I should delete and re-add VMs? On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:43 AM Andrija Panic wrote: > You want to evacuate all VMs of that host, to reinstall it (possibly not > needed) and use it as an brand new host in the Advanced Zone. > This means putting the host into maintenance mode and

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

You want to evacuate all VMs of that host, to reinstall it (possibly not needed) and use it as an brand new host in the Advanced Zone. This means putting the host into maintenance mode and finally removing it. I would make sure to immediately stop cloudstack-agent service. Later you can re-add

Re: CloudStack 4.11.x - KVM hibernation support

Create a GitHub issue? On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:04, Razvan Rosca wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any chance to add KVM hibernation support in a (near) future CS > release? > > Thank you, > Razvan Rosca > > Skype: razvan.rosca > Tel: +40 731 059 660 > Linkedin:

Re: launch instance error

Alejandro, Please send the whole log on pastebin or similar, this one doesn't provide enough information... (beside the " Found pools matching tags: [] ") On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 17:57, Alejandro Ruiz Bermejo < arbermejo0...@gmail.com> wrote: > ok, so i registered a new template and unset-ed the

Re: VPC with Private Gateway leads to MASTER/MASTER

Hi Richard, can I kindly as you to open a GitHub issue, describing the problem in detail, so someone can pick it up for the resolution - we could be able to fix this for the 4.13, but 4.11.3 we are a bit late since it's already in the voting process. Thanks, Andrija On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at

VPC with Private Gateway leads to MASTER/MASTER

I've deployed a fairly simple VPC (one tier, one VM) with a private gateway, but keep getting both VRs in MASTER state. Upon investigating, I can see that the reason is that keepalived is being configured to use the private gateway interface (eth2). Since private gateway interface shares a

Re: 4.13 Heads up

Sounds good to me. +1 Em seg, 10 de jun de 2019 às 12:19, Paul Angus escreveu: > In order to keep up the momentum on the release cadence, some of us are > now planning to get 4.13 moving > > > > We've come up with a plan which I hope everyone will find acceptable (see > below). > > > > > >

Re: K8S LoadBalancer

Thank you very much, Gregor! Would you also be so kind as to help me a little? I tried to deploy your CCM in my K8S, but something seems to be gone wrong. I submitted my question as an issue: https://github.com/swisstxt/cloudstack-cloud-controller-manager/issues/9 - could you, please, take a

Re: launch instance error

ok, so i registered a new template and unset-ed the HVM option and launched a new instance using this themplate. Now the planner can find the host inside the LXC cluster but it seems like it can't find now a propper storage pool. I already have everything configured as it appears on the

Re: Unabele to boot CloudLinux on KVM after update

> Usually indicates missing storage driver in initramfs (if you were on > VMware, I would tell you to check if vmw_pvscsi.ko is present in > initramfs). First thing to check would be to compare the list of PCI devices (lspci) and storage devices (cat /proc/partitions) between the older and the

CloudStack 4.11.x - KVM hibernation support

Hello, Is there any chance to add KVM hibernation support in a (near) future CS release? Thank you, Razvan Rosca Skype: razvan.rosca Tel: +40 731 059 660 Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/razvanrosca/ Facebook: https://fb.com/razvanrosca.com

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

Also I have created a new network offering with LB service. Isn't it possible to change network offering of either basic zone or the guest network? On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:06 PM Fariborz Navidan wrote: > what will happen to VMs running on the host during this procedure? > > On Tue, Jun 11,

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

what will happen to VMs running on the host during this procedure? On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:56 PM Andrija Panic wrote: > In short - no. > You could remove some hosts from Basic zone, create a new advanced zone and > create things from scratch effectively. > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:19,

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

In short - no. You could remove some hosts from Basic zone, create a new advanced zone and create things from scratch effectively. On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 09:19, Fariborz Navidan wrote: > Is it possible to create a new Advanced zone and move/assign other > infrastructure entities i.e. Pods,

Re: [VOTE] 4.11.3.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Based on; > gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.11.3.0-src.tar.bz2.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-cloudstack-4.11.3.0-src.tar.bz2' gpg: Signature made Mon 10 Jun 2019 08:45:16 PM IST gpg:using RSA key 8B309F7251EE0BC8 gpg: Good signature from "Paul Angus

Re: K8S LoadBalancer

Hi Vladimir The CloudStack cloud provider code will be removed from the k8s core soon: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/72178 It's not advisable to use it any more. You can use our CCM that is based on the old cloud provider instead:

[VOTE] 4.11.3.0 RC1

Hi All, I've created a 4.11.3.0 release (RC1), with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.3.0-RC20190610T1615 Commit: 51124b7b35f47089b2e51a93b2094ea93dd15302 Source

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

Is it possible to create a new Advanced zone and move/assign other infrastructure entities i.e. Pods, Clusters, Hosts, etc. from basic zone to advanced one? On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:19 AM Andrija Panic wrote: > In Basiz zone - no. VR is an entity existing only in Advanced Zone. > I.e.

Re: Enabling LB service on existing zone

In Basiz zone - no. VR is an entity existing only in Advanced Zone. I.e. Advanced zone can have many, isolated by VLAN, shared networks - a.k.a. many Basic Zones. i.e. at some point in time (perhaps some guture 5.x release) - basic zones will be removed completely. i.e if this is not production,