Re: [ClusterLabs] Pengine always trying to start the resource on the standby node.

: > On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 08:37 +0800, Albert Weng wrote: > > Hi Andrei, > > > > Thanks for your quickly reply. Still need help as below : > > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Andrei Borzenkov > m> wrote: > > > 06.06.2018 04:27, Albert Weng пишет:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pengine always trying to start the resource on the standby node.

Hi Andrei, Thanks for your quickly reply. Still need help as below : On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 06.06.2018 04:27, Albert Weng пишет: > > Hi All, > > > > I have created active/passive pacemaker cluster on RHEL 7. > > > > Here

[ClusterLabs] pengine always trying to start the resource on the standby node.

68653-26882) derived from /var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-warn-7.bz2 clustera crmd: notice: te_fence_node: Executing reboot fencing operation (23) on clusterb (timeout=6) Thanks -- Kind regards, Albert Weng ___ Users mailing list: Users@cluster

[ClusterLabs] Pengine always trying to start the resource on the standby node.

68653-26882) derived from /var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-warn-7.bz2 clustera crmd: notice: te_fence_node: Executing reboot fencing operation (23) on clusterb (timeout=6) Thanks -- Kind regards, Albert Weng <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

Hi Ken, thank you for your comment. i think this case can be closed, i use your suggestion of constraint and then problem resolved. thanks a lot~~ On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/03/2017 09:04 PM, Albert Weng wrote: >

Re: [ClusterLabs] How to fence cluster node when SAN filesystem fail

shell and pcs make it easier; see their > > man pages and other documentation for details. > > > > > > On 05/01/2017 10:35 PM, Albert Weng wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> My environment : > >> (1) two node (active/passive) pacemaker cluster > &g

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

e2 prefers clusterb thanks a lot On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Marek Grac <mg...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Albert Weng <weng.alb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I have created active/passive pacemaker cl

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

pmi-fence-db01_stop_0 on gmlcdbw02 (local) if i create location constraint, can i force ipmi-fence-db01 keep on the gmlcdbw01? # pcs constraint location ipmi-fence-db01 prefers gmlcdbw01 # pcs constraint location ipmi-fence-db02 prefers gmlcdbw02 Thanks. On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Albert W

[ClusterLabs] How to fence cluster node when SAN filesystem fail

oot itself. but when i use pacemaker on RHEL cluster, when i remove fiber cable on active node, all resources failover to passive node normally, but active node doesn't reboot. how to trigger fence reboot action when SAN filesystem lost? Thank a lot~~~ -- Kind regards, Albert Weng <https://

[ClusterLabs] stonith device locate on same host in active/passive cluster

op monitor interval=60s # pcs status ipmi-fence-node1 clustera ipmi-fence-node2 clusterb but when i failover to passive node, then i ran # pcs status ipmi-fence-node1clusterb ipmi-fence-node2 clusterb why both fence device lo