On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 00:26 +0200, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
> I'm not sure if I understand what you want to know. There was a vote by
> the Cocoon PMC with the result that Corona will become Cocoon 3 (see
> http://cocoon.markmail.org/message/txav36lmvpkpbso4).
The vote was about whether Corona may be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 8/26/08, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mark Lundquist wrote:
>> > On Aug 24, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Nick Baumberger wrote:
>> >> Dear Cocoon-ers,
>> >>
>> >> Can somebody tell me where cocoon is heading after release 2.2 ? I did
>> >> not follow the maili
On 8/26/08, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Lundquist wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Nick Baumberger wrote:
> >> Dear Cocoon-ers,
> >>
> >> Can somebody tell me where cocoon is heading after release 2.2 ? I did
> >> not follow the mailing list for around a year, being
On Aug 25, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Mark Lundquist wrote:
So basically: the long and short of it is, there is this thing
called Cocoon 3.0 and it's called that because the Cocoon developers
weren't clever enough to think of a good name! :-)
I love it :) Great write up, Mark, and everything is corr
On Aug 26, 2008, at 5:31 AM, Ken Starks wrote:
And if so, in spite of the general consensus that 2.2 is the way
forward, should I
just stick to the 2.1.11 (which satisfies my current needs) until
Corona catches up. ?
Hi Ken, I would say that there are only two reasons to ever upgrade.
Yo
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Ken Starks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Aren't these objectives part of Cocoon 22 also ? I though part of the
rationale for blocks was that
they are--beyond a small core-- optional and modular, you don't have to
have any you don'
Mark Lundquist wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Nick Baumberger wrote:
>
>> Dear Cocoon-ers,
>>
>> Can somebody tell me where cocoon is heading after release 2.2 ? I did
>> not follow the mailing list for around a year, being back now I am
>> shocked by the recent announcement regarding co
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Ken Starks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Aren't these objectives part of Cocoon 22 also ? I though part of the
> rationale for blocks was that
> they are--beyond a small core-- optional and modular, you don't have to
> have any you don't need.
>
> So building a
Mark Lundquist wrote:
On Aug 24, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Nick Baumberger wrote:
Dear Cocoon-ers,
Can somebody tell me where cocoon is heading after release 2.2 ? I
did not follow the mailing list for around a year, being back now I
am shocked by the recent announcement regarding cocoon 3 which se
On Aug 24, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Nick Baumberger wrote:
Dear Cocoon-ers,
Can somebody tell me where cocoon is heading after release 2.2 ? I
did not follow the mailing list for around a year, being back now I
am shocked by the recent announcement regarding cocoon 3 which seems
to me a complet
Dear Cocoon-ers,
Can somebody tell me where cocoon is heading after release 2.2 ? I did not
follow the mailing list for around a year, being back now I am shocked by the
recent announcement regarding cocoon 3 which seems to me a complete break with
what has been achieved so far - or have I just
11 matches
Mail list logo
