I built DragonFly 3.0.3 images and uploaded them; they should show up
on mirrors soon:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/mirrors/
This took a while after the tagging because (this time) I verified
every image would boot, first.
PM, David.Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/08/12 11:47, Justin Sherrill wrote:
HP Proliant DL380 G4
It looks like they both are 64 bit.
Is it just me getting older, or are sites designed now to make
information inaccessible?
Here are the specs for both here:
http://h18004
I don't see much difference between the two. The G4 is explicitly
listed as 64-bit, but I'm not sure about the G3.
The one thing I can think of is to look at the hardware listed as
installed and make sure things like the network cards work (very
likely) and the storage controller is supported
We can do that - the caveats are that John is building pkgsrc-current,
so you have to be on pkgsrc-current to use them. We release DragonFly
with the current quarterly release of pkgsrc, so by default, people
are not going to pull from his collection of files even if they are
uploaded.
There
I am in a spot with limited bandwidth, so I can't confirm this, but this
should have uploaded as pkgsrc-2012q2 on Avalon. I haven't had a i386
build complete yet. Hasn't crashed yet, though...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Charlie Root r...@df64.v12.su
Date: Aug 6, 2012 1:25 AM
, 2012 at 10:08:37AM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
pkgsrc bulk build report
Build failures
Package Breaks Maintainer
-
misc/libreoffice
with that one error.
On Aug 7, 2012 11:10 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2012 10:08:37 Justin Sherrill wrote:
I am in a spot with limited bandwidth, so I can't confirm this, but this
should have uploaded as pkgsrc-2012q2 on Avalon. I haven't had a i386
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Sascha Wildner s...@online.de wrote:
The USB image is larger than 4GB, unfortunately (I think around 5GB, as it
was too full with 4GB).
I don't think this is much of a problem. I would bet that the average
USB flash drive size has climbed beyond 4G. Looking
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@kathe.in wrote:
how to?
We don't really have a mechanism for that, cause we don't have a path
for that money. If you want to save up some money, there is:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/donations/
I'm sure there's other equipment that
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Alex Hornung ahorn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 21/06/12 17:07, codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
But a month or so ago the news server stopped responding. Trying again today
it appears still offline. Does anybody know/care about this? I would prefer
to use the nntp
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Siju George sgeorge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
To better rephrase my question.
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2010-09/msg00222.html
from this I guess this error was due to accessing a snapshot.
Just wanted to know what file in flux means? Is it
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2012 09:38:23 Pierre Abbat wrote:
[2485/12503] Successfully built SDL_gfx-2.0.23
[2486/12503] Starting build of qt4-sqlite3-4.8.0nb2
Read from remote host darner: Connection reset by peer
Connection to
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Edward M martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote:
it is better to start pkg_rolling-relpace with options ´s´ f or with
option ´u´ or it
does not realliy matter with which option i start using with when the
rolling process is started?
Order of argument does not
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 09:26:34 Justin Sherrill wrote:
If you're having problems with a couple packages not rebuilding, the
fix is not going to be building 12500 additional packages. If there's
specific packages you can't
On Jun 5, 2012 5:03 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
No I'm not. What I want to do is build all the packages, so that anyone
who
wants to upgrade can do so easily. What is the correct way to restart a
bulk
build where it left off? Who's going to build the packages for 2012Q2,
since
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Siju George sgeorge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I installed DragonFly-DEVELOPMENT/amd64 on a lenovo thinkpad E420.
Linux uses the following firmware
rtl8192c_common: Loading firmware file rtlwifi/rtl8192cfw.bin
How do I compile in support in the kernel for
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
I brought up Firefox (I had been doing it on the laptop, but I took it out
last night and will take it out tonight) and Gimp on darner. Also hammer has
been running over 13 hours, which is highly unusual; usually it takes
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:29 AM, John Marino dragonfly...@marino.st wrote:
Personally I disagree with this philosophy. Pkgsrc packages should be
buildable by anyone as a minimum requirement for being a package, and if
this capability is lost, I believe the package should be removed from
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Matthew Dillon
dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
This time it fixed itself. Sometimes I have to blow the checkout away
and let it re-checkout everything over again.
I did that - rm'd the checkout. I was going to write an email about
this as soon as I
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Matthew Dillon
dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
:I did that - rm'd the checkout. I was going to write an email about
:this as soon as I saw whether it worked again after the next 'normal'
:checkout. Looking at gitweb, I see the conversion commit, but I
This is possibly the largest percentage of successful builds on
DragonFly I've ever seen.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-05-06 01:25
Build end: 2012-05-08 16:13
Full report:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Sunday, May 06, 2012 21:10:24 Justin Sherrill wrote:
pkgtools/pbulk will build everything, upload it, and produce a report.
There's very little documentation, though. I think you can also
'bmake package' for individual
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Wednesday, May 02, 2012 22:02:18 Justin Sherrill wrote:
My preferred method, when binary packages aren't available, is to
update /usr/pkgsrc to the appropriate release and then use
pkg_rolling-replace to upgrade
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Sunday, May 06, 2012 13:17:39 Justin Sherrill wrote:
When packages get name changes, there's no automated way to
transition. I assume what happened is postfix-current became postfix
and some of the KDE packages were
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
I ran into a snag. I ran pkg_rolling-replace -u -D MAKE_JOBS=3 a few times. I
ran into a backup program with a license it didn't like; since I'm not using
it, I removed it. Then I ran into this:
rr x11/xfontsel -
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Edward martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/03/2012 10:46 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
I recommend pkg_rolling-replace in general when building from source.
Off the top of my head, this should mark firefox for rebuilding and
then rebuild it and all its
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Edward martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded and untar pkgsrc2012Q1 into a DragonflyBSD 3.0.2 new install.
when i tried to build firefox 11.0 from www/firefox it error stops with
the following message:
pkg_add: A different version of
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 21:06:14 Justin Sherrill wrote:
Are you asking about doing a full bulk build of all the packages, or
adding/upgrading packages on your system?
Both. I'd like to upgrade the packages on my system
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available?
Pierre
64-bit build just finished this morning, so it'll be at least a day or
two for uploading. 32-bit build is on a machine that has crashed and
I don't have
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
Do you know when the packages for 2012Q1 will be available?
Pierre
64-bit build just finished this morning, so it'll be at least a day
It will
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Edward M martinezedward...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/01/2012 06:30 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at
this point for 2012Q1.
This may sound like a noob question:-)
Will 2012Q1 work on DFlyBSD
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 09:30:50 Justin Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Justin Sherrill
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
I'd advise building from source instead of waiting for binaries at
this point
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Tim Darby t+df...@timdarby.net wrote:
When I run hammer prune-everything remotely via SSH, it pretty consistently
causes all network connections to that box to die, including my ssh session.
Has anyone else seen this?
I have run prune-everything a bunch of
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
I've installed Dragonfly 3.0.2 on an x86_64 box side-by-side with Arch
Linux. Arch is set up for UTC time, America/New_York timezone. When I
installed Dragonfly, I selected 'Yes' in response to the question Is
this
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Konrad Neuwirth kon...@fimsch.net wrote:
Hello everyone,
the handbook on the website is very helpful in regards to jails, and I was
able to set up a jail or three quite quickly following the instructions
there. What I do not yet understand, though, is what
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sly Midnight slymidni...@yahoo.com wrote:
git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0 v3.0.2
git checkout v3.0.2
You almost had it:
git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0 origin/DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0
git checkout DragonFly_RELEASE_3_0
These lines say Attach a local branch to
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 22:39:22 Justin Sherrill wrote:
The people this would inconvenience is anyone upgrading from 3.0.1 or
3.0.2 to 3.0.3; your binary package target would change to a newer
release, so you would
Here's a plan of what I'm going to do in the next little while:
- We have 2.6 binary packages still available. I don't think anyone
is using them at this point, and building from source is still
possible even with these missing. I will delete them soon.
- The next quarterly release of pkgsrc,
3.0.2 is tagged and released. Images for 3.0.2 are also out, and
should be at most mirrors by now.
The major difference between 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 is I/O APIC is disabled
by default when running DragonFly in a virtual machine; some people
had booting issues with that on.
For a shortlog of changes:
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-20 02:35
Build end: 2012-03-23 10:18
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/bleeding-edge/20120320.0235/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Konrad Neuwirth kon...@fimsch.net wrote:
Thu Mar 22 00:34:54 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented: Couldn't
create accept lock (/var/run/accept.lock.81125) (5)
They both mean that apache doesn't start.
Don't know about the SSL error, but can the www
We still have binary pkgsrc packages for DragonFly for version
2.6/2.7, which date back to summer 2010. I want to remove them, but
the last time I brought up the idea I think someone needed older
packages for something where they couldn't build.
We're currently eating up 200+G of storage space
lang/ruby193-base is I thought fixed in pkgsrc-current, so either I
had an older flavor of pkgsrc-current downloaded when I started this,
or I screwed up.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.1/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-14 16:32
Build end: 2012-03-20
I'll be darned if I can figure out why ruby-193 thinks it builds an
oddly-named library and then craps out.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 3.0/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2012-03-12 23:36
Build end: 2012-03-14 05:43
Full report:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
And also, somebody pointed out in this
thread that the .tar archive with the pkgsrc tree may not align well
with my current DragonFlyBSD version, or have I misunderstood something?
Anyway, where can I download the archive with the pkgsrc
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:51 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
P.S. After the installation I ran 'make pkgsrc-create' like
DragonFlyBSD online documentation suggests, and it has been running for
about 2 days already. :D
I can see a program with a command line:
git index-pack --stdin -v --fix-thin
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Bob Gold bgold2...@gmail.com wrote:
some rss feed advertised dragonFly.
so I burned a liveCD (64 bit stable)
the documentation on this is sparse so...
is there ANY GUI build into the LiveCD?
if so how the heck do I invoke it?
If the liveCD file you used
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:17 AM, YOSHIDA Shigeru yshig...@gmail.com wrote:
cd /usr/pkgsrc git fetch origin
remote: Counting objects: 1681874, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (931019/931019), done.
fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer232.22 MiB | 157 KiB/s
fatal: early EOF
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
Do you know where to get the dircolors program? I copied my bashrc from my
Linux box and it has this code:
Does dircolors do something ls -G does not?
Chances are good you already noticed, but: DragonFly 3.0 is released!
Check the release notes for details.
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release30/
Download from a convenient mirror. We had issues with the inital
x86_64 GUI ISO image (file was over 2G when decompressed) but the ISO
there now will
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Zenny garbytr...@gmail.com wrote:
UPDATE: I also tried to install dfly-x86_64-3.0.1_REL.img with/without
acpi and encryption of swap and root with HAMMER,
With encryption, the installer stopped at 93% while creating newfs
with a malloc error, while encrypting
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that the release images are already in place (I even
downloaded one), but there is no formal announcement yet. The release
notes date the release with February 21 (yesterday). What is the current
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:06 AM, David Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
I can get these servers here:
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-45510
...for $10 each, or two for $15.
ATI Rage XL is I think an older chipset and should work well, if I'm
I'm aiming to tag 3.0.1 this weekend and upload images. There's 5
bugs still linked on the catchall 3.0 ticket:
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2286
... but I don't think they are worth holding up the release. If
anyone wants to try to close them in the next 48 hours or so, please
do.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
There are 12 kde related packages in
http://mirror-master.dragonflybsd.org/packages/x86_64/DragonFly-3.0/pkgsrc-2011Q4/All/
but ,
I just put these together. It's RCa because I haven't even tested
these in a VM yet, so hopefully they are... bootable? The next ones,
if made, will be 3.0-RCb. Please test, file bugs, you know what to
do.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/iso-images/dfly-i386-3.0-RCa.iso.bz2
That's weird, since you have a .git directory there. Google queries
suggest rm .git/index git reset but that seems to be from
something that was fixed in an older version of Git.
You could delete the files in /usr/src, including the .git*
directories, and re-download using the Makefile in /usr.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org wrote:
Whatever happened to the old principle for three part numbers
abi level.feature level.fix level
Bug fix releases bump the fix level, new features bump the feature
level and zero the fix level, big
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
I thought that a package that is listed in the repository but not available
meant that it has been replaced by a new version, but there's no new version
of the list.
The package isn't physically there in the repository -
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Dillon
dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
Hello everyone! First, I apologize for the aborted 2.12 release. We
got as far as rolling it but I decided to make a real push to try to
fix the occassional random seg-fault bug that we were still
You could rm everything now, and then use 'bmake install clean
clean-depends' from now on, and you should be fine.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Saturday 03 December 2011 21:03:53 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I have
I had this problem with an old Sony laptop where the CD drive was in a
base docking unit. The solution was to install from a USB stick and
an .IMG file, in my case.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Konrad Neuwirth kon...@fimsch.net wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am currently trying to set up 2.13
The newest Intel video chipsets require GEM/KMS, which does not exist
in any BSD at this point - I think. Watch out for that...
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Edward M. unixdragonfly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/16/11 19:32, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 11/11/2011 09:41 PM, Edward
Is it NAT you control? If it's PF-based, you can put in a rule for
that. I'm about to do the same for a hardware phone at home.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
What software phones are available? I tried kiax but it segfaulted. Kphone
runs, but I
Building happens all the time for the quarterly release, but it takes a
while for each round to finish - plus I've had crashing problems... so
build from source if you want it asap.
On Nov 4, 2011 2:45 PM, Max Herrgard herrg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 nov 2011, at 19.19, Pierre Abbat wrote:
Nov
I'm calling it a 'release candidate', but it's really just 2.12.0
built over last night. Please try it and report problems. I haven't
even run these yet.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/2.12-RC/
Facebook's been doing this for a while; they will 'hijack' terms based
on people talking about them and pretend there's Facebook-exclusive
groups for those topics - including DragonFly:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2010/06/11/6013.html
I hate to say it because it makes me sound like a
I don't think there's ever been activity in it, really. I set it up,
but there's no dramatic reason to put something in there.
We have a DragonFly BSD twitter account
(https://twitter.com/#!/dragonflybsd) that I post Digest headlines to.
It's really just there for the convenience of people who
My guess is that it's an older intel driver that happens to be getting
installed. The most recent version of the intel driver, 2.8, is
Linux-only, so I'm not sure how much luck you will have with any BSD.
http://pkgsrc.se/files.php?messageId=20090810061721.c330b17...@cvs.netbsd.org
You can try
3:33 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
I finally got a build of pkgsrc-current done; this was on x86_64. The
number 1 break is databases/postgresql84-client, from a packaging
error. I should have a new report in a few days since this initial
build is complete.
Justin,
I just pulled in pkgsrc
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Chris Turner
c.tur...@199technologies.com wrote:
I'm happy to pitch in where possible if any of the above needs doing -
just don't feel like I have the 'authority' to set the tone, policy etc -
You have as much authority as you can take. Go go go go go.
I think this would do it:
route add -net 192.168.100.0/24 linuxbox.local
Substitute the IP range within your VPN for the address range, and the
name/IP of your linux box. The command won't survive a reboot; you'd
have to stick it in /usr/local/etc or something, somewhere.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011
Finally, a pkgsrc-current build report!
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-08-22 05:14
Build end: 2011-09-01 11:45
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/bleeding-edge/20110822.0514/meta/report.html
Your question is pretty open-ended - what are you looking to do? I
assume ipf means you want to set up a software firewall. Are you
looking to create a gateway for your home computers, or something
else?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Guerrero Hall guerreroh...@live.com wrote:
Hi, I came
sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Justin Sherrill
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
There's tarballs (or bzip, etc.) for recent branches and
pkgsrc-current at ftp.netbsd.org. For example
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/pkgsrc-2011Q2/
Plus Matthias pointed out you can
I've seen a number of people say they get errors when downloading
dragonfly pkgsrc via git. I don't know what's causing it, but 2
workaround for now would be to either grab it the old-fashioned way
via CVS: (assuming tcsh)
setenv CVSROOT anon...@anoncvs.netbsd.org:/cvsroot
setenv CVS_RSH ssh
cd
I haven't connected via PPTP on a non-Windows machine in a while, but
I bet these steps would work:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/pptp.php
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
My boss has a VPN that I need to connect to. I can connect to it from the
Windows
19, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Justin Sherrill
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
I've seen a number of people say they get errors when downloading
dragonfly pkgsrc via git. I don't know what's causing it, but 2
workaround for now would be to either grab it the old-fashioned way
via CVS: (assuming tcsh
ftp://crater.dragonflybsd.org/Older/
We have had complaints from mirrors that the space for DragonFly is
getting huge, though most of the pain from that is pkgsrc binary
packages.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Max Herrgard herrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason for not having
Would it be worth setting this by default, since (someday, somehow)
IPv6 is becoming more common?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matthias Rampke matth...@rampke.de wrote:
DragonFly doesn't accept router advertisements by default. You have to set
something like ip6mode=autohost in /etc/rc.conf
Maybe check 'arp -a', and see if there's more than one machine
configured with that IP?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ralf Schmitt r...@systemexit.de wrote:
Hi,
when I try to login to the local machine with ssh, it doesn't work:
,
| # ssh -v root@192.168.10.41
|
.)
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2011 09:24:46 Justin Sherrill wrote:
These packages failed during the build for whatever reason
doxygen-1.6.3nb4 cups-1.4.6nb1 xine-lib-1.1.19nb5 akonadi-1.4.0nb5
And kde4 is dependent on them. I
I've built the pkgsrc bootstrap for 2011Q2 several times over
recently, and I didn't encounter this.
I assume there's something out of place on your machine that's
confusing the build. Maybe try doing a 'bmake clean'? That
suggestion sounds kinda weak now that I said it.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011
This machine was building with MAKE_JOBS set - so these results may
improve on a subsequent build.
In any case, the biggest break was net/glib-networking, and it's
complaining that gettext isn't present. That's wierd.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/i386
The binary builds for pkgsrc-2011Q2 are complete and uploaded to
avalon.dragonflybsd.org. (Well, except for DragonFly 2.10/i386. Its
upload was interrupted, so I had to restart it.)
However, pkg_radd isn't going to pull from the new builds without some
manual intervention. To access them, you
I'm going to re-run this build as soon as the upload finishes; the
broken packages list is totally different than the other
DragonFly/pkgsrc-2011q2 reports I have so I suspect something wierd
may be going on, on this machine.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/i386
://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/avahi-0.6.27nb4/depends.log
Maybe it was a gtk2 problem causing it.
I've got the latest gtk2.24 on the system, so maybe the update to that
package fixed these on x86_64.
John
On 6/6/2011 5:36 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
pkgsrc bulk
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-04 20:46
Build end: 2011-06-11 09:38
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.10/20110604.2046/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
The 32-bit build, recently finished on 2011Q1.
-- Forwarded message --
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-07 03:44
Build end: 2011-06-07 16:46
Full report:
Wouldn't he need to do this once, to establish the local copy of the branch?
cd /usr/src git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_2_10
origin/DragonFly_RELEASE_2_10
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Matthias Rampke
matthias.ram...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
to switch to the stable branch
cd
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/meta/report.html
I copied in the wrong setting for the URL path. (s/i386/x86_64/) The
packages are in the right place, though.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Alex Hornung ahorn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/06/11 04:36, Justin
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-03 02:14
Build end: 2011-06-06 03:10
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.11/20110603.0214/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
There's no way to expand/shrink Hammer volumes. Another way to
approach this - and it's not necessarily better or worse - is to use
Hammer's mirroring capability to move data to a larger disk and then
start using that one, or otherwise shift it around.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Dean
i386 build coming up soon too.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-05-28 05:44
Build end: 2011-05-28 23:12
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.10/20110528.0544/meta/report.html
Machine readable
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release210/ has MD5 sums listed there. I
don't have access to crater to update the md5.txt file, though.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Milo dragonfly...@helcaraxe.net wrote:
Hello!
I have two questions:
- Why md5 sums weren't provided for last (2.10.1)
You could stream master - slave, and then if the master fails, change
the slave disk to the master. Dunno if that covers the same area for
you.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2011 17:13:57 Matthew Dillon wrote:
No, unfortunately
pkgsrc-2011Q1, DragonFly 2.11/x86_64, and I think uploaded to the
right place this time.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-05-13 03:45
Build end: 2011-05-17 03:59
Full report:
I think wip/jdk16 in pkgsrc runs on DragonFly, or at least used to...
Also, another thing that may or may not work:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/jdk15p2_dragonfly14.tar.bz2
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
I'd like to run Freenet. It's written in Java.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, David Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody got any advice on what nics work best with Dragonfly, other than
the ones on-site?
I've had good luck with Intel chipsets, like those supported by the
fxp or em drivers.
If you want a list of
I have two reports on recent pkgsrc builds, so I'll just send the URLs
instead of forwarding each:
DragonFly 2.11, x86_64, pkgsrc-2011Q1:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110508.2107/meta/report.html
DragonFly 2.10, i386, pkgsrc-2011Q1: (x86_64 report filepath has been
fixed
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
