Sorry, I used
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/packages/pkgsrc-current.tar.gz
and it seems to give errors because not properly
updated or something.
I had similar bmake errors when using the pkgsrc-current tarball - see:
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2006-01/msg00022.html
I tried to get X up after installing the updated drivers. I now have a
xorg.conf.new file, but when I try to start X, I get a blank screen with
no
cursor. Ctrl-alt-bs exits, as it should. How do I fix it? It was working
before I did the software upgrade.
X isn't going to read that config
On Saturday 31 October 2009 22:58:27 jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
I used X -config xorg.conf.new and it came up blank. Should I post the
conf or
the log file?
Both - we're not low on electrons. If you have someplace to put them, you
can do that and paste a link.
Another help option is
Here they are.
My first guess is to remove DRI and/or GLX from your kernel config; those
are often the most likely culprits in my experience. There's no
convenient error lines in the X output to show.
I'm having similar troubles now, having installed binary packages to test
this, though
Any suggestions about fixing the ACPI problem? If I boot the normal way it
gets a kernel trap.
You hadn't mentioned this before, but I don't know if it matters for the
Xorg problem.
I'm having similar troubles now, having installed binary packages to
test
this, though unloading DRI/GLX
Hi,
on the DragonFly ikiwiki, search results include navigational
elements, from the parsed markdown output.
One example is:
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/wiki.cgi?P=dma
That's a good fix. The only issue is upgrading ikiwiki, since new
versions of search.pm will overwrite this change. The
A new set of pkgsrc packages for 2.5/64-bit 2009Q3 DragonFly have been
built. It's coming from pkgbox64 behind Matt's connection, so the actual
packages are probably still uploading to avalon, but the build report is
here and the logs are here:
In DragonFly BSD 2.4.1 release, the build triplet for target
system is 'amd64-pc-dragonflybsd'.
However, the build.log for gcc44-4 (pkgsrc report above) shows
the target system as 'x86_64-unknown-dragonflybsd2.5.1'
Usually version numbers are not part of the triplet and unknown
is either
version numbers are not part of the triplet and unknown
is either pc or some such.
So, is this the build triplet in the interim as the transition
happens to a new moniker ?
Our system says amd64, while pkgsrc says x86-64. Corecode I think
may
be working to change this...
Justin, thank you
There's a slightly
newer version of ikiwiki that should be installed first, though, as
there's been a few quick minor releases. If I can't get it upgraded
tonight, I'll get it done this weekend.
It's upgraded. I filed a bug report about search results for ikiwiki;
maybe this can get fixed
Another pkgsrc 2009Q3 build for i386 completed - build reports for anyone
who wants to fix packages are at:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports//20091105.0234/
I could use a system for 2.4.x builds - anyone have a machine with root
access and OK upstream bandwidth available?
I have a question for pkgin users should we include pkgin as
part of the official dist? i.e. put it in the release ISOs/IMGs
like we do the git utilities, not bring it into base. It would
still be a package.
I haven't been using pkgin enough to know, but: can we make
2009/11/13 jus...@shiningsilence.com:
Well, pkg_radd does one thing, albeit well. pkgin wraps this
functionality up, along with providing other tools in one --- perhaps
pkgin could just use pkg_radd directly, but that seems a little
pointless, IMO.
I meant the other way - pkg_radd is a
I did pkg_search office and got a list of packages. I installed koffice,
which for some reason caused firefox to be removed. I could not find a
package for OpenOffice. Attempting to reinstall firefox results in this:
What location is pkgin looking at for downloads? What version of
DragonFly
1. What's the relationship between pkgin and pkgsrc? I find pkgin
*really* useful so far for a lot of things like OpenOffice, Firefox,
etc., which would have otherwise crippled my machine trying to compile
them. That said, I also have some applications compiled from pkgsrc.
Is it
My choices are:
a) FreeBSD with gmirror and implementing the snapshot function via
hardlinks
b) FreeBSD + ZFS
c) experimenting with Dragonfly + HAMMER
The two things I've learned from working with Hammer are:
- I've filled up Hammer disks with the default settings twice by running
bulk
On Friday 13 November 2009 13:31:27 jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
I did pkg_search office and got a list of packages. I installed
koffice, which for some reason caused firefox to be removed. I could
not
find a package for OpenOffice. Attempting to reinstall firefox results
in
this:
Hi Justin and everyone,
It would be very cool if someone updated the goals page on the dragonfly
site with information on the status of each of the goals/projects.
Matt, is this something you are interested in? You were the original author.
On Saturday 14 November 2009 20:32:42 jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
Here's my guesses: firefox didn't install because it needs a newer
version
of sqlite3, which pkgin itself needs and you were upgrading using pkgin.
(And pkg_radd won't replace existing packages.)
Sounds sensible. sqlite
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
Another pkgsrc 2009Q3 build for i386 completed - build reports for
anyone
who wants to fix packages are at:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports//20091105.0234/
I could use a system for 2.4.x builds - anyone have a machine with root
access and OK
Greetings,
I'm currently just now evaluating d-fly. After the installation, I looked
to
install Xorg. I see little in the pkgsrc tree regarding Xorg. It seems
that
xf86 is d-fly's X server. Is there any work in progress to make the Xorg
server available in pkgsrc?
xorg's available in
xorg's available in pkgsrc now. There's the modular-xorg-drivers,
modular-xorg-apps, modular-xorg-libs, etc. in the pkgsrc meta category.
Install those and you'll have xorg.
Ahh, I see. The name threw me. I was looking for names prefixed w/ Xorg.
I never would have thought to look for
There's a new build of pkgsrc-2009Q3 for DragonFly 2.4.x on i386. It's
available at avalon now, so it's accessible through pkg_radd.
I have one thing I goofed when moving 2.4 package building to this system;
avalon, where these were built, is a 2.5 system, so even though this was
done with
Packages for 2.5, on i386, for pkgsrc-2009Q3, are updated.
Original Message
Subject: avalon pkgsrc DragonFly 2.5.1/i386 2009-11-25 00:08
From:Charlie Root r...@avalon.theshell.com
Date:Wed, November 25, 2009 4:32 am
To:
DragonFly 2.5 on x86_64 packages, for pkgsrc-2009Q3, are updated.
However! They are still uploading, as pkgbox64 doesn't have a lot of
outgoing bandwidth. The packages should all be on avalon.dragonflybsd.org
in the next day or two; it's on the 'g' files right now.
I could offer CPU Time on my x86_64 for package building also if that
is of any help.
That would be great, assuming you have decent outgoing bandwidth, don't
mind me eating up disk and CPU time as root, and (if it's a Hammer volume)
turning down the snapshot retention.
On Friday 27 November 2009 00:12:53 niklasro.appspot.com wrote:
Dito when handling gnomebuild, could patch bitwise failing packs,
eventually gave in using fluxbox and 2.4 now, noting uri and urn are
wider standards than url, url we shan't use, use uri and/or urn,
unixgrandmaster told.
Same
It occurs to me that with some minor scripting we could automate the
upload to occur in parallel with the build. Upload as the packages
are built and only have to worry about not catching the binary package
as it is being created. Then the uplink bandwidth wouldn't matter so
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:18:12 jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
As kdevelop is free software, it shouldn't depend on convertlit, which
isn't. I got the same error when trying to upgrade. I have a
directory /usr/pkgsrc/textproc/convertlit, but that's the only place any
file named
On Friday 04 December 2009 17:48:41 Pierre Abbat wrote:
Figured it out. I had to list every dependency in every package.
kdegraphics
and kdelibs both depend on ebook-tools, which depends on convertlit. I can
understand ebook-tools depending on convertlit, but not kdelibs depending
on
Leaf.dragonflybsd.org is being updated to the latest master and will
be rebooted today.
Leaf's HAMMER filesystems are being upgraded from version 1 to
version 4. I will regenerate the directories today or tomorrow
to take advantage of the improved directory layout that
On Friday 04 December 2009 20:46:33 jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
Darned if I know... ma...@netbsd.org is the maintainer of the kdelibs3
and kdelibs4 packages - maybe ask him?
I did, and got this answer:
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: kdevelop requires
On Monday 07 December 2009 20:49:07 jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
Have you tried doing a 'bmake install' in textproc/convertlit to build
it
separately? That would at least let the original install finish, which
was the goal.
I tried. I got this result:
Blech. The only thing to do that
Matt,
Hows it going with getting the non-profit status for DragonFly? It'd be
great if any financial contributions would also be tax deductable.
I was looking at doing this a while ago, though I put it off because of
job searching. I'll see if I can start again after the holidays. We do
When I installed bison on my Ubuntu box, apt suggested that I also install
bison-doc, but didn't install it automatically. Does pkgsrc or pkgin have
such a concept?
There are options to pkgsrc packages, when building from source, that can
bring in optional features. 'bmake show-options' will
Hmm. Well. UTF-8 has appeal. I'm just worried that changing it
will be just as shocky to people as changing the original vi to nvi
was (many years ago).
Other than split screens, what's the feature difference?
My assumption, based on nothing concrete, is that people who use vi
I did a build of pkgsrc-current on DragonFly 2.4.1 i386, to prep for the
upcoming pkgsrc-2009Q4 release. Here's the results, below.
The packages are at:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/packages/i386/DragonFly-2.4.0/pkgsrc-current/
If you can't wait for the quarterly release in a few weeks.
Hi folks,
Anyone has the screenshots for the dbBSD desktop.
For those who still couldn't get the X and WindowsManager up at least,
they know it can be done.
And i am one of them. :-)
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Justin Chan (Singapore)
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Sun, October 7, 2007 12:35 am, Justin Chan wrote:
Hi, i am using dfBSD 1.10.0.
I have tried to use the usr/pkgsrc/lang/sun-jre15
,jre14,jdk14,jdk15...all
couldn't work.
Will appreciate, if i can be pointed to a previous
mail ,if existed, which shows the actual
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
On Tue, October 9, 2007 3:51 am, Justin Chan wrote:
Thanks. I consider myself a newbie.. i am not sure how to proceed with
the downloaded file bz20.bz2. I have extracted out the file and
tried to bmake install clean but it seems not so simple.
I haven't actually
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:52 AM, * William william.full.m...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day dragonfly folk.
I found getting any access to Dragonfly 'conversations' difficult. So my
second question, is do you have a google or yahoo group for general
conversation? If you want adopters -- May be you
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tim Darby t+df...@timdarby.net wrote:
After playing with various device files, it's looking like this card is just
not going to work, at least not without more kernel skills than I have or
possibly some imports from FreeBSD. So, let me ask a different question.
First build of pkgsrc-2011Q1, done for x86_64/2.10. (Yeah, it's done
on 2.9, but I munged uname so that pkgsrc tools wouldn't complain.)
It's uploading now. It's somewhere about halfway through, so a full
set of packages should be there by tomorrow, I think.
These packages should be installable
DragonFly 2.10, i386, pkgsrc-2011Q1. I think there's a fix for
rpm2pkg that is newer than the version of 2011Q1 I used.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10.0/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-04-20 02:49
Build end: 2011-04-20 19:48
Full report:
It's certainly possible. Nobody's working on it right now, to my
knowledge. I'm more interesting in seeing Hammer grow, so I'm not
that concerned about it.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:03 PM, David Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand the availability of UFS and Hammer in the
The 2011Q1 package for 2.10/x86_64 DragonFly are done and uploaded.
The 2011Q1 2.10/i386 packages will be done later today... now that I
have the correct filepath and permissions.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Matthew Dillon
dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
My weekend schedule is too
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:46 AM, David Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you ever been accused of being a drama queen before this?
Hey, it's the Internet. People get defensive easily.
What David was asking originally - is ZFS going to be ported/in the
process of porting to
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Chatoor Kalki chatoor.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
hello, i'm new to unix but am interested in learning and getting a decent
command over it as quickly as possible.
initially i will be running dragonfly bsd within virtualbox under windows 7.
can i get help with
You could dump out the B-tree information. I don't know how clear a
picture would come from that, and it may require some massaging of
data anyway since nonduplicated files may have some degree of
matching, duplicated data anyway, especially when dealing with larger
image file.
If you are sure
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:02 AM, kevdmx kev...@gmail.com wrote:
I will change my server from freebsd to dragonflybsd,so I want to know when
does the dragonflybsd will suppert UFS2 filesystem.
Not anytime soon, I think. We're better off working on
DragonFly-specific technologies. That being
May 2011, Justin Sherrill wrote:
sysctl net.wlan.force_swcrypto=1 may help.
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/commits/2010-11/msg00169.html
Works for me. Thank you!
-matthiasr
card, screen, etc., I have on my laptop.
I don't think that's anything to worry about … I've once seen what I had on
screen before the last reboot, so I guess this is just random contents of
video RAM being displayed before anything is drawn over them.
On Samstag, 7. Mai 2011 at 17:44, Justin
I have two reports on recent pkgsrc builds, so I'll just send the URLs
instead of forwarding each:
DragonFly 2.11, x86_64, pkgsrc-2011Q1:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110508.2107/meta/report.html
DragonFly 2.10, i386, pkgsrc-2011Q1: (x86_64 report filepath has been
fixed
pkgsrc-2011Q1, DragonFly 2.11/x86_64, and I think uploaded to the
right place this time.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-05-13 03:45
Build end: 2011-05-17 03:59
Full report:
I think wip/jdk16 in pkgsrc runs on DragonFly, or at least used to...
Also, another thing that may or may not work:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/jdk15p2_dragonfly14.tar.bz2
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
I'd like to run Freenet. It's written in Java.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, David Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anybody got any advice on what nics work best with Dragonfly, other than
the ones on-site?
I've had good luck with Intel chipsets, like those supported by the
fxp or em drivers.
If you want a list of
You could stream master - slave, and then if the master fails, change
the slave disk to the master. Dunno if that covers the same area for
you.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2011 17:13:57 Matthew Dillon wrote:
No, unfortunately
http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release210/ has MD5 sums listed there. I
don't have access to crater to update the md5.txt file, though.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Milo dragonfly...@helcaraxe.net wrote:
Hello!
I have two questions:
- Why md5 sums weren't provided for last (2.10.1)
i386 build coming up soon too.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-05-28 05:44
Build end: 2011-05-28 23:12
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.10/20110528.0544/meta/report.html
Machine readable
There's no way to expand/shrink Hammer volumes. Another way to
approach this - and it's not necessarily better or worse - is to use
Hammer's mirroring capability to move data to a larger disk and then
start using that one, or otherwise shift it around.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Dean
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-03 02:14
Build end: 2011-06-06 03:10
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/2.11/20110603.0214/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
Wouldn't he need to do this once, to establish the local copy of the branch?
cd /usr/src git branch DragonFly_RELEASE_2_10
origin/DragonFly_RELEASE_2_10
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Matthias Rampke
matthias.ram...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
to switch to the stable branch
cd
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/meta/report.html
I copied in the wrong setting for the URL path. (s/i386/x86_64/) The
packages are in the right place, though.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Alex Hornung ahorn...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/06/11 04:36, Justin
The 32-bit build, recently finished on 2011Q1.
-- Forwarded message --
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-07 03:44
Build end: 2011-06-07 16:46
Full report:
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/x86_64
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-06-04 20:46
Build end: 2011-06-11 09:38
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.10/20110604.2046/meta/report.html
Machine readable version:
Marino wrote:
Justin,
I just tried building libcanberra on x86_64 and it built and installed just
fine.
original error logs:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/x86_64/2.11/20110603.0214/libcanberra-0.26nb1/
The current version in pkgsrc is libcanberra-0.26nb2 but I don't think the
pkg
I'm going to re-run this build as soon as the upload finishes; the
broken packages list is totally different than the other
DragonFly/pkgsrc-2011q2 reports I have so I suspect something wierd
may be going on, on this machine.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/i386
The binary builds for pkgsrc-2011Q2 are complete and uploaded to
avalon.dragonflybsd.org. (Well, except for DragonFly 2.10/i386. Its
upload was interrupted, so I had to restart it.)
However, pkg_radd isn't going to pull from the new builds without some
manual intervention. To access them, you
This machine was building with MAKE_JOBS set - so these results may
improve on a subsequent build.
In any case, the biggest break was net/glib-networking, and it's
complaining that gettext isn't present. That's wierd.
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.11/i386
I've built the pkgsrc bootstrap for 2011Q2 several times over
recently, and I didn't encounter this.
I assume there's something out of place on your machine that's
confusing the build. Maybe try doing a 'bmake clean'? That
suggestion sounds kinda weak now that I said it.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011
Maybe check 'arp -a', and see if there's more than one machine
configured with that IP?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ralf Schmitt r...@systemexit.de wrote:
Hi,
when I try to login to the local machine with ssh, it doesn't work:
,
| # ssh -v root@192.168.10.41
|
.)
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2011 09:24:46 Justin Sherrill wrote:
These packages failed during the build for whatever reason
doxygen-1.6.3nb4 cups-1.4.6nb1 xine-lib-1.1.19nb5 akonadi-1.4.0nb5
And kde4 is dependent on them. I
Would it be worth setting this by default, since (someday, somehow)
IPv6 is becoming more common?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matthias Rampke matth...@rampke.de wrote:
DragonFly doesn't accept router advertisements by default. You have to set
something like ip6mode=autohost in /etc/rc.conf
ftp://crater.dragonflybsd.org/Older/
We have had complaints from mirrors that the space for DragonFly is
getting huge, though most of the pain from that is pkgsrc binary
packages.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Max Herrgard herrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason for not having
I've seen a number of people say they get errors when downloading
dragonfly pkgsrc via git. I don't know what's causing it, but 2
workaround for now would be to either grab it the old-fashioned way
via CVS: (assuming tcsh)
setenv CVSROOT anon...@anoncvs.netbsd.org:/cvsroot
setenv CVS_RSH ssh
cd
I haven't connected via PPTP on a non-Windows machine in a while, but
I bet these steps would work:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/pptp.php
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
My boss has a VPN that I need to connect to. I can connect to it from the
Windows
19, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Justin Sherrill
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
I've seen a number of people say they get errors when downloading
dragonfly pkgsrc via git. I don't know what's causing it, but 2
workaround for now would be to either grab it the old-fashioned way
via CVS: (assuming tcsh
sgeorge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Justin Sherrill
jus...@shiningsilence.com wrote:
There's tarballs (or bzip, etc.) for recent branches and
pkgsrc-current at ftp.netbsd.org. For example
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/pkgsrc-2011Q2/
Plus Matthias pointed out you can
Your question is pretty open-ended - what are you looking to do? I
assume ipf means you want to set up a software firewall. Are you
looking to create a gateway for your home computers, or something
else?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Guerrero Hall guerreroh...@live.com wrote:
Hi, I came
Finally, a pkgsrc-current build report!
pkgsrc bulk build report
DragonFly 2.10/i386
Compiler: gcc
Build start: 2011-08-22 05:14
Build end: 2011-09-01 11:45
Full report:
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/reports/i386/bleeding-edge/20110822.0514/meta/report.html
I think this would do it:
route add -net 192.168.100.0/24 linuxbox.local
Substitute the IP range within your VPN for the address range, and the
name/IP of your linux box. The command won't survive a reboot; you'd
have to stick it in /usr/local/etc or something, somewhere.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Chris Turner
c.tur...@199technologies.com wrote:
I'm happy to pitch in where possible if any of the above needs doing -
just don't feel like I have the 'authority' to set the tone, policy etc -
You have as much authority as you can take. Go go go go go.
3:33 PM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
I finally got a build of pkgsrc-current done; this was on x86_64. The
number 1 break is databases/postgresql84-client, from a packaging
error. I should have a new report in a few days since this initial
build is complete.
Justin,
I just pulled in pkgsrc
My guess is that it's an older intel driver that happens to be getting
installed. The most recent version of the intel driver, 2.8, is
Linux-only, so I'm not sure how much luck you will have with any BSD.
http://pkgsrc.se/files.php?messageId=20090810061721.c330b17...@cvs.netbsd.org
You can try
Facebook's been doing this for a while; they will 'hijack' terms based
on people talking about them and pretend there's Facebook-exclusive
groups for those topics - including DragonFly:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2010/06/11/6013.html
I hate to say it because it makes me sound like a
I don't think there's ever been activity in it, really. I set it up,
but there's no dramatic reason to put something in there.
We have a DragonFly BSD twitter account
(https://twitter.com/#!/dragonflybsd) that I post Digest headlines to.
It's really just there for the convenience of people who
I'm calling it a 'release candidate', but it's really just 2.12.0
built over last night. Please try it and report problems. I haven't
even run these yet.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/2.12-RC/
Building happens all the time for the quarterly release, but it takes a
while for each round to finish - plus I've had crashing problems... so
build from source if you want it asap.
On Nov 4, 2011 2:45 PM, Max Herrgard herrg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 nov 2011, at 19.19, Pierre Abbat wrote:
Nov
Is it NAT you control? If it's PF-based, you can put in a rule for
that. I'm about to do the same for a hardware phone at home.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
What software phones are available? I tried kiax but it segfaulted. Kphone
runs, but I
The newest Intel video chipsets require GEM/KMS, which does not exist
in any BSD at this point - I think. Watch out for that...
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Edward M. unixdragonfly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/16/11 19:32, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 11/11/2011 09:41 PM, Edward
I had this problem with an old Sony laptop where the CD drive was in a
base docking unit. The solution was to install from a USB stick and
an .IMG file, in my case.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Konrad Neuwirth kon...@fimsch.net wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am currently trying to set up 2.13
You could rm everything now, and then use 'bmake install clean
clean-depends' from now on, and you should be fine.
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
On Saturday 03 December 2011 21:03:53 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Pierre Abbat wrote:
I have
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Dillon
dil...@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
Hello everyone! First, I apologize for the aborted 2.12 release. We
got as far as rolling it but I decided to make a real push to try to
fix the occassional random seg-fault bug that we were still
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.org wrote:
Whatever happened to the old principle for three part numbers
abi level.feature level.fix level
Bug fix releases bump the fix level, new features bump the feature
level and zero the fix level, big
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Pierre Abbat p...@phma.optus.nu wrote:
I thought that a package that is listed in the repository but not available
meant that it has been replaced by a new version, but there's no new version
of the list.
The package isn't physically there in the repository -
That's weird, since you have a .git directory there. Google queries
suggest rm .git/index git reset but that seems to be from
something that was fixed in an older version of Git.
You could delete the files in /usr/src, including the .git*
directories, and re-download using the Makefile in /usr.
I just put these together. It's RCa because I haven't even tested
these in a VM yet, so hopefully they are... bootable? The next ones,
if made, will be 3.0-RCb. Please test, file bugs, you know what to
do.
http://avalon.dragonflybsd.org/iso-images/dfly-i386-3.0-RCa.iso.bz2
I'm aiming to tag 3.0.1 this weekend and upload images. There's 5
bugs still linked on the catchall 3.0 ticket:
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2286
... but I don't think they are worth holding up the release. If
anyone wants to try to close them in the next 48 hours or so, please
do.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
There are 12 kde related packages in
http://mirror-master.dragonflybsd.org/packages/x86_64/DragonFly-3.0/pkgsrc-2011Q4/All/
but ,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:06 AM, David Crosswell
david.crosswe...@gmail.com wrote:
I can get these servers here:
http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-45510
...for $10 each, or two for $15.
ATI Rage XL is I think an older chipset and should work well, if I'm
1 - 100 of 640 matches
Mail list logo
