; >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________
> > Von: Lou
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2016 06:01
> > An: users@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: AW: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
> >
> > Yes I was pleased to learn that Gradle
quest
> this ... so all the others seem to be ok with this :-)
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Lou
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2016 06:01
> An: users@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
>
> Yes I was p
em to be ok with this :-)
Chris
Von: Lou
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. April 2016 06:01
An: users@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
Yes I was pleased to learn that Gradle can use Maven repos. So what's wrong
with downloading some jar
gt; problem. But then downloading a zip of jars should be equally challenging ;-)
>
>
> Von: Lou
> Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 06:56
> An: users@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
>
> Well I'm not complai
ernet, that's a
problem. But then downloading a zip of jars should be equally challenging ;-)
Von: Lou
Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2016 06:56
An: users@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
Well I'm not complaining (okay, I suppose
OK, we'll see if anyone else needs the old packages. Because this is open
source, anyone, even you, can become the supplier of such a package.
Convenience binaries are not official Apache releases, only the source
package is, because there is no easy way to certify the contents of
binaries.
-Alex
Well I'm not complaining (okay, I suppose I was a little), but there are
probably cases where Maven/Ant aren't being used (Gradle?), although Ant is
fairly universal. There are definitely cases where these tools cannot connect
directly (think secure corporate networks with aggressive firewall r
On 4/16/16, 3:34 PM, "Lou" wrote:
>I noticed that Apache doesn't do convenience binaries for Blaze (is it
>due to infrequent use?)
Do you mean a package of files similar to how Adobe shipped BlazeDS? I
think we thought just about every BlazeDS user was using Maven. Anyone
who prefers the pac
Since I'm not a CF expert, I fell for what far too many people often fall for
with these tech blogs and so-called articles--I assumed the author was
competent and knew something I didn't. Especially dangerous when the topic is
Flash these days. Yes he probably confused Flash forms with remoti
Gotcha... so if we go that route, we'd have to set aside some time for the
initial build. Using JSON doesn't win us anything since it'll introduce other
work anyway.
Yes it seems like most everyone uses GAS3 for POJO generation now.
--
Lou
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 09:08:32 -0700
OmPrakash Mu
Datum: 17.04.16 10:05 (GMT+01:00)
> An: users@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
>
> On 4/17/2016 12:47 PM, Lou wrote:
>
> > very credible anyway: "There’s a few items getting the axe. We can’t
> > complain, in particular they were either unnec
On Apr 16, 2016 10:53 PM, "Lou" wrote:
>
> Do you recall how long it took to build this? It sounds awesome.
The initial setup took a while becuse of all the trial and error. Once we
got a prototype running end to end, it became easy after that.
I forgot to mention that we are using GraniteDS
onses.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Paul Hastings
Datum: 17.04.16 10:05 (GMT+01:00)
An: users@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: BlazeDS, GraniteDS
On 4/17/2016 12:47 PM, Lou wrote:
> very credible anyway: "There’s a few
On 4/17/2016 12:47 PM, Lou wrote:
very credible anyway: "There’s a few items getting the axe. We can’t
complain, in particular they were either unnecessary or a hassle – flash
remoting for example."
but his own lists don't have flash remoting anywhere unless he thinks flash
forms is the same.
Do you recall how long it took to build this? It sounds awesome.
--
Lou
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 22:35:51 -0700
OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2016 10:17 PM, "Paul Hastings" wrote:
> >
> > On 4/17/2016 9:46 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> >>
> >> I have couple of apps running REST ser
On 4/17/2016 12:35 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
We have two clients, one in HTML/JS and one in Flex. The HTML/JS app hits the
same endpoint, but requests a JSON response. The Flex app requests an AMF
reaponse.
ah i see. thanks.
Oh yes, I was putting some REST/SOAP related highlights together with what this
"blog" claims:
https://hostek.com/blog/hosting/coldfusion-2016-is-released-what-now/
Which, to be honest, has the stink of an anti-Flash bias, so probably isn't
very credible anyway:
"There’s a few items getting th
On Apr 16, 2016 10:17 PM, "Paul Hastings" wrote:
>
> On 4/17/2016 9:46 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>>
>> I have couple of apps running REST services which serve AMF responses.
>> Works exceedingly well!
>
>
> curious as to the logic for that. can you explain a bit more?
>
The server side logic
On 4/17/2016 9:46 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
I have couple of apps running REST services which serve AMF responses.
Works exceedingly well!
curious as to the logic for that. can you explain a bit more?
On 4/17/2016 9:32 AM, Lou wrote:
We still use AMF. By the release notes it looks like they shifted CF towards
REST/SOAP. REST is fine, but it doesn't seem smart abandoning technologies
which still arguably work better than the alternatives, especially when
supporting both should be easy enough.
Oh there's definitely interest, especially if it can be done with dependency
injection. But if I get involved with anything it would probably be Judah's
Radii8 design view replacement project first.
--
Lou
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:46:14 -0700
OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> I have couple of apps
I have couple of apps running REST services which serve AMF responses.
Works exceedingly well!
If there is interest, someone can help implement that in BlazeDS.
Thanks,
Om
On Apr 16, 2016 7:32 PM, "Lou" wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:23:03 -0400
> John Barett wrote:
>
> > Hi There,
> > I have
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:23:03 -0400
John Barett wrote:
> Hi There,
> I have been doing Flash Remoting with ColdFusion since ColdFusion 6 &
> Flash version 6 or was it version 7. ColdFusion always had Flash
> Remoting available to it, and ColdFusion even starting having a strong
> integration wi
Hi There,
I have been doing Flash Remoting with ColdFusion since ColdFusion 6 &
Flash version 6 or was it version 7. ColdFusion always had Flash
Remoting available to it, and ColdFusion even starting having a strong
integration with Flash.
I am still using this today, but I don't know what is g
What's the current status of the AMF libs? Are Flex devs abandoning them in
favor of more generic options like web services? Granite's website isn't
working correctly and I noticed that Apache doesn't do convenience binaries for
Blaze (is it due to infrequent use?) BlazeDS Spring integration
on: shaack [mailto:sha...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2014 14:09
An: users@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Flex Client-Server Messaging Howto, BlazeDS, GraniteDS, Websockets
OK, there will be a release of BlazeDS in the future. But my question is more
like what is the best way of do
On 12/16/14, 5:08 AM, "shaack" wrote:
>OK, there will be a release of BlazeDS in the future. But my question is
>more
>like what is the best way of doing client-server messaging with Flex?
>
>The only sense to use libraries like Blaze or Granite would be, if there
>would be no standard messagin
-Messaging-Howto-BlazeDS-GraniteDS-Websockets-tp9184p9200.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 12/15/14, 2:29 PM, "shaack" wrote:
>What we just need for our project is a stable and easy to use messaging
>system for Flex clients. Being in the beginning of the project the
>decision
>should be also future oriented, which means it should be a technology
>which
>will be supported also in a
context:
http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Client-Server-Messaging-Howto-BlazeDS-GraniteDS-Websockets-tp9184.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
30 matches
Mail list logo
