Le jeu. 16 août 2012 19:38:31 CEST, NoOp a écrit:
On 08/16/2012 04:45 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Hello,
I am using LibreOffice x86_64 on Linux, installed from official rpms.
Since it got updated to Version 3.6.0.4 (Build ID: 932b512), rkhunter
whines :
Checking for packet
Hello All,
I have been using libre office since relase. While using libreoffice, I
found several critical bugs like
crash while saving file, creating pdf, data loss when opened from MS word
docx format.
Most stable release was LibO_3.3.2_Win_x86_helppack_en-US.
After that, I tried
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 20:05 -0500, V Stuart Foote wrote:
It is pretty rare for specifics of bugs to be entered on the Users
list, where there might have a passing comment that a bug would be or
had been filed. But often no additional details of the bug in the
discussion. But, that said, the
Hi Marc,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:03 -0800, Marc Grober wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35361
...
that you knew you are creating extra work for the volunteers on the QA
team with intend is really disgusting given the workload of this team.
I suspect that what upset
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:00 -0800, Marc Grober wrote:
The latest from Florian in misspelled CAPS (which now brings us to the
fact that the devs have touched this bug some 8 times without ever
bothering to actually read it) - Bravo Florian, we read you 5 by 5:
I've read it a couple of
leif wrote:
Half the problem is communication.
Very much to the point.
1) simply commenting a bug does _not_ remove NEEDINFO status - in
this case, only if the submitter had commented _and_ changed
status to NEW, the bugs wouldn't have been closed
2) exposing users to the
2012/8/17 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org
Sorry for the mess - but I would hate us arguing over
spilled milk, instead of moving ahead.
-- Thorsten
+1
These are the most well spoken words in this case so far :-)
Cheers,
Leif
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Hi :)I think it's a matter of opinion whether it is a bug or not. I tend to
agree with you both but it's difficult to judge without finding out the
background to the decision to change. It might be worth posting a bug-report
as a feature-request asking for it to be put back the way it was and
ciao, using opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice 3.5:build-403
if in a calc cell you set:
formatcells[alignment tab]: text orientationdegree=180 and wrap
text automatically=yes
the setting is not honored, the result is not wrapped text
leaving the settings as above, if you set: text alignment
Hi Michael and all,
May I suggest that we try to close down the discussion and try to find an
acceptable approach?
I believe that Michaels earlier mail explained the context and (as I read
it) also include a small *apologize*.
I suggest that
- we send a polite and excusing mail to all the
yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
ciao, using opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice 3.5:build-403
if in a calc cell you set:
formatcells[alignment tab]: text orientationdegree=180 and wrap
text automatically=yes
the setting is not honored, the result is not wrapped text
leaving the settings as above, if
Hi :)+1 Regards fromTom :)
--- On Fri, 17/8/12, Leif Lodahl leiflod...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Leif Lodahl leiflod...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Excuse me, but your opinion is simply
unimportant. Start over and you can expect more of the same.
To:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/15/office_2013_strict_open_xml/
This should improve compatibility between LO and M$O.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting
Hi :)
Do!! This is very confusing! I'll be glad when i've got back to where i
was before my 'hols'
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Fri, 17/8/12, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
From: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: off-list :) Re: [libreoffice-users] formatting
To:
I filter on [libreoffice-users] and Ref:[libreoffice-users] in Subject
line with no problems. I route them to a local folder LibreOffice. I do
it for various lists.
Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Is it possible to set filters to look for items in a subject-line instead of
looking at where replies
Hi :)
Depends which type of Ram. 'Old' DDR1 (such as for most of mine) is so
horribly expensive it would be cheaper for me to buy a new mbord, plus chip,
plus a healthy amount of DDR3 leaving a couple of slots for a future upgrade.
On the even older machines at work the 'ancient' sd-ram is
Hi :)
Have you tried Glest and Battle for Wesnoth?
I'm not
an FPS fan so i've not tried Alien Arena (well i have but i die t
fast on-line) but there are many legacy games such as Elite and other
classics. Also
http://trine-thegame.com/site/
Am 17.08.2012 16:31, T. R. Valentine wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/15/office_2013_strict_open_xml/
This should improve compatibility between LO and M$O.
Microsoft announcments
http://peanuts.wikia.com/wiki/Football_Gag
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
On 16/08/2012 at 16:28, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW - what is PM ?
Personal (Private) Message.
Wikipedia article showed up as fourth entry when I asked Google about
PM forum.
But since Google personalizes search results (according to past queries of
user), it's much harder to
Michael,
No one is upset that a bug almost two years was not resolved.
The file in question appeared to have been dropped (in other words, it
was in the product, and then it wasn't), and we could find no
explanation for why it was dropped, which suggests that somewhere there
is a QA issue, but
+1 +1
On 8/17/12 1:12 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
leif wrote:
Half the problem is communication.
Very much to the point.
1) simply commenting a bug does _not_ remove NEEDINFO status - in
this case, only if the submitter had commented _and_ changed
status to NEW, the bugs
Dňa 17.08.2012 18:52, Andreas Säger wrote / napísal(a):
Am 17.08.2012 16:31, T. R. Valentine wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/15/office_2013_strict_open_xml/
This should improve compatibility between LO and M$O.
Does anybody know how far is LO with implementation of Strict Open XML?
Am 17.08.2012 21:30, Milos Sramek wrote:
Dňa 17.08.2012 18:52, Andreas Säger wrote / napísal(a):
Am 17.08.2012 16:31, T. R. Valentine wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/08/15/office_2013_strict_open_xml/
This should improve compatibility between LO and M$O.
Does anybody know how far is
yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
On 17/08/12 13:35, Dan wrote:
yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
ciao, using opensuse 12.1, kde 4.9, LibreOffice 3.5:build-403
if in a calc cell you set:
formatcells[alignment tab]: text orientationdegree=180 and wrap
text automatically=yes
the setting is not honored, the
On 08/17/2012 12:04 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Le jeu. 16 août 2012 19:38:31 CEST, NoOp a écrit:
...
I can't replicate on the deb version with:
Rootkit Hunter version 1.3.8
What version of rkhunter have you:
rkhunter --update
to ensure that your rkhunter is up to date?
Version
I am using Libre Office 3.6.0.4 on an iMac 10.8
if I enter the date as 17/08/12 it is displayed as 17/08/2012.
No doubt whatsoever that the date is being accepted using ddmmyy
Tink
--
View this message in context:
Am 17.08.2012 22:12, Tinkerer wrote:
I am using Libre Office 3.6.0.4 on an iMac 10.8
if I enter the date as 17/08/12 it is displayed as 17/08/2012.
No doubt whatsoever that the date is being accepted using ddmmyy
OK, we could collect valid input pattern for dates in 180 different locales.
On 08/17/2012 01:27 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 08/17/2012 12:04 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
...
Thanks for your reply. I'm using a rpm ;), it is rkhunter-1.4.0-1.el5.
I'm installing that now on Fedora 17 to test.
Of course I can get rkhunter silent with something like
DISABLE_TESTS=hidden_ports
Hi :)
I think the problem is that MS Office 2010's and 2007's versions of docX, xlsX,
(etc ) are not the same as each other and not the same as the ISO standard they
managed to push through. For most programs the differences would be considered
bugs and work would be done to make the program
Hi :)
I think Win7 uses less resources than Vista. it was the first time they
de-bloated their OS = an attempt to fit it onto mobile devices such as tablets
(ok, not very mobile but more mobile than desktops). So upgrading from Vista
to Win7 might well be a good idea without worrying about
30 matches
Mail list logo
