Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Paul D. Mirowsky
We're talking POP and Thunderbird. IMAP is a pre-existing condition. The ability for POP clients to keep all of their shared clients current is a glaring omission that should be rectified. I regret not having the ability to do this myself. IMAP is a security risk that increases the attack

[libreoffice-users] Database help please

2016-03-02 Thread John Montgomery
Dear Sirs, I am trying to assemble a simple graveyard database but am having difficulty in getting the form to work as I want. I have tried to use parts of the "Search and Filter" database but end up confused. I have also read relevent parts of the Base manual. I have two forms, Graves and

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Paul D. Mirowsky
Ok, I don't know what Data Replication is. Please see http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/definition/database-replication I don't know what Key Exchange is. Please see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U62S8SchxX4 But I think somebody does. On 3/2/2016 12:06 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 3/2/2016

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread toki
On 02/03/2016 16:32, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > The ability for POP clients to keep all of their shared clients current is a > glaring omission that should be rectified. Can you please rephrase that. If you literally mean what you wrote, then please study both the POP and IMAP protocol

[libreoffice-users] Libreoffice 4.3 License

2016-03-02 Thread Dais Kochery
Hi, We are using libreoffice (version 4.3) library in our code. we are using it to convert .XLS to .CSV But, we does not have the license for it. Could you please provide the license file and steps to install it in UNIX server. Could you also provide your contact number. Thanks, Dais Kochery

[libreoffice-users] "Designing with LibreOffice" interview

2016-03-02 Thread Bruce Byfield
In case anyone is interest: Paul Brown at Open Content and Software has interviewed me on my forthcoming book, "Designing with LibreOffice": http://www.ocsmag.com/2016/03/01/bruce-byfield-interview-designing-with-libreoffice/ -- Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time)

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/2/2016 11:32 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > We're talking POP and Thunderbird. And like I said, POP simply isn't designed for such usage. > IMAP is a pre-existing condition. No idea what you mean by that. > The ability for POP clients to keep all of their shared

RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: Issues Converting to PDF

2016-03-02 Thread Rufus Reynolds, III
Thank you for the information. We will look into running some tests under 4.4.7.2 to see if we get the same results. We are running under Red Hat version 6.7. -Original Message- From: Pedro [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 10:33 AM To:

[libreoffice-users] Re: Issues Converting to PDF

2016-03-02 Thread Pedro
Rufus Reynolds, III wrote > We're using LibreOffice 4.4.1 on a project for DISA and have several cases > where Microsoft Office documents take a very long time to convert to PDF, > and sometimes actually crash the service. We are running in headless mode. Is there any reason why you are not using

Re: [libreoffice-users] Database help please

2016-03-02 Thread Kolbjørn Stuestøl
I don't know if it works in your case, but perhaps using A01, A02 … A10 will give the right order? Kolbjørn Den 02.03.2016 20:07, John Montgomery skreiv: Dear Sirs, I am trying to assemble a simple graveyard database but am having difficulty in getting the form to work as I want. I have tried

Re: [libreoffice-users] Libreoffice 4.3 License

2016-03-02 Thread toki
On 02/03/2016 18:14, Dais Kochery wrote: > Could you please provide the license file and steps to install it in UNIX > server. The license for LibreOffice can be found at https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/licenses/. > Could you also provide your contact number. A list of certified

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Tanstaafl
Neither of which relate to serverless mail synchronization of local mail stores. On 3/2/2016 1:17 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > Ok, I don't know what Data Replication is. > Please see > http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/definition/database-replication > > I don't

Re: [libreoffice-users] Libreoffice 4.3 License

2016-03-02 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Dais, you have downloaded a package and inside the package there should be a file LICENSE.html for the license of LibreOffice and a file NOTICE (actually plain text) for the integrated foreign work. The package has a folder readmes with installation instructions. Kind regards Regina

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Paul D. Mirowsky
On 3/2/2016 2:17 PM, toki wrote: On 02/03/2016 16:32, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: The ability for POP clients to keep all of their shared clients current is a glaring omission that should be rectified. Can you please rephrase that. If you literally mean what you wrote, then please study both

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/2/2016 4:00 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > On 3/2/2016 2:17 PM, toki wrote: >> Can you please rephrase that. >> If you literally mean what you wrote, then please study both the POP and >> IMAP protocol specifications, before making any suggestions as to what >> should

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread Paul D. Mirowsky
What relates Thunderbird is a database of information. The fact that there is no data replication built in is not the inhibiting factor to doing so. I have underlined the pertinent words from a quoted definition from the previously mentioned URL.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Database help please

2016-03-02 Thread tonybsa
> On 3/03/2016, at 08:07, John Montgomery wrote: > > My problem arises when I enter double numbers eg A11, A20 etc, these should > follow in sequence but do not follow the sequence I want but A10 follows A1 > etc. > How can I ensure correct sequencing. Enter A1 to A9 as A01

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread toki
On 02/03/2016 22:26, James Knott wrote: >Also, if you're leaving email on a POP server for a period of time, it's going to be there when someone comes looking for it. That is not the threat model I was addressing. jonathon -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread James Knott
On 03/02/2016 05:57 PM, toki wrote: >> Also, if you're leaving email on a POP server for a period of time, > it's going to be there when someone comes looking for it. > > That is not the threat model I was addressing. Then what was it? -- To unsubscribe e-mail to:

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread James Knott
On 03/02/2016 11:32 AM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > IMAP is a pre-existing condition. > > The ability for POP clients to keep all of their shared clients > current is a glaring omission that should be rectified. > I regret not having the ability to do this myself. I guess you don't know much about

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread toki
On 02/03/2016 21:40, James Knott wrote: > Also, how is IMAP a security problem, If, as is usually done with IMAP, the email is stored on a server that is neither owned, nor operated, nor controlled by the recipient of the email, then the security issue is the IMAP vendor turning that email over

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread James Knott
On 03/02/2016 05:08 PM, toki wrote: > If, as is usually done with IMAP, the email is stored on a server that > is neither owned, nor operated, nor controlled by the recipient of the > email, then the security issue is the IMAP vendor turning that email > over to third parties without your

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread James Knott
On 03/02/2016 12:06 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> IMAP is a security risk that increases the attack surface area. YaHoo, >> > should I say more. > No, you really shouldn't, because you obviously don't know what you're > talking about. > > The only thing IMAP *might* have in common with Yahoo is that

Re: [libreoffice-users] Thunderbird potential as the official/default email-client for LO? Re: [board-discuss] BoD decision from 2015-10-05

2016-03-02 Thread James Knott
On 03/02/2016 03:46 PM, Paul D. Mirowsky wrote: > Thunderbird is a database of information. The fact that there is no > data replication built in is not the inhibiting factor to doing so. It is an email client, nothing more. If you want replication, you're going to need some means for all

[libreoffice-users] Slideshow article about LO 5.1

2016-03-02 Thread Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster
I do not know if anyone has seen this, but here is a link to the article/slide-show about LO 5.1 LibreOffice 5.1 Offers Reorganized User Interface for Its Apps By Sean M. Kerner | Posted 2016-02-16

[libreoffice-users] Issues Converting to PDF

2016-03-02 Thread Rufus Reynolds, III
We're using LibreOffice 4.4.1 on a project for DISA and have several cases where Microsoft Office documents take a very long time to convert to PDF, and sometimes actually crash the service. We are running in headless mode. Most of the documents are PPT or PPTX. We've been given permission to