On 06/15/2012 04:14 PM, Stefan Pochmann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:47 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
What you need to do is a "custom" install and reinstall it. That way you
choose the language[s] for the menus and the list of dictionaries installed.
Ok, thanks. I hadn't installed it
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:47 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
wrote:
>
> What you need to do is a "custom" install and reinstall it. That way you
> choose the language[s] for the menus and the list of dictionaries installed.
Ok, thanks. I hadn't installed it yet but cancelled it as soon as I
saw the Ge
Hi :)
Thanks :) Most people on this list are friendly and helpful. Even though
Andreas agreed with e-letter he (Andreas) still manages to put negative
information in a much more polite and friendly way (except when addressing me
personnally of course).
Yes, my suggestion was to keep an ori
On 06/15/2012 02:28 PM, Stefan Pochmann wrote:
I have downloaded what's supposed to be "LibreOffice Windows, version
3.5.4, English (US)" (file LibO_3.5.4_Win_x86_install_multi.msi). But
the installer greets me with German text. I don't want German. I want
the English version. What do I do? My OS
Andreas Säger wrote:
Experience is the keyword. From my experience it is a matter of pure
chance if the table wizard produces a set of tables that can be
related to each other. It is perfectly normal that a primary key does
not fit the type of a foreign key.
This is inacceptable because newbies
I have downloaded what's supposed to be "LibreOffice Windows, version
3.5.4, English (US)" (file LibO_3.5.4_Win_x86_install_multi.msi). But
the installer greets me with German text. I don't want German. I want
the English version. What do I do? My OS is English (Windows 7
Professional).
Regards,
S
Experience is the keyword. From my experience it is a matter of pure
chance if the table wizard produces a set of tables that can be related
to each other. It is perfectly normal that a primary key does not fit
the type of a foreign key.
This is inacceptable because newbies can not understand th
Hello,
Thanks for Scott's and Tom's suggestions so far.
My motivation for the original question was that I prefer to keep the single
installation of LibreOffice 3.5 that exists in our group, if one of *.pot or
*.potx can work reasonably well in LibreOffice. I hope that LibreOffice will
become the
Andreas Säger wrote:
You must never use a wizard to create a table. The table wizard makes too
many wrong assumption about what you need.
It is easy to create a table in design view. It is even easier to create a
table in SQL. Certain features are only accessible through SQL.
--
View this messag
On 06/15/2012 09:45 AM, Robert Peirce wrote:
> In article ,
> Robert Peirce wrote:
>
>> In article <4fdab66c.1040...@gmail.com>,
>> Jay Lozier wrote:
>>
>>> Can you post some typical data on Nabble? I assume you do not need to
>>> transform the data but plot the actual values.
>> What is Nabble
In article ,
Robert Peirce wrote:
> In article <4fdab66c.1040...@gmail.com>,
> Jay Lozier wrote:
>
> > Can you post some typical data on Nabble? I assume you do not need to
> > transform the data but plot the actual values.
>
> What is Nabble?
I found the problem and I was really stupid!!
In article <4fdab66c.1040...@gmail.com>,
Jay Lozier wrote:
> Can you post some typical data on Nabble? I assume you do not need to
> transform the data but plot the actual values.
What is Nabble?
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://ww
AGAIN for the hundredths time: Because e-letter is perfectly right. Only MS
software can edit MS file formats simply because they tailor their file
format very tightly around their software.
LibO can export to the old binary formats in acceptable quality so this is
the one and only acceptable file
You must never use a wizard to create a table. The table wizard makes too
many wrong assumption about what you need.
It is easy to create a table in design view. It is even easier to create a
table in SQL. Certain features are only accessible through SQL.
--
View this message in context:
http://n
On 2012-06-15 12:47, Robert Peirce wrote:
If I use a small amount (3 pairs) of dummy information, the intercept,
slope and R^2 are exactly what I expect them to be. If I use something
on the order of 400 pairs it makes no sense at all. When I use Linest,
the results are reasonable.
I am eval
15 matches
Mail list logo
