On 2/19/13 7:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> SourceForge reports downloads by country. It appears that the number of
> languages supported does not limit the locations where the downloads happen
> (although destination country is necessarily an estimate, just as it is on
> the ClustrMap of visi
Greetings. Just signed up for the list. Have NOT had the time yet to
get to the archives and dig for prior messages to this list regarding
blind users, so if this is already old news, please forgive me and drop
a link to the pertinent archives.
I will assuredly be delving for this topic as s
Readers,
Advance warning: for statisticians.
There is an interesting thread of posts in the R mailing list, about
comparison between 'nls' and 'power trend line':
http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help@r-project.org/msg192684.html
Is this m$ error repeated in LO calc?
--
For unsubscribe instructio
At 20:04 19/02/2013 -0700, John Meyer wrote:
I'm doing QA in my office and I have a sheet filled with Employee
IDs and a simple pass/fail score, like so:
EmpID Pass/Fail
11 Pass
12 Pass
11 Fail
13 Fail
What I want to do,
I'm doing QA in my office and I have a sheet filled with Employee IDs and a
simple pass/fail score, like so:
EmpID Pass/Fail
11 Pass
12 Pass
11 Fail
13 Fail
What I want to do, is in a separate area of the sheet, have the
Hi.
My understanding is that LO4 will drop support for .sxw, .sxc, .sxd,
.sdw?, .sdc?
I have about 2500 of these and am looking to perform a headless
conversion across the whole system.
Is the filter name in the LO3.6 series for a writer document writer8.
Although writer8 works I couldn't see
pardon moi, mais ... ;-)
well, just butting in with a 'bit of humour' - this definition
strikes my punny-bone ;-)
To confuse the foreigners more re. the craziness of the English
language ;-)
the computer language has re-defined any number of words;
I am confused. when I use Tools -> Customize, the Customize dialog
opens. I don't see where I can select /New Document from Template/ nor
/Template Manager/. What do see at the top is four tabs with /Menus/
selected with /File/ menu as the default for the dropdown list. Perhaps
you could g
On 02/19/2013 01:06 PM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 19/02/2013 at 18:15, "webmaster-Kracked_P_P"
wrote:
How did AOO figure out how much their version of OOo was worth per day
to users?
They used assumption that downloaded and bought copy are totally
interchangeable, which means that if not do
We found a 'work around'. If we open the template directly from where it is
stored on the network, the input fields stop and ask the user for the
appropriate data. However, this is a step backwards, and is extremely slow.
In LO 3.5.5 we were able to create a menu item that would open the templat
Hi :)
Any menus or ribbons or whatnot (thanks Amiko) at the top or bottom on a
wide-screen display drives me nuts. I really should just turn my wide-screen
on it's side so i can see documents properly instead of through a letter-box.
How come mobile devices have a portrait mode by default!! G
On 2013-02-20 06:25, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to
I thought the article explained exactly how it was calculated: <
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/21_million_per_day>. There's no need to
speculate.
There are two base figures: (1) the average number of AOO full-install
downloads per day and (2) an estimated average price for a permanent
Micros
SourceForge reports downloads by country. It appears that the number of
languages supported does not limit the locations where the downloads happen
(although destination country is necessarily an estimate, just as it is on
the ClustrMap of visitors to my web sites).
I assume that as language ve
On 2013-02-19 12:30 PM, Doug wrote:
On 02/19/2013 11:33 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the
ribbon in MSO, but would love to see the UI with a decent
facelift/refresh...
On 02/19/2013 12:30 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at leas
On 19/02/2013 at 18:15, "webmaster-Kracked_P_P"
wrote:
> How did AOO figure out how much their version of OOo was worth per day
> to users?
They used assumption that downloaded and bought copy are totally
interchangeable, which means that if not downloaded, every AOO copy would be
bought for
Not a list for Feature Requests, but you can go to
http://bugs.freedesktop.org and file a request (Feature requests are
handled using the issue reporting system)
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013, sun shine wrote:
> On 19/02/13 17:25, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
>>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:31 AM, sun shine wrote:
> On 19/02/13 17:25, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>>
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are th
On 2/19/13 6:20 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> I suspect they multiply the standard package price of MS Office and
> multiply that by their numbers of stated downloads, then divide it by
> 365. At least that's how I would do it.
Average number of downloads per day, multiplied by 150 dollars (whic
On 19/02/13 17:25, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to giv
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
>
>> On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>
>>> I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
>>> UI code to AOO...
>>>
>>> Are there any plans to at least take a look at this cod
On 02/19/2013 11:33 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hello,
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the
ribbon in MSO, bu
On 2013-02-19 11:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (ha
On 02/19/2013 11:08 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments have a
hilarious amount of FUD in them. One wonders if they have ever even tried
either MSO or LO.
http://www.zdnet.com/how-to-affordably-own-your-office-software-711449/?s_cid=e
How did AOO figure out how much their version of OOo was worth per day
to users?
I cannot figure out any way. Of course it makes great Marketing Copy.
We are giving our users some much product value, we must be the better
product. FUD or what?
---
ht
On 02/19/2013 11:56 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hello,
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony UI
code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and poss
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:44 AM, sun shine wrote:
> On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony UI
>> code to AOO...
>>
>> Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
>> cherry pick it to gi
On 19/02/13 16:33, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hello,
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the
ribbon in MSO, but wou
Hello,
I read recently that IBM had finally donated all of the Lotus Symphony
UI code to AOO...
Are there any plans to at least take a look at this code and possibly
cherry pick it to give a facelift for LO? I don't want (hate!) the
ribbon in MSO, but would love to see the UI with a decent
2013/2/19 Tom Davies
> Hi :)
> The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments have a
> hilarious amount of FUD in them. One wonders if they have ever even tried
> either MSO or LO.
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/how-to-affordably-own-your-office-software-711449/?s_cid=e539
> Regar
Hi :)
The article is very pro-LibreOffice but so many of the comments have a
hilarious amount of FUD in them. One wonders if they have ever even tried
either MSO or LO.
http://www.zdnet.com/how-to-affordably-own-your-office-software-711449/?s_cid=e539
Regards from
Tom :)
--
For unsubsc
Hi Steve,
Your input provided the solution to the formula syntax and use.
Had you looked, I am assuming you did not, at the Nabble document I had
uploaded with the original question you would have seen the correct values
for some of the 'Givens' you listed i.e.
If you have G2 as your input,
33 matches
Mail list logo
