Hola Miguel Ángel, all
mariosv wrote
So that's not my logic.
Yes, I understood your position. I'm sorry if it wasn't clear.
mariosv wrote
My perception of reading here and there, it is not only compile with a 64
bits tool matter, but a large code adaptation. I think in some
applications
On 2013-11-08 5:28 PM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
I know and I agree, Miguel. I just don't agree with the logic don't ask for
a 64bit version because it's very time consuming and expensive and you don't
need it anyway.
Why do Linux and Mac people need it more than Windows people?
They
Hi Kind People! :-)
I have already written in the past about win64 builds. And now, after
reading this interesting entire thread I think:
- I completely agree that it is a first priority to complete the Calc
(LibreOffice?) code rewrite and modernization;
- but (!!!) just after this further
Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you
advocating OO correctly..
Continues on my blog:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
Feedback very welcome, of course!
Marco
--
To
Interesting article, and indeed it is true that the file format is the
most important aspect of the office suite debate, but I think you are a
little naive in your assumption that LO should stop doing any other
type of marketing.
Firstly, the question of a truly open and compatible format *is*
M. Fioretti:
...shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
There's no such thing as 'open format'. Any format can only slavishly
describe its reference implementation. There is no reference implementation
for ODF, except a monstrous
On 11/09/2013 12:59 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you
advocating OO correctly..
Continues on my blog:
http://stop.zona-m.net/2013/11/shall-we-waste-twelve-more-years-promoting-free-office-suites-instead-of-open-office-formats/
Feedback
Don't worry, you can safely ignore Urmas, he's a known troll around
these parts; his bias is strongly (and probably paid for by) MS.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:33:04 +0700
Urmas davian...@gmail.com wrote:
M. Fioretti:
Paul:
Don't worry, you can safely ignore Urmas, he's a known troll around
these parts;
You're welcome to name a full reference implementation of ODF format not
using the OO.o/Staroffice code.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
Paul:
...to do
what some company (like Microsoft) thinks you should be able to do, and
only if you pay them very well, open source software believes that
everybody should be able to do whatever they want. That's the very
nature of Open Source: you have the source, change it if you need to.
Oh
It would be nice if the listing of last used document was split up so when I
use writer I will only get the last used writer documents and when I use calc I
will only get the calc documents.
Will this be possible to achive?
Best regards
Leif Burstrom
Sweden
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:33 -0500, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 11/09/2013 12:59 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
Twelve (TWELVE!!!) years ago I asked OpenOffice users “Are you
advocating OO correctly..
Continues on my blog:
Leif Burstroem:
It would be nice if the listing of last used document was split up so when I
use writer I will only get the last used writer documents...
I recall there was a discussion about this and the decision was to keep it
as it is now.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 21:25:19 PM +0200, Paul wrote:
Interesting article, and indeed it is true that the file format is
the most important aspect of the office suite debate, but I think
you are a little naive in your assumption that LO should stop doing
any other type of marketing.
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 15:20:49 PM -0500, Jay Lozier wrote:
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:33 -0500, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
There are two different topics here.
1 - Open File Formats - ODF
2 - Free and Open Source Software office suites - LO and OOo/AOO
Kracked_P_P
that is true. But
As far as I can gather, neither OASIS nor the ODF Technical Committee
require a reference implementation, so none has been named. I don't
know about the ISO standard, but I would assume this applies there too.
That said, OO.o/LO would be considered by most as the reference
implementation. As a
Den 09.11.2013 21:27, skreiv Urmas:
Leif Burstroem:
It would be nice if the listing of last used document was split up so
when I use writer I will only get the last used writer documents...
I recall there was a discussion about this and the decision was to
keep it as it is now
Why?
I would
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:39:00 +0100
M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
Firstly, the question of a truly open and compatible format *is*
used when discussing the problems with MSO. Secondly, we are so few,
that...
these are the SAME answers that ruled the scene in 2001. My point is
Two points:
1) LibreOffice only started embedding fonts in ODF files in version 4.1
(released in July 2013); MS Office files have had this ability for YEARS. In
my opinion ODF files are NOW starting to be useful as an editable file
exchange format.
2) Advocating ignoring MS files only makes
Jay Lozier wrote
Also, using ODF formats avoids the tweaking MS apparently does with
their formats with each new release.
I disagree. ODF has the same problem. That is why LO has an option to save
in ODF 1.0/1.1 or 1.2 and even 1.2 extended.
ODF has EXACTLY the same problem that accuses DOCX
On 08/11/2013, Bekor Adams bekorad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello when i try to save a invoice as *Microsoft
excel*https://www.google.com/search?biw=1440bih=772q=microsoft+excelspell=1sa=Xpsj=1ei=gxR5UvXTC_PTsASh1YHwBAved=0CCgQvwUoAA2007/2010
document it changes it to this below . I have looked
Tanstaafl wrote
The reason there is none is because it is *hard* to do - *very* hard -
and because the benefit is so little, it isn't a high priority.
Are you a developer? Hard to very hard? So all FLOSS projects that have a
64bit build are maintained by geniuses?
If the benefit was so
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 14:06:44 -0800 (PST)
Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Advocating ignoring MS files only makes sense on a personal basis.
Por companies that is absurd. Maybe academia could start that
movement but it will take time before it reaches the companies...
Actually, it makes lots
I believe that companies should use open formats, but at this point in
time I have never seen a company that has moved from the standard MSO
formats. This is likely because the majority has not changed to open
formats. Once more people adopt using open formats, then we will likely
see a
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 23:29:01 PM +0200, Paul wrote:
Also, I don't think the current situation could have been any better,
no matter what argument we used. The fact that it is changing at all is
testimony to our dedication in spreading all the good arguments for Open
Source and ODF. This is,
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 14:06:44 PM -0800, Pedro wrote:
Two points:
1) LibreOffice only started embedding fonts in ODF files in version 4.1
(released in July 2013); MS Office files have had this ability for YEARS. In
my opinion ODF files are NOW starting to be useful as an editable file
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 00:38:21 AM +0200, Paul wrote:
This is something we should be advocating (as loudly as possible,
even), but we should be aware of the realities, and advocating it as
a sane option, not trying to force it down peoples throats.
When a public administration demands that you
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 14:21:43 PM -0800, Pedro wrote:
The ONLY difference is...
can you generate MS Office documents automatically with just a few
lines of code as in http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/tag/odf-scripting ?
I'm sorry to break this idealism about ODF's perfection...
I explicitly say
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:06 -0800, Pedro wrote: Two points: 1)
LibreOffice only started embedding fonts in ODF files in version 4.1
(released in July 2013); MS Office files have had this ability for
YEARS. In my opinion ODF files are NOW starting to be useful as an
editable file exchange
Hi :)
I was sent the files in a private email and just took out the name and
addresses in the 2 invoices although i think they were fictional examples
too.
-version2.ods
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4082304/-version2.ods
Hyannis_Cafe_Inv._#_1029converted0-version2.xlsx
On 11/06/2013 07:54 PM, Scott Castaline wrote:
In Libreoffice Base The Form Design window, I was trying to get it
where the cursor starts in the first field. Right now it is in the top
left corner at start up (data entry) like it is when I go into form
edit mode. In exploring ways to do this
e-letter:
If you want to save an invoice in m$ format, why have you not bought a
legal copy of m$?
BIFF is a Microsoft format now? What an idiot.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
I wound up blowing off my original form and recreated it. The Automatic
Control Focus function then behaved the way it should leaving the form
navigation controls active. So I may have accidentlly changed something
to cause my problem. For some reason Activation Order does not fix the
starting
If everyone knows he's a troll why do so many bother responding in such
great lengths. Why bother feeding the troll. Everyone knows this, but
still so many feel obligated to defend. If you don't feed trolls, they
go away.
--
Dale Erwin
Jr. 28 de Julio 657, Depto. 03
Magdalena del Mar,
Is there an extension in LO in order to read DRM ebooks?
Thanks
Daniel
--
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
35 matches
Mail list logo
