On 16/03/11 07:15, Bruce Carlson wrote:
I now use evolution on my linux machines and until evolution for windows
improves sufficiently I simply will not use windows for emails at all. Except
this smart phone--HTC touch pro 2-- Evolution email imports all calenda and
contact info from
: [libreoffice-users] Has it all except ... #2
On 16/03/11 07:15, Bruce Carlson wrote:
I now use evolution on my linux machines and until evolution for windows
improves sufficiently I simply will not use windows for emails at all.
Except this smart phone--HTC touch pro 2-- Evolution email imports all
March 2011 2:37 PM
To: users@libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Has it all except ... #2
Bruce,
Alas, no evolution support for MAC yet. These days I'm just a home user and
I don't count. It saddens me.
It saddens me, but not enough to use Win unless I am forced to. I guess
evolution
And... according to the Virtual-Access website, it's a Windows-only
application (win32) which makes it a very poor fit since it leaves out
everyone who uses Linux and OSX.
Ok, that uncovers my other agenda. I'm trying to shift away from Windoze
and VA is one of my few remaining apps there,
Hello Mark,
On 15/03/11 08:14, Mark Stanton wrote:
[...]
I'm trying to shift away from Windoze and VA is one of my few remaining apps
there, so moving it to include
other platforms would be a big plus from my pov.
[...]
Point taken about Thunderbird and the need, or not, of having a mail
On 14/03/11 09:40, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I think the point is, (and this has been done to
Hi,
Thanks for the thoughtful reply.
To clear up an incorrect impression I seem to have created, I'm not a
M$ Office user, haven't ever been, except when I've been forced into
it at some particular site where I've been on contract. As a Virtual
Access user I'm... Shall we say underwhelmed by
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I'd suggest that Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) would be a
good fit. It's a
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:40, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I'd suggest that Virtual Access
Well, since there´s already thunderbird, and it´s really really good, and
it´s alredy well integrated into major distros(Ubuntu, etc...), don´t really
feel that integrating it into LO would be so great, since it´s already
integrated into desktop enviroment.
Of course one could say that TJ is
On 03/14/2011 06:05 AM, Glenn wrote:
On 3/14/11 5:40 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Further to Fernando's post I'd like to add a thought.
I hadn't noticed the project planning thing, but it seems to me that
(aside from that?) What LO misses, compared to M$Office, is an email
facility.
I'd suggest
Le 2011-03-14 09:59, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions a écrit :
.
Virtual Access (www.virtual-access.org) - their web site states:
[quote]
Virtual Access is a mature and well established Windows mail, news and
conferencing product ..
[unquote]
What if you use Linux or Mac OSX?
Strongly worded, but well-aimed I think. I have an iMAC
running OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) and I use Thunderbird.
I would welcome conferencing but because of my choices,
I am standing out on the loose edges.
I have been let down by Windows-only decisions made by
developers and/or vendors too.
13 matches
Mail list logo