Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
2015-08-21 4:15 GMT+02:00 jlwal...@monkeypantz.net: On 2015-08-20 22:10, toki wrote: On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review? It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review. EASY MONEY! The days of the paid, professional reviewer are numbered. From one side, are reviews written for gratis across the social media; From the other side, bots are writing reviews; From the third side, content distributors are trying to slash costs wherever and whenever possible; I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews. The primary virtue of BYTE! reviews was that there was a sense of objectivity, in what was rated, and how it was rated. There were a couple of times when the reviewer was trying to say the product was good, when their own ratings showed that it was bad, and vice-versus. jonathon Thought I'd share this. One of my latest open source pieces for TechRepublic about LibreOffice 5.0. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/libreoffice-5-0-the-strongest-release-to-date/ Jack On the contrary, Jack, comparing the LO UI with that of Windows, most users with whom I've come in contact who don't use these products professionally - your «average user» - find the former far easier to understand and use than the latter. Professional users soon get accustomed to any interface, even one as unintuitive as the infamous MS Office «ribbon», which now also plagues such services as Hotmail (aka Outlook.com) and then find it easy to use, but this is definitely not the case for the average user. Toolbars which make it easy to find what one is looking for are far better than those that hide them under layers of inaccessibility Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 19/08/15 23:05, Steve Edmonds wrote: ... Mike, check the URL you end up at from that link. I get redirected to http://au.pcmag.com/libreoffice-40/2249/review/libreoffice-40 from the www.pcmag.com site. Steve http://uk.pcmag.com/office-suites-products/2249/review/libreoffice Somewhat different. -- Mike Scott (unet2 at [deletethis] scottsonline.org.uk) Harlow Essex England -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 08/20/2015 06:12 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews. I have every print issue of Byte on my shelf, right from the first, Sept. 1975. I bought my first subscription, at the Ottawa Hamfest in 1975, from the original publisher, Wayne Green. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 12:15 +0100, Mike Scott wrote: Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00 I get a LO 5.0 review... but it is OK, you aren't missing anything. It is a pretty typical drive-by rubbish review which spends most of its time nit-picking superficial issues. Mostly it reads like an add for pay-for products [he even includes links and prices]. Among the new features in LibreOffice 5.0 are some that you probably won't care about, ... yeah, classy. I love reviewers who know what features I need and what is important to me. And he clearly does not know how to do versioning in LO. So he criticizes it as wanting. I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews - EASY MONEY! I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews. -- Adam Tauno Williams mailto:awill...@whitemice.org GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 2015-08-20 22:10, toki wrote: On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review? It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review. EASY MONEY! The days of the paid, professional reviewer are numbered. From one side, are reviews written for gratis across the social media; From the other side, bots are writing reviews; From the third side, content distributors are trying to slash costs wherever and whenever possible; I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews. The primary virtue of BYTE! reviews was that there was a sense of objectivity, in what was rated, and how it was rated. There were a couple of times when the reviewer was trying to say the product was good, when their own ratings showed that it was bad, and vice-versus. jonathon Thought I'd share this. One of my latest open source pieces for TechRepublic about LibreOffice 5.0. http://www.techrepublic.com/article/libreoffice-5-0-the-strongest-release-to-date/ Jack -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review? It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review. EASY MONEY! The days of the paid, professional reviewer are numbered. From one side, are reviews written for gratis across the social media; From the other side, bots are writing reviews; From the third side, content distributors are trying to slash costs wherever and whenever possible; I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews. The primary virtue of BYTE! reviews was that there was a sense of objectivity, in what was rated, and how it was rated. There were a couple of times when the reviewer was trying to say the product was good, when their own ratings showed that it was bad, and vice-versus. jonathon -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
in agreement, seemed like an ad. for MSFT ;-) From: Gabriele Ponzo gpo...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:46 PM Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com To: Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org I've always believed that PC Mag is in M$'s payroll and this article just confirms my thoughts. On 2015-08-19 06:22, James Knott wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
zed wrote: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) When I click on it, it says 5.0. But I don't agree with this: Clunky interface. Confusing menu options. Actually I find the new MS Office interface quite confusing, and the LO menu's much easier to use. Maybe I am just a bit too old-fashioned :) -- Piet van Oostrum p...@vanoostrum.org WWW: http://pietvanoostrum.com/ PGP key: [8DAE142BE17999C4] -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
Well, eventually we had to find _someone_ who actually liked the ribbon, and apparently it is this reviewer. Regards, On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Piet van Oostrum pie...@pietvanoostrum.com wrote: zed wrote: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) When I click on it, it says 5.0. But I don't agree with this: Clunky interface. Confusing menu options. Actually I find the new MS Office interface quite confusing, and the LO menu's much easier to use. Maybe I am just a bit too old-fashioned :) -- Piet van Oostrum p...@vanoostrum.org WWW: http://pietvanoostrum.com/ PGP key: [8DAE142BE17999C4] -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Kevin B. O'Brien zwiln...@gmail.com http://google.me/+kevinobrien “If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went.” - Will Rogers -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
When I click the link in either Chrome or Firefox, I go to a Libreoffice 5.0 review dated August 17, 2015. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Mike Scott m...@scottsonline.org.uk wrote: On 19/08/15 12:07, James Knott wrote: On 08/18/2015 04:24 PM, zed wrote: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) David Someone else, possibly from Australia also saw 4.0, whereas I see 5.0. I guess that's what happens when you're upside down. ;-) Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00 and the page says Version 4.0, recently released, looks a lot like the long-running 3.x series, but I'm definitely in the northern hemisphere, unless continental drift has increased :-) I wish these guys would date their reviews! -- Mike Scott Harlow, Essex, England -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 19/08/15 12:07, James Knott wrote: On 08/18/2015 04:24 PM, zed wrote: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) David Someone else, possibly from Australia also saw 4.0, whereas I see 5.0. I guess that's what happens when you're upside down. ;-) Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00 and the page says Version 4.0, recently released, looks a lot like the long-running 3.x series, but I'm definitely in the northern hemisphere, unless continental drift has increased :-) I wish these guys would date their reviews! -- Mike Scott Harlow, Essex, England -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
List Ahoy: It is perturbing to see that different parties can click on the same link, and see dramatically different results. We have been blaming it on an antipodal bias, but now Mike Scott weighs in from the near-arctic with the same distortion. I don't know how to find the Firefox page info he cites, but its May, 2013 date is telling. The Micro$$ hagiography I see is definitely 5.0, starting off with: By Edward Mendelson http://www.pcmag.com/author-bio/edward-mendelson LibreOffice, the leading free desktop-style alternative to Microsoft Office http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2383731,00.asp$81.78 at Amazon http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992#, just got a new version number, a more modern-looking interface, improved import and export filters, and a vast number of bug fixes. But don't get the idea that LibreOffice 5.0 is massively different from the previous version (4.4), or that if you're not using LibreOffice now, version 5.0 will make you want it. However, if you or your business can't afford or don't want to use a proprietary, for-pay office suite, LibreOffice 5.0 is your best bet. *Version Confusion* Until late in its development, LibreOffice 5.0 was known by the version number 4.5. If you're using version 4.x now, version 5.0 is a smooth, mostly hassle-free upgrade. If you tried LibreOffice 4.x and found it wanting, the new version won't change your mind. Does Bro Scott have an ancestral bias for the Fatal Shore powerful enough to invert the internet? trj -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 19/08/15 18:07, mxk wrote: ... I don't know how to find the Firefox page info he cites, but its May, 2013 date is telling. Right-click in the page and pick 'page info'. There's something unusual about the site (clearly!) -- I've just tried an ancient IE in a VM -- it puts up the 4.0 page with a couple of warning dialogue boxes, one saying about a secure connection, and one that it can't open the page (???!!! even though it did!). When I close them, the page clears to a 'cannot display' message; although by a bit of fiddling, it's persuadable to continue to show the wrong page. Weird. ... Does Bro Scott have an ancestral bias for the Fatal Shore powerful enough to invert the internet? Nope. Gaelic ancestry if anything (or so I'm told). Does that count? I wonder if they've redundant servers with load balancing, and one's out of sync. -- Mike Scott Harlow, Essex, England -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
Thank you Mike Scott for imparting a bit of Firefox knowledge that I was unaware of. Now, if I can only remember it. Upon employing that skill, we get: Modified: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:58:41 PM, establishing that PC Mag has indeed somehow arranged to have two sites with the same address. By all accounts, the Gaelic underpinnings would have afforded no protection. His Majesty was openhanded with free Transportation to subjects in all his realms. trj -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 2015-08-20 08:06, mxk wrote: Thank you Mike Scott for imparting a bit of Firefox knowledge that I was unaware of. Now, if I can only remember it. Upon employing that skill, we get: Modified: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:58:41 PM, establishing that PC Mag has indeed somehow arranged to have two sites with the same address. By all accounts, the Gaelic underpinnings would have afforded no protection. His Majesty was openhanded with free Transportation to subjects in all his realms. trj Mike, check the URL you end up at from that link. I get redirected to http://au.pcmag.com/libreoffice-40/2249/review/libreoffice-40 from the www.pcmag.com site. Steve -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: On 08/18/2015 04:24 PM, zed wrote: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) David Someone else, possibly from Australia also saw 4.0, whereas I see 5.0. I guess that's what happens when you're upside down. ;-) ...but I had the monitor upside down, too! David -- zed Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform. -- Mark Twain -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 08/18/2015 04:24 PM, zed wrote: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) David Someone else, possibly from Australia also saw 4.0, whereas I see 5.0. I guess that's what happens when you're upside down. ;-) -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-) David -- zed A running mate is a husband who dared to talk back -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
Yeah, I noticed it wasn't the greatest article too. On 08/18/2015 04:35 PM, elderdanlewis wrote: He found LibreOffice lacking somewhat; I find his article lacking as well. He said that it will create flat databases which it will.But he failed to mention that it also creates relational databases. Nor did he mention that it can be used as the front end for other databases. ( Just spouting off a little. ) Dan Original message From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com Date:08/18/2015 2:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To: LibreOffice users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
RE: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
He found LibreOffice lacking somewhat; I find his article lacking as well. He said that it will create flat databases which it will.But he failed to mention that it also creates relational databases. Nor did he mention that it can be used as the front end for other databases. ( Just spouting off a little. ) Dan Original message From: James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com Date:08/18/2015 2:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To: LibreOffice users@global.libreoffice.org Subject: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review for 4.0 Steve On 2015-08-19 06:22, James Knott wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
I've always believed that PC Mag is in M$'s payroll and this article just confirms my thoughts. Il 19/ago/2015 01:24, Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com ha scritto: Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review for 4.0 Steve On 2015-08-19 06:22, James Knott wrote: I just came across this article. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2418419,00.asp?mailing_id=1431647mailing=whatsnewnowmailingID=E2768DCC83E0602F9C1DB70A73032992 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review Rating | PCMag.com
On 2015-08-19 12:55, James Knott wrote: On 08/18/2015 07:23 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote: Hi. Is this a review for LO 4? When I click on the link I get a review for 4.0 It says 5.0, when I click on the link. Must be a redirect because that link takes me to http://au.pcmag.com/libreoffice-40/2249/review/libreoffice-40 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
