onger.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Tom Davies [mailto:tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 16:55
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS font exploit
Hi :)
Thanks Dennis. :) I know i am pretty safe at home. A targeted attack
day
for me to get access to all but 2 of the machines.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 6/11/11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton
> Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS font exploit
> To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> Date: Sunday, 6 November, 2011, 23:45
ay, November 05, 2011 11:20
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS font exploit
Hi :)
That seems to list all the supported versions/distros of Windows but doesn't
included unsupported ones such as Win98. Does that mean Win98 is safe or
just that they don't both
Windows although it can take a bit of work sometimes. Luckily i am mostly able
to avoid such old machines.
The info is good to know tho so thanks for that :)
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sat, 5/11/11, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> From: Dotan Cohen
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: MS fo
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 20:19, Tom wrote:
> Hi :)
> That seems to list all the supported versions/distros of Windows but doesn't
> included unsupported ones such as Win98. Does that mean Win98 is safe or
> just that they don't bother to look to see if it's vulnerable?
>
Windows 98 is vulnerable.
Hi :)
That seems to list all the supported versions/distros of Windows but doesn't
included unsupported ones such as Win98. Does that mean Win98 is safe or
just that they don't bother to look to see if it's vulnerable?
Tbh my interest suddenly dropped away when i found that LO is safe even if
w
