Hi all,
In our cluster we use virtual_Free and h_vmmem as consumable resources
per job:
# qconf -sc|egrep 'virtual_free|h_vmem|^#'
#name shortcut typerelop requestable consumable
default urgency
Hi,
Am 23.10.2013 um 03:50 schrieb Ian Mortimer:
On 22/10/13 17:39, Reuti wrote:
Correct - there is no look ahead feature in SGE - i.e. after the suspension
you would be inside thegranted limit again. The suspension is the result of
another job in another queue being started. You can
Hi,
Am 23.10.2013 um 08:59 schrieb Arnau Bria:
In our cluster we use virtual_Free and h_vmmem as consumable resources
per job:
# qconf -sc|egrep 'virtual_free|h_vmem|^#'
#name shortcut typerelop requestable consumable
default urgency
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:06:12 +0200
Reuti Reuti wrote:
Hi,
Hi Reuti,
# qconf -sc|egrep 'virtual_free|h_vmem|^#'
#name shortcut typerelop requestable
consumable default urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/10/13 13:39, John Kloss wrote:
Should we assume that, since Univa claims ownership of all
copyright and trademarks, _including_ the code under the SISSL,
that Univa will be fighting to shutdown the open source versions of
Grid Engine (open
You are quite correct,
Bill, that it is too early for this. We are currently busy with
onboarding and assisting the Oracle customers and with ingesting the
Oracle Grid Engine assets.
Cheers,
Fritz
William Deegan
23. Oktober 2013
02:19
Fritz,I
know it's probably early
Am 23.10.2013 um 10:29 schrieb Arnau Bria:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:06:12 +0200
Reuti Reuti wrote:
Hi,
Hi Reuti,
# qconf -sc|egrep 'virtual_free|h_vmem|^#'
#name shortcut typerelop requestable
consumable default urgency
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, William Hay w@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
That might be excessively paranoid. IANAL but I don't think owning
copyrights entitles one to revoke licenses already granted by your
predecessors in title. If that were possible don't you think Oracle
would have used that
Are you kidding me? NO?
Have you seen what Adaptive Computing did with Moab?They took Maui
added/improved it
and are now charging a fortune for Moab.
If a company wants to start from scratch with a product fine, but to take a
product contributed
by the community for free and then
Just my $.02 ...
Joseph Farran wrote:
If a company wants to start from scratch with a product fine, but to
take a product contributed
by the community for free and then repackage it with bug fixes and added
features, that's not
good.
Accidental or intentional that statement trivializes
10 matches
Mail list logo