Re: RO calls authentication

Maybe checking out this code 1) from an app that I am working on can help you? I am making unauthorized calls to the endpoints /register and /authenticate. The other endpoints use basic authentication. See also docs 2) and further 1)

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Thanks for this James. My observation re: using the (relational) data model as the initial input though is that this is likely to lead to rather coupled code, ultimately not maintainable. For example, typically we would model a one:many relationship will a simple foreign key. But if that was

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

I actually tested out using Telosys to generate an isis app from database definition. It did work but of course it meant i did the ER first. I used MySQL, did the ER modelling on the workbench, forward engineered into the database and then used telosys scripts to generate a functional Isis

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Really interesting, James. I didn’t knew about it … I’ll take a look. Thanks, Oscar > El 14 nov 2015, a las 16:00, James Agada escribió: > > I actually tested out using Telosys to generate an isis app from database > definition. It did work but of course it meant

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

On 13 November 2015 at 09:45, Óscar Bou - GOVERTIS wrote: > > Hi all. > > I’m considering re-introducing UML Class diagrams in our workflow mainly > for: > - graphically design the domain entities. > - modeling relationships. > - agree with names of properties, collections

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Many thanks, Stephen for this detailed explanation. The problem I’m facing is that I intent to communicate the developers what’s the model to implement. And I usually don’t find big mistakes in action code, but what mostly forces us to refactor is miscommunication regarding the Domain

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Yep, I'm thinking something similar. Will take a look at capableobjects, but think I'll make plantuml my main focus. Perhaps you could see what the plantunl/xtext/Eclipse story is, and whether it fits your desired work flow . Cheers, Dan On 14 Nov 2015 17:23, "Óscar Bou - GOVERTIS"

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

I'll look at it in detail. Thanks! Oscar > El 14 nov 2015, a las 18:34, Dan Haywood > escribió: > > Yep, I'm thinking something similar. > > Will take a look at capableobjects, but think I'll make plantuml my main > focus. Perhaps you could see what the

Re: Override ActionParametersFormPanel.properties

Hi Martin, On 13 November 2015 at 09:23, Martin Vogel wrote: > Hi Dan, > > since the TodoApplication_en.properties was mothballed am I right to > assume that overriding the ActionParametersFormPanel.properties in an > external property file or the AppManifest is not working

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Really nice to hear is your full circle, Dan :) Mine also. I started all this by using the excellent Bold for Delphi components, now Capable Objects MDriven Framework [1]. It was wonderful to design in Rational Rose your entities, including constraints in OCL, and after that generate the code,

Re: Thinking about re-introducing UML in our workflow

Hi, Very interesting, and I'll follow with great interest. I forgot to mention that my main use-case, in the short term, is user generated forms, so I am looking at the problem 'domain' from a different perspective. If I wanted to generate Java classes with Isis annotations I would use the