Similar situation over here in Australia, most companies I have talked
to, are either not sure, say its on the way or say no problems "send
them to us as xml via http". eerrm ... no thanks.
They also charge like a wounded bull.
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 09:50, Eric Carlson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I i
Sorry if this has been discussed before, I have been busy with other
things, Kannel has been running on our system without a hitch for nearly
a year now, I don't read the list as much as I should.. tisk tisk..
Since we use a GSM modem for our SMSC, when people receive sms message
from our system,
Hi All:
I have been having a problem with using a Nokia Phone as SMSC. I have
tried it in both RedHat 7.2 and Windows 2k with the same problem.
Attached is the Linux kannel.conf file and the output from smsbox.exe
group = core
admin-port = 13000
wapbox-port = 13002
smsbox-port = 13005
admin-
Greetings,
Is it possible to retrieve the Telecom Operator's
error messages (such as "message failed" or "check operator services") via
Kannel sendsms?
Thanks and Regards,
Patrick
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 12:34, Choong Hong Cheng wrote:
> I did implement the simple and weighted round-robin
> for load balancing in Kannel I even sumbit the
> patches for it last time Did you guys get it ? I
> will resubmit again with the latest CVS within these
> few days and I hope you
I did implement the simple and weighted round-robin
for load balancing in Kannel I even sumbit the
patches for it last time Did you guys get it ? I
will resubmit again with the latest CVS within these
few days and I hope you guys can give some feedback.
Cheers,
Hong Cheng
--- Oded Arbe
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 12:19, Ian Daly wrote:
> need to set denied-smsc-id aswell to ensure that the access you've set works
> as you expect?
That's the whole point - I don't want access control - I want load
balancing. that's why prefered-smsc-id is better, like you suggested.
> > That's was wha
> Really ? this is not what I understood from the user guide - as I
> understand it, allowed SMSC is used for access control, while prefered
> SMSC is used for routing priorities.
> But ok - I agree that using prefered SMSC is a much better keyword to
> use if load balancing is required.
Ah, cros
Nisan Bloch wrote:
> I have a patch that allows one to override the src and dest TON and NPI
> settings on an SMSC basis. Anyone interested?
At least I am. Would you mind putting patch to CVS? It seems that right
now many people have written similar changes separately, thus doing
duplicate work.
