So, at the end no reply with patent id, so it's a buzz ?
Julien
2009/2/14 Stipe Tolj s...@gw.tolj.org:
David schrieb:
Hello,
Us users of SMS Shortcodes are getting hit in the US for violating a
patent by TCS Inc. The patent claims to cover:
A gateway, comprising: a first communication
David schrieb:
Hello,
Us users of SMS Shortcodes are getting hit in the US for violating a
patent by TCS Inc. The patent claims to cover:
A gateway, comprising: a first communication path to accept a short
message from a mobile device; a translation module to insert said short
message
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 07:40, Falko Ziemann wrote:
Does the Patent say anything about HTTPS? I mean HTTPS is not HTTP. And
if the patent cover this to, why not simply route your traffic through a
ssh-tunnel? You can setup this in seconds and these guys even helped
you with their claim to
Hi
I had a similar problem with long php scripts updating several databases.
What I finally do is split the php script in 2 parts a way that I can
respond back to kannel ASAP so kannel can continue with next message
and then. I did this storing data in a temporary table and then launch
the 2nd
Hi,
Not necessary. It is much simpler to start it in the background with ''. If
kannel doesn't support this, you can very easily make a simple shell
wrapper, that calls from within the large executable in the background.
But I thought, thanks to our resident lawyer Falco, that we can start using
Wow, be carefull. That was what I found in a blog.
I'm some 1,000 miles away from the US and so is my knowledge about the
US law-system. I can quite surley tell you, that these guys have no
chance in Germany ... but the US?! I read a story about a guy who sued
McDonalds because the coffee
Hello,
Us users of SMS Shortcodes are getting hit in the US for violating a patent by
TCS Inc. The patent claims to cover:
A gateway, comprising: a first communication path to accept a short message
from a mobile device; a translation module to insert said short message into an
Hypertext
: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
Hello,
Us users of SMS Shortcodes are getting hit in the US for violating a
patent by TCS Inc. The patent claims to cover:
A gateway, comprising: a first communication path to accept a short
message from a mobile
- Original Message -
From: David
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
Hello,
Us users of SMS Shortcodes are getting hit in the US for violating a
patent by TCS Inc. The patent claims to cover:
A gateway
shortcode=%P
operatorid=%o metadata=%D /dev/null 21
--- On Thu, 2/12/09, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
To: dbw1...@yahoo.com, users@kannel.org
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2009, 1:39
Hi David,
Falko gave the solution - use sqlbox for internal communication.
Anyway, I'd love to know more of this like patent ID etc.
In short, I have my doubts that they will claim violation.
In short you do use http as internal communication INSIDE your boxes.
HTTP is NOT used to receive MO
it.
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: David
To: users@kannel.org ; Nikos Balkanas
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
my php script is this really, really long php script that controls all
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200804/ai_n25346966
The patent describes a means for triggering an Internet informational
query or search using a simple text message originated from a cell
phone or mobile device, and is widely used today for two-way premium
messaging
Uhh, found a even better one here:
http://www.cellitmarketing.com/blog/the-tcs-patent-dispute-cellits-viewpoint/
As many of you know, TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. is currently
pursuing legal actions against many players in the mobile space.
(bla bla)
It is Cellit’s belief this patent claim
, 2/12/09, Falko Ziemann /fal...@gmail.com/* wrote:
From: Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
To: dbw1...@yahoo.com
Cc: seikath seik...@gmail.com, users@kannel.org User
users@kannel.org
Date: Thursday
, February 13, 2009 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
Uhh, found a even better one here:
http://www.cellitmarketing.com/blog/the-tcs-patent-dispute-cellits-viewpoint/
As many of you know, TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. is currently pursuing
legal
13, 2009 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: HELP! Patent claim! Can we use an alternate protocol?
it ups to the handler you call with exec, the system resources you posses
...
in case you dont experience high loads exec is acceptable as short term
solution
otherwise, use sqlbox, or, what about XML POST ?:)
i
17 matches
Mail list logo
