Re: [IronPython] IronPython and CPython httplib and ssl modules produce IOError

2011-06-10 Thread Zachary Gramana
Lukas, I'm working on this issue, or at least an issue that generates the same exception. I do have a working patch, which I hope to contribute back after a little more work on it. Check your API to see if you are making any calls to socket.makefile(). If you do, and subsequently close

Re: [IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-06-10 Thread Zachary Gramana
I hesitate to say anything as I am someone who just started lurking in the periphery, but on the off chance that others might agree, I'm throwing in my $0.02 USD: There are some big Python applications (e.g. Mercurial) that are going to remain on 2.7 for some time. There are important modules

Re: [IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-06-10 Thread Zachary Gramana
some of my assumptions. On 6/10/2011 12:21 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Zachary Gramana zgram...@pottsconsultinggroup.com wrote: There are some big Python applications (e.g. Mercurial) that are going to remain on 2.7 for some time. There are important modules

Re: [IronPython] IronPython and CPython httplib and ssl modules produce IOError

2011-06-10 Thread Zachary Gramana
studio(tm) [M] i...@duber.cz [W] http://www.duber.cz [A] R.A.Dvorského 601, Praha 10 [A] 10900, Czech Republic, Europe On 10.6.2011 16:32, Zachary Gramana wrote: Lukas, I'm working on this issue, or at least an issue that generates the same exception. I do have a working patch, which I hope

Re: [IronPython] Moving forward on 2.7.1

2011-06-10 Thread Zachary Gramana
of a way to do screen sharing as well, please chime in. Shoot me a mail off list and we'll sort it out. - Jeff On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Zachary Gramana zgram...@pottsconsultinggroup.com wrote: That's great to hear. On the getting involved note, one thing I would love is a code review over

Re: [IronPython] Seattle IronPython Meetup

2011-06-10 Thread Zachary Gramana
I you are open to virtual attendees, then I'm in. On 6/10/2011 2:24 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Curt Hagenlocherc...@hagenlocher.org wrote: Welcome to Seattle! Or as I like to think of it, welcome to June-and-we-still-have-the-heat-on! :( I'm from Canada, so this

Re: [IronPython] socket, _socket, and socket.py

2011-05-18 Thread Zachary Gramana
- boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Zachary Gramana Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 3:38 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] socket, _socket, and socket.py I noticed this, with a little disappointment. I also noticed that they implemented a sort of ersatz/platform agnostic

[IronPython] socket, _socket, and socket.py

2011-05-17 Thread Zachary Gramana
Hi: I've been working on adapting Mercurial to run on IronPython 2.7, and ran into http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/26852 which has stopped me from getting `hg clone` working over SSL. I noticed that for the ssl module, the IPY team mirrored the CPython pattern of placing the

Re: [IronPython] socket, _socket, and socket.py

2011-05-17 Thread Zachary Gramana
library with IronPython. So it made sense to implement the socket module directly. When IronPython started shipping the standard lib, it could have been changed, but never was. I think it makes sense to follow the CPython pattern. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Zachary Gramana zgram

Re: [IronPython] socket, _socket, and socket.py

2011-05-17 Thread Zachary Gramana
I noticed this, with a little disappointment. I also noticed that they implemented a sort of ersatz/platform agnostic reference tracking system in ssl.py. Seeing the _makefile_refs system got me thinking about the whole ssl.py/_ssl.pyd paradigm and sockets.cs, since I remembered you tackled