Related note:
Cut of is the function of the used pseudopotential.
It have no sense to use higer cut of than the one for witch the pseudopotential
was designed,
becouse othervise the source of error starts to be the pseudopotencial, not the
cut-off.
Michal Husak
UCT Prague
Data obtained by vc-relax corresponds to 0 K.
Data obtained by relax with RT cell parameters fixed corresponds
to not relaxed QM minimum with undefined temperature.
To describe correctly structure at given temperature you must use quantum
dynamic calculations ...
Michal Husak
UCT Prague
For solids:
CSD database - organic
ICSD database - inorganic
Rest : molecular modeling as starting point ? Try Avogadro free code before
something more complex ...
Maybe I do not understand the question. Coorinates are experimentaly known only
for solids
becouse only X-ray , neutron or electron
Hi
I apology to QE users, but my solution:
Use instead of QE CASTEP, witch generates pseudopotentials on the fly
optimized for given functional (no databases used) ... It solves all the
pseudopotential database issues ..
Supports rSCAN, r2SCAN ...
I hope QE authors will sometime add to the
e help file:
/usr/share/openmpi/help-mpi-api.txt: No such file or directory. Sorry!
From: Paolo Giannozzi
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 12:01 PM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Cc: Husak Michal
Subject: Re: [QE-users] libxc needed for this functional - QE
, December 19, 2023 12:01 PM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Cc: Husak Michal
Subject: Re: [QE-users] libxc needed for this functional - QE bulid with libxc
On 12/17/23 10:16, Husak Michal via users wrote:
> We had de-facto stopped QE usage, because from the version 7.0 QE support for
&g
or what
you see.
Michal Husak
From: chan yong keat
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2023 8:53:50 AM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org; Husak Michal
Subject: Re: [QE-users] libxc needed for this functional - QE bulid with libxc
Hi Mr Michal Husak,
I have pro
I belive you must at first compile LibXC separately, preferably perform its
self test ...
Than you can buld QE
At least it was working for me (under cygwin on Win 7) ...
Michl Husak
From: users on behalf of Boucherdoud
Ahmed
Sent: Wednesday, August 16,
I had identical problem ...
The reason was the use of Windows "wget" instead of cygwin/Linux "wget" ...
Native Windows "wget" does not accept the QE setup script syntax
Maybe there is similar issue with mac "wget" ?
On Windows the solution was to rise the cygwin "wget" preference by
path
Hi
I am tiring to recompile QE 7.1 under Windows + cygwin64 (environment
described in another E-mail).
I am able to get a pure serial QE version (no MP no MPI) in such way passing
the QE test-suite ...
if I try MP or MPI build, I get error message below ...
I do not understand why a standard
Hi
Can anybody explain, how does QE work with space group symmetry ?
I am a crystallographer - no need to explain theory ...
Let speak e.g. about e,g, P212121
I expect:
A) When space_group = 19, QE generate the 3 more molecules from 1, check the
lattice is P (eventually transforms to P from
The most save and correct way is not to use ibraw, but space group number ...
I will generate correct diamond for you toomorow (I work
with my students on CIF->QE convertor with GUI ...
But diamond is so simple, it can be done by hand
You need just the SG number (i do not remember Fd3m
tained for many years. So, users should not be advised to use it as an
assistant.
[1] http://nninc.cnf.cornell.edu/
Regards,
HZ
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 10:45 PM Husak Michal
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>> wrote:
I had finally identified the issue with cygwin64 as well ...
The cygwin
If you use space group for QE setting, you can enter ONLY the symmetry
independent atoms ... Othervise QE will generate the atoms based on symetry
multiple times = overlap.
If your supercell keep the original symetry it will work ...
If your supercell does not have the original symmetry and it
Suggestion:
Try to describe your system by the help of
crystal_sg and correct space gropu nuber (space_group)
Correct ibrav will be generated automatically , no need to eneter ...
And you will need to ente ronly the symmetry idedpendent atoms = less mistakes.
And you do not risk QE will fidn
Hi
After solving the "curl" conflict I can finally run test-suite for QE 7.0
cygwin64 gfotran build ...
I test only the pw
Results:
1) serial
225 out of 226 tests passed (1 skipped). (numeric errors pw_relax -
relax-extfor.in )
2) OpenMP
225 out of 226 tests passed (1 skipped). (numeric
I had finally identified the issue with cygwin64 as well ...
The cygwin64 was using the Windows version of curl ...
After installing the cygwin64 native version of curl (not default part of
cygwin64 installation)
the QE pseudo download works with original scripts without any modification ...
I can confirm the issue is related to the cygwin64 probably ...
I was able to handle the problem by modifying the content of the
check_pseudo.sh file in following way:
Original not working for cygwin64:
${DOWNLOADER} ${ESPRESSO_PSEUDO}/${pp_file} ${NETWORK_PSEUDO}/${pp_file} 2>
/dev/null
Hi
The sequence bellow still does note work. I had done this carefully 2x.
Still getting the result bellow ... Running QE 7.0 under cygwin64
USER@USER-PC /cygdrive/m/My_project/fortran/qe/qe-7.0/test-suite
$ more ENVIRONMENT
# Copyright (C) 2001-2016 Quantum ESPRESSO group
#
# This
Dear Paolo
Thank you for your advice ...
I had followed exactly the instructions you give bellow, but the downloads of
test-suite pseudopotential does not still work. After the clean up + 2 changes
I still get:
USER@USER-PC /cygdrive/m/My_project/fortran/qe/qe-7.0/test-suite
$ make pseudo
Hi
I am trying to run the tests form the QE test-suite.
The result is:
USER@USER-PC /cygdrive/m/My_project/fortran/qe/qe-7.0/test-suite
$ make pseudo
Download of O.pz-rrkjus.UPF FAILED, do it manually -- Testing aborted!
make: *** [Makefile:35: pseudo] Error 255
I get an advice on this forum
-content/uploads/upf_files/ is not a website.
Then `make run-tests-pw-parallel` will work.
Ye
===
Ye Luo, Ph.D.
Computational Science Division & Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:48 PM Husak Michal
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>>
Hi
This does not work.
The link bellow is not accessible in any mode ...
https://www.quantum-espresso.org/wp-content/uploads/upf_files/
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access this resource.
Apache/2.4.38 (Debian) Server at www.quantum-espresso.org
tory
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:31 PM Husak Michal
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>> wrote:
Hi
Thank you for your advice.
I do not thing my environment is wrong - I was able to compile similar code
(CASTEP) with same environment
in both MPI, and OpenMP version and it is 100% functional wit
...
Michal Husak
From: users on behalf of Husak
Michal
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 10:26 PM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Subject: [QE-users] Tracing MPI buidl of QE 7.0 malfuction (gfortranm OpenMPI).
Hi
I am trying to find why the MPI build
Hi
I am trying to find why the MPI build (gfortan + OpenMP) does not work for QE
6.6-7.0
The code stops in the routine
good_fft_order (in fft_support.f90)
on following statement
IF (np <= 0 .OR. np > nr) &
This is called from
realspace_grid_init (in fft_types.f90) ...
Following command
I am trying to build a Windows QE binary by cygwin64, OpenMP and gfortran ...
I was successful, but I see the performance is pure, result of my comparison
tests bellow.
Simple PBE L-alanine SCF calculation.
The comparison is done with QE 6.4.1 build (made by others I am not able to
..
Michal Husak
From: users on behalf of Paolo
Giannozzi
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2022 5:52 PM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
Subject: Re: [QE-users] Does QE contain any OpenMP optimization ?
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM Husak Michal
mailto:michal.hu..
Hi
I was comparing the speed of QE build with
--enable-openmp
and
--disable-openmp
MPI was disabled ...
>From what I see OpenMP is activated but the speed gain is zero ...
I was searching for OpenMP optimization flags in QE fortran code like
!$OMP PARALLEL etc ...
But I did not find any
Hi
I had compiles MPI version of QE 7.0 for Windows in 2 different ways:
1) by cygwin64 + OpenMPI
2) by MSYS2+ Microsoft MPI + MinGW
In both situation I get following error:
Error in routine good_fft_order (1): invalid np
I have no idea what to do ...
it must work because the same
I am trying to buld QE 7.0 under MSYS2 and gfortran.
I am on internet = devxlib folder is correctly loaded and unpacked.
The file device_auxfunc_mod.f90 exist in the src directory ...
Whatever I do I sill get builds error listed below ...
Any idea what to do ?
make[3]: Entering directory
Sorry I had in mind MSYS2 environment and gfortran
Michal
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi
I am trying to build QE by NAYA2 environment and gfortran.
configure works OK ...
make generate error shown bellow ...
Did I miss something ?
Similar problem was already discussed in relation to Mac rebuild in this
mailing list with no conclusion ...
Michal Husak
UCT Prague ...
configure:
Hi
I am trying to run QE 7.0 in the MPI mode ...
I consistently get following output and code termination:
%%
Error in routine good_fft_order (1):
invalid np
Hi
I was getting horrible bad performance of QE 7.0 when build with
--enable-openmp option.
This did not happened with previous version (6.8) ...
There was an approx. 8x speed down ...
I had traced the problem to the link with fftw3_omp library witch was added in
the 7.0 release
for the
Hi
I am trying to build qe 7 for windows and to use OpenMP parallelization.
I use cygwin64 and gpfortran ...
>From the manual I understand OpenMP builds should be done by
configure --enable-openmp--disable-parallel
This will enable OpenMP and disable MPI parallelization , correct ?
I
Maybe it can be added:
Only total energy differences are, provided they are
calculated in the same supercell and with the same wfc/density cutoffs
and with same k-point sampling scheme ?
**
Dear Poonam S.
As a general rule, total energies are not meaningful
Maybe it can be added:
Dear Poonam S.
As a general rule, total energies are not meaningful in the case of
plane-wave/pseudopotentials calculations in periodic boundary
conditions. Only total energy differences are, provided they are
calculated in the same supercell and with the same wfc/density
I understand that Qunatum Espresso on its will change centered cell to
primitive,not changing the overal symmetry ... It create equivalent descriptipn
in lover system with primitive cell automatically ...
And it change the crystallographic system and lattice parameters as well
The question
It this a really functional file ?
tstress= ture
**
This can not work - tstress= .true.
I do not see any dispersion correction with PBE functional usage + cell
parameter relaxation ...
This usually give nonsense cell parameters ...
Michal Husak
UCT Prague
I am a crystallographer using QE for crystal structure verification.
If I do not know sure the lattice parameters (I work e.g. on structure
prediction), I must do vc-relax ...
If I know the lattice parameters experimentaly and I want to study something
on a crystal with this parameter known
You are wrong.
During scf you do not change lattice parameters.
Relax is used when you are sure about lattice parameters - eg. from X-ray
diffraction.
From: users on behalf of
singaravelan T R
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 8:38:16 AM
To:
Hi
Can anybody give me access to Quantum Espresso 6.7 wit mGGA library linked
(I need SCAN functional) ?
I need binary compiled with Microsoft MPI working under Windows 10 ...
I had failed to recompiled the code by cygwin64 environment myself ...
I had found only 6.4.1 Quantum Espresso
Hi
I can not give you a glue for QE ...
I have a lot of identical issues (what work on one system, does not work on
another) with CASTEP code ...
In all cased the reson was the used Fotran compiler and eventually mathematics
libraries ..
I suggest to ask the peopel on anothe supercomputer
Forget this method.
Get a CIF file for the structure you want to stady and
use the space group based crystal definition ...
From: users on behalf of valeria
arteaga muñiz
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 5:26:37 AM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
Subject:
Under Windows for sure. Just specify in some startup .bat file from what
directory you want to run pw.exe = version.
Linux will work similary ...
From: users on behalf of Mainak
Ghosh
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2020 12:32:02 PM
To:
Thank you for the answer ...
To be 100% sure I had tested on diamond the computational time (all parameters
set identical).
1) Material cloud generated file based on ibrav = 0 definition (BURAI generates
the same)
scf time 22.11 sec
2) The same file but diamond was described by space group
Hi
I have a question to QE developers.
The Material Cloud as well as BURAI gui generate QE files without
information about the cell centering (Bravais lattic).
As the result QE calculates with 2-4x more atoms than neccesary in
the corresponding primitive non-centered unit cell ...
Does it realy
to find how I can solve this problem and run scf calculation.
Thanks
Mahsa
[Capture.JPG]
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 12:53 AM Husak Michal
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>> wrote:
Sorry
The sintax is:
mpirun -np 4 pw.x < scf.in<http://scf.in> > scf.out
You work probably on Linux ...
On W
ect: Re: [QE-users] QE didn't generate output files in scf calculation
I do that, but I received this error: How can I run this file??
No executable was specified on the mpirun command line.
Aborting.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:33 PM Husak Michal
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>> wrote:
Correct
Correct sintax:
mpirun -np 4 < scf.in > scf.out
Check documentatio. The filenames are not paramsters, but IO sources ..
From: users on behalf of
M.Golmoammadi
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 7:50:58 PM
To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
Subject: [QE-users] QE
I would like to ask what is the typical time difference between running PBE and
and the hybrid PBE0 ...
Using CASTEP the PBE0 takes typically 200-1000 x more time than PBE ...
This is OK , I run CASTEP on a 1000 node supercomputer and work is done in a few
days typically ...
I had run PBE
Hi
I work on a specific problem - study of H proton transfer in molecular
cocrystals.
Standard functionals (PBE, PBE0, B3LYP) produce incorrect results.
Details:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/anie.201809381
I would like to test in Qunatum Espresso the suggested
Hi all ...
Before I continue I would like to mentioned I had done the homework on this
topic (checked mail list, studied about 20 related articles, done a few hundred
test calculations by QE and CASTEP) ...
The target of my work is to verify (enhance quality) of X-ray based molecular
crystal
No. I do no use hyperthreading.
I had checked both OpenMPI and OpenMP - in outup file ...
It shows what I set by the launch and enviromental variable correctly.
If I use more than 4 cores in any way, I get no speed up ...
From: users on behalf of Pietro
Delugas
mic
displacement system will make in each BFGS cycle to achieve converge.
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020, 1:37 am Husak Michal,
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>> wrote:
> First of all, you can find all the information about units of data in pw.x
> input manual.
For conv_thr the units are missing in
Just in case you want to check my table comparing QE - CASTEP setup parameters.
It can be downloaded from this link:
https://uloz.to/file/ago6c1MMiIWU/qe-castep-param-comparison-xls
Let me know please, whatever you thing my conclusions related to the parameters
correspondence/
transformation
same purpose.
All the energy units are in Rydberg, as mentioned in manual.
Hope it helps.
I am also facing similar problems by going from QE to SIESTA.
Keep in touch
Regards
Yuvam
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020, 12:43 am Husak Michal,
mailto:michal.hu...@vscht.cz>> wrote:
Hi all
I was working a l
: Saturday, November 14, 2020 8:22:48 PM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum; Husak Michal
Subject: Re: [QE-users] CASTEP to QE setup parameters conversions
One possibility would be to upload your structure (or in principle even
your CASTEP .cell file) here:
https://www.materialscloud.org/work/tools
Hi all
I was working a lot with CASTEP last years ...
I want to switch some my projects to QE + do head to head comparison with
CASTEP.
I am confused by some selected corresponding setup parameters conversion
(I had handled the rest including input formats conversion myself):
QE:
60 matches
Mail list logo