Dont quite get you there, but its pretty simple,
we are on a list, having an open discussion, if you reply to me, or I,
you, then it should go by the list, on this list very simple, its
configured correctly by having reply-to set, to the list, problem does
not exist, if you reply, or reply-all,
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 17:25 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Personally, I don't like that preference because I would much rather get
the LIST post than the direct one.
also, some list software can be configured that if it sees a direct
copy, it wont send them the list copy, mailman has
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:54 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote:
Hey! I like lists without Reply-To set. I don't think they're braindead,
We need to agree to disagree Ben :)
However, your point is valid. If you *really* want to keep all
discussion public for a list, Reply-To is a way to achieve
On 2014-01-17 10:10 PM, Kaz Kylheku k...@kylheku.com wrote:
Your vehemence against private replies is bizarre and baffling.
Surprisingly, I'm in agreement with Noel (I generally don't see his
posts unless someone quotes him)...
What you seem to fail to be grasping is, we are saying that on
On 18.01.2014 05:58, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 10:10 PM, Kaz Kylheku k...@kylheku.com wrote:
Your vehemence against private replies is bizarre and baffling.
Surprisingly, I'm in agreement with Noel (I generally don't see his
posts unless someone quotes him)...
What you seem to fail
Charles Marcus skrev den 2014-01-16 20:27:
On 2014-01-15 1:54 PM, Benny Pedersen me[at]junc.eu wrote:
thunderbird need a plugin to make it work, roundcube it just works
default
Thunderbird has had a proper 'Reply-To-List' button/feature for a long
time now.\
and RCU maillist now makes it
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP, the list AND a 3rd party (me)
'private'?
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i did teh impossible!
Really? You call replying to the OP,
On 17.01.2014 11:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 20:12, schrieb Kaz Kylheku:
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply
On 2014-01-17 2:12 PM, Kaz Kylheku k...@kylheku.com wrote:
On 17.01.2014 10:10, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-17 1:04 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 17.01.2014 18:58, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
and RCU maillist now makes it impossible to reply private :(
really? look i
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 18:58 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Charles Marcus skrev den 2014-01-16 20:27:
On 2014-01-15 1:54 PM, Benny Pedersen me[at]junc.eu wrote:
thunderbird need a plugin to make it work, roundcube it just works
default
Thunderbird has had a proper 'Reply-To-List'
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 11:12 -0800, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
Indeed, Reindl did not reply to the list, as claimed; or at least so I'm
led to suspect, based on not having received the post you're replying
to, keeping in mind that absence of evidence doesn't proves absence.
Harald is currently
On 17.01.2014 16:25, Noel Butler wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 18:58 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Charles Marcus skrev den 2014-01-16 20:27:
On 2014-01-15 1:54 PM, Benny Pedersen me[at]junc.eu wrote:
thunderbird need a plugin to make it work, roundcube it just works
default
Thunderbird
On 2014-01-15 1:54 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
thunderbird need a plugin to make it work, roundcube it just works default
Thunderbird has had a proper 'Reply-To-List' button/feature for a long
time now.\
On 2014-01-15 3:04 PM, Kaz Kylheku k...@kylheku.com wrote:
Reply should
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote:
On 16/01/14 7:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 21:43, schrieb Ben Schmidt:
Another is that sometimes people have direct copies delivered to
their inbox, but copies via the list filtered into a folder. Such
users want both
On 16.01.2014 16:02, Noel Butler wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote:
On 16/01/14 7:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 21:43, schrieb Ben Schmidt:
Another is that sometimes people have direct copies delivered to
their inbox, but copies via the list
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 18:24 -0800, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
NB [I]t annoys me greatly that people find the need to reply directly
NB as well as a list, I mean we *are* all on the same list, so we will
*all*
NB yes, including intended recipient, get the post, do people think
that
NB sending it
On 15.01.2014 09:28, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-14 7:46 PM, Kaz Kylheku k...@kylheku.com wrote:
I know about the Reply List thing; I neglected to mention, in fact,
that I tried both Reply All and manually invoking Reply List, with
identical results.
Look; Reply All is obviously doing
As the maintainer of a mailing-list manager, and as a user of mailing
lists, I thought I would chip in.
I think there are uses for all three scenarios: (1) reply to sender
(only), (2) reply to list (only), (3) reply to all (sender, list and any
CCs).
(1) is useful for private replies.
so there is no solution satisfy all
I agree entirely.
finally *that* is no valid reason for mail duplicates
Equally, it is not a valid reason to filter them. We need to recognise
people and communities are different, that both behaviours are useful,
and valid, and that people who want one
On 15.01.2014 12:43, Ben Schmidt wrote:
As the maintainer of a mailing-list manager, and as a user of mailing
lists, I thought I would chip in.
I think there are uses for all three scenarios: (1) reply to sender
(only), (2) reply to list (only), (3) reply to all (sender, list and
any
CCs).
21 matches
Mail list logo
