Hello Antoine
I used a Lenovo T420 with Ubuntu 16.04 (I need to check when I am back on this
machine, and I'll try to find what is the graphic driver), and Scilab 6.0.
With this machine, but under Windows and Scilab 5.5.2, this did not happen = it
used to be correct, with open gap at the %Nan value.
I can't try this machine and SciLab 6 under Windows, as Windows is not on this
machine anymore.
I also tried the following code:
// Code
X=1:5;
Y=X.^2; Y(3)=%nan;
plot2d(X',Y')
// End of code
- with an HP Z440 + Windows 7 Pro + SciLab 6.0 : both plot and plot2d are
correct
- with an HP Z420 + Windows 7 Pro + SciLab 5.5.2 : both plot and plot2d are
correct
I did not fill a bug report.
I notice a different behaviour between "your bug" and "my bug": in your
bug/no_bug PNGs, Nan points are plot in the center (both x-wise and y-wise) of
the graph, whereas in my observation (sorry, I do not have the true result, I
can produce it when I am back on the Linux machine) only the y coordinate is
"fake" data in the mid-range of Y, but at the right value of X...
HTH
Denis
-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] De la part de Antoine
Monmayrant
Envoyé : mercredi 18 octobre 2017 16:47
À : Users mailing list for Scilab
Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? ?= )
Yep, you're right, it looks the same.
Did you fill a bug report?
On what machine/OS did you observe this bug?
Antoine
Le Mercredi, Octobre 18, 2017 14:23 CEST, CRETE Denis
a écrit:
> This seems to be the same problem I discussed with Christophe (although he
> observed a correct behaviour) :
> --
>
> Objet: Scilab 6's plot2d displays %nan on the horizontal line in the
> mid-range of vertical axis
>
> Hello Denis,
>
> > De CRETE Denis
> > Envoyé : mercredi 17 mai 2017 14:20
> >
> > If %nan values are in the Y vector,
> > plot2d behaves as if the following was performed before display:
> > Y (isnan(Y))=(YM + Ym)/2
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you're pointing out.
> The following code works exactly as I expect:
> --
> x = 1:5;
> y=x.^2;
> y(3)=%nan;
> plot(x, y)
> --
> i.e. the point at x=3 is simply missing, with a blank between x=2 and x=4.
> --
> Christophe Dang Ngoc Chan
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] De la part de
> Rafael Guerra Envoyé : mercredi 18 octobre 2017 13:35 À :
> antoine.monmayr...@laas.fr; Users mailing list for Scilab Objet : Re:
> [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? Bug?: plot with nan values
> (Linux Ubuntu 17.04)
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> I observe the "No bug" behavior (i.e., gaps when plotting nans) in both
> Scilab 5.5.2 and Scilab 6.0.0 installations on Win7 64-bit PC.
>
> Regards,
> Rafael
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] On Behalf Of
> Antoine Monmayrant
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 1:26 PM
> To: Users mailing list for Scilab
> Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? Bug?: plot with
> nan values (Linux Ubuntu 17.04)
>
> Update:
>
> 1) Here is a simpler minimal working example:
>
> ///
> x=1:100;
> y=rand(x);
> th=0.1;
> rg=find(y ynan=y;
> ynan(rg)=%nan;
>
> scf();
> plot(x,y,'k.-');
> plot(x,ynan,'r.-');
> ///
>
> 2) This might be due to some graphic drivers, but I think I am up to date on
> that front. How can I check it's related to a graphic driver or not?
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Le Mercredi, Octobre 18, 2017 13:22 CEST, "Antoine Monmayrant"
> a écrit:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I think I stumble upon a weird bug when plotting data with nan values:
> > instead of a gap in the plot line, I have segments that go go towards the
> > center of my plots.
> > This bug is present on Ubuntu 17.04, but not on Ubuntu 16.04 and it affects
> > both scilab 5.5.2 and 6.0.
> > I attached the expected plot ('no_bug.png', what I get with 16.04), the
> > bugged one ('bug.png') and the minimum working example ('bug_plot_nan.sce')
> > with the original dataset with nans ('dat_with_nans.txt').
> > Are you also affected by this bug? Which platform (OS) are you working on?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Antoine
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
Dear Antoine,
Correct behavior in Windows 10 and Scilab 6.0.0
Patrice
-Message d'origine-
De : users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] De la part de Antoine
Monmayrant
Envoyé : mercredi 18 octobre 2017 13:23
À : users@lists.scilab.org
Objet : [Scilab-users] Bug?: plot with nan values (Linux Ubuntu 17.04)
Hi everyone,
I think I stumble upon a weird bug when plotting data with nan values: instead
of a gap in the plot line, I have segments that go go towards the center of my
plots.
This bug is present on Ubuntu 17.04, but not on Ubuntu 16.04 and it affects
both scilab 5.5.2 and 6.0.
I attached the expected plot ('no_bug.png', what I get with 16.04), the bugged
one ('bug.png') and the minimum working example ('bug_plot_nan.sce') with the
original dataset with nans ('dat_with_nans.txt').
Are you also affected by this bug? Which platform (OS) are you working on?
Cheers,
Antoine
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi everyone,
This error persists. Unable to add files
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Bug-with-file-exchange-tp4035642p4036153.html
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,I was trying some simple programs that use the input statement on Scilab 6.0.0, and I got unexpected behaviour. Here is a test:n = input("n = ")
while n > 0
n = input("n = ")
end
printf("\nThanks")Here is the result of this program on Scilab 6.0.0 console with input 1, 2, 3, 4 and 0:n = 1n = --> 2n = 3n = 4n = 0Thanks2+2 ans = 4.Compare this with the output on Scilab 5.5.2 console for the same input:n = 1n = 2n = 3n = 4n = 0Thanks This is much more what one should expect from this litle program. Remark that on 6.0.0 console1) There is a disturbing new line after printing the input statement message2) There is a spurious apearance of the console prompt "-->" after the first execution of input statement3) The console prompt "-->" does not appear after the end of program execution.I am using Scilab on a Windows 10 system.Thanks for your attention.Osvaldo
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Le 01/03/2017 à 08:58, Pierre Payen a écrit :
Hi everyone,
How can we post on file exchange ? When i try to add something i get
this error :
Could not create the file set. Please correct the errors below and try
again.
Although there aren't any errors (see screen-shot in attachment).
The manual versionning is the last feature very recently added to FE.
One-2 months ago, it was only automatic, with a 1 increment (1.0, 2.0,
3.0 etc).
May be trying with an integer version ?
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Ok, because it is not clear whether this bug is related to another one I
decided to enter a new bug report:
Bug 14424
Wolfgang
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] Im Auftrag von JLan
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 17:53
> An: users@lists.scilab.org
> Betreff: Re: [Scilab-users] Bug of input function in Scilab 6.0 beta 1
>
> I doubt that it is related to bug 14375.
> That seems to be caused by a long temporary prompt:
> prompt('CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH
> CRASH CRASH
> >')
>
> But the behavior is certainly strange and inconsistent, should be reported as
> a separate bug. This is what I got once, but I cannot repeat it exactly:
>
> --> a=input("a:");
> a:1
> a:2
> --> disp(a)
>2.
> --> b=input('b:');
> b:3
> --> disp(b)
>3.
> --> b=input("b:");
> b:4
> --> a=input("a:");
> b:5
> b:6
> ans =
> 6.
> --> disp(a)
>2.
> --> disp(b)
>5.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Bug-
> of-input-function-in-Scilab-6-0-beta-1-tp4033549p4033571.html
> Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Le 25/02/2016 18:10, grivet a écrit :
Le 24/02/2016 21:40, Serge Steer a écrit :
Le 24/02/2016 11:30, grivet a écrit :
I appreciate your help; however, neither suggestion works: I still
get the same error message.
The similar line
[frq,repf]=repfreq(hz,0.01,0.49);
has no problem
You are right the problem is exactly for the frequency 0.5 besause
exp(2*%pi*%i*0.5) -> - 1. + 1.225D-16i
and hz.num has 2 zeros very near -1
I checked the hz value with Matlab, the results are the same. So it
seems that hz is ok. So it is probabily a probleme due to floating point
computations procucing a zero value instead of a very small one.
Serge
please can you save the hz value using the Scilab save function and
send the file?
Serge
Voila le code:
//filtre Butterworth
Order = 2; // The order of the filter
Fs = 1000; // The sampling frequency
Fcutoff = 40; // The cutoff frequency
// We design a low pass Butterworth filter
hz = iir(Order,'lp','butt',Fcutoff/Fs/2,[0.1 0.1]);
// We compute the frequency response of the filter
[frq,repf]=repfreq(hz,0,0.5);
[db_repf, phi_repf] = dbphi(repf);
// And plot the bode like representation of the digital filter
subplot(2,1,1);
plot2d(Fs*frq,db_repf);
xtitle('Obtained Frequency Response (Magnitude)');
subplot(2,1,2);
plot2d(Fs*frq,phi_repf);
xtitle('Obtained Frequency Response (Phase in degree)');
iir est sauvegardé dans "svgd_iir" joint (binaire).
Cordialement,
JP Grivet
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Le 24/02/2016 21:40, Serge Steer a écrit :
Le 24/02/2016 11:30, grivet a écrit :
I appreciate your help; however, neither suggestion works: I still
get the same error message.
The similar line
[frq,repf]=repfreq(hz,0.01,0.49);
has no problem
please can you save the hz value using the Scilab save function and
send the file?
Serge
Voila le code:
//filtre Butterworth
Order = 2; // The order of the filter
Fs = 1000; // The sampling frequency
Fcutoff = 40; // The cutoff frequency
// We design a low pass Butterworth filter
hz = iir(Order,'lp','butt',Fcutoff/Fs/2,[0.1 0.1]);
// We compute the frequency response of the filter
[frq,repf]=repfreq(hz,0,0.5);
[db_repf, phi_repf] = dbphi(repf);
// And plot the bode like representation of the digital filter
subplot(2,1,1);
plot2d(Fs*frq,db_repf);
xtitle('Obtained Frequency Response (Magnitude)');
subplot(2,1,2);
plot2d(Fs*frq,phi_repf);
xtitle('Obtained Frequency Response (Phase in degree)');
iir est sauvegardé dans "svgd_iir" joint (binaire).
Cordialement,
JP Grivet
svgd_iir
Description: Binary data
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I doubt that it is related to bug 14375.
That seems to be caused by a long temporary prompt:
prompt('CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH CRASH
>')
But the behavior is certainly strange and inconsistent, should be reported
as a separate bug. This is what I got once, but I cannot repeat it exactly:
--> a=input("a:");
a:1
a:2
--> disp(a)
2.
--> b=input('b:');
b:3
--> disp(b)
3.
--> b=input("b:");
b:4
--> a=input("a:");
b:5
b:6
ans =
6.
--> disp(a)
2.
--> disp(b)
5.
--
View this message in context:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Bug-of-input-function-in-Scilab-6-0-beta-1-tp4033549p4033571.html
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Wolfgang,
It might be the http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14375 about input
behavior.
Regards,
--
Clément
Le jeudi 25 février 2016 à 15:00 +, SCHULZ Wolfgang a écrit :
> Clement,
> shoud I add my findings to the original bug report? In case of yes - which
> bug report number is
> it?
> Thanks
> Wolfgang
>
>
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] Im Auftrag von Clément
> > David
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 17:06
> > An: users@lists.scilab.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? Bug of input function in Scilab 6.0
> > beta 1
> >
> > Hi Antoine,
> >
> > Note sure about that, we have to investigate more on that point and opening
> > two bug will leave the door open to solving issues in two ways.
> >
> > --
> > Clément
> >
> >
> > Le mardi 23 février 2016 à 18:27 +0100, Antoine Monmayrant a écrit :
> > >
> > > Le Mardi 23 Février 2016 17:16 CET, Clément David
> > > a écrit:
> > >
> > > > Hi Wolfgang,
> > > >
> > > > It seems to be a bug, please report it.
> > >
> > > Is this related to the previous 'input()' bug reported here (crashing for
> > > long
> > input string)?
> >
> > ___
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.scilab.org
> > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Clement,
shoud I add my findings to the original bug report? In case of yes - which bug
report number is it?
Thanks
Wolfgang
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] Im Auftrag von Clément
> David
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 17:06
> An: users@lists.scilab.org
> Betreff: Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? Bug of input function in Scilab 6.0
> beta 1
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Note sure about that, we have to investigate more on that point and opening
> two bug will leave the door open to solving issues in two ways.
>
> --
> Clément
>
>
> Le mardi 23 février 2016 à 18:27 +0100, Antoine Monmayrant a écrit :
> >
> > Le Mardi 23 Février 2016 17:16 CET, Clément David
> > a écrit:
> >
> > > Hi Wolfgang,
> > >
> > > It seems to be a bug, please report it.
> >
> > Is this related to the previous 'input()' bug reported here (crashing for
> > long
> input string)?
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Le 24/02/2016 11:30, grivet a écrit :
I appreciate your help; however, neither suggestion works: I still get
the same error message.
The similar line
[frq,repf]=repfreq(hz,0.01,0.49);
has no problem
please can you save the hz value using the Scilab save function and send
the file?
Serge
Your problem arises because one frequency value you ask for
corresponds exactly to a zero of hz.num
log(roots(hz.num))/(2*%pi)
so you want to compute the gain in dB of a zero value which is -inf
To avoid such problem you can let repfreq to do the frequency
discretization.
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz)
or equivalently
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz,0,0.5)
in this case the discretization uses varying frequency step
Serge
Le 23/02/2016 14:41, grivet a écrit :
Le 23/02/2016 14:21, Serge Steer a écrit :
Please can you give more details :
value of Order and Fcutoff/Fs/2
and what you are doing with hz (because iir does not call dbphi)
Serge
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I appreciate your help; however, neither suggestion works: I still get
the same error message.
The similar line
[frq,repf]=repfreq(hz,0.01,0.49);
has no problem
Your problem arises because one frequency value you ask for
corresponds exactly to a zero of hz.num
log(roots(hz.num))/(2*%pi)
so you want to compute the gain in dB of a zero value which is -inf
To avoid such problem you can let repfreq to do the frequency
discretization.
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz) or equivalently
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz,0,0.5)
in this case the discretization uses varying frequency step
Serge
Le 23/02/2016 14:41, grivet a écrit :
Le 23/02/2016 14:21, Serge Steer a écrit :
Please can you give more details :
value of Order and Fcutoff/Fs/2
and what you are doing with hz (because iir does not call dbphi)
Serge
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Wolfgang,
It seems to be a bug, please report it.
--
Clément
Le mardi 23 février 2016 à 14:48 +, SCHULZ Wolfgang a écrit :
> Hello,
> since Scilab 6.0 beta 1 I have a problem with the input function (everything
> worked under Scilab
> 6.0 alpha 1).
>
> I execute the following code:
> Code:
> mode(0);
> ieee(1);
> clear;
> iteration = input("Sensor data of which Iteration:");
> name = sprintf("iteration%03d.sensor",iteration)
>
> With Scilab 5.5.2 I enter 1 and get the following output:
> -->exec('H:\SCILAB\Problem_input_data.sce', -1)
> Sensor data of which Iteration:1
> name =
> iteration001.sensor
>
> Scilab 6.0 beta 1: I had to input “1” 2 times:
>
> --> exec('H:\SCILAB\Problem_input_data.sce', -1)
> Sensor data of which Iteration:1
> Sensor data of which Iteration:1 name =
>
> iteration001.sensor
>
> As mentioned Scilab 5.5.2 and the Scilab 6.0 alpha 1 worked without problems
> (I didn’t try Scilab
> 6.0 alpha 2).
>
> Is this a bug and simply a new behavior of the input function?
> Best regards
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.scilab.org
> http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
since Scilab 6.0 beta 1 I have a problem with the input function (everything
worked under Scilab 6.0 alpha 1).
I execute the following code:
Code:
mode(0);
ieee(1);
clear;
iteration = input("Sensor data of which Iteration:");
name = sprintf("iteration%03d.sensor",iteration)
With Scilab 5.5.2 I enter 1 and get the following output:
-->exec('H:\SCILAB\Problem_input_data.sce', -1)
Sensor data of which Iteration:1
name =
iteration001.sensor
Scilab 6.0 beta 1: I had to input "1" 2 times:
--> exec('H:\SCILAB\Problem_input_data.sce', -1)
Sensor data of which Iteration:1
Sensor data of which Iteration:1 name =
iteration001.sensor
As mentioned Scilab 5.5.2 and the Scilab 6.0 alpha 1 worked without problems (I
didn't try Scilab 6.0 alpha 2).
Is this a bug and simply a new behavior of the input function?
Best regards
Wolfgang
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Your problem arises because one frequency value you ask for corresponds
exactly to a zero of hz.num
log(roots(hz.num))/(2*%pi)
so you want to compute the gain in dB of a zero value which is -inf
To avoid such problem you can let repfreq to do the frequency
discretization.
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz)
or equivalently
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz,0,0.5)
in this case the discretization uses varying frequency step
Serge
Le 23/02/2016 14:41, grivet a écrit :
Le 23/02/2016 14:21, Serge Steer a écrit :
Please can you give more details :
value of Order and Fcutoff/Fs/2
and what you are doing with hz (because iir does not call dbphi)
Serge
I am just running the example found in "how to design an elliptic
filter". Here is the code:
Order= 2; // The order of the filter
Fs = 1000; // The sampling frequency
Fcutoff = 40;// The cutoff frequency
// We design a low pass elliptic filter
hz = iir (Order,'lp','ellip',[Fcutoff/Fs/2 0],[0.1 0.1]);
// We compute the frequency response of the filter
[frq,repf]=repfreq (hz,0:0.001:0.5);
[db_repf, phi_repf] = dbphi (repf);
// And plot the bode like representation of the digital filter
subplot (2,1,1);
plot2d (Fs*frq,db_repf);
xtitle ('Obtained Frequency Response (Magnitude)');
subplot (2,1,2);
plot2d (Fs*frq,phi_repf);
xtitle ('Obtained Frequency Response (Phase in degree)');
with 'ellip' replaced by 'butt', and [Fcutoff/Fs/2 0] replaced
byFcutoff/Fs/2.
I am beginning to use digital filters to treat some data. As my first
step, I try to run the examples in the help,how to design an elliptic
filter (using Scilab 5.5.1, Win7-64). This works . However, when I
select a Butterworth filter:
hz = iir(Order,'lp','butt',Fcutoff/Fs/2,[0.1 0.1]);
I get this error message:
Singularité de la fonction log ou tan.
at line 6 of function dbphi called by :
[db_repf, phi_repf] = dbphi(repf);
What did I miss ?
No bugs have been reported for function dbphi, but three similar
bugs are listed for iir.
Any suggestion welcome.
JPGrivet
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
I am beginning to use digital filters to treat some data. As my first
step, I try to run the examples in the help,how to design an elliptic
filter (using Scilab 5.5.1, Win7-64). This works . However, when I
select a Butterworth filter:
hz = iir(Order,'lp','butt',Fcutoff/Fs/2,[0.1 0.1]);
I get this error message:
Singularité de la fonction log ou tan.
at line 6 of function dbphi called by :
[db_repf, phi_repf] = dbphi(repf);
What did I miss ?
No bugs have been reported for function dbphi, but three similar bugs
are listed for iir.
Any suggestion welcome.
JPGrivet
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Le 07/04/2015 15:39, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello,
Is there any plan to solve bug #13158 ?
http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13158
There is no assignee since the bug has been signaled (in 2014)... As
far as I am concerned, I have access to a Linux machine where
parallel_run is completely functional, but my usual machine is a
MacPro and I would like to use parallel_run on MacOS also.
S.
Hello all,
I have proposed a workaround which seems to work seamlessly. OSX users
can proceed to the bug page to see the nop unix trick:
http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13158
S.
--
Département de Génie Informatique
EA 4297 Transformations Intégrées de la Matière Renouvelable
Université de Technologie de Compiègne - CS 60319
60203 Compiègne cedex
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
I have a function using csim that worked OK in 5.4.1 but not in 5.5.0.
However, if I use the csim.sci from 5.4.1 it also works in 5.5.0.
I stop the simulation, read the states, insert an impulse by adding to
the first state, and continue with the the states as initial states
(x0) in a new run.
So it seems like the new csim does something different with the
initial states?
Regards
Stefan
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a bug - therefore I want to ask her first:
I'm using Scilab 5.4.1 64 bit under Win7:
Depending on the size of the figure the axis are disappearing or not.
Is it a bug or can I avoid/circumvent this feature somehow?
Thanks a lot
Wolfgang
attachment: test.pngattachment: test1.png___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Wolfgang,
It is probably a bug.
Could you report it on bugzilla.scilab.org with a little test case please ?
Thanks
Best regards
Calixte
On 26/02/2014 15:56, SCHULZ Wolfgang wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a bug - therefore I want to ask her first:
I'm using Scilab 5.4.1 64 bit under Win7:
Depending on the size of the figure the axis are disappearing or not.
Is it a bug or can I avoid/circumvent this feature somehow?
Thanks a lot
Wolfgang
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Calixte Denizet
Software Development Engineer
---
Scilab Enterprises
143bis rue Yves Le Coz - 78000 Versailles, France
http://www.scilab-enterprises.com
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 02/26/2014 04:07 PM, Calixte Denizet wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
It is probably a bug.
Could you report it on bugzilla.scilab.org with a little test case
please ?
And if you post the test case here, I'll try to reproduce it on linux...
Antoine
Thanks
Best regards
Calixte
On 26/02/2014 15:56, SCHULZ Wolfgang wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a bug - therefore I want to ask her first:
I'm using Scilab 5.4.1 64 bit under Win7:
Depending on the size of the figure the axis are disappearing or not.
Is it a bug or can I avoid/circumvent this feature somehow?
Thanks a lot
Wolfgang
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Calixte Denizet
Software Development Engineer
---
Scilab Enterprises
143bis rue Yves Le Coz - 78000 Versailles, France
http://www.scilab-enterprises.com
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 2014-01-28 18:42, Serge Steer wrote:
Le 28/01/2014 17:14, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
The page does not mention pause
Just because pause behave similarily to functions with respect to
calling context
And you think the fact that it behaves equal to (not similar to)
functions is self-evident?
Of course, I have read help *pause*:
Switch to the pause mode; inserted in the code of a function, pause
interrupts the execution of the function: one receives a prompt symbol
which indicates the level of the pause (e.g. -1-). The user is then
in a new workspace in which all the lower-level variables (and in
particular all the variable of the function) are available.
I have therefore always thought that the given prompt symbol -1- was
the level of the function (see the link below), and that I still was
at that level!
Stefan
http://wiki.scilab.org/howto/global%20and%20local%20variables
sorry, o busy to file a bug
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 2014-01-29 20:03, Stefan Du Rietz wrote:
On 2014-01-28 18:42, Serge Steer wrote:
Le 28/01/2014 17:14, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
The page does not mention pause
Just because pause behave similarily to functions with respect to
calling context
And you think the fact that it behaves equal to (not similar to)
functions is self-evident?
Of course, I have read help *pause*:
Switch to the pause mode; inserted in the code of a function, pause
interrupts the execution of the function: one receives a prompt symbol
which indicates the level of the pause (e.g. -1-). The user is then
in a new workspace in which all the lower-level variables (and in
particular all the variable of the function) are available.
I have therefore always thought that the given prompt symbol -1- was
the level of the function (see the link below), and that I still was
at that level!
And, as I have earlier worked with Matlab, I therefore believed that
*pause* worked like its *keyboard*:
http://www.mathworks.se/help/matlab/ref/keyboard.html
keyboard , when placed in a program .m file, stops execution of the
file and gives control to the keyboard. The special status is
indicated by a K appearing before the prompt. You can examine or
change variables; all MATLAB® commands are valid. This keyboard mode
is useful for debugging your functions.
Stefan
http://wiki.scilab.org/howto/global%20and%20local%20variables
sorry, o busy to file a bug
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
The page does not mention pause
http://wiki.scilab.org/howto/global%20and%20local%20variables
sorry, o busy to file a bug
--
Adrien Vogt-Schilb
PhD Student (Cired)
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Le 28/01/2014 17:14, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
The page does not mention pause
Just because pause behave similarily to functions with respect to
calling context
http://wiki.scilab.org/howto/global%20and%20local%20variables
sorry, o busy to file a bug
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I have been using scilab for many years.
today I downloaded for my new computer scilab 5.41(64bit) and got
afterwards on the first start
an error message like the ones further down
on the version 5.5beta(64bit) there happens the same sort of thing
on both versions the control bar file, edititing ... does not work
i.e. no response on klick
for version 5.41
Starte Ausführung: (start execution)
lade Startumgebung (load startenviroment)
%val=[�000sinternalslib;
!--error 2
Ungültiger Faktor. (unvalid factor)
in execstr instruction called by :
at line 35 of function evstr called by :
at line 848 of function %_sodload called by :
at line 6 of function atomsSystemInit called by :
atomsSystemInit();
at line 107 of exec file called by :
exec('SCI/etc/scilab.start',-1);;
and for the beta
starte Ausführung: (start execution)
lade Startumgebung (load startenviroment)
%val=[�000sinternalslib;
!--error 2
Ungültiger Faktor. (unvalid factor)
in execstr instruction called by :
at line 35 of function evstr called by :
at line 908 of function %_sodload called by :
at line 6 of function atomsSystemInit called by :
atomsSystemInit();
at line 113 of exec file called by :
exec('SCI/etc/scilab.start',-1);;
I use windows 7 home premium
Gerhard Fuchs
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello,
While 'E1 = 1i*r; ' is converted correctly by both mfile2sci and
translatepaths, the following line is not:
E2 = 1i*r; % pb of coexistence 1i/comment
Giving this report
E2 = 1i*r; ;// pb of coexistence 1i/comment
!--error 276
Opérateur, virgule ou point-virgule manquant.
This problem occurs as soon as a % sign for comments is appended to the line
containing 1i.
Denis
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
in fact, scilab works with float numbers. so this kind of things always
happen. say,
--format(25);
--1-0.9
ans =
0.0999777955
and
--0.1 == 1 - 0.9
ans =
F
you need to remember that this software is not for symbolic algebra system
like maxima or maple
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Пилюгин Иван pilyugi...@yandex.ru wrote:
programm code
-
clear
z=mscanf('%g')
--
Input 7.9
Result z=7.901
--78.8
z =
78.83
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
programm code
-
clear
z=mscanf('%g')
--
Input 7.9
Result z=7.901
--78.8
z =
78.83
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
I've seen the bug report http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6737.
The report is 2 years old, can we still hope it will be fixed?
Thanks,
Matthias
ferag...
Ferag AG
Matthias Frei
Forschung Entwicklung
Zürichstrasse 74
CH-8340 Hinwil
Telefon +41 44 938 65 86
matthias.f...@ferag.com
www.ferag.com http://www.ferag.com/
This message is intended only for [users@lists.scilab.org]. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Ok, than your problem is not related to my bug report.
I do have a C compiler and a Fortran compiler installed. On Windows their is no
compiler installed by default. Only if you have these compilers installed and
Scilab doesn't find them it would be a bug.
But I agree, I am missing a page in the wiki or in the help file that explains
how
to install the necessary compilers on Windows.
Regards:
Uwe Fechner
Am 27.10.2012 23:50, schrieb Lester Anderson:
I am working on Windows 7 64-bit
On 27 October 2012 22:26, Uwe Fechner u.fech...@tudelft.nl
mailto:u.fech...@tudelft.nl wrote:
Which operation system do you use?
Regards:
Uwe Fechner
Am 27.10.2012 23:09, schrieb Lester Anderson:
I tried the n-pendulum demo on both 5.4.0 and 5.3.3 and both times it says
the demo is
disbled because it could not find a C compiler. This happens on a few
others too.
Lester
On 27 October 2012 19:26, Uwe Fechner u.fech...@tudelft.nl
mailto:u.fech...@tudelft.nl wrote:
I created a bug report:
http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12039
Regards:
Uwe Fechner
--
View this message in context:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Bug-II-of-the-demos-using-Scilab-5-4-0-on-Ubuntu-12-04-32-bit-tp4025016p4025084.html
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list
archive at Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org mailto:users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org mailto:users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I tried the n-pendulum demo on both 5.4.0 and 5.3.3 and both times it says
the demo is disbled because it could not find a C compiler. This happens on
a few others too.
Lester
On 27 October 2012 19:26, Uwe Fechner u.fech...@tudelft.nl wrote:
I created a bug report:
http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12039
Regards:
Uwe Fechner
--
View this message in context:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Bug-II-of-the-demos-using-Scilab-5-4-0-on-Ubuntu-12-04-32-bit-tp4025016p4025084.html
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive
at Nabble.com.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
53 matches
Mail list logo
|