Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 30-01-2006 22:22:47:
On 1/30/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so my questions:
1) could someone with a working (with maven 2.0.2) cobertura plugin
please
send it to me with the correct pom.xml - jason z only sent me the
compiled
plugin
Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31-01-2006 10:44:57:
On 1/31/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll deploy a snapshot, so you can follow the instructions on the
maven
website to use it.
Okay that would be great. Will you announce it to this list when you
do
Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31-01-2006 11:16:29:
On 1/31/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either way I probably need to bind checkstyle, pmd, findbugs etc to a
phase other than compile then, perhaps verify. Hmm will ponder this.
The reports, or the checks? The reports
Only the order they are declared in the POM.
- Brett
On 1/31/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31-01-2006 11:16:29:
On 1/31/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either way I probably need to bind checkstyle, pmd, findbugs etc to a
phase
Hmm okay then something very strange
is happening as when I type mvn site it attempts to compile my code again,
then instrument the classes for cobertura again (only now generates 0 byte
length classes doing so) and then dies running the unit tests via surefire.
i don't have the source code for
On 1/30/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so my questions:
1) could someone with a working (with maven 2.0.2) cobertura plugin please
send it to me with the correct pom.xml - jason z only sent me the compiled
plugin without any pom.xml so it is entirely possible this is a big part
of my
On 1/28/06, David Sag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) why does mvn site now trigger the other phases of the lifecycle. is
this supposed to happen?
no.
2) anyone else using cobertura having this problem?
nope.
3) do i need to update my core cobertura libs too or is version 1.6 still
okay for
