Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Horlock
Hi, We are using Cocoon 2.1.11 with Maven and Java 6. I just joined the company, and I get a few thousand errors in eclipse when I import the project - As it seems the reason is that Java 6 includes a lot of new org.w3c classes, that hadn't been in the other JDKs before, so these classes were

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Armin Ehrenfels
A few months ago, I developed a Groovy based component for Cocoon 2.2. I found the maven support very good. There were, at that time, a few very helpful archetypes that made setting up the project easy. I remember the Cocoon community as being very active, friendly and supportive. From my

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Horlock
Well, I also guessed that Cocoon 2.2 has (a better) maven support. However, as I am completely new to the company as well as to Cocoon, I doubt it would be the best idea to make the entire dev team switch to Cocoon 2.2, especially as it works for them. Maybe there's an option that would be less

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Armin Ehrenfels
Have you checked at the Cocoon web site, to what degree version 2.1.11 supports maven ? I can remember an extended discussion about how to use maven in conjunction with this version, but IIRC, many experienced users/developers recommended the switch to 2.2. Maybe that has changed. Good luck

RE: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Martin Gainty
keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen. Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:44:38 +0200 From: armin.ehrenf...@t-online.de To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11 A few months ago, I developed a Groovy based component for Cocoon 2.2. I found the maven support very good

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Armin Ehrenfels
den Inhalt uebernehmen. Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:44:38 +0200 From: armin.ehrenf...@t-online.de To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11 A few months ago, I developed a Groovy based component for Cocoon 2.2. I found the maven support very good. There were

RE: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Martin Gainty
effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:56:46 +0200 Subject: Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11 From: peter.horl...@googlemail.com

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On 12 Jun 2009, at 12:42, Armin Ehrenfels wrote: sorry, I don't know of any. As I wrote in my last reply , there was a discussion on the mail lists about how to use maven with Cocoon 2.1.11, but at that time, there were archetypes available for Cocoon2.2 only. You're unlikely to see

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On 12 Jun 2009, at 12:57, Martin Gainty wrote: please keep us apprised as many others are (considering a) move to cocoon Just out of interest, why are you considering moving to Cocoon? -Dom - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Maven + Cocoon 2.1.11

2009-06-12 Thread Stephen Connolly
Sent from my [rhymes with myPod] ;-) On 12 Jun 2009, at 14:04, Dominic Mitchell d...@semantico.com wrote: On 12 Jun 2009, at 12:57, Martin Gainty wrote: please keep us apprised as many others are (considering a) move to cocoon Just out of interest, why are you considering moving to