Regards,
> John
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 March 2008 15:01
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: Re: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
> >
>
>
> > I
me. I guess we'll have to use the command line in the
meantime.
Regards,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 March 2008 15:01
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
>
> I
o be streets ahead
> > of the various eclipse efforts I have tried. Since devzuz support Q4E I
> > am hoping it is better than what I have seen.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >&g
ng it is better than what I have seen.
Regards,
John
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 February 2008 11:24
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
Hi !
Though this doesn't answer your question re
seen.
Regards,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 February 2008 11:24
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
>
> Hi !
>
> Though this doesn't answer your question regardi
> look at them
> from time to time.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 02:45 AM
> To: users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
>
> I googled around
all these tools are not ready, in my opinion, but it is worth to take a
look at them
from time to time.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 02:45 AM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for
Hi !
Though this doesn't answer your question regarding a comparison.. :-):
I use Q4E and am really happy with it. much better than m2eclipse and
mevenide, pom synchronization and classpath integration works well. No
webtools support in the version I use, but that could have changed in
the me
Hi Chris,
we started with m2eclipse, too, and had troubles too. After spending
about a week in total fixing the worst things in it, it is quite usable.
Unfortunately, almost none of my suggestions made it into the mainstream
code, and I've given up trying. I thought about a fork but I don't ha
on to achieve this goal.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Besides the objective, there are technical differences. While
> m2eclipse
> >> > >> shows Maven output in a console, Q is based in events and will show
> them
> >> >
extension
> >> in mind so other people can develop their own plugins taking advantage
> >> of the functionality they need (see for instance Candy for Appfuse
> >> <http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/candy-for-appfuse-will-be
> >>
>
-under-extr
gt; Also it's implemented in several modules with reusability and extension
> > >> in mind so other people can develop their own plugins taking advantage
> > >> of the functionality they need (see for instance Candy for Appfuse
> > >> <http:/
t in a console, Q is based in events and will show
> > them
> > > >> in an organized way that allows filtering by severity, search,...
> > > >> Functionality like the dependency graph, or creation of new projects
> > > >> using the archetype mechanism a
like the dependency graph, or creation of new projects
> > >> using the archetype mechanism are only present in Q.
> > >>
> > >> Also it's implemented in several modules with reusability and
> extension
> > >> in mind so other p
lity and extension
> >> in mind so other people can develop their own plugins taking advantage
> >> of the functionality they need (see for instance Candy for Appfuse
> >> <http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/candy-for-appfuse-will-be
> >>
>
-unde
tance Candy for Appfuse
>> <http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/candy-for-appfuse-will-be
>> -under-extreme-refactoring/<http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/2007/09/02/candy-for-appfuse-will-be-under-extreme-refactoring/>>
>> ).
>>
>> In any case the
ibraries used for both plugins are the
> same (the Maven Embedder) and both plugin developers collaborate in its
> development.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008
developers collaborate in its
development.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 5:45 PM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Mevenide vs. M2Eclipse, Q for Eclipse/IAM
I googled around to try to find a comparison bet
I googled around to try to find a comparison between Mevenide and the
alternatives, and didn't come up with much.
Can someone tell me the differences?
(I've spend some time with m2eclipse, and I'm *not* impressed).
-
To unsub
19 matches
Mail list logo
