RE: No versions available but actually local repository contains it!

2012-07-26 Thread Markus KARG
this? -Original Message- From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 16:14 To: users@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: No versions available but actually local repository contains it! Importance: High javadoc suggests bracket version bracket or [version] for exact

RE: No versions available but actually local repository contains it!

2012-07-26 Thread Markus KARG
when forcing [1.3]. BTW, the problematic artifact is org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:1.3. -Original Message- From: Milos Kleint [mailto:mkle...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 09:33 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: No versions available but actually local repository contains

Re: No versions available but actually local repository contains it!

2012-07-26 Thread Doug Douglass
Message- From: Milos Kleint [mailto:mkle...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 09:33 To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: No versions available but actually local repository contains it! there's some code in latest maven that not only checks the presence of the jar/pom in local

Re: No versions available but actually local repository contains it!

2012-07-25 Thread Milos Kleint
there's some code in latest maven that not only checks the presence of the jar/pom in local repository but also some additional metadata which describes where it was downloaded from. where is defined by repository id. if the repository id in your project is missing in the current metadata, a new

RE: No versions available but actually local repository contains it!

2012-07-25 Thread Martin Gainty
javadoc suggests bracket version bracket or [version] for exact match http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin/rules/versionRanges.html if you specify a specifiv version such as version1.3/versionand you get any other version such as 1.1 or 1.2 then that is a bugperhaps a 1.2 or