do not understand why.
> x Not secure https://
> ec2-44-219-227-80.compute-1.amazonaws.com:8443/nifi/
>
> Anyway, thank you Bryan, Matt, and Isha for replying.
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:05 PM Matt Gilman
> wrote:
>
>> What is this Access Token it cites at top?
; *does not have permission to access the requested resource. Unable to view
> the user interface. Returning Forbidden response.*
>
> What is this Access Token it cites at top?
>
> Based on what I have read in the documentation, nifi itself must be
> allowed to create the authorizations.
James,
If you check the nifi-user.log in the logs directory, you should see
messages for the requests that are being rejected. In that log message you
should see the identity that you're authenticated with. Can you compare
that with the user that you've configured the policies for. Hopefully,
Hi Jim,
If you open the Summary page from the global menu you should see the active
threads in parentheses next to the scheduled state. Find the row in question
and click the cluster icon from the actions column. This will open a dialog
with a node-wise breakdown. I believe that the thread
gle root path would make a
> difference for the authentication issue, it just makes setting up the
> reverse proxy configuration easier since you only need to worry about 1
> path instead of multiple.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 2:46 PM Matt Gilman
> wrote:
>
>> Wyllys,
>>
&g
Wyllys,
NiFi is comprised of any number of web applications. NiFi offers extension
points for custom processor configuration UIs and data type viewers. These
UIs can be bundled and discovered at runtime. These docs [1] detail the
steps necessary for proxying a NiFi instance.
Thanks
Matt
[1]
t rath
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mat,
>>
>> For this quick response.
>>
>> Thanks a lot ,
>>
>> Sanjeet
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, 11:43 pm Matt Gilman,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I just responded to your StackOverflow post:
>>
I just responded to your StackOverflow post:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60551242/nifi-user-addition-gives-u-null-pointer-exception/60551638#60551638
I believe you'll need to upgrade to a version that addresses the BUG.
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 1:10 PM sanjeet rath wrote:
> Hi
Dweep,
Sorry you're having trouble with this. Can you please confirm the URL you
direct your browser to initially and compare that to the address you are
returned to following successful authentication? Would also be interested
in seeing if the value in the redirect_uri query parameter when
Curtis,
I haven't set this up recently but it was working the last time I tried it.
Just wanted to ensure you that were following the guidance in our admin
guide for standing up instances behind a proxy [1].
Matt
[1]
Bulletins for a Process Group should be available in the bulletin field in
each Process Group. For instance, if you query for a Process Group
/nifi-api/process-groups/{id}
it should contain the bulletins rolled up from all descendant components.
Matt
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:33 AM Shawn Weeks
rch.
>
>
>
> What are to be unique? It’s the UUID (id field) present in
> users/userGroups endpoints? The identity (short names)?
>
> I may have some duplicated between names between user and groups, I’m
> going to check that point.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
&
thout guarantee that it’s linked to
> the issue:
>
>
>
> Content Security Policy: « x-frame-options » ignoré en raison de la
> directive « frame-ancestors ».
>
> CURRENT_SITE: par01prdedge1.soft.fau:18443/nifi/users
> KeeperFill-var.js:30:935
>
> uncaught exception: Ea
Ryan,
If you're running 1.7 or later you can enable or disable in bulk just like
you can start or stop. It's supported right in NiFi UI. You can use actions
out of the Operate palette or the context menu.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5066
Matt
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 2:07 PM Andy
Hi.
Could you open up your browsers Developer Tools and check the Console for
any errors and look at the Network requests and ensure that they are
returning correctly. The behavior your describing indicate one of two
things. Either the request is not returning from the server or there is a
front
y to set/change this
> value through the configurations? (I just want to make sure that I didn’t
> accidently change it somehow).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> User
>
> *From:* Matt Gilman [mailto:matt.c.gil...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2019 9
Hi,
I just took a quick look at the code and the underlying library in use and
it appears that searching SUBTREE should be enabled by default.
Thanks
Matt
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:59 AM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I was wondering if there was a way to set the Search Scope to SUBTREE when
> using
Jianan,
There have been a few attempts where community members submitted a PR. [1]
is another. Unfortunately, they all seemed to have stalled out. The latest
NiFi does not support localization. It's a really important feature that
we'd like to see soon. But to my knowledge, it is not currently
How are you trying to access the UI?
Matt
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:38 AM N, Vyshali wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have installed Nifi(1.7 version) in windows 10 and configured the port
> as 8081
>
> The logs don’t throw any error but the Nifi UI doesn’t come up.
>
> Attached is the nifi properties
workaround we have.
>
>
>
> Thanks very much for the help!
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Matt Gilman
> *Reply-To: *"users@nifi.apache.org"
> *Date: *Friday, June 8, 2018 at 2:10 PM
> *To: *"users@nifi.apache.org"
> *Subject: *
Matt,
Have you tried updating other components as well? All components
(Processors, Ports, RPGs, etc) return their own URL in their object model
(JSON blob). I would assume if the Reporting Tasks URLs are not formed
correctly then the URLs for other components will also not be formed
correctly.
Paul,
Unfortunately, there is no workaround in NiFi currently. First the
OidcIdentityProvider attempts to use email scope if its supported. If it is
not, it attempts to use the email claim on the UserInfo endpoint. Until
NiFi is updated to support a configurable user identity claim (like upn in
e a user clears an alarm.
> Any way to do that? Or, at the very least, can I make them last a lot
> longer?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> On 04/06/2018 07:20 AM, Matt Gilman wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> What version of NiFi are you running? If your running NiFi 1.x the
Vitaly,
That endpoint will start/stop every component the requesting user has access
to. Is your instance secured? If so please ensure that your including necessary
authentication details. For instance, if your using client certificate in your
browser be sure you request in your Java program
Scott,
What version of NiFi are you running? If your running NiFi 1.x then the
parent process group ID shouldn't be necessary. The fully qualified URL of
a processor would look something like
http://localhost:8080/nifi-api/processors/9b52d2bf-0162-1000-d1ac-89e944aa1bfe
Or are you trying to
Just to follow up. For the most part, the permission required is the same
as the resource being requested. In this case, it is the /flow (view the
flow) resource. Status/Stats for a component are available for anyone with
permission to view the flow. 'View the component" will expose configuration
Hi Tim,
Sorry for the inconvenience but this was a bug that was introduced in
Apache NiFi 1.5.0. This was addressed in this JIRA [1] and will be included
in Apache NiFi 1.6.0 which is currently under vote.
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 3:13
Ravi,
The available ports are independently retrieved on each node. When
clustered the response to the client should only include the ports that all
nodes have discovered. However, I believe that currently, it's returning
ports that any node has discovered. I've filed a JIRA [1] to address this
Vitaly,
I believe that error is being generated by Jackson which handles the JSON
(de)serialization. Often times there is additional information that gets
logged to your logs/nifi-user.log. Check there to see if there is anything
helpful.
By any chance, are you attempting to pass the status back
Jorge,
A node must be disconnected before it can be removed. If you're looking to
invoke the REST endpoints, I would suggest looking at your browsers Dev
Tools to see the requests in action. Alternatively, you could use the
NodeManagerTool [1] that is bundled in the toolkit [2].
Matt
[1]
I've gone ahead and issues a PR [1] for this issue. Feel free to check it
out and verify it in your environment if possible.
Thanks
Matt
[1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2482
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for the emai
Thanks for the email. I just looked and this does appear to be a bug in the
Javascript that was introduced in 1.5.0 when addressing this issue [1].
I've filed a JIRA [2] to address this issue.
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4518
[2]
Robert, James, All,
NiFi has been updated to be a little more strict regarding incoming HTTP
requests. If the Host header does not comply with an expected value, the
request is rejected. Currently, the expected value comes from those .host
properties. What's happening is the proxy is likely
Amit,
The splash screen is shown while waiting for a number of requests to return
from the server. In your logs, I can see a number those requests coming in.
Can you please let me know what the Network tab is showing? In addition,
what the Console tab is showing?
Thanks
Matt
On Sun, Jan 7,
Amit,
Anything helpful in the user log? Or what do you see if you open the Developer
Tools in your browser and check the Network tab?
Matt
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 6, 2018, at 7:41 PM, Amit Pandit wrote:
>
> It shows the splash page, but it seems to be waiting on
Hey guys,
I just wanted to chime in here. The grayed out buttons on the canvas may be
due to the fact that there was no flow.xml.gz in your conf directory when
the users/authorizers were seeded. Due to the clustering model, a node may
not know what the root group will be. Because of this, the
Jeremy,
The behavior your describing happens when you do not have permissions to
the root group. This is the behavior when the policies for the initial
admin (configured either through the property or through a legacy
authorized-users.xml file) are created but there is no existing flow.xml.gz
in
Fabian,
I have not personally set up a load balancer. However, I can offer that the
LDAP authentication utilizes signed JWT bearer tokens. The key used to sign
each token is unique to a given user. The signing key is persisted on a
given node and is currently not shared across the cluster.
Uwe,
Services defined in the Controller Settings are available to Reporting
Tasks and other services defined there. Services defined within a Process
Group are available to descendent components. To create a service that is
available to all components in the flow, define it in the root Process
I've responded to your question on SO [1].
Matt
[1] https://stackoverflow.com/a/46648603/5969130
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:01 AM, mathes waran
wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
>
> I didn’t configure *SPNEGO*. Even LDAP authentication won’t work
>
>
>
> Does exist a quick solution to fix it . ;) a little a patch for example,
> if it already exists
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> *De :* Matt Gilman [mailto:matt.c.gil...@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* mardi 12 septembre 2017 16:14
>
> *À :* use
oll (slick.grid.js:1)
>
> at SlickGrid.resizeCanvas (slick.grid.js:1)
>
> at Object.resetTableSize (nf-canvas-all.js?1.1.0.2.1.3.0-6:14)
>
> at Object.resetTableSize (nf-canvas-all.js?1.1.0.2.1.3.0-6:18)
>
> at HTMLLIElement.select (nf-canvas-all.js?1.1.0.2.1.3.0
What browser are you using? Are there any errors in the Console of the
Developer Tools in your browser?
Matt
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Papa Samba DIOP <
papasamba.d...@orange-sonatel.com> wrote:
> ***
>
> Sonatel:Scan antiviral effectue (3)
>
>
directs public-ip/pipeline to public-ip/nifi
>
> I am stuck trying to figure out all the proxies that nifi needs. Someone
> please help me out.
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Awesome. Glad you got eve
Russell,
Thanks for the suggestion on the improved Controller Service UX. Would you
mind filing a JIRA for this improvement?
In 1.x, the user can see the components referencing a Controller Service in
1 of 3 places. The references are shown in the read-only details dialog,
the service
or the response.
>
> Is there any alternate solution to achieve this?
>
> Also please look at my another stack overflow question
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45346902/multiple-
> initial-admin-or-initial-admin-group
>
> Thanks,
> Kumar
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017
Jennifer,
I just wanted to clarify that you can set up username/password
authentication with any directory server. It does not have to be Active
Directory. Many folks use OpenLDAP or ApacheDS depending on the
environment. As James mentioned Kerberos is also an option.
Let us know if you have any
Awesome. Glad you got everything working. I've filed a JIRA for updating
the documentation accordingly [1].
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4206
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Raviteja Lokineni <
raviteja.lokin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is what I used in
Vijaya,
Here's a link to the contribution guide [1]. It's more oriented around
submitting a PR but should be helpful. The gist is that you'll want to run
mvn clean install
from the root directory where the NiFi source is cloned. Once that
completes the target directory of the nifi-assembly will
Matheswaran,
The Node Identities in the authorizers.xml file need to correspond with the
DN from the server certificates each node is configured with. I would
recommend using keytool to print the certificate and then copy/paste that
DN into the authorizers.xml on each node.
NOTE: A
Thanks for the great summarization Andy. Just wanted to clarify one small
detail. The default file-based authorizer will use
conf/authorizations.xml though this value is configurable in
conf/authorizers.xml. In the 0.x, when NiFi used role-based authorization
the file was called
Matheswaran,
The Initial Admin grants the user with that identity the required
permissions to administer that instance including adding/updating/removing
users, groups, and policies. The policies are granted at a resource level.
This means that you can introduce new administers at a Process Group
Hey Neil,
The issue you're seeing is because some of your nodes have not been
upgraded yet. In this particular scenario, a node that hasn't been upgraded
is attempting to replicate a request to a node that has been upgraded. We
could better handle rolling upgrades in the 0.x because we could
NAPSHOT/logs org.apache.nifi.NiFi
> 2017-06-12 18:01:50,506 INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.bootstrap.Command
> Launched Apache NiFi with Process ID 20304
> 2017-06-12 18:01:51,063 INFO [NiFi Bootstrap Command Listener]
> org.apache.nifi.bootstrap.RunNiFi Apache NiFi now running and listening
Georg,
The UI will be available once you see these log messages:
2017-06-09 09:02:37,208 INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.web.server.JettyServer
NiFi has started. The UI is available at the following URLs:
2017-06-09 09:02:37,208 INFO [main] org.apache.nifi.web.server.JettyServer
http://:/nifi
to set this response header will be applied on Apache
NiFi 0.7.4 and Apache NiFi 1.3.0 releases. Users running a prior 0.x or
1.x release should upgrade to the appropriate release.
Credit: This issue was discovered by Matt Gilman.
CVE-2017-7665: Apache NiFi XSS issue on certain user input components
sword on the trust store and that is the only change I am making.
>
> I will need to dig into the nifi logs to check for any errors there.
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Raymond,
>>
>> When it's in a
Mike,
Currently, the services are saved if they are referenced by processors in
your data flow. There is an existing JIRA [1] to always include them.
Thanks
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2895
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Mike Thomsen
wrote:
Raymond,
When it's in a state that is not working are there any bulletins on the
second processor? When it's in that state and you view the configuration
details for that processor, do the properties look correct and the same as
when you manually re-add the processor through the UI? Specifically,
Matt,
When a request fails, the reason for the failure will is typically included
in the response body as text/plain. This should provide some insight about
why the requests aren't working. These same details should be in the
logs/nifi-user.log of your NiFi instance.
Also, I would suggest
or my ignorance. I am
> now to nifi.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Shrey
>
>
>
> *From:* Matt Gilman [mailto:matt.c.gil...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 26, 2017 11:38 AM
> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Nifi Authentication
>
>
>
>
Shrey,
1) I believe that you can use the encrypt-config tool that is part of the
nifi-toolkit to encrypt the sensitive parts of the
login-identity-providers.xml file. The documentation for that is available
in the admin guide [1]. The nifi-toolkit is available on the downloads page
[2].
2) NiFi
check the status of the rest api to find if the connection is created
> successfully or not, otherwise, the loop sleeps for some time then begins
> the next iteration. I just wonder if there is something I should do in NIFI
> configuration to the need for this loop?
>
> Regards
Ben,
The warning in your log is simply letting the developer of those components
know that the bundle is not following the suggested best practices [1].
NiFi has detected this but will not have any ill effects based on other
isolated classpath configurations and referencing components. If the
Jim,
Yes, the contain can be archived once the flowfile has exited NiFi. This
allows the content to be downloaded/viewed from provenance events for that
flowfile. This behavior can be controlled using
the nifi.content.repository.archive.* properties [1].
Thanks
Matt
[1]
bout what I think is the
>> problem and a potential remedy for the problem.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Mark
>>
>> > On May 18, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for the additional details. They will be
Thanks for the additional details. They will be helpful when working the JIRA.
All nodes, including the coordinator, heartbeat to the active coordinator. This
means that the coordinator effectively heartbeats to itself. It appears, based
on your log messages, that this is not happening. Because
Thank you for the confirmation. I've filed this JIRA [1] to track the issue.
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3933
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:21 AM, ddewaele wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> When killing a non-coordinator node, it does take 8 * 5
Hi,
Once the new coordinator was elected, it is responsible for disconnecting
nodes due to lack of heartbeat. It will wait 8 times the
configured nifi.cluster.protocol.heartbeat.interval before the node
is disconnected. Can you confirm that this amount of time has elapsed?
Did you see any
gt; the queue status
> 6) I tried to change the backpressure threshold without any effect.
> 7) During the problem the queue was operating normally on the cluster, and
> flowfiles were flowing through it without any issue.
>
> Arnaud
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39
Sorry for the delayed response. Similar behavior has been reported by some
other users [1]. Does the connection have any back pressure threshold
configured? Can new flowfiles be enqueued? Do the expiration settings have
any affect?
Lastly, if you restart the cluster does it claim the connection
Tim,
Just wanted to provide a few more details. Prior to 1.2.0 the flow and
templates did not contain any details about the NAR (bundle) it was
packaged in. In 1.2.0, since your template did not contain any bundle
details NiFi attempted to find a compatible Processor (matched by class
name only).
I've responded to the question on StackOverflow [1].
Thanks
Matt
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43788780/nifi-issues-with-creating-and-connecting-rpg-programmatically/43789310#43789310
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Pushkara R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to
This is a known issue [1] that has been addressed in the upcoming 1.2.0
release. If you include a position then you should be able to creation the
component successfully. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2994
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:00 PM,
Nijandan,
I can't tell how you're creating your request based off your message. I
would say to make sure you are setting the Authorization as an HTTP header
and not part of the body of the request.
Matt
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Nijandan D wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am
Pushkar,
NiFi employs an optimistic locking scheme that requires clients to pass in
a revision when making a mutable request. The revision is comprised of a
version (a number that increments with each modification) and a client id.
The client id can be any string. You should continue to use this
There is no option to add users with full privilege. Setting the initial
admin identity will give that user access to the UI and permissions to
manage users, groups, and policies. Additionally, if the NiFi instance has
an existing flow it will grant permissions to the root group. Otherwise,
the
Hi,
What browser are you using? We had some issues the action icons in Firefox
in NiFi 1.1.0 wrapping to the next line that is addressed in this JIRA [1].
If you are using Firefox, can you try Chrome to help narrow down the issue?
Does the policy links show up in the Controller Services tab?
Kumar,
Check out my response on Stack Overflow [1].
Thanks
Matt
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42827820/how-to-pass-credential-to-nifi-rest-api
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:33 AM, kumar r wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have enabled LDAP authentication for Apache NiFi-1.1.1.
>
Chakri,
Unfortunately, LDAP user groups are not currently supported. Currently,
user authentication through LDAP is supported but loading/interpreting
their groups are not.
Adding the concept of a group provider which would complement the existing
identity provider seems like a good fit. Also,
mmon instances of one or more of these services typically
> shared across process groups?
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Jim, Joe,
>>
>> Just wanted to clarify. It sounds
Jim, Joe,
Just wanted to clarify. It sounds as though your running the 0.x baseline.
In 0.x, a single revision is maintained for the entire flow. If another
user makes a change, you will get a notification that you need to Refresh
to realize their changes before you can make any changes.
In 1.x
Without knowing more of your setup, I would guess that your browser is
prompting you based on the available certificates. What happens if you
uninstall the certificate from your browser?
Matt
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 9, 2017, at 7:37 PM, Joe Skora wrote:
>
> I have an
BH,
You should be able to select the components in question and dragging and
dropping them into the desired Process Group. You can select the components
by holding down Shift and clicking on each one. Another option is to use a
selection box by clicking and dragging on the canvas. You should see
Just wanted to add to Bryan's response that there is a JIRA [1] that
captures the ability to synchronize LDAP user/groups. This is probably a
good place to capture any additional use cases.
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3409
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Bryan Bende
i
> is asking for JWT.
> Please, Could anyone share your Apache HTTPd Proxy configuration ?
>
> Regards.
>
> - wr
>
>
>
> On 16 January 2017 at 14:38, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A couple comments. Apache NiFi is comprised of a number of web
A couple comments. Apache NiFi is comprised of a number of web
applications. You've mapped to three of them. However, we also support UI
extensions for Custom Processor configuration (like UpdateAttribute and
JoltTransformJson) and custom data viewers (based on content type) when
looking at data
I'm not super familiar with this endpoint so hopefully someone else can
chime in here if necessary. But I believe the transactionId is already
composed in the Location header of this endpoint
POST
/data-transfer/input-ports/{portId}/transactions
There is a Java class [1] available in NiFi
level controller service as it was in the original NiFi instance
> before exporting the template).
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Panos
>
>
> --
> *From:* Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2017 6:27
Panos,
The current behavior is that Controller Services are only included if they
are referenced by a component in the template. While this was initially by
designed, we have received comments about it from folks looking to export
their entire configuration. There is an outstanding JIRA [1] to
Alessio,
There is currently no way to lock the canvas. If the current user has
permissions to modify a given component it will be modifiable if the
component is in a valid state for the request action. For instance, if the
component is scheduled to execute it cannot be deleted.
There has been
Naz,
Thanks for feedback. This issue has been captured in the following JIRA
[1]. I apologize for any inconvenience.
Matt
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3306
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Irizarry Jr., Nazario
wrote:
> In NiFi 1.1.1 (and 1.1.0) if you pull
If your instance is clustered, you'll need to authorize the nodes with the
data policies as well. Any 'data-plane' endpoint (where data or meta-data
is returned or modified) will require the nodes in the request chain to
also be approved for access as the data will traverse some of them when the
t I cannot enter my new Processor Group.
>
>
>
> Strangely, my Processor Groups that do not have a GenerateFlowFile
> Processor still work. So I might have just narrowed this down to one
> Processor, GenerateFlowFile.
>
>
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> *From:* Matt G
e points out to me, but it might not be
> related. Kerberos returns an error:
>
>
>
> POST http://servername:1/nifi-api/access/kerberos 409
> (Conflict)
>
>
>
> Probably not related, but otherwise I do not see any other error that
> would explain what is g
Sorry for the inconvenience. Is there a stack trace listed in the user log?
A quick glance at the code and the error handler looks like it logs the
exception (which should include the stack trace) unconditionally.
Also, you should be able to look backward from that line to look for other
log
eed rest api which create template for entire ui elements.
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think you would need to specify every component that is on the canvas.
>> If all of the components were in a nested Pr
I think you would need to specify every component that is on the canvas. If
all of the components were in a nested Process Group, then you would just
need to specify that Process Group.
What is the behavior you're seeing?
Thanks
Matt
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:52 PM, prabhu Mahendran
In order to modify the nodes in the cluster, a user would need to have
permissions to the controller. Permissions to this resource will allow a
user to view and modify different aspects of the Flow Controller including
Reporting Tasks, Controller Services (referenced by Reporting Tasks), the
Nodes
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Nirmal Kumar <nirmal.ku...@impetus.co.in>
wrote:
> Each time I fire the DELETE request I first GET the ProcessGroup details
> and then fetch the *version*.
>
> So I am passing the correct version in DELETE request.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo