...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
My 2 cents as forum moderator.
We agreed on the forum to reject spam only. Therefore, we do not filter such
question when they come (but they are rather rare).
In such case we move them to the General discussion section with the
appropriate
On 02/12/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
let's make it a project decision and not an
individual decision. I'll take this to the dev list now and, subject to
lazy consensus, in three days you will be able to reject Quick Office
Pro messages with backing from the project.
Update: we have consensus
their time for free.
For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing
lists available to support other software products, including
[Quick Office Pro or whatever], which are sold and distributed
by commercial entities as profit-making products.
We therefore encourage you to go ahead
On Dec 3, 2014, at 03:52, mt m...@lockedbags.org wrote:
For these reasons, we are unable to make our forums/mailing lists available
to support other software products, including [Quick Office Pro or whatever],
which are sold and distributed by commercial entities as profit-making
been provided.
Those three programs (AnOO, LibO, EU) are close enough to AOo that
accurate support can usually be provided, even if one has never seen,
much less used the product in question.
We therefore encourage you to go ahead and replace your [Quick Office
Pro or whatever] with AOO, so you can
Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
I have a quick Office pro app
That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
please report the app to the App Store. And of course we can't help you
since this mailing list
...@apache.org wrote:
Des O'Shaughnessy wrote:
I have a quick Office pro app
That app claims to come from OpenOffice, but this is not true. It is
totally unrelated to the OpenOffice project http://openoffice.org ;
please report the app to the App Store. And of course we can't help you
since
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other moderators adopt the same
approach.
S.
-1
We are MODERATORS, not the list
Exactly. That's why Simon is providing info that OO/ Apache is not related
to
Quick Office; explaining that this group can't help re QO, and directing
the person making inquiry to a possible source for help since that help
can't be obtained here.
I can't think of a better function for a
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
MODERATORS: I have started rejecting incoming e-mails like this one
with a
message stating that QuickOffice is unrelated to Apache and AOO and they
should contact their supplier. I suggest other
Office Pro are in-scope for
the list. My objection is based on the principle, not the Quick Office
Pro issue itself. As per my reply to Jim, I maintain that, in accordance
with ASF guidelines, it is not our responsibility to answer posts on
behalf of the list (albeit by way of rejection notices
not be rejected by moderators?
Thanks,
S.
I do not claim that questions about Quick Office Pro are in-scope for
the list. My objection is based on the principle, not the Quick Office
Pro issue itself. As per my reply to Jim, I maintain that, in accordance
with ASF guidelines, it is not our
in
this instance.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 13:51
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Quick Office Pro
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Dec
Correcting (1-2)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 14:42
To: users@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Quick Office Pro
I support what Simon proposes to do for the following reasons:
1. We are talking about
Hi there...
I have a quick Office pro app..it remains open for just a second on a
report I was doing.decided I needed to reinstall it which I didgot
charged again, as far as I could see and the same situationHelp!
Desmond O'Shaughnessy
Enviado desde mi iPad
: Hello, My iPad crashed a few
weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the app,
the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something
I can buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
T wrote:
Hello, My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I
tried to buy the app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use.
Is there something I can buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
This mailing list is for the Apache OpenOffice project:
http
On 09/22/2014 07:26 AM, T wrote:
Not sure what a binary is. I just had thought if I got the app again, my
files might come back with it? Just a reach I guess. I wasn't really sure how
that worked. Is that even possible?
Your files should not have disappeared. They should still be there.
crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Hello,
My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
On 09/21/2014 03:57 PM, T wrote:
Hello,
My iPad crashed a few weeks ago, and I had Quick office pro. I tried to buy the
app, the 2.99 one, but it is 4 pages of how to use. Is there something I can
buy to replace, and get those files back?
Tabitha
22 matches
Mail list logo
