[ovirt-users] Re: affinity/pool/fencing ?

2020-07-28 Thread Staniforth, Paul
Geldenhuys Cc: Staniforth, Paul ; users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Re: affinity/pool/fencing ? Caution External Mail: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know that the content is safe. You might find affinity labels are a better fit in this use

[ovirt-users] Re: affinity/pool/fencing ?

2020-07-28 Thread Alan G
You might find affinity labels are a better fit in this use case. It would allow you to add/remove/move hosts in the future much more quickly than hard coding affinity. But that still leaves the bulk configuration tasks. The only way to do this quickly is with the REST API or one of the SDKs

[ovirt-users] Re: affinity/pool/fencing ?

2020-07-28 Thread Nardus Geldenhuys
Hi Paul Thanks for the response, easy way to add 100 VM's in your second step ? Regards Nar On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 13:17, Staniforth, Paul < p.stanifo...@leedsbeckett.ac.uk> wrote: > Hello Nar, >you can achieve this with 2 affinity rules, a positive > and negative one. > >

[ovirt-users] Re: affinity/pool/fencing ?

2020-07-28 Thread Staniforth, Paul
Hello Nar, you can achieve this with 2 affinity rules, a positive and negative one. In the cluster create the first affinity group VM affinity rule disabled HOST affinity rule positive set enforcing mode. Then add the VMs and 2 Hosts to force them to run on these hosts. In