I have an oVirt dev environment, and I have one host and the engine
as well as VMs running on a network that looks something like this
172.16.12.0/24 when I start a Windows 10 VM, 1903 or 1809 I start
getting issues all across that sub-net. It happens to be my server
subnet. Now we have
Hello,
I've a problem, all my ovirt hosts and vms are linked with a bonding mode
1（Active-Backup）2x10Gbps
ovirt version：4.3
topology：
--eno2
vm--ovirtmgmt--bond0---eno1
ifcfg-bond0：
# Generated by VDSM
Hi all
We've just updated our dev environment from 4.1 to RHV 4.3 and found that
while a lot better, Windows 10 under SPICE still isn't great.
We're running dual screen VMs at 2560x1440 resolution. The Windows login
screen is particularly bad although once logged in it gets better but not
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 02:26:31PM +0800, Colin Coe wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We've just updated our dev environment from 4.1 to RHV 4.3 and found that
> while a lot better, Windows 10 under SPICE still isn't great.
>
> We're running dual screen VMs at 2560x1440 resolution. The Windows login
> screen
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:08:12PM +0800, Colin Coe wrote:
> Hi Victor
>
> The SPICE server is
> rpm -q spice-server
> spice-server-0.14.0-6.el7_6.1.x86_64
>
> On the VM we're using SPICE QXL.
>
> Looks like
>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:56 PM wrote:
> El 2019-05-24 13:39, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:32 PM wrote:
> >
> >> El 2019-05-24 13:22, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM wrote:
> >>>
> El 2019-05-24 12:41, nico...@devels.es
Hi Victor
The SPICE server is
rpm -q spice-server
spice-server-0.14.0-6.el7_6.1.x86_64
On the VM we're using SPICE QXL.
Looks like
https://www.spice-space.org/download/windows/qxl-wddm-dod/qxl-wddm-dod-0.19/spice-qxl-wddm-dod-0.19.zip
has the performance fixes you mentioned.
Any ideas if/when
El 2019-05-14 08:19, Yedidyah Bar David escribió:
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM wrote:
Please, any ideas about this?
Thanks.
El 2019-05-10 09:18, nico...@devels.es escribió:
> Hi,
>
> We're running oVirt version 4.3.3, and trying to configure one of the
> hosts to support Nested
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:32 PM wrote:
> El 2019-05-24 13:22, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM wrote:
> >
> >> El 2019-05-24 12:41, nico...@devels.es escribió:
> >>> El 2019-05-14 08:19, Yedidyah Bar David escribió:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 13:39, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:32 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 13:22, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 12:41, nico...@devels.es escribió:
El 2019-05-14 08:19, Yedidyah Bar David escribió:
On Tue, May
El 2019-05-24 12:41, nico...@devels.es escribió:
El 2019-05-14 08:19, Yedidyah Bar David escribió:
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM wrote:
Please, any ideas about this?
Thanks.
El 2019-05-10 09:18, nico...@devels.es escribió:
> Hi,
>
> We're running oVirt version 4.3.3, and trying to
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM wrote:
> El 2019-05-24 12:41, nico...@devels.es escribió:
> > El 2019-05-14 08:19, Yedidyah Bar David escribió:
> >> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please, any ideas about this?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> El 2019-05-10 09:18,
El 2019-05-24 13:22, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 12:41, nico...@devels.es escribió:
El 2019-05-14 08:19, Yedidyah Bar David escribió:
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM wrote:
Please, any ideas about this?
Thanks.
El 2019-05-10 09:18,
El 2019-05-24 14:30, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:56 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 13:39, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:32 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 13:22, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 12:41,
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:39 PM wrote:
> El 2019-05-24 14:30, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:56 PM wrote:
> >
> >> El 2019-05-24 13:39, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:32 PM wrote:
> >>>
> El 2019-05-24 13:22, Simone Tiraboschi
Il giorno ven 24 mag 2019 alle ore 14:58 Victor Toso
ha scritto:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:08:12PM +0800, Colin Coe wrote:
> > Hi Victor
> >
> > The SPICE server is
> > rpm -q spice-server
> > spice-server-0.14.0-6.el7_6.1.x86_64
> >
> > On the VM we're using SPICE QXL.
> >
> > Looks like
> >
I might have been unclear, so I apologize.
I was referring to when one adds a Group to a Quota as a Consumer, the Users in
that Group are not labelled as Consumers of the Quota.
An example: Group A, which consists of Alice and Bob, is added to Quota A as a
Consumer. However, Alice, when she
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:48 PM wrote:
> El 2019-05-24 14:42, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:39 PM wrote:
> >
> >> El 2019-05-24 14:30, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:56 PM wrote:
> >>>
> El 2019-05-24 13:39, Simone Tiraboschi
El 2019-05-24 14:42, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:39 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 14:30, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:56 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 13:39, Simone Tiraboschi escribió:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:32 PM wrote:
El 2019-05-24 13:22,
Hi,
Are you referring to the fact that quota is shared between all users in the
group, as described here in the documentation[1]?
This is done by design. Quota objects are independent of users or groups.
VMs and disks can be assigned to consume a given quota, and users or groups
just have a
20 matches
Mail list logo
