Please have a look here:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhev/
Without a commercial product to pay the vast majority of the developers, there
is just no chance oVirt can survive (unless you're ready to take over). RHV 4.4
full support ends this August and that very likely
My idea is that Gluster is there and is in use and it should not be removed
just because the downstream is closing to EOL.
A simple warning on the website is enough.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В петък, 4 февруари 2022 г., 22:11:45 Гринуич+2, Dori Seliškar via Users
написа:
I
I've not been part of the ovirt project for 9 years now and have left red
hat in 2018, so this isn't insider talk, just pure speculation. However...
KubeVirt has been making a splash in the current height-of-fashion platform
kubernetes and by extension in openshift. To me it only makes a lot of
I wonder if Oracle would not be interested in keeping the ovirt. It will
really be too bad that ovirt is discontinued.
https://docs.oracle.com/en/virtualization/oracle-linux-virtualization-manager/
Em sáb., 5 de fev. de 2022 09:43, Thomas Hoberg
escreveu:
> There is unfortunately no formal
Oh i have spent years looking.
ProxMox is probably the closest option, but has no multi-clustering
support. The clusters are more or less isolated from each other, and
would need another layer if you needed the ability to migrate between
them.
XCP-ng, cool. No spice support. No UI for
I have had a lot of problems with gluster in my HCO environment, so was already
leanings towards a storage migration at some point this year. My own plan is to
use 2x Synology NAS SA3400 devices and put them into a HA pair that then
exposes the storage as NFS (or whatever else I want it exposed
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022, Alex McWhirter wrote:
ProxMox is probably the closest option, but has no multi-clustering support.
The clusters are more or less isolated from each other, and would need
another layer if you needed the ability to migrate between them.
It's also Debian-based, so if you're
Has anyone looked at OpenNebula?
https://opennebula.io/
Seems to be libvirt based.
-wk
On 2/5/22 5:03 AM, marcel d'heureuse wrote:
Moin,
We will take a look into proxmox.
Hyper v is also eol, if server server2022 is standard.
Br
Marcel
Am 5. Februar 2022 13:40:30 MEZ schrieb Thomas
> I wonder if Oracle would not be interested in keeping the ovirt. It will
> really be too bad that ovirt is discontinued.
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/en/virtualization/oracle-linux-virtualization-man...
>
>
> Em sáb., 5 de fev. de 2022 09:43, Thomas Hoberg escreveu:
I've been looking there,
Interesting, I hadn't read about the planned migration from RHV to
OpenShift. Based on what I've read here, it seems like 4.5 development is
well underway, so I doubt 4.4 will be the last release of oVirt. That
would mean August is probably not the end of the line.
However, the removal of
There is unfortunately no formal announcement on the fate of oVirt, but with
RHGS and RHV having a known end-of-life, oVirt may well shut down in Q2.
So it's time to hunt for an alternative for those of us to came to oVirt
because they had already rejected vSAN or Nutanix.
Let's post what we
Xen came before KVM, but ultimately Redhat played a heavy hand to swing much of
the market but with Citrix it managed to survive (so far).
XCP-ng is a recent open source spin-off, which attempts to gather a larger
community.
Their XOSAN storage is aimed to deliver a HCI solution somewhat like
Moin,
We will take a look into proxmox.
Hyper v is also eol, if server server2022 is standard.
Br
Marcel
Am 5. Februar 2022 13:40:30 MEZ schrieb Thomas Hoberg :
>There is unfortunately no formal announcement on the fate of oVirt, but with
>RHGS and RHV having a known end-of-life, oVirt may
Can anybody from redhat confirm what is supposed here, all my staff depends on
the future of ovirt. How can we help to maintain this project alive if redhat
dev are not implicated anymore? I may donate some hardware or is it unuseful?
Le 5 févr. 2022 11:31, Thomas Hoberg a écrit :
Please have
Wait a minute.
Use of GlusterFS as a storage backend is now deperecated and will be
removed in a future update?
What are those who's deployments have GlusterFS as their storage
backend supposed to use as a replacement?
I'm feeling vibes of the SPICE deprecation all over again. but
moving
15 matches
Mail list logo
