We have had positive experience with Rocky Linux 9. We run RL9 for most
of our VMs under oVirt 4.4. We also run RL9 on some of our stand-alone
HP Gen8 servers. We are also currently running oVirt 4.4 on HP Gen8
servers and will probably run oVirt 4.6 on HP Gen8 servers.
So, my vote is
As oVirt is no longer a RHV-Next upstream, I don't see a reason for trying
to convince the community to keep using CentOS Stream as the chosen OS for
4.6 development. As a community, you all can suggest which OS you'd like to
have in your datacenter, gather consensus about it and change oVirt as
Whatever it’s Redhat or a clone, the situation is the same, Stream is a risky
path, independently of the reliability of the OS by itself.
> Le 12 déc. 2023 à 11:29, Fabrice Bacchella a
> écrit :
>
> I have a problem with CentOS stream.
>
> The purpose of Redhat and clone is to have good
Then pay for redhat?
I really don't understand this. You want a free OS with a team of people
behind that help you within x hours if you have an issue, but you don't
want to pay for it.
Either pay, or use centos stream and report the issues/debug them
yourselves.
On 12/12/2023 11:29,
I have a problem with CentOS stream.
The purpose of Redhat and clone is to have good hardware and software support.
Vendors will provide tools and driver to know OS versions. I’m afraid that in
case of problems with Stream release, I will be on my own, with unexpected
broken node in case of
Hi all
I'm decommissioning an old SAN that holds our DEV/TST RHV instance.
I'm following https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6529691 (How to move the
Hosted-Engine storage to a new storage domain) and I'm on step 9 (Make sure
that the self-hosted engine is shut down).
hosted-engine --vm-status
6 matches
Mail list logo
